On 2011-10-05 05:50, Iain Buclaw wrote:
My worst kept secret is out.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=OTk2NA
This is great news.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 10/4/2011 11:50 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
My worst kept secret is out.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=OTk2NA
Awesome! Two things, though:
1. When will this actually happen? Is GCC 4.7 going to have GDC in it?
2. How will the impedance mismatch between DMD Front End's
Why not just write a redirect rule from the old D pages to the new ones?
On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:55 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 03:50:35 Iain Buclaw wrote:
My worst kept secret is out.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=OTk2NA
*Sigh* They gave
dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:j6hkec$7lb$1...@digitalmars.com...
2. How will the impedance mismatch between DMD Front End's fast release
cycle and GCC's slower release cycle be handled? I'm definitely not going
to use the official version of GDC packaged with my Linux
Maybe if this was posted on Reddit it would get some vocal support and
give the GNU guys reassurance that D is a sought-after language.
Anyway this is great news! Congrats to Iain Buclaw and anyone else who helped.
http://www.amazon.com/Garbage-Collection-Handbook-Management-Algorithms/dp/1420082795/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1317790242sr=1-1
I heard it's good.
Andrei
deadalnix:
This is why the type system is made for isn't it ?
Casts are often the points where type systems fail :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:55:19 -0400, Andrew Wiley wiley.andre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:54:58 -0400, Andrew Wiley wiley.andre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Walter Bright
On 10/4/2011 11:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Garbage-Collection-Handbook-Management-Algorithms/dp/1420082795/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1317790242sr=1-1
I heard it's good.
I have the older version:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471941484/classicempire
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:56:52 -0400, Andrew Wiley wiley.andre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Andrew Wiley wiley.andre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:54:58 -0400, Andrew Wiley
On 2011-10-04 21:39, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/4/11 12:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-04 17:48, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/04/11 09:09, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-04 13:21, Regan Heath wrote:
In this particular case, because these std,.getopt options are global
On 2011-10-05 03:49, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:54:27 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2011-10-04 17:14, Robert Jacques wrote:
I'm sorry, you're right. In my mind b extended to the end of the a
array, for some reason. However, if you do define b to extend to the
On 2011-10-05 04:40, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote:
On 2011-10-04 12:37, Kagamin wrote:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
What are the thoughts around here on function names containing arbitrary
symbols, like in Scala. Example:
void ::: (int a) {}
On 10/4/2011 2:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What are the thoughts around here on function names containing arbitrary
symbols, like in Scala. Example:
void ::: (int a) {}
This, in effect, means user defined tokens. The lexing pass will then become
intertwined with semantic analysis. While
I agree. But there's something that can be done to help make the
operators even more usable.
Example: named foreach loops over objects:
struct TestStruct
{
public:
this(string text) { _text = text.dup; }
int opApply(string name : text)(int delegate(ref dchar) dg)
{
int
I vaguely like the idea of using a trailing question mark in predicate names.
Thank you to all the people that have answered.
I don't like to write isFoo, I'd like to write foo?, but after the discussions
I presume this idea will not see the light in D :-|
Bye,
bearophile
Read my thread about thoughts on improving the operators.
Your idea might see the light after all :-)
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:42 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
I vaguely like the idea of using a trailing question mark in predicate names.
Thank you to all the people that have
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:26:26 +0300, Gor Gyolchanyan
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote:
Example: named foreach loops over objects:
You can achieve almost exactly this by iterating over a delegate (define a
method with the same signature as opApply). The only change at the call
site is
I didn't know that was possible! Thanks!
But the case with the ternary operator is the most interesting one.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:26:26 +0300, Gor Gyolchanyan
gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote:
Example:
Gor Gyolchanyan , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146100), a écrit :
I agree. But there's something that can be done to help make the
operators even more usable.
Example: named foreach loops over objects:
struct TestStruct
{
public:
this(string text) { _text = text.dup; }
int
The whole point was to put the question mark to a better use.
I mean, it's used in the ternary operator exclusively.
