On Thu, 07 May 2009 21:54:34 -0400, Juiceman wrote:
> Something as simple as "" or "" or "" would be enough to
> change the hash of the CHK and would be a known value so we could recreate
> the missing CHKs and reinsert them, yes?
Or just use numerical procession: "1", "2" ... "23",
On Thu, 07 May 2009 00:59:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> (Easy) - MHKs (or DHKs) - redundant CHKs for the top block of a splitfile
> (no, I don't like RHK, it sounds too much like RSK, and R stands for
> Revocable not Redundant). (Reasonably easy)
Trivial, actually. Simply add a field that
On Thu, 07 May 2009 00:59:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
(Easy) - MHKs (or DHKs) - redundant CHKs for the top block of a splitfile
(no, I don't like RHK, it sounds too much like RSK, and R stands for
Revocable not Redundant). (Reasonably easy)
Trivial, actually. Simply add a field that can
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:16:15 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:32, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> [quoted text muted]
>
> I didn't say reinstall, I said run the update script.
>
> What exactly is it that happens? The linux install script doesn't set
&
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:16:15 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:32, Jusa Saari wrote:
[quoted text muted]
I didn't say reinstall, I said run the update script.
What exactly is it that happens? The linux install script doesn't set
update.sh/update.cmd
And you won't get new ones to replace them, since the installer (both the
java and the tar.gz ones) is broken, or at least didn't work when I
tried to reinstall Freenet recently on Linux. Apparently, it fails to set
the execute bit of some scripts to on.
Might want to check that one out.
Oh, and
And you won't get new ones to replace them, since the installer (both the
java and the tar.gz ones) is broken, or at least didn't work when I
tried to reinstall Freenet recently on Linux. Apparently, it fails to set
the execute bit of some scripts to on.
Might want to check that one out.
Oh, and
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:30:30 +, Michael Rogers wrote:
> On Mar 11 2008, Sven-Ola T?cke wrote:
>> P.S. While I'm not a Java expert - for unbloating software, normally an
>> #ifdef is a good thing [tm]. Any analog contructs with this funny
>> language?
>
> Dynamically loaded classes can be
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:30:30 +, Michael Rogers wrote:
On Mar 11 2008, Sven-Ola Tücke wrote:
P.S. While I'm not a Java expert - for unbloating software, normally an
#ifdef is a good thing [tm]. Any analog contructs with this funny
language?
Dynamically loaded classes can be useful when
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:34:52 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Linux, during CPU intensive node activities - resuming requests,
> decoding or encoding a large splitfile etc - the threads that do the core
> of Freenet's work (the packet sender and packet receiver threads, request
> senders etc),
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:34:52 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Linux, during CPU intensive node activities - resuming requests,
decoding or encoding a large splitfile etc - the threads that do the core
of Freenet's work (the packet sender and packet receiver threads, request
senders etc), get
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:57:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> FCP API for Node to Node
> Messages so Thaw etc can talk with Thaw on nearby darknet nodes.
IMHO this is a bad idea. The only use I can imagine for this would be to
create a "Thaw-net" to route around Freenet proper. If this Thaw-net
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:57:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
FCP API for Node to Node
Messages so Thaw etc can talk with Thaw on nearby darknet nodes.
IMHO this is a bad idea. The only use I can imagine for this would be to
create a Thaw-net to route around Freenet proper. If this Thaw-net
FProxy global queue page often shows that a nonzero percentage of a file
has been downloaded, yet claims that the file size is "unkown". How is
this possible? Surely the total size must be known to calculate the
pecentage?
FProxy global queue page often shows that a nonzero percentage of a file
has been downloaded, yet claims that the file size is unkown. How is
this possible? Surely the total size must be known to calculate the
pecentage?
___
Devl mailing list
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 01:40:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Freenet 0.7 build 1041 is now available. Please upgrade, tell us if you
> have any problem upgrading, and tell us if you find any bugs.
>
> Major changes:
> - Major internal changes/refactoring getting ready for opennet. We don't
>
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 01:40:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Freenet 0.7 build 1041 is now available. Please upgrade, tell us if you
have any problem upgrading, and tell us if you find any bugs.
Major changes:
- Major internal changes/refactoring getting ready for opennet. We don't
yet have
>
> Opennet is the key to getting a the installed base which allows darknets
> to work.
