Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Greg Baker wrote: Take this with a huge grain of salt, because it's been a while since I last touched OpenMail, and I've not played with Samsung Contact. OpenMail created a whole lot of extra sendmail rules; email addresses of a certain format were OpenMail addresses and were to be

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Greg, I think there was an attempt get Openmail to run on SME, a while back? I will look back in my archive and see. I don't believe they were successful. Greg Baker wrote: On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 07:22, Brandon Friedman wrote: Folks I have been testing Samsung Contact

[e-smith-devinfo] Mailing List Control

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
This is to Mitel.. Please can you either block/remove e-mail address from the list that are responding with error messages... Everytime I send a message to the list, I get this error: Reporting-MTA: dns; ezems1.mobil.telenor.no Received-from-MTA: dns; ezgwu1.mobil.telenor.no

[e-smith-devinfo] How To Lock/Unlock users on SME 5.5

2002-07-15 Thread ml
Hi, I installed John The Ripper on my SME server to check every weeks passords validity... I done a script witch executes John, and then send an e-mail to every account, witch notify that the account will be Locked in 2 days if they don't do on http://srver/user-password to change it. My

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Filippo Carletti
never at all times *should* mean no dialups - the diald filter should be programmed to down. If it doesn't, then in my book that's a bug. If a It works as it should, never means no outgoing dialup attempts. At least on 4.1.2, 5.0 and 5.1.2. Ciao, Filippo -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] groupware/PDA

2002-07-15 Thread John Crisp
Timothy, Thanks for your reply. Following the below conversation, I would love to have something to be able to synchronise all our Outlook contacts here. ... Any other suggestions for an Exchange server replacement ? The bynari connector works well but to get the full use out

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 11:43:58AM +0200, Brandon Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Paul Unfortunately we some of us can't just change technology on the fly...too expensive or isn't supported. We need a better dial-up solution! At the risk of sounding like a broken record - _you_

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread little bark, BIG BYTE!!
Brandon, This is my exact plight also. I know there is something out there, it's just a case of finding it I would suspect.PDA access is an absolute requirement by my clients. What would be the feasibility of writing a PDA client for something like PHProjekt? I thought I looked at one of the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Mailing List Control

2002-07-15 Thread Charlie Brady
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote: This is to Mitel.. Please can you either block/remove e-mail address from the list that are responding with error messages... For mailing list issues, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks -- Charlie Brady

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Charlie Brady
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Filippo Carletti wrote: never at all times *should* mean no dialups - the diald filter should be programmed to down. If it doesn't, then in my book that's a bug. If a It works as it should, never means no outgoing dialup attempts. At least on 4.1.2, 5.0 and 5.1.2.

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Mark Wilkinson
Hmmm... must have been my imagination. I'll let the client know that the huge phone bill was their imagination too. Mark Wilkinson -Original Message- From: Charlie Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday 15 July 2002 9:19 PM To: Filippo Carletti Cc: Gordon Rowell; [EMAIL

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:18:41AM -0400, Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Filippo Carletti wrote: never at all times *should* mean no dialups - the diald filter should be programmed to down. If it doesn't, then in my book that's a bug. If a It works as

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Charlie Brady
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Mark Wilkinson wrote: Hmmm... must have been my imagination. I'll let the client know that the huge phone bill was their imagination too. Those comments don't help anyone, Mark. Wherever the problem was, there needs to be an accurate and detailed diagnosis before

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SME 5.5 server-manager

2002-07-15 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 02:55:44AM -, Darrell May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Test and report your results. If tbe 5.1.2 panel works better, this would point to FormMagick as all other factors would be the same. Adding Internationalisation costs, both in effort and processing (which

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:31:42AM +1000, Greg Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 07:22, Brandon Friedman wrote: [...] First problem is that it requires sendmail? Be carefil - many packages say they require sendmail when they actually just require and SMTP MTA. [...]

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
h I agreed with 4.x, I had almost no hassle with dial-up??? 4.1.2 and up has seem to be more problematic Were there any major changes in the dial-up config between 4.x and 5.x? Filippo Carletti wrote: never at all times *should* mean no dialups - the diald filter should be

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Well then I think Samsung contact is for you. Supports: pop3,smtp,imap,wap,PDA. Samsumg windows and web-client Outlook mapi support.. Very comprehensive. I have tested all except outlook little bark, BIG BYTE!! wrote: Brandon, This is my exact plight also. I know there is

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Gordon Rowell wrote: Be carefil - many packages say they require sendmail when they actually just require and SMTP MTA. Yeah believe so.the only problem is that SC make some configuration changes to sendmail.it tries to control pop,smtp and imap itself! [...] OpenMail created

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Charging regimes (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion)

2002-07-15 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:25:09AM -0400, Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Other regimes have: - no per call flagfall - untimed local calls [...] Here's a good exercise which will help us determine what could be tuned and how - fill out the following tables (in text please)

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:45:09PM +0200, Brandon Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Yeah believe so.the only problem is that SC make some configuration changes to sendmail. And it is a true dependency, since it makes sendmail rule changes. it tries to control pop,smtp and

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Charging regimes (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion)

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Gordon Rowell wrote: Hmm, I know quite a few who have no such restriction. People with continuous connections will typically want the link up ASAP, so yes it would need to be configurable. IIRC, the Australian charging regime is still: - $0.xx per call flagfall (xx =~ 20) - no

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Charlie Brady
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote: h I agreed with 4.x, I had almost no hassle with dial-up??? 4.1.2 and up has seem to be more problematic Please do not ever again say seems. Present evidence(*). We have gotten, and will get, nowhere with seems. (*) If you can't do

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Charlie Brady
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote: Gordon Rowell wrote: Be carefil - many packages say they require sendmail when they actually just require and SMTP MTA. Yeah believe so.the only problem is that SC make some configuration changes to sendmail.it tries to control

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Gordon Rowell wrote: Yeah believe so.the only problem is that SC make some configuration changes to sendmail. And it is a true dependency, since it makes sendmail rule changes. Yep.I think this is problem the last guys ran into when trying to setup Openmail on e-smith

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Charging regimes (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion)

2002-07-15 Thread Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)
Gordon Wouldn't this (and similar research items) be a good candidate for a survey on the e-smith.org home page? Doesn't nuke provide for such things? Scott -Original Message- From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
It SEEMS Charlie that you need a bit more coffee :) You don't have to scrutinize each word.just think out aloud here! My questionactually nevermind I will research first before asking it.! Charlie Brady wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brandon Friedman wrote: h I agreed

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Charging regimes (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion)

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Gordon Rowell wrote: Here's a good exercise which will help us determine what could be tuned and how - fill out the following tables (in text please) for your environment. I think Brandon has volunteered to collate the information :-) Yep no-problem, I have my mysql database setup

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] samsung contact manager

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Charlie Brady wrote: In that case, then (unmodified) SC is incompatible with SME, just as linuxconf, webmin, swat etc are. Looks that way... What I might look todo is keep my mail on SME and use SC for groupware? My main reason is because Sendmail is insecure ' -- Regards Brandon

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Charging regimes (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion)

2002-07-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Gordon, Just reading through more of the diald filters: # If you are running named, then it will send data across the link # periodically to synchronize against other domain name servers. # Since this can happen at any time, it is undesirable to keep the # link up for it. Therefore, we ignore

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Charging regimes (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Diald/Dial-0n-demand/DNS discussion)

2002-07-15 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 11:17:14AM -0400, Smith, Jeffery S (Scott) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gordon Wouldn't this (and similar research items) be a good candidate for a survey on the e-smith.org home page? Doesn't nuke provide for such things? Yes and yes, though I think it would be useful