It's such a waste of a token.
The question mark logically belongs to bools (which goes good with the
ternary operator), but the bools are much more ofter worked with in
the form of
Le 05/10/2011 05:38, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 10/4/11 9:50 PM, Caligo wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org mailto:seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/__2011-10/msg00037.html
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:39:42 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 10/4/11 12:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-04 17:48, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/04/11 09:09, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-04 13:21, Regan Heath wrote:
In this particular case,
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:53:25 -0400, Regan Heath re...@netmail.co.nz
wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:39:42 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 10/4/11 12:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-10-04 17:48, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/04/11 09:09, Jacob
Le 04/10/2011 20:30, Walter Bright a écrit :
On 10/4/2011 2:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
With casts to immutable, it is perfectly correct if you, the user,
ensure that there are no other mutable references to the same data. It's
just that the compiler itself cannot make this guarantee, hence it's
Christophe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146070), a écrit :
On 10/4/11 2:39 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/4/11 12:05 PM, Christophe wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146060), a écrit :
I'm don't often use getopt just for the fact
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html
Andrei
This would be awesome. I hope it works out. What a great move.
Jens
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146111), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146070), a écrit :
On 10/4/11 2:39 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/4/11 12:05 PM, Christophe wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic , dans le message
Christophe wrote:
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146111), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146070), a écrit :
On 10/4/11 2:39 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/4/11 12:05 PM, Christophe wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic , dans le
So the next step is a manhunt for Dave F. Or a rewrite of the parts he
contributed?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00037.html
Andrei
On 10/5/11 6:53 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:39:42 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Did it ever prevent you from getting anything done with it?
That's not the question we should be asking. The question we should be
asking is, will anyone ever
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 16:24:32 Jens Mueller wrote:
However, the current way to parametrise getopt is to change the
character for options ('-'), and I belive the string for long option is
twice the character for short option (--). I don't think this makes
great sense. We could
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146114), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146111), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146070), a écrit :
On 10/4/11 2:39 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
At last you say something I can agree with in this thread.
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:03:11 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 10/5/11 6:53 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:39:42 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Did it ever prevent you from getting anything done with it?
On 10/5/11 10:27 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
I understand the issue, and the point you're making below, and I agree
completely. At the same time, this particular change being as simple as
it is, and as obviously beneficial as I hope I have managed to show,
would have taken less time to simply change
The reality is apps use many different sorts of argument passing
styles. Saying that one or the other is wrong is silly. Here's some
various flavors:
Firefox: firefox.exe -safe-mode www.mozilla.com
Scite: SciTE -import c:\os\web_work SciTEDoc.html
AVG: avgscanx.exe /comp /qt /priority=high /pwdw
On 10/5/11 10:12 AM, Christophe wrote:
One think I don't know regarding getopt, and that I didn't find in the
documentation (maybe because I didn't look close enough after having
found that -o output was not supported), is if the arguments are sorted
like in the c getopt, and how to get the
Christophe wrote:
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146114), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146111), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146070), a écrit :
On 10/4/11 2:39 PM, Andrei
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:06:35 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Garbage-Collection-Handbook-Management-Algorithms/dp/1420082795/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1317790242sr=1-1
I heard it's good.
Narihiro Nakamura (a.k.a author of japanese
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146124), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146114), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Jens Mueller , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146111), a écrit :
Christophe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu , dans le message
Andrei Alexandrescu , dans le message (digitalmars.D:146123), a écrit :
On 10/5/11 10:12 AM, Christophe wrote:
One think I don't know regarding getopt, and that I didn't find in the
documentation (maybe because I didn't look close enough after having
found that -o output was not supported), is
Maybe the correct approach is simply to try and eliminate the mutex protecting
GC operations so allocations can be performed concurrently by multiple threads?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Andrew Wiley wiley.andre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Robert
On 10/5/2011 6:25 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I see two solutions to deal with this :
Something allocated on a Thread local heap can be seen from other threads, and
this is safe as long as a reference is kept in the allocating thread.