>
> -Colin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jusa Saari wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:06:42 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>>> Nonethe
e:
>> On 6/7/07, Florent Daigni?re
>> wrote:
>> > * Jusa Saari
>> > [2007-06-07 23:23:48]: Implementing a workaround (opennet,
>> > backtracking, ...) is only a way of fixing temporarily the topology to
>> > the expense of both liberty (it has to
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:05:41 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thursday 07 June 2007 21:23, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:11:27 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> > Recent probe data suggests a theory:
>> >
>> > Parts of the network are "r
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:11:27 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Recent probe data suggests a theory:
>
> Parts of the network are "rabbit holes" or "dungeons", i.e. sub-networks
> which are only weakly connected to the larger network. These cover a small
> chunk of the keyspace, say 0.36-0.41
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:05:41 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007 21:23, Jusa Saari wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:11:27 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Recent probe data suggests a theory:
Parts of the network are rabbit holes or dungeons, i.e.
sub-networks which
, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jusa Saari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2007-06-07 23:23:48]: Implementing a workaround (opennet,
backtracking, ...) is only a way of fixing temporarily the topology to
the expense of both liberty (it has to be the default behaviour as you
pointed out
Clarke wrote:
On 6/7/07, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jusa Saari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2007-06-07 23:23:48]: Implementing a workaround (opennet,
backtracking, ...) is only a way of fixing temporarily the topology
to the expense of both liberty (it has to be the default behaviour
On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:11:27 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Recent probe data suggests a theory:
Parts of the network are rabbit holes or dungeons, i.e. sub-networks
which are only weakly connected to the larger network. These cover a small
chunk of the keyspace, say 0.36-0.41 (roughly, in
Here. Mind you, I just updated to 991 from some months-old version. And
I'm running this with Kolivas's idleprio patches in a machine that gets
heavy CPU load from time to time, so I don't know how representative these
stats are.
* Cached keys: 14,065 (439 MiB)
* Stored keys: 16,626 (519
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:49:29 -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2006 08:04, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>> * Ed Tomlinson [2006-10-16 08:01:51]:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > At toad's prompting I tried an experiment. The results were
>> > interesting. I changed by output bandwidth limit
Here. Mind you, I just updated to 991 from some months-old version. And
I'm running this with Kolivas's idleprio patches in a machine that gets
heavy CPU load from time to time, so I don't know how representative these
stats are.
* Cached keys: 14,065 (439 MiB)
* Stored keys: 16,626 (519
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:05:56 +0100, toad wrote:
> Saving a LOT of lines of code. Threads are entirely legitimate tools.
> Hundreds of threads is reasonable on modern chips, especially as they are
> likely double the number of cores every 2 years for some time to come.
> However, ***IF*** it
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 16:05:56 +0100, toad wrote:
Saving a LOT of lines of code. Threads are entirely legitimate tools.
Hundreds of threads is reasonable on modern chips, especially as they are
likely double the number of cores every 2 years for some time to come.
However, ***IF*** it proves to
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:58:08 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Could it significantly slow down reaching optimality? Could it in fact be
> partly responsible for the simulated O(n^2) swaps needed?
You mean swap attempts, of course, since the propability for a swap to
happen at a given time has
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:58:08 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Could it significantly slow down reaching optimality? Could it in fact be
partly responsible for the simulated O(n^2) swaps needed?
You mean swap attempts, of course, since the propability for a swap to
happen at a given time has
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:30:31 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> What is backoff for? It's not to prevent overloading nodes; nodes reject
> requests pre-emptively. What it is for is this:
>
> If we don't backoff slow nodes, then these slow nodes will have to reject
> (or occasionally timeout) the
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:30:31 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
What is backoff for? It's not to prevent overloading nodes; nodes reject
requests pre-emptively. What it is for is this:
If we don't backoff slow nodes, then these slow nodes will have to reject
(or occasionally timeout) the
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:27:46 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Jusa Saari
> [2006-07-11 21:58:26]:
>
>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:40:17 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>>
>> > * Colin Davis [2006-07-08
>> > 23:41:24]:
>> >
>> >> Fair
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:27:46 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Jusa Saari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2006-07-11 21:58:26]:
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:40:17 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-08
23:41:24]:
Fair- The profilers I found all seemed to be GUI
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:40:17 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Colin Davis [2006-07-08 23:41:24]:
>
>> Fair- The profilers I found all seemed to be GUI based- I run my node on
>> a server without X, that I can only access via SSH. I know Java 1.5 has
>> a way do generate a profile text file,
Or just use the
-XX:+DisableExplicitGC
parameter to make Sun JVM ignore garbage collection requests. Simply add
wrapper.java.additional.1=-XX:+DisableExplicitGC
to wrapper.conf, like I just did.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:54:07 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I would support making it
Or just use the
-XX:+DisableExplicitGC
parameter to make Sun JVM ignore garbage collection requests. Simply add
wrapper.java.additional.1=-XX:+DisableExplicitGC
to wrapper.conf, like I just did.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:54:07 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
I would support making it
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:40:17 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-08 23:41:24]:
Fair- The profilers I found all seemed to be GUI based- I run my node on
a server without X, that I can only access via SSH. I know Java 1.5 has
a way do generate a profile
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:23:20 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> 1. Most people who reach the downloads page apparently don't download the
> installer.
