On 1/8/07, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1010 is now available. This build fixes a serious
> security bug in our encryption code, affecting both link encryption and
> encryption of keys. Please upgrade immediately; it is a mandatory build
> as of now (meaning it wi
On 12/19/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> PROBEALL: requests (telnet to 2323 and type PROBEALL: then tail -f
> wrapper.log), and implementation of spying on other nodes' swaps, seem
> to confirm the prior observations that:
> - Locations of nodes are strongly clustered around 0.0.
> - PROBEALL: and s
On 12/19/06, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PROBEALL: requests (telnet to 2323 and type PROBEALL: then tail -f
> wrapper.log), and implementation of spying on other nodes' swaps, seem
> to confirm the prior observations that:
> - Locations of nodes are strongly clustered around 0.0.
> - Any code review would be more than welcome.
> - Does anyone have any idea how to proceed from here? Any theories? Any
> idea for intelligence gathering?
> - More PROBEALL: traces would be interesting; are they all centered on
> 0.0/1.0?
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v
On 12/13/06, toad wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:14:39PM +, Michael Rogers wrote:
> > toad wrote:
> > > This is why the vast majority of swap attempts fail in
> > > "swapsRejectedAlreadyLocked" on the stats page:
> >
> > If most nodes are locked at any given time, doesn't that mean nodes
On 12/13/06, toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:14:39PM +, Michael Rogers wrote:
> > toad wrote:
> > > This is why the vast majority of swap attempts fail in
> > > "swapsRejectedAlreadyLocked" on the stats page:
> >
> > If most nodes are locked at any given time, doesn
On 12/8/06, toad wrote:
> Does anyone have any concrete ideas on how to do PMTU in Freenet?
>
> So far, these seem to be the options:
>
> - Fixed maximum packet size, at the moment this is 1400-28 (28 being
> UDP headers).
> - The above, but can be overridden by nodes who know their local MTU;
>
On 12/8/06, toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any concrete ideas on how to do PMTU in Freenet?
>
> So far, these seem to be the options:
>
> - Fixed maximum packet size, at the moment this is 1400-28 (28 being
> UDP headers).
> - The above, but can be overridden by nodes who know
gni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> > * Juiceman [2006-11-16 20:53:08]:
> >
> > > Could we get a new freenet-ext.jar built and uploaded pretty please?
> >
> > It will be as soon as it's ready. I use to give links to pre-releases of
> > it on irc to get feedback... So fa
M +0100, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-16 20:53:08]:
>
> > Could we get a new freenet-ext.jar built and uploaded pretty please?
>
> It will be as soon as it's ready. I use to give links to pre-releases of
> it on irc to get
Could we get a new freenet-ext.jar built and uploaded pretty please?
Also the http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar.url
doesn't update anymore. Is that by design?
On 11/16/06, nextgens at freenetproject.org
wrote:
> Author: nextgens
> Date: 2006-11-16 15:35:41 +00
Could we get a new freenet-ext.jar built and uploaded pretty please?
Also the http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar.url
doesn't update anymore. Is that by design?
On 11/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2006-11-16 15:35:41 +
I would suggest waiting for Sun to actually do it first. I heard it
would happen before January... so we'll know one way or the other soon
enough.
On 11/1/06, toad wrote:
> Should we reconsider our current ban on using java 1.5-specific
> features, now that Sun has publicly committed to open-sou
I would suggest waiting for Sun to actually do it first. I heard it
would happen before January... so we'll know one way or the other soon
enough.
On 11/1/06, toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Should we reconsider our current ban on using java 1.5-specific
features, now that Sun has publicly comm
Yes, a discouraging message makes more sense. Remind the user that
people may be on vacation or having computer difficulties and to wait
a few weeks to remove connections unless they are really sure.
On 10/16/06, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$)
wrote:
> * Ian Clarke [2006-10-15 21:37:35]:
>
> >
>
Yes, a discouraging message makes more sense. Remind the user that
people may be on vacation or having computer difficulties and to wait
a few weeks to remove connections unless they are really sure.
