The 6.0 ISO on the Hungarian mirror site is over 100 MB smaller than the
5.6 ISO. Can anyone explain why it is smaller? More efficient code or
some packages no longer included?
Thanks,
Des
--
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to
erver
on a different distribution to provide a more stable base than FC may be
able to provide?
--
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubs
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 13:56, Charlie Brady wrote:
> Your simplest solution is to upgrade.
Thanks, Charlie. I'll install on my test box.
Des
--
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for re
ox, and got no error messages or
missing pre-requisites, so functionally, it looks like it is
straightforward.
Thanks,
Des
--
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to
ld my test box then, unless I can re-apply the
5.6 glibc RPMs!
--
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
off base there).
Anyway, I'm now stuck, and would appreciate any assistance to resolve
this issue.
Thanks,
--
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
fragment I created is only a part of the way to a solution,
so I'd appreciate any guidance from the community.
Thanks,
--
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAI
ading open source
application server (it says at http://zope.org!).
Python and Plone RPMs for SME Server 5.6, and a short README, can be found
here: http://www.contribs.org/contribs/ddougan/Plone/
Have fun!
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (onl
At 22:37 26/3/2003, you wrote:
This page has RedHat 8.0 RPMs for Python 2.2.2:
http://plone.org/Members/longsleep/plone-rpms/1.0.1/redhat
I started to get something working for SME 5.5, but ran
into problems, and moved on to other priorities.
If someone can take these RPMs as a starting point, pl
_' or '/':
%defattr(-,root,root)
Failed to find Requires:
Can someone shed some light on what is causing the failure? I'm assuming
I've missed something, but can't really see what that might be. The source
RPM came from the python.org web site, FWIW.
T
u may
experience operational problems as a result. Consider using Python 2.1.3
instead.
warnings.warn(err)
And when I changed the port from 8080, and tried to restart plone, I got an
error that plone was still running, although it's not...
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL
iliar with this? If so, how does it compare to FreeS/WAN in
levels of security, resource requirements and ease of use?
It _sounds_ like it is a very useful tool, but as I have little experience
with FreeS/WAN, I can't really compare them.
Regards,
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs
"flexbackup -newtape" option. I've added it via a custom
template to the script ahead of the existing steps (right after the path
command, in fact) and it has been running OK the past couple of weeks. I'd
be interested to learn if this works for others, and also why this might
w
to the LDAP datastore? Was there any particular reason that
the developers didn't set up OUs?
Thanks,
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
I just realized that I sent this to Charlie rather than the list yesterday
(wrong reply option - my apologies, Charlie).
>At 07:39 31/7/2002, you wrote:
>>Yes, it should work for 5.1.2, but the motivation for making the change is
>>not there in 5.1.2, i.e. the "passwd chat" configuration correct
At 21:50 2/7/2002, Lionel wrote:
>restore: Tape is not a dump tape
This seems to ring a bell. Did you "/bin/mt -f /dev/nst0 fsf 1" to move to
the data?
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered cus
; /dev/tape &
>[1] 25772
>[root@e-smith /root]# tar: -: Cannot read: Cannot allocate memory
>tar: At beginning of tape, quitting now
>tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss se
ed in its documentation).
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he command prompt,
or is there an add-in that enables users to do this from the client side?
If not, how feasible is it to develop a panel which would display the
queue(s) and enable their manipulation?
Thanks,
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom,
At 11:54 13/4/2002, Tom Carroll wrote:
>This should be secure enough shouldn't it? It shouldn't cause any problems
>making changes this way, right?
No, it should be fine. Using MindTerm is a bit more flexible (IMO) than
PuTTY/Lynx, as you can use a graphical browser.
Des
--
Please r
you can get to the server manager from your browser.
I've got it set up to access my gateway server, and then another tunnel to
my test network - it works very well and is pretty straightforward to
configure (and you don't need to know PERL :>)
Let me know if you need any help with it
ynamically generated, is there
a mechanism for setting such directives in a configuration file, or should
I create a template to be concatenated with the generated settings?
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
S
n them.
FWIW, I downloaded and applied the RPMs too, but did not see any dependency
errors (on 2 stock 5.1.2 boxes, one an upgrade, the other a clean install).
