On Sunday 13 February 2011 22:51:02 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> "Caligo" wrote in message
> news:mailman.1613.1297648969.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> > Qt is not an open source project. Qt is Free software (GPL/LGPL) which
> > is also dual licensed (commercial license) for development of
"Caligo" wrote in message
news:mailman.1613.1297648969.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> Qt is not an open source project. Qt is Free software (GPL/LGPL) which is
> also dual licensed (commercial license) for development of proprietary and
> commercial software. Even if Microsoft was the
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Having just landed a new job, I can now say that I will be using D in that
job (but aren't using it yet).
Please keep us posted!
On Sunday 13 February 2011 21:59:58 Simen kjaeraas wrote:
> Robert Clipsham wrote:
> > Having seen a post by Peter Alexander (in Re: D for game development),
> > mentioning some of the issues he's hit I thought I'd post this. I've
> > been in his shoes (every other time I use D it seems), and feel
Good hint. I found some pre-built binaries at
http://dsource.org/projects/multiarray , Bill Baxter's old project. I
tested them (superficially) and they WORK on Windows w/ DMD 2.052 beta
and SciD SVN. Lars, please post this zip file somewhere on your SciD
site so that other Windows users who
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:47:30 +0200, Alan Smithee wrote:
Gary Whatmore Wrote (fixed that for you):
Let's try to act reasonable here. Walter fanboyism is already
getting old and sadly favored by our famous NG trolls, that is
pretty much everyone here. I wouldn't be shocked to hear this Gary
What
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Having seen a post by Peter Alexander (in Re: D for game development),
mentioning some of the issues he's hit I thought I'd post this. I've
been in his shoes (every other time I use D it seems), and feel I should
ask - who here uses D, and to what extent?
I'm mostl
Sorry this was a completely unintentional error --- I meant to say "in case
anyone
doubts Gary's post". Blame the lateness of the night and/or my annoyingly lossy
wireless keyboard.
Kevin
> our famous Reddit trolls, that is retard = uriel = eternium = lurker
In case anyone doubts gay's guess... for those who don't follow entertainment
trivia, Alan Smithee is a pseudonym used by directors disowning a film (google
it). So anyone using this name is actually effectively *claiming* to
bearophile wrote:
Walter:
The inline assembler can't do everything a standalone assembler can, but
what it does it does well enough, and is a pleasure (to me) to use.
The D inline assembler has another purpose you have not underlined: it's a
didactic tool to learn some assembly without nothin
On 2/13/11 2:05 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
golgeliyele wrote:
2. dmd compiler's command line options:
This is mostly an esthetic issue. However, it is like the entrance to
your house. People who are not sure about entering in
care about what it looks like from the outside. If Walter is willing,
On 02/07/2011 05:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 2/7/11 3:18 PM, Matthias Walter wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> as I'm currently working on a C++ project which involves gcd
>> computations I had a quick look at phobos' implementation.
>>
>> 1. First thing I saw is that gcd(-3,6) raises an exce
"nedbrek" wrote:
>
> Yes, I am also using some tricks I found on the web to support building
> outside of the source tree.
>
> I currently have all the dependendcies in one file, and regenerate manually.
> I have gotten auto-dependency generation to work with C++ (it is just a
> matter of bre
Unfortunately DMC is always out of the
question because the performance is 10-20 behind competition, fast
compilation won't help it.
Can you please give a few links on this?
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:01:53 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a
useful improvement.
I agree with that, but there's a
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:58:48 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
so wrote:
If you are against this reasoning, i don't have any idea why D has
inline assembly, which again targets a very small audience.
The inline assembler is s much easier to deal with than the
miserable, fugly assemblers f
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Nick_B wrote:
> Here is a comment by Jeff_S, near the bottom of the comments re Microsoft
> taking over Nokia.
>
> I now worry that the wonderful Qt C++ GUI library, that Nokia now owns with
> it's acquisition of Trolltech a few years ago, will now founder in
> sta
On Sunday 13 February 2011 16:09:43 Nick_B wrote:
> Here is a comment by Jeff_S, near the bottom of the comments re
> Microsoft taking over Nokia.