So, if you cast something TL and mutable as immutable, you have to
On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/4/2011 11:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Garbage-Collection-Handbook-Management-Algorithms/dp/1420082795/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1317790242sr=1-1
I heard it's good.
I have the older version:
Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org writes:
So the next step is a manhunt for Dave F. Or a rewrite of the parts he
contributed?
How difficult is it to identify and rewrite the parts he contributed?
On 10/5/2011 11:46 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/4/2011 11:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Garbage-Collection-Handbook-Management-Algorithms/dp/1420082795/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1317790242sr=1-1
I heard it's
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 12:21:53 Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/5/2011 11:46 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/4/2011 11:06 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/Garbage-Collection-Handbook-Management-Algorit
On 2011-10-05 09:54, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/4/2011 2:46 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What are the thoughts around here on function names containing arbitrary
symbols, like in Scala. Example:
void ::: (int a) {}
This, in effect, means user defined tokens. The lexing pass will then
become
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote in message
news:mailman.23.1317827712.28623.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 16:24:32 Jens Mueller wrote:
However, the current way to parametrise getopt is to change the
character for options ('-'), and I belive the
Christophe trav...@phare.normalesup.org wrote in message
news:j6ho92$gtr$1...@digitalmars.com...
Well, too much parametrization is wrong. But the posix way has to be
supported, and it includes -o output (which is much more helpful than
-ooutput for readability and for auto-completion in the
On 10/5/2011 12:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
And D's GC can use all of the help that it can get.
It's not that bad. For one thing, it's reliable.
great news, will certainly help d a bit forward but will it be for d1 or d2?
On 10/5/2011 12:54 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Does Scala have the same problem?
I don't know enough about Scala to answer.
On 5/10/11 9:41 PM, maarten van damme wrote:
great news, will certainly help d a bit forward but will it be for d1 or
d2?
GDC is both I believe.
Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de wrote in message
news:mailman.21.1317824685.28623.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I think we have failed, if a significant number of users rather write
their own command line parsing than using the built-in one.
I suspect that what often happens is what
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:j6hrko$ni3$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 10/5/11 6:53 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:39:42 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Did it ever prevent you from getting anything done
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de wrote in message
news:mailman.21.1317824685.28623.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
I think we have failed, if a significant number of users rather write
their own command line parsing than using the built-in one.
I suspect that what
Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com wrote:
The whole point was to put the question mark to a better use.
I mean, it's used in the ternary operator exclusively.
It's such a waste of a token.
The question mark logically belongs to bools (which goes good with the
ternary operator), but
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 10/5/11 6:53 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:39:42 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Did it ever prevent you from getting anything done with it?
That's not the question we should be
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 13:39 Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/5/2011 12:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
And D's GC can use all of the help that it can get.
It's not that bad. For one thing, it's reliable.
Regardless of how good or bad it is, it needs all the help that it can get.
The GC
== Quote from Sean Kelly (s...@invisibleduck.org)'s article
So the next step is a manhunt for Dave F. Or a rewrite of the parts he contr
ibuted?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail@erdani.o
rg wrote:
On 10/05/11 16:37, kennytm wrote:
I don't buy this. You make it sounds like the community cannot contribute
with more than 1 focus concurrently. The fact is that, the GCC integration,
making wrappers of C library and switching to non-global in std.getopt are
done in parallel by different
On 10/05/11 16:25, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:j6hrko$ni3$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 10/5/11 6:53 AM, Regan Heath wrote:
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:39:42 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Did it ever
I am part of a team that organizes a programming contest that supports
multiple programming languages. Since there are multiple servers that need
to be set up, someone in the team placed all source packages for the
supported languages on our main server, ignorantly assuming that no
license
Andrei wrote:
We don't kind of have a MySQL library. We just don't have one.
Actually, we have three or four. Maybe more.
There aren't any in phobos, but they are still fairly easy
to find. (Or hell to just wrap C takes less than an hour.)
On 10/05/11 17:53, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Andrei wrote:
We don't kind of have a MySQL library. We just don't have one.
