Walter Bright Wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/7uys8/porting_d_to_the_mac/
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblogshow=Porting-D-to-the-Mac-Pt.-2.htmlItemid=29
great stuff :D
Great stuff!
Expect window's version!
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which
means that you
David Ferenczi Wrote:
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
implementation of signals and slots(thanks to great people
ideage Wrote:
Great stuff!
Expect window's version!
I will probably do it in couple of weeks. Don't have time now :(
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first implementation of
signals and slots(thanks to great people from #d) which means that you can
actually start doing something useful. 0.1 is probably most suitable tag for
this release. Again - see tutorials
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
David Ferenczi Wrote:
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
implementation of signals and
Daniel Keep escribió:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
David Ferenczi Wrote:
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
implementation
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gmfo1e$2kt...@digitalmars.com...
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
David Ferenczi Wrote:
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:gmfr9m$2u5...@digitalmars.com...
Plus, notice that you can't open one of the files in a new tab without it
*also* opening in the same tab.
Clarification: That problem seems to happen on Ctrl-Click, but not
Right-Click-Open In New Tab.
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gmfujj$2t...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Daniel Keep escribió:
No files in this directory.
Well that sucks. Oh well, I... hey, wait a second...
*unblocks javascript*
No files in this directory, but there ARE
BCS wrote:
Reply to Bill,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
You want to use JS to make the site more usable? That's great! But
you DO NOT break basic functionality to do it. EVER. If you can't
figure out how, you're not qualified to be
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
lol :)
Yeah, well, for a directory listing they could have shown the full tree,
but if it's too big then it's ugly, and browsing folder by folder (like
dsource) is slow for me.
The point is that instead of giving you a sub-optimal but functional
alternative, they
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.658.1233882921.22690.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions I'm not exaggerating when I say
that for a few months before I found that addon, using the web was so bad
I
was *very* close to
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.658.1233882921.22690.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions I'm not exaggerating when I say
that for a few months before I found that addon, using the web was so bad
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gmg4av$dq...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
lol :)
Yeah, well, for a directory listing they could have shown the full tree,
but if it's too big then it's ugly, and browsing folder by folder (like
dsource) is slow for
Hello Bill,
http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions I'm not exaggerating when I
say that for a few months before I found that addon, using the web
was so bad I was *very* close to abandoning use of the web entirely.
What kind of sites do you go that are so bad? I find things a little
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Interesting side note: I've noticed that such flash-only pages and sites
seem to be by far the most common among musicians and restaurant chains.
Yup; I *hate* looking up tour dates.
Don't get me started on actual Flash development... (I have the
oh-so-wonderful luck
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Daniel Keepdaniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gmfujj$2t...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Daniel Keep escribió:
No files in this directory.
Well that sucks. Oh well, I... hey, wait a second...
*unblocks javascript*
No files in this
Hello Chris,
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Daniel Keepdaniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gmfujj$2t...@digitalmars.com...
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Daniel Keep escribió:
No files in this directory.
Well that sucks. Oh well, I... hey, wait a second...
*unblocks javascript*
No
But... why Javascript hurts you that much? What did it do to you?
Yesterday, I was on digitalmars.com, browsing the archive for the D
newsgroup. Actually, I just had it open in a tab, and was actively
browsing another website. I wondered why the browser had such a bad
response. Finally, I
Daniel Keep wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
David Ferenczi Wrote:
I'm glad to see this release and the progress of qtd!
Coudl you please provide a link to the tutrial? Many thanks!
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
It didn't take very long after previous post to make a first
implementation of
Daniel Keep daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gmg4oj$dq...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.658.1233882921.22690.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions I'm not
Do I see correctly, that you didn't need to introduce a MOC compiler for
D? And that the Signal and Slots implementation is written in pure D?
grauzone n...@example.net wrote in message
news:gmgjou$1af...@digitalmars.com...
But... why Javascript hurts you that much? What did it do to you?
Another example is Candydoc. That tree on the left is awful JavaScript
hackery. It only works if JS is enabled, and even then it is slow,
bearophile Wrote:
C#2 has lambdas, and C#3 adds closures and more type inferencing, so C#3+
supports the following syntaxes:
(int i) = { return i % 3 == 1; } // C#2
i = i % 3 == 1 // C#3
i = { return i % 3 == 1; } // C#3, with statements too
To define a delegate o delegate closure:
Hi,
I just found a bug that comes out of the property syntax.
