13.02.2012 9:45, Alf P. Steinbach пишет:
I first started with a Windows message box program and installing an
IDE. I'm now using the VisualD plug-in with the Visual Studio 10
Shell, after battling a bit with installation of service pack 1 for
Visual Studio. VisualD works, sort of, except the
13.02.2012 10:16, Mantis ?:
...snip...
What is unicode_based_api file? I don't see it in core.sys.windows:
http://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/tree/master/src/core/sys/windows
Oh, I guess I understand what you're trying to do. IIRC, druntime source
files get compiled into
a zillion.. any amount. just bring her back. I am not vacuous, I will get
it. Now you bring her back, that is an order
On 13 February 2012 21:44, Adam adaprogram...@usenet.net wrote:
a zillion.. any amount. just bring her back. I am not vacuous, I will get
it. Now you bring her back, that is an order
Adam, what is your purpose here? You have done little but post
irrelevant nonsense on threads. I understand that
On 2/12/2012 11:45 PM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
Anyway, I haven't yet started delving into the language documentation or any
tutorials, just used gut-feeling, so I'd appreciate discussion of how to make
this my first D console program less non-idiomatic g:
code
import std.stdio;
import
I find that dynamic typing is useful sometimes and static typing other
times. Certainly dynamic (duck) typing is useful for scripts and
similar, and static typing is certainly better for writing code that
is especially picky about its values. I liken it to the way I write
code in PHP, the
Somewhat off topic, but Alf, I have noticed you posting a few times, I
think newbie questions are better suited to the digitalmars.D.learn
mailing list.
Thanks
James Miller
On 13.02.2012 12:48, James Miller wrote:
Somewhat off topic, but Alf, I have noticed you posting a few times,
Uhm, 2 times.
I think newbie questions are better suited to the digitalmars.D.learn
mailing list.
I am sure that if but the right mindset was brought to bear, the D
community and
On 13/02/2012 02:21, Don wrote:
snip
I don't know why struct toString() still exists.
snip
What are you talking about? If you define a struct, it doesn't have any methods other
than the ones you put into it.
Stewart.
On 13.02.2012 10:33, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/12/2012 11:45 PM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
Anyway, I haven't yet started delving into the language documentation
or any
tutorials, just used gut-feeling, so I'd appreciate discussion of how
to make
this my first D console program less non-idiomatic
On 2/13/12 1:13 PM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
I am sure that if but the right mindset was brought to bear, the D
community and in particular those with some responsibility for the
toolset and language, could learn as much from my current 2 postings as
I am learning about the tools and language.
I wrote this article because I felt like helping other people coming to
D, but I'm not sure where the appropriate place to make such a
contribution is. Maybe a Learning Articles or an Idioms section.
The One-Letter Nested Function
As a programmer new to D I wanted to share an idiom I've been
Using @disable this(this); in structs marked as shared does not appear to be
possible; shared alone works, just @disable this(this); works too, but both
together result in compile failures with cryptic error messages about 'this',
like
wrong type. not mutable or not an lvalue, usually without
With 2.058 the single-letter function can become:
auto u = (int a, int b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
It's not much of savings in typing.
The only problem is I can't seem to make it static:
static u = (int a, int b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
Error: non-constant nested delegate literal
Am 13.02.2012 13:26, schrieb Stewart Gordon:
On 13/02/2012 02:21, Don wrote:
snip
I don't know why struct toString() still exists.
snip
What are you talking about? If you define a struct, it doesn't have any
methods other than the ones you put into it.
Stewart.
import std.stdio;
struct
On 2/13/12 2:43 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
auto u = (a, b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
Which would make 'u' a template. I'm not sure what the exact syntax
was that was requested though.
This could never work without major changes to the language, because 'u'
cannot be assigned a type.
Zach the Mystic:
void setRandomColorPair( ref ColorPair cp )
{
import std.random;
ubyte u(int a, int b) { return cast(ubyte) uniform(a,b); }
Where possible it's good to add static to nested functions:
static ubyte u(in int a, in int b) pure nothrow { return cast(ubyte)
On 13.02.2012 13:50, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/13/12 1:13 PM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
I am sure that if but the right mindset was brought to bear, the D
community and in particular those with some responsibility for the
toolset and language, could learn as much from my current 2 postings as
I
On 2/13/12, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
This could never work without major changes to the language, because 'u'
cannot be assigned a type.
Yeah, the syntax is wrong. I found bear's post and the syntax:
alias (x = x ^^ 2) sqrTemplate;
So it would be:
alias ((a, b) =
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:40:20 -0500, Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Am 13.02.2012 13:26, schrieb Stewart Gordon:
On 13/02/2012 02:21, Don wrote:
snip
I don't know why struct toString() still exists.
snip
What are you talking about? If you define a struct, it doesn't have any
Am 13.02.2012 15:23, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:40:20 -0500, Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Am 13.02.2012 13:26, schrieb Stewart Gordon:
On 13/02/2012 02:21, Don wrote:
snip
I don't know why struct toString() still exists.
snip
What are you talking
On 13 February 2012 12:13, Alf P. Steinbach
alf.p.steinbach+use...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13.02.2012 12:48, James Miller wrote:
Somewhat off topic, but Alf, I have noticed you posting a few times,
Uhm, 2 times.