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registe
At 18:04 6/3/2002, Tom Keiser wrote:
>If anyone is set up to compile on 5.1.2, I'd be grateful if you
>could compile a 3ware raid driver for me. They have provided the
>.c, the .h, a text explanation, and a redhat makefile. If a small
>payment is required, I can handle that too.
I've installed ma
At 05:46 11/2/2002, Dan York wrote:
>Hm I remember us talking about that and you sending me info.
>I guess I thought it was for consideration for the manual or incorporation
>into a HOWTO that I would write (and have not yet done)...
Dan,
My sincere apologies - you are correct, and my me
retaining the user's customizations.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
e if it is of use to you.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
. the ones who pay) have
any call on how Mitel sets its priorities, but I do agree with Greg that a
roadmap would at least assist in providing a context to development
discussions.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss secu
, but you'll need a second hub or switch to enable you to connect the
internal interface of your test box to your test PC on your test LAN. I
have this set-up at home.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issue
At 14:01 5/1/2002, Darrell May wrote:
>. It shows
>'unsaved changes', review configuration is blank, etcetera.
Darrell,
I just ssh'd into my 5.1b3 test system from my production box. Everything
looks normal, apart from the server manager option where the colours of all
the selections apart fr
I'm having some minor difficulties with the version of vim-common &/or
vim-enhanced (6.0.0-27) in 5.1 B3. This appears to be an early alpha of Vim
6.0. Will a later version be shipped with the released 5.1?
Thanks,
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please ma
At 14:12 28/12/2001, Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
>What does
>everyone else buy that works out of the box with e-smith and is a good price
>value?
I'm very happy with Intel EtherExpress Pro NICs. I have never had a problem
with them, either during installation recognition or in
At 17:11 19/12/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Is this an SMP capable machine?
>
>If so, this should go away with the next reboot - it's a chicken&egg
>problem with the installer running the non-SMP kernel.
Yes. it is, and, as one rarely needs to reboot a Linux box, I hadn't
noticed that
Thank
behaviour ("not supported by
kernel"). If there is no USB support, why does it try to start these up?
Because they're identified by the BIOS?
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for
At 17:37 2/12/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>Problem: Initial W2K attempt to connect to domain using 'admin' failed
>
>Error: 'Logon failure: unknown username or bad password'
Darrell,
If you type the username and password in again, it will successfully connect.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EM
At 14:17 30/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Obviously, grab the latest version.
I've downloaded and tested the latest e-smith-samba with roaming profiles
activated (my strong preference - it provides flexibility as well as a
backup of the desktop environment).
I've tested with the admin ID as w
At 10:43 29/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Under NT at least, Z: is mapped by default to ~gordonr/home (not
>~gordonr/home/._winprofile)
Way to go, Microsoft... Isn't inconsistent behaviour wonderful!!
Well, I've had it for tonight. I'll sleep on this and see if I can think of
anything more cre
At 21:27 29/11/2001, David Brown wrote:
>OK, the above isn't entirely true: logon drive = H: will map H: to whatever
>logon home is set to (\\%N\%U in my case).
Which means, it would appear, that H: would end up mapped to (in SME's
case) \\%N\%U\._winprofile, which would really mess things up,
At 21:01 29/11/2001, David Brown wrote:
>I'm betting this goes back to the home drive situation I brought up earlier
>when I discussed the logon drive parameter in smb.conf. If you get a
>chance, see if you can tell what drive letter the netlogon.bat file is
>running under; it's probably Z:
Yes
At 18:47 29/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Great. Assuming you are running e-smith-samba-1.1.0-29 (i.e.
>not using the [profiles] share):
OK. I backed out the [Profiles] share and changed the logonPath directive
back to use ._winprofile.
>cd ~test
>mkdir winprofile
>cd home
>mv ._winprofile ._w
At 18:31 29/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Anyone able to experiment?
I can. Do you just want me to try a symlink, or do you want fragments amended?
Let me know and I'll do it in the next hour or so.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to di
Greg,
At 16:51 29/11/2001, Greg J. Zartman wrote:
>A work around for the auto Z: mapping is to put a delete entry in the
>netlogon.bat file:
>
>net use z: /delete /yes
I'll try that tonight. This is the only thing that concerns me about the
Samba configuration - I don't want hidden files to be
At 23:05 28/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Am I missing something?