> - Is there a technical problem?
> - Is it simply that the installer is cached by web proxies?
No, the reason is most likely the "Important note
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:23:20 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
1. Most people who reach the downloads page apparently don't download the
installer.
- Is there a technical problem?
- Is it simply that the installer is cached by web proxies?
No, the reason is most likely the Important note to
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:10:21 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Jusa Saari
> [2006-06-21 00:38:45]:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:21:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>> > All unmaintained CSS styles for the node will be deleted in the near
>> > f
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:10:21 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Jusa Saari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2006-06-21 00:38:45]:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:21:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
All unmaintained CSS styles for the node will be deleted in the near
future. If you want your favourite theme
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:21:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> All unmaintained CSS styles for the node will be deleted in the near
> future. If you want your favourite theme to remain in Fred, please could
> you respond to this thread volunteering to be a maintainer. From time to
> time new
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:21:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
All unmaintained CSS styles for the node will be deleted in the near
future. If you want your favourite theme to remain in Fred, please could
you respond to this thread volunteering to be a maintainer. From time to
time new features
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:44:25 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:03:20PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:37:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> > There is, though we always start the thread at the end of the
>> > const
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:37:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:45:02AM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> > Also the point about starting threads in constructors in non-final
>> > classes may impact us. It is also possible that some code violates
>>
ynchronization. For example, it is possible to obtain a fresh value for
> one field of an object, but a stale value for another. Similarly, it is
> possible to read a fresh, updated value of a reference variable, but a
> stale value of one of the fields of the object now being referenced
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:37:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:45:02AM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
Also the point about starting threads in constructors in non-final
classes may impact us. It is also possible that some code violates
this:
Uh oh. I've seen code
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:44:25 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 01:03:20PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 01:37:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
There is, though we always start the thread at the end of the
constructor, and as I understand that page
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:57:38 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:59:56PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:34:05 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:26:55PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> >&g
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:34:05 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:26:55PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> What happens if the watchdog gets stuck too ? It has to synchronize with
>> the watched thread sometimes to do its work, AFAIK.
>
> It just rea
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:34:05 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:26:55PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
What happens if the watchdog gets stuck too ? It has to synchronize with
the watched thread sometimes to do its work, AFAIK.
It just reads a variable. An int. Without
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:57:38 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 12:59:56PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:34:05 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:26:55PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
What happens if the watchdog gets stuck too
. Similarly, it is
possible to read a fresh, updated value of a reference variable, but a
stale value of one of the fields of the object now being referenced.
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 10:16:47PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:57:38 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Wed, Jun
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:53:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:32:52PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote:
>>
>> >> Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working
>>
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:53:35 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:32:52PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote:
Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working
just fine, even on Freenet 0.7 ?
It works
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote:
>> Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working just
>> fine, even on Freenet 0.7 ?
>>
> It works only under Windows. And no, Wine is *not* a solution, because it
> works only on Linux 32bits, and so Mac OS[X] users and
Why does Freenet request ARKs from people I'm currently connected to ? If
I'm connected to them, then I already know their IP address, and if I need
to know any more information about them, I can simply ask them directly,
can't I ?
See, the Darknet page says:
CONNECTED*
* Requesting ARK
And
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:18:27 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote:
> I would like to know if some of you have an idea for the name of the fuqid
> replacement. I would prefer something not suggesting too much "traditional
> filesharing" or copyright infringment, and, if possible, not containing
> "fuqid".
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:18:27 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote:
I would like to know if some of you have an idea for the name of the fuqid
replacement. I would prefer something not suggesting too much traditional
filesharing or copyright infringment, and, if possible, not containing
fuqid.
Since
Why does Freenet request ARKs from people I'm currently connected to ? If
I'm connected to them, then I already know their IP address, and if I need
to know any more information about them, I can simply ask them directly,
can't I ?
See, the Darknet page says:
CONNECTED*
* Requesting ARK
And
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:15:54 +0200, Jerome Flesch wrote:
Finally, why does FUQID need replacing ? I thought it was working just
fine, even on Freenet 0.7 ?