The property syntax is great in that it allows a smooth transition from simple
code dealing with public member variables to the use of interfaces without
needing to update the client code.
i.e. A.bob = 1 can stay as A.bob = 1 when
Walter Bright wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Is it really that hard? Can't you just detect this case (non-void
function without a 'return' at the end but with inline asm inside)?
Since the compiler should know the calling convention[1], the register
that will contain the return value of the
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:32:15 +0300, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
C#2 has lambdas, and C#3 adds closures and more type inferencing, so
C#3+ supports the following syntaxes:
(int i) = { return i % 3 == 1; } // C#2
i = i % 3 == 1 // C#3
i = { return i % 3 == 1; } // C#3, with
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Is it really that hard? Can't you just detect this case (non-void
function without a 'return' at the end but with inline asm inside)?
Since the compiler should know the calling convention[1], the
register that will contain
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:21:54 +0300, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Is it really that hard? Can't you just detect this case (non-void
function without a 'return' at the end but with inline asm inside)?
Since the compiler
http://michelf.com/weblog/2009/non-fragile-abi-in-d/
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
Michel Fortin wrote:
http://michelf.com/weblog/2009/non-fragile-abi-in-d/
Summary of the upcoming discussion: use interfaces!
You should preemptively list reasons, why this is not enough.
Kagamin wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
C#2 has lambdas, and C#3 adds closures and more type inferencing, so C#3+
supports the following syntaxes:
(int i) = { return i % 3 == 1; } // C#2
i = i % 3 == 1 // C#3
i = { return i % 3 == 1; } // C#3, with statements too
To define a delegate o delegate
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:32:15 +0300, Kagamin s...@here.lot wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
C#2 has lambdas, and C#3 adds closures and more type inferencing, so
C#3+ supports the following syntaxes:
(int i) = { return i % 3 == 1; } // C#2
i = i % 3 == 1 // C#3
i = { return i %
dsimcha wrote:
snip
Good idea. Stupid question, though: Where the heck is the account creation
page
so I can create wiki4d account and post some info to this page?
There isn't one. You just give yourself a username in the preferences
and then you're ready to go.
What I see above is a smörgåsbord of syntaxes that shoot all over the
proverbial barn door in the hope that one of them would strike someone's
fancy. That strikes me as a rather lousily done job. Also, it is my
I find this statement rather ironic, because you also seem to be quite
happy with
== Quote from Stewart Gordon (smjg_1...@yahoo.com)'s article
dsimcha wrote:
snip
Good idea. Stupid question, though: Where the heck is the account
creation page
so I can create wiki4d account and post some info to this page?
There isn't one. You just give yourself a username in the
grauzone wrote:
What I see above is a smörgåsbord of syntaxes that shoot all over the
proverbial barn door in the hope that one of them would strike
someone's fancy. That strikes me as a rather lousily done job. Also,
it is my
I find this statement rather ironic, because you also seem to be
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:25:05 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:46:29 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Max Samukha wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:01:29 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Frits van Bommel
fvbom...@remwovexcapss.nl wrote:
Don wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Is it really that hard? Can't you just detect this case (non-void
function without a 'return' at the end but with inline asm
dsimcha wrote:
snip
Invalid username dsimcha not stored.
server time: February 5, 2009 8:54
local time: February 5, 2009 16:54
The preferences have been saved.
No matter what I do I can't get wiki4d to actually let me edit anything.
AIUI your username needs to be BiCapitalised, like the
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Frits van Bommel
fvbom...@remwovexcapss.nl wrote:
Don wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Is it really that hard? Can't you just detect this case (non-void
function without a 'return' at the
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:55:46 -0500, Alex Burton alex...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
I just found a bug that comes out of the property syntax.
The property syntax is great in that it allows a smooth transition from
simple code dealing with public member variables to the use of
interfaces without
Reply to Nick,
This way, it's impossible to take valid code, add or remove a
semicolon, and still have valid code (which I think was your main
concern?).
I think that way can be made even stronger my making the delegate/block need
a trailing ';' (it's a function call after all) where a bare
Reply to Andrei,
Kagamin wrote:
Also,
it is my perception (and not only mine) that C#'s creator completely
missed the power of templates and generative programming.
I have never met the man, but it is my impression that Anders didn't miss
the power, he just doesn't care for the paradigm. I
hsyl20 wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
The first notation _ % 2 == 0 has no boilerplate and Scala is statically
typed (unlike Python).
I like that very much, especially since you can use either the implicit _ or
a manually named var. Although I would prefer something like a, b, etc,
(or maybe
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:55:46 -0500, Alex Burton alex...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
I just found a bug that comes out of the property syntax.