That with the Z:\ mapping behaviour I saw, the ._winprofile is not hidden.
If the Z:\ mapping can be got rid off, then the ._winprofile would work, as
it would normally be hidden under H:\.
With 9x, the Z:\ mapping is disconnec
Gordon,
>At 22:09 28/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>No, the brace is in the right place for a file of comments (a Perl "eval" of
>that block returns nothing). It needs to be moved if you uncomment the lines.
Ah, OK. Shows how little I know about Perl!!
>It's not the sticky bit. The set-grou
Gordon,
At 02:07 28/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> - Whether we need to use a separate [profiles] share
I've tested this as follows:
1. Upgraded my box to 5.1 Beta1 and applied your latest Samba contrib.
2. Edited the 61Profilesshare template and uncommented the various lines
(note: the c
Greg,
At 20:19 26/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Yes, this is because you are a member of the domain administrator group. As
>part of this group, you have the ability to add/delete user accounts.
Does this mean that all SME users are in this group? Is there no way to
have different user classes
At 21:50 26/11/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>If this is a non-production server you might wish to rollback the samba
>templates and test what works and doesn't work for roving profiles.
I will test this on Wednesday or Thursday evening, depending on my
schedule, and report back.
Des
--
Please
At 22:02 25/11/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>Also IIRC, I thought WinNT/W2K/XP had known problems using a hidden
>profile directory.
Darrell, can you elaborate on the known problems? Are they related to my
findings below?
>This was the reason for using a separate profiles
>share for WinNT/W2K/XP.
>
At 21:45 25/11/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>but it appears there is a recent 'smeserver-5.1beta1.iso' on e-smith.org.
Trust you to spot it before anyone else :)
It hasn't been announced yet. There are still some issues with the alpha1,
AFAIK.
Welcome back. Hope you had a good vacation.
Des
-
At 20:05 19/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Try cranking up the debug level in smb.conf and see whether you ever get
>the netlogon request from the client.
I've set debug level = 3 (don't know if that's enough). I will post PC,
smbd and nmbd logs to bugs for you to look at - I am not sure what I'
At 22:59 19/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Now try joining the domain by entering admin as the user and your system
>password.
>
>Try also to join the domain as "root", which should now fail.
Both work as they should (i.e. admin works, root fails).
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTEC
At 20:05 19/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Try cranking up the debug level in smb.conf and see whether you ever get
>the netlogon request from the client.
Will do (again, it'll be tomorrow at the earliest).
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only)
At 20:05 19/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Still investigating, but reports from others who are willing to try this
>out would be great.
I'll try it, but it won't be till tomorrow night at the earliest.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to d
At 07:26 18/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>What are the permissions of the netlogon directory and netlogon.bat
>on your machine?
drwxr-xr-x2 adminadmin4096 Nov 17 13:31 netlogon
drwxr-xr-x2 adminadmin4096 Nov 17 13:31 .
drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 N
At 07:12 18/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>After that a login as me gave me the logon.bat
That's the behaviour I'd expect to see, but it just isn't happening on my box.
I definitely need some help on this one.
Thanks,
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROT
At 14:28 17/11/2001, Des Dougan wrote:
>When I try "net use h: /home" from the command line, I get the message:
>
>"The user's home directory has not been specified."
I've done some more testing. If I go to the Advanced option of Users in
Control Panel an
Gordon, et al,
At 13:39 16/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Very simple one right now - as requested:
I can join the domain successfully with my Win 2K (SP2) box. However, it
doesn't seem to even attempt to execute netlogon.bat. I renamed my own file
and used the basic one Gordon posted, with th
At 06:19 16/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>I believe I've got it after a trawl through the Samba source.
>
>chmod 0660 /etc/smbpasswd # i.e. 0600 root root
>
>seems to do the trick. I can now join a domain as "admin", since admin is
>in group root and can now write to the smbpasswd file.
Greg,
At 08:01 15/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>This has nothing to do with Samba. Microsoft would need to implement this
>functionality client side.
We have this on NetWare at work - in a large network it saves having to
create local accounts separately, and in out case, there is never normal
Gordon,
At 09:18 15/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Note: You _must_ (under the current version of Samba) use "root" and the
>root/admin password as the user on the WinNT/2K client to allow the machine
>to join the domain.