>
> I now worry that the wonderful Qt C++ GUI library, that Nokia now owns
> with it's acquisition of Trolltech a few years ago, will now founder in
>
Hello,
"gölgeliyele" wrote in message
news:9f28e8ed-939d-4edb-ab1f-0a4f9b72da44%usul...@gmail.com...
>>
>> I use an incremental build with Makefiles.
>>
> Can you tell me how you used incremental build with Makefiles? I
> don't know much about D1, but it most likely has similar module and
> bui
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:01:53 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a
useful improvement.
I agree with that, but there's a caveat. I did such
>
> I use an incremental build with Makefiles.
>
> Hope that helps,
> Ned
Hi,
Can you tell me how you used incremental build with Makefiles? I
don't know much about D1, but it most likely has similar module and
build support as D2. I have been playing around with incremental build
with d
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:03:42 +1300, Nick_B wrote:
> I'm also scratching my head on this, in terms of what Nokia gets out of
> this. They are essentially trading a larger, more successful, more
> established, platform and ecosystem (Symbian) and large developer mind
> share, for a much smaller, much l
Hello all,
(there are a lot of posts here! Just getting to this one :)
"Robert Clipsham" wrote in message
news:ifo9jd$1kt9$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Having seen a post by Peter Alexander (in Re: D for game development),
> mentioning some of the issues he's hit I thought I'd post this. I've bee
Adam D. Ruppe:
> All of this has been done, and caught on to a huge degree.
> They called that asm+types language "C"
This is part of what I was referring to:
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/talc/
Bye,
bearophile
Here is a comment by Jeff_S, near the bottom of the comments re
Microsoft taking over Nokia.
I now worry that the wonderful Qt C++ GUI library, that Nokia now owns
with it's acquisition of Trolltech a few years ago, will now founder in
stagnation.
The optimist in me hopes that it will por
bearophile wrote:
> There is not much intrinsic in the asm language that forces people
> to not define and use a good type system on asm instructions to
> catch programming bugs, to indent asm code well, to use a modern
> IDE on asm code, and so on.
All of this has been done, and caught on to a hu
Here is a comment by Jeff_S, near the bottom of the comments re
Microsoft taking over Nokia.
I now worry that the wonderful Qt C++ GUI library, that Nokia now owns
with it's acquisition of Trolltech a few years ago, will now founder in
stagnation.
The optimist in me hopes that it will ported
Walter:
> The inline assembler can't do everything a standalone assembler can, but what
> it
> does it does well enough, and is a pleasure (to me) to use.
The D inline assembler has another purpose you have not underlined: it's a
didactic tool to learn some assembly without nothing but the nor
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:06:46 -0800, Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 3:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Michel Fortin wrote:
>>> But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
>>> for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a
>>> useful improvement.
>>
>>
On 2/13/2011 3:01 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Michel Fortin wrote:
>> But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically for
>> demangled names for missing symbols. This by
>> itself would be a useful improvement.
>
> I agree with that, but there's a caveat. I did such a thing y
Michel Fortin wrote:
But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a
useful improvement.
I agree with that, but there's a caveat. I did such a thing years ago for C++
and Optlink. Nobody cared, including
so wrote:
If you are against this reasoning, i don't have any idea why D has
inline assembly, which again targets a very small audience.
The inline assembler is s much easier to deal with than the miserable, fugly
assemblers found on the various systems.
The Linux as assembler is designe
On 2011-02-13 16:37:19 -0500, Walter Bright said:
Michel Fortin wrote:
Parsing error messages is a problem indeed. But demangling symbol names
is easy.
Demangling doesn't get us where golgeliyele wants to go.
Correct.