The property syntax is great in that it allows a smooth transition from
simple code
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:27:27 -0500, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:55:46 -0500, Alex Burton alex...@mac.com wrote:
int main()
{
B b;
b.a.j = 10; // error b.a is a temporary.
}
BCS wrote:
Why use this:
func(someInt) { |a,b| return a+b; };
when you can reuse syntax and get this for the same amount of typeing
func(someInt) (a,b){ return a+b; };
While I know the compiler could (should) know the difference easily
enough, my eyes want to parse that as a chained
Reply to Yigal,
Personally I prefer to have syntax for blocks like Ruby/smalltalk.
given the following example function:
int func(int a, delegate int(int) dg) { .. }
// call func with [something in this spirit is my favorite]:
func(someInt) { | int a, int b | return a+b; };
how about require
Kagamin wrote:
Yeah, C# lambdas are the killer feature. Slick, readable, C-compatible. Anders
knows his job. Let's face it: delegate literals suck a little, mixins as
delegates suck a lot, the former is too verbose, the latter just sucks.
C# delegates in C# 2.0 are annoying. I try not to use
Christopher Wright dhase...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:gmfsqa$311...@digitalmars.com...
Kagamin wrote:
Yeah, C# lambdas are the killer feature. Slick, readable, C-compatible.
Anders knows his job. Let's face it: delegate literals suck a little,
mixins as delegates suck a lot, the
Robert Jacques Wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:55:46 -0500, Alex Burton alex...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
I just found a bug that comes out of the property syntax.
The property syntax is great in that it allows a smooth transition from
simple code dealing with public member variables to
Alex Burton wrote:
Hi,
I just found a bug that comes out of the property syntax.
Yep, as was said, this is a feature.
Sadly I forget why, but I'm pretty sure ref returning doesn't solve all
of the problems with properties, just this one (sorta). Also, D1
doesn't have ref returns, so if
Robert Jacques Wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:27:27 -0500, Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:55:46 -0500, Alex Burton alex...@mac.com wrote:
int main()
{
B b;
b.a.j = 10; //
Frits van Bommel wrote:
His approach depends on DMD directly emitting x86 machine code, so it
can just emit 'RET' and be done with it.
LDC on the other hand needs to emit LLVM asm, which requires it to
specify an explicit return value. My approach is a way to extract that
return value from
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:26:03 -0500, Alex Burton alex...@mac.com wrote:
Robert Jacques Wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 06:55:46 -0500, Alex Burton alex...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
I just found a bug that comes out of the property syntax.
The property syntax is great in that it allows a smooth
Chad J wrote:
Alex Burton wrote:
Hi,
I just found a bug that comes out of the property syntax.
Yep, as was said, this is a feature.
Sadly I forget why, but I'm pretty sure ref returning doesn't solve all
of the problems with properties, just this one (sorta). Also, D1
doesn't have ref
I was coding a simple Euclidean distance function with limit:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (; !a.empty; a.next, b.next)
{
enforce(!b.empty);
auto t = a.head - b.head;
result += t *
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was coding a simple Euclidean distance function with limit:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (; !a.empty; a.next, b.next)
{
enforce(!b.empty);
auto t =
On 2009-02-05 12:53:07 -0500, BCS a...@pathlink.com said:
What I would like to see is the vtbl offsets being patched up by the
linker. That way the vtbl can be reordered with impunity and you only
need to re link. You still can't get binary compatibility for DLL/SO's
(unless loading them does
Hello Andrei,
I was coding a simple Euclidean distance function with limit:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (; !a.empty; a.next, b.next)
{
enforce(!b.empty);
auto t = a.head - b.head;
result += t * t;
if (result = limit)
BCS wrote:
Reply to Yigal,
Personally I prefer to have syntax for blocks like Ruby/smalltalk.
given the following example function:
int func(int a, delegate int(int) dg) { .. }
// call func with [something in this spirit is my favorite]:
func(someInt) { | int a, int b | return a+b; };
how
On 2009-02-05 08:51:39 -0500, grauzone n...@example.net said:
Summary of the upcoming discussion: use interfaces!
You should preemptively list reasons, why this is not enough.
Well, you can't create a subclass and override functions if only the
interface is exposed. In fact, exposing only
Christopher Wright wrote:
C#:
delegate void SomeName(int i);
void foo(SomeName dg);
Ugh, don't remind me!