Root is the one account I didn't try...
What did you fix in the RPMs? I
At 18:57 14/11/2001, Des Dougan wrote:
>I will make the template change to use .profiles and see what happens (as
>I already have a Win 98 box set up, I can test profiles on both). If I get
>to it, I'll report back what I find.
I brought my Win 2K box up on my test LAN. I made
Gordon,
At 03:28 15/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Great - thanks. I propose we unify the profiles under the .profile
>directory of each user, as previously discussed in this thread.
>
>I believe that also means we can lose the [Profiles] share.
>
>Are there any objections to this?
This sounds r
At 21:08 12/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>I am more comfortable with %N as (as Charlie has said), we know that
>this resolves to "this server".
So would %L be used in a multi-server environment?
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss
At 17:03 12/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>Finally, should we be using %L (login server) or %N (netbios name of
>this server)? We are currently using %N and I don't see a reason to
>change.
Just to be clear on this - the shipped alpha has %L in both fragments. I
used %N in my current 4.1.2 set-u
At 13:15 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Second, an additional backslash needs to be added to
>the parameter.
And to the parameter in the 11logonPath fragment - it has the same issue.
Thanks for all your help on this.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROT
Greg,
At 11:40 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Say setting the logon path = \\%L\Profiles\.%U
>
>That is, hide the profiles.
No, this has no effect.
Setting "logon home = \\\%L\%U\.profiles" works.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to di
At 11:40 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Say setting the logon path = \\%L\Profiles\.%U
>
>That is, hide the profiles.
In my 4.1.2 version, I have
logon home = \\%N\%U\.profiles
So are you suggesting that Profiles be at a level higher than the home
directory? Let me try this to see how it wil
Greg,
At 11:22 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>. It seems to me that if you put a period before the profile
>directory, then they would be hidden wouldn't they?
Yes, it's straightforward to do. I was suggesting it to the list (well,
Gordon and Charlie actually) rather than to you. I'd like to
Greg,
At 10:56 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Looks like the fragments need to specify three backslashes when two are
>required in those fragments that utilize perl code.
Yes, three backslashes resolves the issue. Thanks!
I'd like to suggest that the roaming profile be stored in a hidden
.pr
Greg,
At 10:09 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>When you expand the fragment, you should see the parameter
>
>logon home = \\%L\%U in your smb.conf file.
I think that this is what the problem may be - I see only a single \ ahead
of %L, and the same in the logon path line:
logon home = \%
Greg,
At 09:52 12/11/2001, Greg Zartman wrote:
>Let me try this again My email client seems to be hacking out the open
>bracket at the beginning of the fragment:
OK, I've made the change, including the bracket :) However, expanding the
templates gives me the same problem. With the trailin
one mailed me off-list to suggest it may be a CR/LF issue. However, I
get the same problem from the command line, FYI. I haven't yet tried the
command line with no NETLOGON.BAT in the equation.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) t
is incorrect".
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
At 22:27 11/11/2001, Scott Duncan wrote:
>You MUST use
>the HOME switch in CAPS.
No, this is not the issue. The same PC connects properly to my production
4.1.2 box where the /home switch is in lower case.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PRO
t the syntax is incorrect. The client PC is Win ME
(yeuchh!).
I suspect that one of the Samba settings has changed, but I'm too brain
dead to dig into it further tonight...
--
Let me know if you need further information.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED
I agree that this is a positive change.
At 09:13 16/10/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>Everyone agree? Anyone disagree? Any other changes come to mind?
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers
doesn't
seem to have changed from my reading of the docs. As you rightly point out,
they are very confusing, though.
At 08:29 15/10/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>Graeme, try editing this to:
>
> logon home = \\%L\%U\
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
At 09:10 12/10/2001, stephen noble wrote:
>I don't really want to use OLE but ...
I'm using Eudora, which works fine (although, as yet, I don't have any but
the default folders).