But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
Gölgeliyele wrote:
Can the D logo (as in the github site:
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1fe90c0586802aee103ff9ac0b8f3fbe?s=140&d=https://github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png)
located on the left top area where the digital mars logo used to sit?
the empty space looks a little
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Alan Smithee wrote:
> Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
>
>> "Perhaps"? Well, is it or isn't it? Are we supposed to just assume
> that lack of use means it's actually broken and not just unpopular?
>
> Assume it's broken or demonstrate large projects written in D to
> show th
Agreed. These things might make D appear like less of a joke, thus
attracting more hapless users to their subsequent dismay.
On 02/13/2011 10:35 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"spir" wrote in message
news:mailman.1602.1297626622.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Also, I really miss a D for D lexical- syntactic- semantic- analyser that
would produce D data structures. This would open the door hoards of
projects, includ
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
> "Perhaps"? Well, is it or isn't it? Are we supposed to just assume
that lack of use means it's actually broken and not just unpopular?
Assume it's broken or demonstrate large projects written in D to
show that it CAN be unpopular because something else makes up for
it.
>
Andrej Mitrovic:
> I'm getting more and more convinced to join the iota camp. The new
> syntax barely saves any characters, and is potentially confusing.
Simen kjaeraas:
> This is also an interesting point. If a..b were to be a separate type,
> opSlice would no longer need to exist, it could be
Hello,
Back to the subject of using unittest and assert. I'll try to illustrate a
testing style that seems to be rare in the D community, is not properly
supported by D builtin tools --while this would require only minimal
improvements--, and is imo rather sensible, practicle and efficient. U
Michel Fortin wrote:
Parsing error messages is a problem indeed. But demangling symbol names
is easy.
Demangling doesn't get us where golgeliyele wants to go.
"spir" wrote in message
news:mailman.1602.1297626622.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>
> Also, I really miss a D for D lexical- syntactic- semantic- analyser that
> would produce D data structures. This would open the door hoards of
> projects, including tool chain elements, meta-studies on
"Alan Smithee" wrote in message
news:ij967s$12rb$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
>
>> Could you elaborate on that? Aren't .di files supposed to be auto-
> generated by the compiler, and not hand-written?
>
> Yea, aren't they? How come no one uses that feature? Perhaps it's
> intr
Hi,
this is what I miss in D and Go.
Most developers that only used C and C++ aren't aware how easy it is to
compile applications in more
modern languages.
It is funny that both D and Go advertise their compilation speed, when I was
used to fast compilation since
the MS-DOS days with Turbo Pas
Hi,
now I am conviced. Thanks for the explanation.
--
Paulo
"Walter Bright" wrote in message
news:ij99gb$18fm$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Paulo Pinto wrote:
>> Why C and not directly D?
>>
>> It is really bad adversting for D to know that when its creator came
>> around to rewrite the linker, W
On 02/13/2011 08:30 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
1. people just check out when they see pages and pages of wacky switches. Has
anyone ever actually read all of man gcc?
+ 12_000 /lines/ in my version
Denis
--
_
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
On 2011-02-13 14:38:20 -0500, Walter Bright said:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
It's not impossible, but is a tremendous amount of work in order to
improve one error message, and one error message that generations of C
and C++ programmers are comfortable dealing with.
What's wrong with parsing low-
On 02/13/2011 07:53 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Paulo Pinto wrote:
Why C and not directly D?
It is really bad adversting for D to know that when its creator came around
to rewrite the linker, Walter decided to use C instead of D.
That's a very good question.
The answer is in the technical detai
hyp wrote:
Hello,
I know you can easily get the base class of some class in D. However is
there any way to get a list of classes that inherit a given class?
I was reading around the docs, but couldn't find anything :/. But maybe
someone knows how to do it?
This question is probably bett
Lutger Blijdestijn wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Akakima wrote:
Changing the object module format is not sufficient. The symbolic debug
info would have to be changed (and Microsoft's is undocumented) and then
there's the dependency on Microsoft's C runtime library if linking with
VC generated ob
Walter Bright wrote:
> Akakima wrote:
>>> Changing the object module format is not sufficient. The symbolic debug
>>> info would have to be changed (and Microsoft's is undocumented) and then
>>> there's the dependency on Microsoft's C runtime library if linking with
>>> VC generated object files.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:38:23 -, Kevin Bealer
wrote:
I don't know if you can find all of them easily but you can find the
instantiated
ones by adding a line to the Foo constructor as shown here.