On 10/16/06, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTE
* Cached keys: 252,640 (7.70 GiB)
* Stored keys: 54,344 (1.65 GiB)
* Overall size: 306,984/306,888 (9.36 GiB/9.36 GiB)
* Cache hits: 105,863 / 121,449 (87%)
* Store hits: 3,579 / 124,397 (2%)
* Avg. access rate: 15/s
Of course this was a full 10G store before the Cache/Stor
* Cached keys: 252,640 (7.70 GiB)
* Stored keys: 54,344 (1.65 GiB)
* Overall size: 306,984/306,888 (9.36 GiB/9.36 GiB)
* Cache hits: 105,863 / 121,449 (87%)
* Store hits: 3,579 / 124,397 (2%)
* Avg. access rate: 15/s
Of course this was a full 10G store before the Cache/Store cha
?
>
> Ian.
>
> On 3 Oct 2006, at 17:01, Juiceman wrote:
>
> GASP kp. If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some
> light bondage gear aka kinky porn.
>
> On 10/3/06, toad wrote:
>
> We should add some more index sites.
> Curre
graphy?
Ian.On 3 Oct 2006, at 17:01, Juiceman wrote:GASP kp. If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some
light bondage gear aka kinky porn.On 10/3/06, toad <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We should add some more index sites.Currently we only have the Darknet Index:
[EMA
GASP kp. If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some
light bondage gear aka kinky porn.
On 10/3/06, toad wrote:
> We should add some more index sites.
> Currently we only have the Darknet Index:
> USK at
> PFeLTa1si2Ml5sDeUy7eDhPso6TPdmw-2gWfQ4Jg02w,3ocfrqgUMVWA2PeorZx40TW0c-FiIO
GASP kp. If you had checked it, you would see it was adults in some
light bondage gear aka kinky porn.
On 10/3/06, toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We should add some more index sites.
Currently we only have the Darknet Index:
[EMAIL
PROTECTED],3ocfrqgUMVWA2PeorZx40TW0c-FiIOL-TWKQHoDbVdE,AQABAA
On 8/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: toad
Date: 2006-08-05 16:28:21 + (Sat, 05 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 9907
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
Log:
minor bugfix
Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
=
And this is in the node's log:
Initializing CHK Datastore
Aug 05, 2006 17:23:53:998 (freenet.node.Node,
WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache
Aug 05, 2006 17:23:54:076 (freenet.node.Node,
WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing pubKey Datastore
Aug 05, 2006
And this is in the node's log:
Initializing CHK Datastore
Aug 05, 2006 17:23:53:998 (freenet.node.Node,
WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing CHK Datacache
Aug 05, 2006 17:23:54:076 (freenet.node.Node,
WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): Initializing pubKey Datastore
Aug 05, 2006
On 8/5/06, toad at freenetproject.org wrote:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2006-08-05 16:28:21 + (Sat, 05 Aug 2006)
> New Revision: 9907
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
> Log:
> minor bugfix
>
> Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
> =
On 8/4/06, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Juiceman [2006-08-03 20:26:42]:
>
> > It looks like the Windows .dll's are missing something. They are much
> > smaller than they should be. Last time Nextgens uploaded a .jar to
> > the downloads directory that h
On 8/4/06, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-03 20:26:42]:
> It looks like the Windows .dll's are missing something. They are much
> smaller than they should be. Last time Nextgens uploaded a .jar to
> th
again?
On 8/3/06, Juiceman wrote:
> On 8/3/06, nextgens at freenetproject.org
> wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2006-08-03 14:50:09 + (Thu, 03 Aug 2006)
> > New Revision: 9857
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/contrib/freenet_ext/ExtVers
On 8/3/06, nextgens at freenetproject.org
wrote:
> Author: nextgens
> Date: 2006-08-03 14:50:09 + (Thu, 03 Aug 2006)
> New Revision: 9857
>
> Modified:
>trunk/contrib/freenet_ext/ExtVersion.java
> Log:
> new version of freenet-ext.jar : #5
>
> Modified: trunk/contrib/freenet_ext/ExtVersio
again?