It works only under Windows. And no, Wine is *not* a solution, because it
works only on Linux 32bits, and so Mac OS[X] users and Linux
On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:33:23 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Firstly, why do we need two index formats? I'm the first to admit that the
> current Librarian index format is limited - way too limited - but why do
> we need two? The main changes I would make to the librarian format right
> now
On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:33:23 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Firstly, why do we need two index formats? I'm the first to admit that the
current Librarian index format is limited - way too limited - but why do
we need two? The main changes I would make to the librarian format right
now would
There's something wrong with the bookmark editor. Not only does it not
update them, but it also randomly returns a text page that looks like a
CSS style sheet. When this happens, the proxy looks like it had no CSS
enabled until the next time the browser is closed and reopened (reloading
the page
There's something wrong with the bookmark editor. Not only does it not
update them, but it also randomly returns a text page that looks like a
CSS style sheet. When this happens, the proxy looks like it had no CSS
enabled until the next time the browser is closed and reopened (reloading
the page
On Wed, 31 May 2006 10:44:27 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Jusa Saari
> [2006-05-31 11:31:08]:
>
>> Well, I updated the node, added the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environmental
>> variable, restarted the node, and then went to doing other things. Heavy
>> CPU usage thi
Well, I updated the node, added the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environmental
variable, restarted the node, and then went to doing other things. Heavy
CPU usage things. No problem, since I've niced Freenet to 19. Well, guess
what ? When I came back, Freenet had restarted itself.
I guess that the deadlock
Well, I updated the node, added the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL environmental
variable, restarted the node, and then went to doing other things. Heavy
CPU usage things. No problem, since I've niced Freenet to 19. Well, guess
what ? When I came back, Freenet had restarted itself.
I guess that the deadlock
I searched around the Net about the "thread tries to lock a nonlocked
object" bug, and found a discussion about such an issue:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=343023=2942637
According to it, this might actually be a bug in glibc and nptl library.
Specifically, there appears to be
On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:21:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Immediate priorities:
>
> 1a. Do not do any (synchronous) DNS lookups on PacketSender. 1b. If:
> - We are on a Sun/Blackdown JVM (prior to 1.6??) - We are on Linux
> - LD_ASSUME_KERNEL isn't set
> Then we are vulnerable to the
On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:21:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Immediate priorities:
1a. Do not do any (synchronous) DNS lookups on PacketSender. 1b. If:
- We are on a Sun/Blackdown JVM (prior to 1.6??) - We are on Linux
- LD_ASSUME_KERNEL isn't set
Then we are vulnerable to the EvilJVMBug,
I searched around the Net about the thread tries to lock a nonlocked
object bug, and found a discussion about such an issue:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=343023messageID=2942637
According to it, this might actually be a bug in glibc and nptl library.
Specifically, there appears
On Fri, 26 May 2006 12:42:45 +0200, Jano wrote:
> Here's my situation:
>
> I have a computer with static IP and always on, where I run a fairly well
> connected .7 node. I'd like to use that node for freenet browsing from
> remote computers which have dynamic IPs. Setting transient nodes in each
Okay. I just downloaded a splitfile and it seems to have come through
intact. However, now the column where the download percentage was reads
"FIXME". Shouldn't it be "Done" ?-)
Using "Freenet 0.7 Build #738 r8863" according to FProxy...
Okay. I just downloaded a splitfile and it seems to have come through
intact. However, now the column where the download percentage was reads
FIXME. Shouldn't it be Done ?-)
Using Freenet 0.7 Build #738 r8863 according to FProxy...
___
Devl mailing
On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:23:05 +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:07:50 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>
>> * Jusa Saari
>> [2006-05-23 22:59:09]:
>>
>>> I would, but the bug tracker seems to be slashdotted. Not a good sign
>&g
On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:07:50 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> * Jusa Saari
> [2006-05-23 22:59:09]:
>
>> I would, but the bug tracker seems to be slashdotted. Not a good sign
>> ;).
>
> works for me : try https://bugs.freenetproject.org/
>>
>> I'm hap
.org/ ? We get a lot of bug reports, and we
> need people to use the bugtracker so that issues don't fall off our todo
> list.
>
> Ian.