Two limits:
1. This doesn't report Bar itself since a Bar object is never created;
howeve
On 02/13/2011 04:07 PM, Gary Whatmore wrote:
his might sound like blasphemy, but I believe the skills and knowledge for
developing large scale applications in language XYZ cannot be extrapolated from
small code snippets or from experience with projects in other languages. You
just need to eat
gölgeliyele wrote:
...
>
> I think what we need here is numbers from a project that everyone has
> access to. What is the largest D project right now? Can we get numbers on
> that? How much time does it take to compile that project after a change
> (assuming we are feeding all .d files at once)?
Denis Koroskin wrote:
It's not impossible, but is a tremendous amount of work in order to
improve one error message, and one error message that generations of C
and C++ programmers are comfortable dealing with.
What's wrong with parsing low-level linker error messages and output
them in human
I don't know if you can find all of them easily but you can find the
instantiated
ones by adding a line to the Foo constructor as shown here.
Two limits:
1. This doesn't report Bar itself since a Bar object is never created; however
in
a sense a 'Bar' object was created when Baz and Qux are cre
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:12:02 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:26:50 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
golgeliyele wrote:
I don't think C++ and gcc set a good bar here.
Short of writing our own linker, we're a bit stuck with what ld does.
That's
bearophile wrote:
Walter:
With D, the D compiler will create ModuleInfo and TypeInfo objects, which
more or less rely on some sort of D runtime existing.
In LDC there are no_typeinfo (and in maybe no_moduleinfo) pragmas to disable
the generation of those for specific types/modules:
http://ww
gölgeliyele wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
golgeliyele wrote:
1. Difficult to understand linker errors due to missing main():
...
The problem is the main() can come from a library, or some other .obj file
handed to the compiler that the compiler doesn't look inside. It's a very
flexible way t
Walter:
> With D, the D compiler will create ModuleInfo and TypeInfo objects,
> which more or less rely on some sort of D runtime existing.
In LDC there are no_typeinfo (and in maybe no_moduleinfo) pragmas to disable
the generation of those for specific types/modules:
http://www.dsource.org/proj
Daniel Gibson wrote:
> Am 13.02.2011 20:01, schrieb gölgeliyele:
>> I don't think
>> supporting multiple compilation models is a good thing.
>>
>
> I think incremental compilation is a very useful feature for large projects so
> it should be available.
> Also the possibility to link in .o fi
On 02/13/2011 01:59 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
In C++, you get essentially the same thing from g++:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.5/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function
`_start':
(.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Lot of people come here be
Akakima wrote:
Changing the object module format is not sufficient. The symbolic debug
info would have to be changed (and Microsoft's is undocumented) and then
there's the dependency on Microsoft's C runtime library if linking with VC
generated object files.
I found some doc there:
http://
Walter Bright wrote:
> golgeliyele wrote:
>> 1. Difficult to understand linker errors due to missing main():
>> ...
>
> The problem is the main() can come from a library, or some other .obj file
> handed to the compiler that the compiler doesn't look inside. It's a very
> flexible way to buil
On 02/13/2011 01:17 PM, foobar wrote:
Lutger Blijdestijn Wrote:
first rule of usability: don't listen to users
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010805.html
I fail to see how that page ( which talks about website design ) applies to
what I've said.
It says that you should look at what peopl
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:26:50 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
golgeliyele wrote:
I don't think C++ and gcc set a good bar here.
Short of writing our own linker, we're a bit stuck with what ld does.
That's not true. The compiler has knowledge of what symbols will be
retard wrote:
I wish there were more news about D. This would bring us more reddit
threads and thus more bug fixes.
You can write articles about D and post them to reddit. What's holding you back?
gölgeliyele wrote:
I don't think
supporting multiple compilation models is a good thing.