On 8/3/06, Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: nextgens
> Date: 2006-08-03 14:50:09 + (Thu, 03 Aug 2006)
> New Revision: 9857
>
> Modified:
>trunk/contrib/freenet_ext/ExtVersion.java
On 8/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2006-08-03 14:50:09 + (Thu, 03 Aug 2006)
New Revision: 9857
Modified:
trunk/contrib/freenet_ext/ExtVersion.java
Log:
new version of freenet-ext.jar : #5
Modified: trunk/contrib/freenet_ext/ExtVersion.java
On 8/1/06, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Juiceman [2006-08-01 18:21:20]:
>
> > On 8/1/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > >On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$)
> > >wrote:
> > >> * Matthew Toseland [2006-08-01 19
On 8/1/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2006-08-01 19:06:42]:
> >
> > > It's not mirrored is it?
> >
> > Now it is.
>
> Ummm, that's bad. sha1test.jar should NOT be mirrored.
Neither should be mirr
On 8/1/06, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-01 18:21:20]:
> On 8/1/06, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$)
> >wrote
On 8/1/06, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:11:31PM +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-01 19:06:42]:
>
> > It's not mirrored is it?
>
> Now it is.
Ummm, that's bad. sha1test.jar should NOT be mirrored
On 7/31/06, nextgens at freenetproject.org
wrote:
> Author: nextgens
> Date: 2006-07-31 10:30:14 + (Mon, 31 Jul 2006)
> New Revision: 9830
>
> Modified:
>trunk/apps/installer/installclasspath/linux/update.sh
>trunk/apps/installer/installclasspath/windows/update.cmd
> Log:
> update the
On 7/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2006-07-31 10:30:14 + (Mon, 31 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 9830
Modified:
trunk/apps/installer/installclasspath/linux/update.sh
trunk/apps/installer/installclasspath/windows/update.cmd
Log:
update the updating
On 7/30/06, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would someone mind if I remove "pentium" optimized native big
> integer libraries ? what about pentiummmx too ?
> The asset beeing a space gain.
>
> Atm, we have : none, pentium, pentiummmx, pentium2, pentium
On 7/30/06, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Would someone mind if I remove "pentium" optimized native big
integer libraries ? what about pentiummmx too ?
The asset beeing a space gain.
Atm, we have : none, pentium, pentiummmx, pentium2
Great job Nextgens :)
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/21 21:56:47 | --> Wrapper Started as Service
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/21 21:56:47 | Launching a JVM...
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/07/21 21:56:47 | Wrapper (Version 3.2.0)
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/07/21 21:56:47 |
Great job Nextgens :)
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/21 21:56:47 | --> Wrapper Started as Service
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/21 21:56:47 | Launching a JVM...
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/07/21 21:56:47 | Wrapper (Version 3.2.0)
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/07/21 21:56:47
On 7/14/06, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Juiceman [2006-07-13 18:30:49]:
>
> > The new freenet-ext.jar seems broken:
> >
> > STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/13 18:26:45 | --> Wrapper Started as Service
> > STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/13 18:26:45 | Laun
On 7/14/06, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-13 18:30:49]:
> The new freenet-ext.jar seems broken:
>
> STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/13 18:26:45 | --> Wrapper Started as Service
> STATUS | wrapper | 2006/0
The new freenet-ext.jar seems broken:
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/13 18:26:45 | --> Wrapper Started as Service
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/13 18:26:45 | Launching a JVM...
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/07/13 18:26:46 | Wrapper (Version 3.2.0)
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/0
The new freenet-ext.jar seems broken:
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/13 18:26:45 | --> Wrapper Started as Service
STATUS | wrapper | 2006/07/13 18:26:45 | Launching a JVM...
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/07/13 18:26:46 | Wrapper (Version 3.2.0)
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org
INFO | jvm 1| 2006/
On 7/10/06, Colin Davis wrote:
> It seems that a number of the options on the config page aren't
> phrased as clearly for people who aren't familiar with freenet, as we
> could be.
>
> I've done a quick re-write, but I'd love to hear the ideas of anyone
> else on how to rephrase certain lines. Ne
On 7/10/06, Colin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that a number of the options on the config page aren't
phrased as clearly for people who aren't familiar with freenet, as we
could be.