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) t
told this past weekend by one of the 3Ware
distributors in Vancouver that they (3Ware) have discontinued all RAID
controller production, so that definitely impacts the IDE RAID side of things.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discu
into their own RPM
> - split 10globals into lots of separate fragments
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
Darrell,
At 10:36 28/9/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>To run every 15 & 30 minutes:
>
>[root@e-smith /root]# cat /etc/cron.d/raidmonitor
>*/15 * * * * root /usr/local/bin/raidmonitor -v
>
>[root@e-smith /root]# cat /etc/cron.d/ravupdate
>*/30 * * * * root /usr/local/rav8/bin/ravav --update engine --ho
Darrell,
You shouldn't have to do anything - the cron daemon refreshes when changes
have been made according to the man page. For example, when I made the
change for flexbackup, it was picked up OK. Do you want to post an example
to see if there's something obvious you may have missed?
At 15:
Graeme,
Many thanks.
At 19:31 21/9/2001, Graeme Robinson wrote:
>squid is active by default under 4.1.2, but not transparent - ie you need
>to point the browsers to it to use it.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
fic,
>since the packets are filtered in the OUTPUT chain, instead of the
>INPUT chain.
>
>This also blocks outbound proxy traffic. :)
>
>I've rolled two new RPMS that resolve this:
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only)
day or so.
Further feedback is welcomed, of course!
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Jon,
Sorry if I wasn't clear. When I said "current version", I meant the current
e-smith version, not 2.2, so you wouldn't have to upgrade.
At 21:11 5/9/2001, Jon Thiele wrote:
>I found the documentation on how to install the 'current' version of Samba,
>its just that I'm not sure I want to go
;ve done that, you should be able to
see the share OK and set up your printer driver to print to it.
Let me know if you need more help, and I'll go back through my notes.
At 19:44 5/9/2001, you wrote:
>1) is there anyway I can set my printer access to: Write = Group (or
>something lik
The subject of my initial query doesn't have the latest IMP fixes,
otherwise they are both clean 4.1.2 installs (not upgrades).
At 14:39 2/9/2001, Charlie Brady wrote:
>Interesting. Perhaps they are different versions.
Des
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTEC
At 10:14 2/9/2001, Charlie Brady wrote:
>I assume that DHCP is working correctly and you are getting an IP address
>for the external interface, as
>desired.
Yes, that's correct.
>What you are reporting is just a cosmetic problem.
OK. It just seemed odd, because the other server I checked is r
ess, not a user name.
Can someone clarify what may have happened here so that I can correct it?
Many thanks,
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PRO
Darrell,
Many thanks for your reply. I will try to find some time tonight or
tomorrow night to look into your suggestions, and will get back to you and
the list as soon as I can.
At 00:49 21/8/2001, Darrell May wrote:
>Hi Des, hey I looked over your backup to disk script and then came up
>with
Darrell,
Thanks for your reply.
At 13:49 19/8/2001, you wrote:
>Hi Des, you should publish your script for downloading/viewing so we may
>review and comment. Can you make it available for download?
Here it is:
---
#!/bin/sh
#
# This script runs as a cron job to back up va
ight which can be shed on this. I will strengthen the
script if it is login or timing related and am happy to write a HOWTO if
anyone would find it of use.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for
Does anyone know what is happening at Granite Canyon? It looks like the
site is down. Anyone else use them for DNS?
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL
smith /root]# grep default.ida /var/log/httpd/access* | wc -l
> 869
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
>rotate them at midnight.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
polling
this group to see whether there is a consensus around adding local changes
such as this to the template system, or simply making them in place.
What do all the gurus out there think?
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss
ript which gets =
>the ip address from ifconfig. Anyway, these dont work as well as liked. =
>Is there a way to post my IP to a file (html or txt) to the html =
>directory. Thanks for any information.
Des Dougan
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 20:14 10/7/2001, Des Dougan wrote:
>I will have to annoy the family at the weekend and take the server offline...
Oh my... Never a truer word spoken. I've basically been down 24 hours, all
in, but am finally up again with one minor problem (of which more later).
I did a backup to
Ed,
Thanks for your help. I did mean RAID 1 - brain and fingers not
communicating effectively
I'll try your suggestions.
At 13:30 10/7/2001, Edward Tak wrote:
>This applies if it's a RAID 1 install and not a RAID 0 install (Can you do
>a RAID 0 with esmith?)
Des
--
Please report bugs
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