I think it's necessary if one is to support both small and large projects, and
all the different ways one could use a D compiler as a tool.
Am 13.02.2011 20:01, schrieb gölgeliyele:
> I don't think
> supporting multiple compilation models is a good thing.
>
I think incremental compilation is a very useful feature for large projects so
it should be available.
Also the possibility to link in .o files that were generated from C code w
Lutger Blijdestijn wrote:
"Why use C instead of the D programming language? Certainly, D is usable for
such low level coding and, when programming at this level, there isn't a
practical difference between the two. The problem is that the system to
build Optlink uses some old tools that only wor
golgeliyele wrote:
1. Difficult to understand linker errors due to missing main():
Fixing this would be useful for newbies. If there is not already a defect on
this, I suggest we file a defect and it gets fixed
sometime. I am assuming that this can be caught before going to the linker.
Does d
On 02/13/2011 05:30 PM, Olli Aalto wrote:
I encountered a problem with alias this, when the aliased member is private.
I'm using the latest dmd2. It reports the follwing:
src\main.d(14): Error: struct K.K member s is not accessible
If I change the private modifier on the s member to public it wo
Walter Bright wrote:
> golgeliyele wrote:
>> I don't think C++ and gcc set a good bar here.
>
> Short of writing our own linker, we're a bit stuck with what ld does.
>
I am not necessarily questioning the use of ld (or a different linker on
a different platform). What intrigues me is: Is it
Paulo Pinto wrote:
Why C and not directly D?
It is really bad adversting for D to know that when its creator came around
to rewrite the linker, Walter decided to use C instead of D.
That's a very good question.
The answer is in the technical details of transitioning optlink from an all
asse
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:26:50 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
golgeliyele wrote:
I don't think C++ and gcc set a good bar here.
Short of writing our own linker, we're a bit stuck with what ld does.
That's not true. The compiler has knowledge of what symbols will be passed
to the linker, and
On 13.2.2011 19:40, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Olli Aalto wrote:
I encountered a problem with alias this, when the aliased member is
private. I'm using the latest dmd2. It reports the follwing:
src\main.d(14): Error: struct K.K member s is not accessible
If I change the private modifier on the s m
Hello,
I know you can easily get the base class of some class in D. However is
there any way to get a list of classes that inherit a given class?
I was reading around the docs, but couldn't find anything :/. But maybe
someone knows how to do it?
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Could you elaborate on that? Aren't .di files supposed to be
auto-generated by the compiler, and not hand-written?
You can do it either way.
In Phobos, you can find examples of both. In no instance are you worse off than
with C++ .h/.cpp files.
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:10:01 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 2/13/11, Alan Smithee wrote:
>> Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
>>
>>> Could you elaborate on that? Aren't .di files supposed to be auto-
>> generated by the compiler, and not hand-written?
>>
>> Yea, aren't they? How come no one uses that featu
golgeliyele wrote:
I don't think C++ and gcc set a good bar here.
Short of writing our own linker, we're a bit stuck with what ld does.
On 2/13/11, Alan Smithee wrote:
> Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
>
>> Could you elaborate on that? Aren't .di files supposed to be auto-
> generated by the compiler, and not hand-written?
>
> Yea, aren't they? How come no one uses that feature? Perhaps it's
> intrinsically broken? *hint hint*
>
>
> This N
Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
> Could you elaborate on that? Aren't .di files supposed to be auto-
generated by the compiler, and not hand-written?
Yea, aren't they? How come no one uses that feature? Perhaps it's
intrinsically broken? *hint hint*
This NG assumes a curious stance. Sprouting claims and
Can the D logo (as in the github site:
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1fe90c0586802aee103ff9ac0b8f3fbe?s=140&d=https://github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png)
located on the left top area where the digital mars logo used to sit?
the empty space looks a little strange.