I've done a quick re-write, but I'd love to hear the ideas of anyone
else on how to rephrase certain
I'm seeing "Custom" as the revision on the latest snapshot:
Freenet 0.7 Build #844 r at custom@
On 6/28/06, toad at freenetproject.org wrote:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2006-06-28 23:41:35 + (Wed, 28 Jun 2006)
> New Revision: 9399
>
--
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall
I'm seeing "Custom" as the revision on the latest snapshot:
Freenet 0.7 Build #844 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
On 6/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: toad
Date: 2006-06-28 23:41:35 + (Wed, 28 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 9399
--
I may disagree with what you have to say, b
On 6/22/06, Ruud Javi wrote:
> >Hmm, is high CPU usage common?
>
> Yes, unfortunately
>
> My CPU usage:
> 10-90% CPU from an AMD Athlon 64 3000+ system running win xp
>
> There are periods where freenet is stable around 10-20% CPU usage. But now
> that I am monitoring it, it seems more often to ha
On 6/22/06, Ruud Javi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hmm, is high CPU usage common?
Yes, unfortunately
My CPU usage:
10-90% CPU from an AMD Athlon 64 3000+ system running win xp
There are periods where freenet is stable around 10-20% CPU usage. But now
that I am monitoring it, it seems more often
On 6/19/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:26:03PM -0500, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
> > Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> > >* zothar at freenetproject.org [2006-06-18
> > >19:02:38]:
> > >
> > >>Author: zothar
> > >>Date: 2006-06-18 19:02:33 + (Sun, 18 Jun 2006)
On 6/19/06, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:26:03PM -0500, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
> Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-18
> >19:02:38]:
> >
> >>Author: zothar
> >>Date: 2006-06-18 19:02:33 + (Sun
What if 2 or more lists have the same user-friendly name but have them
pointing to different keys? How would this be handled?
--
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
What if 2 or more lists have the same user-friendly name but have them
pointing to different keys? How would this be handled?
--
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
___
Devl mai
On 6/16/06, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote:
> On 6/16/06, Colin Davis wrote:
> > Is there any way to automatically update the Freenet support files,
> > such as update.sh? ;)
> >
> > -Colin
> > On Jun 15, 2006, at 5:59 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >
> > > The update.sh script now checks the SHA1 checks
On 6/16/06, Lars Juel Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/16/06, Colin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to automatically update the Freenet support files,
> such as update.sh? ;)
>
> -Colin
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 5:59 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > The update.sh script no
Since we are in a state of alpha, why not keep lastGoodBuild fairly
recent? Maybe a window of 15 node versions? The people that are
running this at this early stage surely don't mind updating their
nodes every 2 weeks or so, and throwing out the few older nodes that
aren't getting updated might m
Since we are in a state of alpha, why not keep lastGoodBuild fairly
recent? Maybe a window of 15 node versions? The people that are
running this at this early stage surely don't mind updating their
nodes every 2 weeks or so, and throwing out the few older nodes that
aren't getting updated might
The link to the demo is borked, btw...
On 4/25/06, Ian Clarke wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> And in other ways it is more secure. I think a time will come when
> straddling both 0.5 and 0.7 will hurt us, and that time may be now.
> We can still link to the 0.5 stuff
The link to the demo is borked, btw...
On 4/25/06, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> And in other ways it is more secure. I think a time will come when
> straddling both 0.5 and 0.7 will hurt us, and that time may be now.
> We can still li
I like 9481, because it is 1984 scrambled ;)
On 2/17/06, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> What port number should we use for FCPv2?
>
> I propose 9481. It does not seem to be used.
>
> We can't use 8481, because we already use it for a different protocol
> (FCPv1). Well, we could... but it'd be nice i
I like 9481, because it is 1984 scrambled ;)
On 2/17/06, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What port number should we use for FCPv2?
>
> I propose 9481. It does not seem to be used.
>
> We can't use 8481, because we already use it for a different protocol
> (FCPv1). Well, we could...
Looks like the problem should be fixed now.