>
> On 23 May 2006, at 10:05, Jusa Saari wrote:
>
>> Well, I just installed Freenet to try the Darknet (anyone interested in
>>
On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:07:50 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Jusa Saari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2006-05-23 22:59:09]:
I would, but the bug tracker seems to be slashdotted. Not a good sign
;).
works for me : try https://bugs.freenetproject.org/
I'm happy to report, however, that I got
On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:23:05 +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:07:50 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Jusa Saari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2006-05-23 22:59:09]:
I would, but the bug tracker seems to be slashdotted. Not a good sign
;).
works for me : try https
? We get a lot of bug reports, and we
> need people to use the bugtracker so that issues don't fall off our todo
> list.
>
> Ian.
>
> On 23 May 2006, at 10:05, Jusa Saari wrote:
>
>> Well, I just installed Freenet to try the Darknet (anyone interested in
>> pass
Well, I just installed Freenet to try the Darknet (anyone interested in
passing refs ? Don't know anyone running Freenet IRL :( ), and the
installation still seems to need a little work. Specifically, I got the
following error messages:
[exec] CreateDesktopShortcut.sh: line 4:
Well, I just installed Freenet to try the Darknet (anyone interested in
passing refs ? Don't know anyone running Freenet IRL :( ), and the
installation still seems to need a little work. Specifically, I got the
following error messages:
[exec] CreateDesktopShortcut.sh: line 4:
reports, and we
need people to use the bugtracker so that issues don't fall off our todo
list.
Ian.
On 23 May 2006, at 10:05, Jusa Saari wrote:
Well, I just installed Freenet to try the Darknet (anyone interested in
passing refs ? Don't know anyone running Freenet IRL
of bug reports, and we
need people to use the bugtracker so that issues don't fall off our todo
list.
Ian.
On 23 May 2006, at 10:05, Jusa Saari wrote:
Well, I just installed Freenet to try the Darknet (anyone interested in
passing refs ? Don't know anyone running Freenet IRL
Is this actually load balancing ? It sounds more like load limiting.
Is there ever a situation where a message is forwarded to any but the
optimal (from purely routing perspective, without any account for load)
node ?
I'm asking because I just came to think about a really nasty interaction
Is this actually load balancing ? It sounds more like load limiting.
Is there ever a situation where a message is forwarded to any but the
optimal (from purely routing perspective, without any account for load)
node ?
I'm asking because I just came to think about a really nasty interaction
Geometric mean is still vulnerable to this, just less so than arithmethic
mean. Besides, it is likely much more expensive computationally - or do
modern day chips come with instructions to calculate the Nth root (could
be, I haven't really examined their capabilities) ?
Is there any particular
Geometric mean is still vulnerable to this, just less so than arithmethic
mean. Besides, it is likely much more expensive computationally - or do
modern day chips come with instructions to calculate the Nth root (could
be, I haven't really examined their capabilities) ?
Is there any particular
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 12:16:54 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:09:34PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> On 2 Sep 2005, at 12:01, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> >Excellent idea. Implies we have a web interface to the queue, which
>> >IMHO
>> >is important anyway. Ian disagrees
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 12:16:54 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:09:34PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
On 2 Sep 2005, at 12:01, Matthew Toseland wrote:
Excellent idea. Implies we have a web interface to the queue, which
IMHO
is important anyway. Ian disagrees though. :|
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:36:29 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:43:10AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> What, if anything, prevents FCP from being backwards compatible? It
>> would be a shame if 3rd party apps like Frost had to be completely
>> redesigned unnecessarily.
>
>
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 14:36:29 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:43:10AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote:
What, if anything, prevents FCP from being backwards compatible? It
would be a shame if 3rd party apps like Frost had to be completely
redesigned unnecessarily.
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 01:20:50 +, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:37:29AM +0200, Jusa Saari wrote:
I'm running stable build 5046. Currently, I have 49 nodes in my routing
table, 45 which are contacted. Of these 45, only 4 a not backed off
currently. At no time have I observed more
I'm running stable build 5046. Currently, I have 49 nodes in my routing
table, 45 which are contacted. Of these 45, only 4 a not backed off
currently. At no time have I observed more than 6 nodes being not backed
up.
Now then. If I understood correctly, this means that my node only has 4
other
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:14:23 -0500, Andrew Rodland wrote:
BTW. Wasn't the whole point of NGRouting to ease the development by
allowing one to improve the algorithm simply by comparing the estimated
and observed routing times - the closer they are, the better ? Wouldn't it
make sense to
My node has recently pushed the Probability of success of an
incoming request maximum from 2 (been there from since NGRouting came to
unstable) to 4.5. Also, the datastore, incoming requests and succesfull
incoming requests are showing signs of specializations; very faint, but
what's interesting
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