-b
On 20
golgeliyele Wrote:
> It is a mistake to consider the language without the tooling that goes along
> with it. I think there is still time to recover from
> this error. Large projects are often build as a series of libraries. When the
> shared library problem is to be attacked, I think
> the tooli
Gary Whatmore Wrote (fixed that for you):
Let's try to act reasonable here. Walter fanboyism is already
getting old and sadly favored by our famous NG trolls, that is
pretty much everyone here. I wouldn't be shocked to hear this Gary
Whatmore will be bashing D in about 2 years' time when he realiz
Olli Aalto wrote:
I encountered a problem with alias this, when the aliased member is
private. I'm using the latest dmd2. It reports the follwing:
src\main.d(14): Error: struct K.K member s is not accessible
If I change the private modifier on the s member to public it works.
Is this as inten
Paulo Pinto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> still you don't convice me.
>
> So what language features has C that are missing from D and prevent a
> linker to be written in
> D?
>
> The issue is not if I can beat Walter, the issue is that we have a
> language which on its official
> home page states lots of re
On 2/13/11, Alan Smithee wrote:
>> You can do the same in D using .di files.
>
> Except no one really does that because such an approach is insanely
> error prone. E.g. with classes, you need to copy entire definitions.
> Change any ordering, forget a field, change a type, and you're having
> unde
Alan Smithee Wrote:
> > You can do the same in D using .di files.
>
> Except no one really does that because such an approach is insanely
> error prone. E.g. with classes, you need to copy entire definitions.
> Change any ordering, forget a field, change a type, and you're having
> undefined beha
I wonder if we can get something positive out of this discussion. I would like
to enumerate a few possibilities for the several
things we discussed:
1. Difficult to understand linker errors due to missing main():
Fixing this would be useful for newbies. If there is not already a defect on
this
> You can do the same in D using .di files.
Except no one really does that because such an approach is insanely
error prone. E.g. with classes, you need to copy entire definitions.
Change any ordering, forget a field, change a type, and you're having
undefined behavior.
How about eating your own
Hi,
still you don't convice me.
So what language features has C that are missing from D and prevent a linker
to be written in
D?
The issue is not if I can beat Walter, the issue is that we have a language
which on its official
home page states lots of reasons for using it instead of C and C++,
I encountered a problem with alias this, when the aliased member is
private. I'm using the latest dmd2. It reports the follwing:
src\main.d(14): Error: struct K.K member s is not accessible
If I change the private modifier on the s member to public it works.
Is this as intended, or a bug?
O.
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> On 2/13/11 3:15 AM, foobar wrote:
> > Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/11/11 7:07 AM, foobar wrote:
> >>> Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> >>>
>
> I don't find the name "iota" stupid.
>
> Andrei
> >>>
> >>> Of course _you_ don't. However practic
On 2/13/11, Gary Whatmore wrote:
> Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
>
>> I guess if you're not writing new templates in your code then
>> incremental compilation is possible?
>
> Exactly. What I did is a simple wrapper module for Phobos with
> preinstantiated non-templated functions for typical use cases. F
I don't think C++ and gcc set a good bar here.
Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
> I guess if you're not writing new templates in your code then
> incremental compilation is possible?
Exactly. What I did is a simple wrapper module for Phobos with preinstantiated
non-templated functions for typical use cases. For example there are few
wrappers for the
Paulo Pinto Wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry, but I don't belive it.
>
> Many other systems programming languages that atempted to displace C and
> C++, have
> the toolchain built in its languages, after the compilers were bootstrapped,
> as anyone
> with enough compiler knowledge will surely tell
I guess if you're not writing new templates in your code then
incremental compilation is possible?
I did collect some information on using DMD here (it's a bit
Windows-specific but my guess is it works similar on OSX):
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?D__Tutorial/CompilingLinkingD
If anyone has
Paulo Pinto Wrote:
> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
> news:ij7v76$1q4t$1...@digitalmars.com...
> > ... (cutted) ...
> >
> > That's not the compiler, that's the linker. I don't know what linker DMD
> > uses on OSX, but on Windows it uses OPTLINK which is written in
> > hand-optimized Asm so
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