Michael J. Freedman mfreed at cs.nyu.edu
Fri Dec 2 18:07:56 EST 2005
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
As many of you pointed out, we experienced some downtime with CoralCDN
today as its DNS servers stopped resp
Looks like the problem should be fixed now.
Michael J. Freedman mfreed at cs.nyu.edu
Fri Dec 2 18:07:56 EST 2005
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
As many of you pointed out, we experienced some downtime with CoralCDN
today as its DNS servers stopped resp
Don't these URL's need ".nyud.net:8090" added after them to take
advantage of Coral Cache? Or do you have some sort of server-side
redirect enabled?
On 11/28/05, bob at freenetproject.org wrote:
> Author: bob
> Date: 2005-11-29 00:36:32 + (Tue, 29 Nov 2005)
> New Revision: 7630
>
> Modified
Don't these URL's need ".nyud.net:8090" added after them to take
advantage of Coral Cache? Or do you have some sort of server-side
redirect enabled?
On 11/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: bob
> Date: 2005-11-29 00:36:32 + (Tue, 29 Nov 2005)
> New Revision: 7630
>
I was looking at how you added Sun Java 1.5 support... Wouldn't it
make sense to look for 1.5 before looking for 1.4? That way if a user
has both installed it will choose the more modern 1.5.
If you agree I have attached a patch that will fix the detection and
look for 1.5 first.
If that patch i
Sun Java 1.5 but the version of
freenet-webinstaller.exe in the snapshots directory doesn't...!
The freenet-webinstaller.exe file in the snapshot directory is from
December 2004. Is it possible you didn't upload the latest version
after you got it working?
>
>
> Juiceman wrote:
nstaller.exe detects Sun Java 1.5 but the version of
freenet-webinstaller.exe in the snapshots directory doesn't...!
The freenet-webinstaller.exe file in the snapshot directory is from
December 2004. Is it possible you didn't upload the latest version
after you got it working?
>
Ok, I got to looking into this and I think I would be able to do basic
maintainance of the webinstallers if no-one else demands the job...
I have put together a hacked webinstaller that allows for the use
of Sun Java 1.5. It compiles and runs on my system, but I haven't
tested it for Sun Java 1.4
It appears that the only working script in the directory is the
freenet-new.nsi script. You will need to edit the build.bat file to
run that, or rename freenet-new.nsi to freenet.nsi
On 9/19/05, Juiceman wrote:
> On 9/19/05, Yongqian Li wrote:
> > I have noticed that the installe
On 9/19/05, Yongqian Li wrote:
> I have noticed that the installers on the freenet website is seriously
> outdated. It is for Java 1.4, which is not only not the most current version
> but has shown to have serious security bugs (see
> http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3439391). The
It appears that the only working script in the directory is the
freenet-new.nsi script. You will need to edit the build.bat file to
run that, or rename freenet-new.nsi to freenet.nsi
On 9/19/05, Juiceman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/19/05, Yongqian Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On 9/19/05, Yongqian Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noticed that the installers on the freenet website is seriously
> outdated. It is for Java 1.4, which is not only not the most current version
> but has shown to have serious security bugs (see
> http://www.internetnews.com/security/articl
On 9/18/05, Yongqian Li wrote:
> Java 5 is very diffrent from previous versions (4, 3, 2) etc., so you cannot
> compile the code for previous JREs. If some of the warnings look like
>
> Note: [java file].java uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
> Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details
When I try to compile Freenet on Windows XP_SP2 with the build.bat
file I get the following error: target release 1.1 conflicts with
default source release 1.5
The jar fails to build.
If I try a different target other than 1.5 it will fail, if I use
-target 1.5 it will build but with 6 warnings
On 9/18/05, Yongqian Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Java 5 is very diffrent from previous versions (4, 3, 2) etc., so you cannot
> compile the code for previous JREs. If some of the warnings look like
>
> Note: [java file].java uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
> Note: Recompile with -Xlint:un
When I try to compile Freenet on Windows XP_SP2 with the build.bat
file I get the following error: target release 1.1 conflicts with
default source release 1.5
The jar fails to build.