Right, not a few, but a couple. ;-)
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p e ? p++ : p) = (c
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:41:14 -0500, Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de wrote:
Am 13.02.2012 15:23, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
That is a legacy feature, back when writefln was a D variadic function
(not a template), and all you had was the TypeInfo.
It's essentially a hack that the
On 12 February 2012 17:45, Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
Turns out I can't help myself:
https://github.com/yebblies/dmd/tree/microd
(the makefile changes are win32 only, but aren't very compilcated)
It compiles the following into cryptic c full of mangled names just fine:
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote in message
news:mailman.287.1329145247.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
O_O
=) Which bit's making you pull that face? Is it the fact I think it might
be a good idea or the fact I think it wouldn't be that hard?
It currently can translate:
import
On 13/02/2012 14:21, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/13/12, David Nadlingers...@klickverbot.at wrote:
This could never work without major changes to the language, because 'u'
cannot be assigned a type.
Yeah, the syntax is wrong. I found bear's post and the syntax:
alias (x = x ^^ 2)
There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to get
things going, I have volunteered to manage the review of Jose's std.log
proposal. Barring any objections, the review period starts now and ends
in three weeks, on March 6th, followed by a week of voting.
---
Code:
On 2/13/12 9:14 AM, bearophile wrote:
Where possible it's good to add static to nested functions:
static ubyte u(in int a, in int b) pure nothrow { return cast(ubyte)
uniform(a,b); }
You're right. The only advantage to the way I wrote it is, possibly,
it's easier for new people (like
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.283.1329140648.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
The only problem is I can't seem to make it static:
static u = (int a, int b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
auto u = function (int a, int b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
Zach the Mystic:
But I'm
pretty sure uniform is NOT a pure function. In fact, generating random
numbers is about as far opposite a pure function as you can get,
right? :-)
Right, and sorry, I didn't see the function contents.
If I don't run the D code you have to assume it's wrong code.
On 2/13/12 5:17 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Andrej Mitrovicandrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.283.1329140648.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
The only problem is I can't seem to make it static:
static u = (int a, int b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
auto u = function
On 2/13/12 7:46 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/13/12 2:43 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
auto u = (a, b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
Which would make 'u' a template. I'm not sure what the exact syntax
was that was requested though.
This could never work without major changes to the language,
On 13 February 2012 15:31, Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote in message
news:mailman.287.1329145247.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
O_O
=) Which bit's making you pull that face? Is it the fact I think it might
be a good idea or the fact
David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote in message
news:jhbdnb$21sb$1...@digitalmars.com...
auto u = function (int a, int b) = cast(ubyte)uniform(a, b);
Should do it.
I know it currently isn't, but shouldn't this be inferred as per TDPL
anyway?
David
Yes, it's just a way to force
On 2/13/12 4:50 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
https://github.com/jsancio/phobos/commit/d114420e0791c704f6899d81a0293cbd3cc8e6f5
Docs: http://jsancio.github.com/phobos/phobos/std_log.html
A few small points from a first pass through the docs:
Spelling nits:
- potion - position
- enviroment -
On 2/10/12 4:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The last thing we need is balkanization of the community. You are of
course free to initiate such a project but if you care about D it would
be great to apply your talent in a different direction.
I think this might be going a little bit too far.
On 2/13/12 10:45 AM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On 2/10/12 4:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The last thing we need is balkanization of the community. You are of
course free to initiate such a project but if you care about D it would
be great to apply your talent in a different direction.
I
On 2/13/12 11:21 AM, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
Regarding pure random generators, I have asked it too:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5249
Aren't pure and random diametrically opposed in a fundamental way?
On 13 February 2012 17:01, Zach the Mystic
reachzachatgooglesmailserv...@dot.com wrote:
On 2/13/12 11:21 AM, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
Regarding pure random generators, I have asked it too:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5249
Aren't pure and random diametrically
On 02/13/2012 06:01 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On 2/13/12 11:21 AM, bearophile wrote:
Zach the Mystic:
Regarding pure random generators, I have asked it too:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5249
Aren't pure and random diametrically opposed in a fundamental way?
They are. It is
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote in message
news:mailman.288.1329151783.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
It's the fact that it does *nothing* to change code generation, as D
code compiles down to the same as C equivalent.
Isn't that what a C backend is supposed to do?
Code
On 2/13/12, Alf P. Steinbach alf.p.steinbach+use...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I see that the list of functions provided by
core.sys.windows.windows is rather short, covering a very small fraction
of the API:
How would one go about extending that?
On Sunday, 12 February 2012 at 17:45:46 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Turns out I can't help myself:
https://github.com/yebblies/dmd/tree/microd
hmmm
Do you see anything wrong with using a similar strategy to
output something like C# or Java?