Robert Fraser wrote:
Which looks even worse. IMO, this is the perfect place for goto -- small
function, used only for an exit condition. There's no spaghetti code
here at all. I know goto used to be abused back in the day, but it has
its place.
Oh, I agree. I didn't say that in my response
Brad Roberts wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Which looks even worse. IMO, this is the perfect place for goto -- small
function, used only for an exit condition. There's no spaghetti code
here at all. I know goto used to be abused back in the day, but it has
its place.
Oh, I agree. I didn't say
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was coding a simple Euclidean distance function with limit:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (; !a.empty; a.next, b.next)
{
enforce(!b.empty);
auto t = a.head -
Chris R Miller wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah, same here. I seem to finally have found one of the elusive cases
when goto simplifies things.
About Brad's variant - ranges don't define clear, but assigning b =
b.init does the trick. (I personally still find the goto version
marginally
Walter Bright wrote:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (; 1; a.next, b.next)
{
if (a.empty)
{
enforce(b.empty);
break;
}
enforce(!b.empty);
auto t
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
He tried a test to narrow the area of specialty. He put each man in a
room with a stove, a table, and a pot of water on the table. He said
Boil the water. Both men moved the pot from the table to the
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (; 1; a.next, b.next)
{
if (a.empty)
{
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:37:35 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was coding a simple Euclidean distance function with limit:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (; !a.empty; a.next, b.next)
{
Robert Fraser wrote:
BCS wrote:
Reply to Yigal,
Personally I prefer to have syntax for blocks like Ruby/smalltalk.
given the following example function:
int func(int a, delegate int(int) dg) { .. }
// call func with [something in this spirit is my favorite]:
func(someInt) { | int a, int b |
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:gmgb9u$qk...@digitalmars.com...
I was coding a simple Euclidean distance function with limit:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (;
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:gmgb9u$qk...@digitalmars.com...
I was coding a simple Euclidean distance function with limit:
double euclideanDistance(Range)(Range a, Range b, double limit)
{
limit *= limit;
double result = 0;
for (;
In the web-source of hius adventure-game
http://www-cs-staff.stanford.edu/~uno/programs/advent.w.gz
Knuth comments (resp. warns the reader):
By the way, if you don't like |goto| statements, don't read this. (And
don't
read any other programs that simulate multistate systems.)
Don Knuth,
Weed Wrote:
I just would like that D could substitute C++ completely in all
applications...
D can do it. Phobos and Tango - can't.
Weed wrote:
I just would like that D could substitute C++ completely in all
applications...
D2 can easily, but it seems there is not so much interest if measured by
what library code is available. D1 can do too, but if you want to use raii
for memory management D2 has better facilities.
In
Chris Nicholson-Sauls Wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
taqya wrote:
snip
char[] a = a.dup;
char[] b = b.dup;
writefln(a + b); //Error: Array operations not implemented
snip
If so, the error informs you why you can't do that.
snip
Except that
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
snip
Suggest: Array operation 'OP' not implemented for type T[].
Where OP is here '+' and T is here char.
It doesn't quite work like that. AIUI the only supported way of using
array operations is assigning the result to an array slice, which this
isn't.
And
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
snip
Suggest: Array operation 'OP' not implemented for type T[].
Where OP is here '+' and T is here char.
It doesn't quite work like that. AIUI the only supported way of using
array operations is assigning the result to an array slice,
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
--- Comment #2 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-02-05 04:16 ---
that's not a bug if you look at it a different way; -o- is to allow generating
ddoc output without having to run everything.
not everything, just object file generation
zorran Wrote:
in Delphi, C#, and many C++ compilers - All OK!
Why?
it can reduce popularity D!
Russian text not needs two-byte code-page! its not Chinese!
In C# all strings are two-byte encoded (UTF-16), in C++ L... strings are
(usually) two-byte encoded, Delphi is a legacy technology, but
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
--- Comment #3 from shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu 2009-02-05 11:58 ---
At some point I home that DMD will actual do more semantic stuff under -o- as
then I can get DDoc output for generated code. However even then DMD should
only do
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
--- Comment #4 from to...@famolsen.dk 2009-02-05 12:07 ---
DMD actually does quite a bit of error handling during code generation. I've
been hit by this several times in LDC, where it means that quite a lot of the
time, you can't be
BigInt b = 10;
foreach( i; 1..20 ){
b*=10;
writeln(b*b);
}
system: Windows
CPU: Intel Core2 Duo T7250 2.00GHz
result:
1
100
1
100
1
100
81553255926290448384
100
88 matches
Mail list logo