If I try a different target other than 1.5 it will fail, if I use
-target 1.5 it will build but with 6 warnings
If we had connection multiplexing in place, I think it would be a lot easier
to fix NGR, as each set of Nodes would have only one connection between
them -- In effect this would act as a limiting form of load balancing...
Other benefits would come from the required packetizing of trailers, which
s
I have always thought that the whole NGR thing was misguided. Freenet works
because of keyspace specialization. NGR trashes keyspace specialization in
favor of "speed", which reduces Freenet from an medium speed expressway to a
grid of city-streets with traffic-lights and congestion. You might b
P Pro SP1 here...
>On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:20:24PM -0500, Juiceman wrote:
>>
>> Umm... All the windows users are still being set for only 256M datastores
by default. Do you think this has any effect on the network?
>They are? Are you sure? It was supposed to be 10% o
- Original Message -
From:
Ian Clarke
To: Discussion of development issues
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 1:06
PM
Subject: [freenet-dev] More musings on
NGR and load-balancing
The more I think about it, the more I think that putting NGR in-charge
of l
From:
Ed Tomlinson
To: Discussion of development issues
Cc: Ian Clarke
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 9:42
AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Rethinking
load-balancing
HiOn the otherhand, maybe we want to just eliminate QR and use
somethinglike this. Nodes have 1
from the freenet.ini file:
# set yes to not bandwidth throttle connections to
LocalInterfaces i.e. FCP and mainportdontLimitClients=false
Set this as true by
default.
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bi
Make Y-threads the
default.
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
My node won't even start with the latest
unstable snapshot.
See attached log for
NPE
freenet_log.zip
Description: Binary data
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
How does the Node determine what nodes to
delete from its routing table to make room for a new noderef?
I noticed my node seemed to delete one of the
only 10 nodes that I had open connections to.
Why would my node delete a working noderef (it
had an open connection to it) when it had 30 f
Doesn't this cause less than optimal
specialization? Maybe the data would have been found in less than that 25
htl if your node heads in the right direction in the first place?
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew Rodland
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 20
The bookmark manager servlet wasn't being
compiled...
<>
Where does if(internalRun())
ever get set true? See code below from
main.java...
static class InsertARK extends AutoBackoffNodeRequester {
boolean died = false;
public InsertARK() throws KeyException {
super(new InternalClient(node), getURI(initialARKversion+1),
true, myGetBucket(), Node
hehe :)
- Original Message -
From: "Edgar Friendly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Increasing default rtMaxNodes above 50?
> "Juiceman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
Our current default is 50 (at least in build 6102)
*snip*
> Nodes need to route suboptimally sometimes so that they can find out
> about paths that are better than their data indicated. That being
> said, we can't go the other extreme and use only 2 nodes. Our current
> default of 100 is reasona
rr);
e.printStackTrace(System.err);
}
- Original Message -
From:
Juiceman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:31
PM
Subject: Re: ARK insertion after IP
change detection is still broken (was Re: [freenet-dev] Windows autorun)
All ARK's are inserte
All ARK's are inserted that need to be
inserted when the node is restarted. Is the "insert ARK" code only called
at start-up?
- Original Message -----
From:
Juiceman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:21
PM
Subject: ARK insertion
I can verify
this here. IP address change(s) are correctly detected and ARK
sequence increases (but new ARK(s) are not inserted!!!)
build 6102 Sun JVM 1.4.2-b28 Windows
XP
>Build 5012.>Yes, now
it does partially work.>- IP address update is detected.>-
Environment Page shows new IP add
What about setting the follow default to
true? It speeds up page loading here, and I think it would improve the
user experience. This is a better setting for the majority of average
users that run their node on the same machine that they browse freenet on
IMHO...
Name: dontLimitClients
Now that we have NIO, what
about increasing default rtMaxNodes to allow more accurate/greater
specialization in routing requests?
I think that with a higher number of nodes to
route to, a node would be better able to pick a *better* route that may be more
specialized (aka closer to the k
Shouldn't the legend titles be switched in the
graphical OCM? It would make more sense if the arrows are pointing in the
direction the connection is made. See attached
picture.
<>
401 - 500 of 503 matches
Mail list logo