Actually, we have three or four. Maybe more.
There aren't any in phobos, but they are still fairly easy
to find.
Well that wasn't the best example, but you know what I mean.
On 10/5/2011 3:48 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
I am part of a team that organizes a programming contest that supports multiple
programming languages. Since there are multiple servers that need to be set up,
someone in the team placed all source packages for the supported languages on
our main server,
Andrei wrote:
link to a few
There's mine:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
see database.d and mysql.d for mysql. Also some code for postgres
and sqlite in there own modules.
Piotr Szturmaj's is postgres only, but generally vastly superior
to
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:24:52 -0400, jimmy zsu0...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:
Hi,
I have the following code.
struct Foo(int DIM) {
Foo!(DIM) opBinary(string op) (Foo!(DIM) rhs)
if (op == + || op == -)
{
return Foo!(DIM)();
}
}
unittest {
In the core.thread library, there is a method isRunning() which takes a thread.
To make code more portable, rather than use a system call or getenv(), how might
isRunning() be adapted to check if a program is running?
Ideally: isrunning(program_name);
I had exactly this problem too, I asked on the Derelict forums:
http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5856sid=8ebff671fafec3bd8962ddfceaf99eb8
At the moment I've resolved this by building Derelict with make, first a normal
full
build, then a second run using the cleandi target, which
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:38:58 -0400, Dsmith dsm...@nomail.com wrote:
In the core.thread library, there is a method isRunning() which takes a
thread.
To make code more portable, rather than use a system call or getenv(),
how might
isRunning() be adapted to check if a program is running?
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:05:02 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:38:58 -0400, Dsmith dsm...@nomail.com wrote:
In the core.thread library, there is a method isRunning() which takes a
thread.
To make code more portable, rather than use a system
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
It's just the getting of the pid based on the name is not straightforward.
There's an open standard for this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Information_Model_%28computing%29
Do you know why this program doesn't compile (with DMD 2.056head)?
immutable(int[]) foo(in int[] x) pure {
return new int[1];
}
void main() {}
It gives:
test.d(2): Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (new int[](1u)) of type
int[] to immutable(int[])
This program instead compiles
Maybe:
immutable(int[]) foo(in int[] x) pure {
return new immutable(int[1]);
}
void main() {}
Or does this have something to do with implicit casts to immutable for
pure functions? I'm only vaguely familiar with pure..
Andrej Mitrovic:
Maybe:
immutable(int[]) foo(in int[] x) pure {
return new immutable(int[1]);
}
void main() {}
I'd like to know why the code in my original post doesn't compile. I suspect
it's a DMD bug, but I am not sure.
Or does this have something to do with implicit casts to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5886
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6769
Summary: [CTFE] AA.keys doesn't compile when -inline is used
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3748
--- Comment #7 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-10-05
06:31:35 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1035)
Corrected some errors that were previously hard to detect because inout didn't
work
uploaded a fixed version of
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6770
Summary: inout is allowed on fields
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3748
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-10-05
06:49:38 PDT ---
See new bug 6770
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6771
Summary: Jagged array and init causing DMD to take a LONG time
to compile.
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6770
--- Comment #1 from Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com 2011-10-05
08:06:15 PDT ---
I should add that this bug is valid only for the (currently unreleased) 2.056
version, 2.055 does not have a valid inout implementation.
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6759
--- Comment #3 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2011-10-05 12:04:09 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Your patch was already merged (commit: f53ff46), and it looks correct to me
the
fixing lack of merging prelude before semantic.
But, your sample
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6772
Summary: Cannot pass cfloat argument type to a function on
x86_64
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6773
Summary: inout variable should not be modifiable
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6774
Summary: Assertion failure: '0' on line 1117 in file 'glue.c'
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6770
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid, patch
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6773
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3748
--- Comment #9 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-10-05 17:41:38 PDT ---
For fixing error8 and error11.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/433
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6769
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6775
Summary: [CTFE] foreach over an AA fails
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
94 matches
Mail list logo