It might be a relatively easy way to get (a
On 2/13/12 11:54 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just find it difficult to imagine things that way. Tiny devices are
confined to small programs by definition, and at that magnitude the
field is quite leveled; for a 3K-lines program, C is just fine and many
of D's (and other languages')
On 2/13/12 11:46 AM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On 2/13/12 11:54 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I just find it difficult to imagine things that way. Tiny devices are
confined to small programs by definition, and at that magnitude the
field is quite leveled; for a 3K-lines program, C is just fine
Am 12.02.2012 15:23, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
Paulo Pintopj...@progtools.org wrote in message
news:jh7tvk$29sv$1...@digitalmars.com...
So in the end you just get an already existing language, but with
different syntax.
So it is not worth the effort designing such languages.
Where are you
On Sunday, February 12, 2012 19:32:28 David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/12/12 7:28 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
The shallow distinction of visibility vs. accessibility breaks the
module system because
one can't safely add a private symbol without possibly affecting every
dependent module.
Thus
Hi,
On 13.02.2012 08:45, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
I first started with a Windows message box program and installing an
IDE. I'm now using the VisualD plug-in with the Visual Studio 10 Shell,
after battling a bit with installation of service pack 1 for Visual
Studio. VisualD works, sort of,
On Monday, February 13, 2012 17:49:49 David Nadlinger wrote:
You define the Severity enum members starting with fatal as 0. Why not
the other way round – so that severityA severityB would do what you
(or at least I) would expect?
syslog defines 0 (LOG_EMERG) as the strongest and 7 (LOG_DEBUG)
I'd like to see a simple example of how to specify the filename of the log file.
On 13 February 2012 17:22, Daniel Murphy yebbl...@nospamgmail.com wrote:
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote in message
news:mailman.288.1329151783.20196.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
It's the fact that it does *nothing* to change code generation, as D
code compiles down to the same as C
Hi Alf! Welcome!
On 2/12/2012 4:02 PM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
Hi
I just installed D 2.x.
* Improvement potential #1 -- installer description.
It was not clear to me that the first download is a full offline installer. In
ignorance I used the one that downloads from web. The web page can
On 2/13/2012 6:15 AM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
Are there group charters?
Not much beyond the descriptions here:
http://digitalmars.com/NewsGroup.html
We're pretty informal.
As a newbie one tries things and asks about things that a person more accustomed
to The Usual Ways(TM) just
Fyi
In our env we use reviewboard. Its a web based code review tool that works very
well for keeping track of reviews, comments, statuses, etc. If you have lots of
reviews it speeds things up tremendously. (We have a couple thousand reviews so
far)
Its available here reviewboard.org. its
Am 09.02.2012 17:20, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 2/9/2012 1:37 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I have a project that we actually plan to use in production in the
company for
which I work. They still require 10.5 support for their products so
removing
that support would make for a very bad situation
On 2/13/2012 4:32 AM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
It's the name of the module generated by the program, just more clean aliases
for the Unicode based Windows API functions -- e.g., in C++ one would write
`MessageBox`, not `MessageBoxW`, so I alias them.
The Windows .h files are set up so that
On Monday, 13 February 2012 at 19:27:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/13/2012 6:15 AM, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
Are there group charters?
Not much beyond the descriptions here:
http://digitalmars.com/NewsGroup.html
We're pretty informal.
I read that last word as 'normal' and was about to
On 2/13/2012 11:50 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
So either the problem is just a build setup issue or it was something I
didn't test (I tested writefln() as in bug 4854). Is there a standard
way to build the DMD+druntime+phobos package so I can simulate the
original build process? Right now I just
A first quick observation:
I vote for a debug severity level. Then make that default to the
template parameter for log:
template log(Severity severity = Severity.debug)
That would make it nice for good old print debugging.
log(This is a dbg message);
/Jonas
On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:44 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
A first quick observation:
I vote for a debug severity level. Then make that default to the template
parameter for log:
template log(Severity severity = Severity.debug)
That would make it nice for good old print debugging.
I think that's
Log levels debug and maybe also trace would be useful, but I see
that vlog(n)() is meant for that purpose. I would just prefer explicit
names instead of just numbers.
Is there a compelling reason why formatted logging is not the default? I
find that most logging calls in practice use
On 13.02.2012 19:52, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
On 13.02.2012 08:45, Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
I first started with a Windows message box program and installing an
IDE. I'm now using the VisualD plug-in with the Visual Studio 10 Shell,
after battling a bit with installation of service pack 1 for
On 14 February 2012 10:17, Sönke Ludwig
lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de wrote:
Log levels debug and maybe also trace would be useful, but I see that
vlog(n)() is meant for that purpose. I would just prefer explicit names
instead of just numbers.
Is there a compelling reason why formatted
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:54 PM, John Arrizza cppge...@gmail.com wrote:
Fyi
In our env we use reviewboard. Its a web based code review tool that works
very well for keeping track of reviews, comments, statuses, etc. If you have
lots of reviews it speeds things up tremendously. (We have a
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:07:20 +0100, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Sunday, February 12, 2012 19:32:28 David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/12/12 7:28 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
The shallow distinction of visibility vs. accessibility breaks the
module system because
one can't safely
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 00:15:40 Martin Nowak wrote:
Can you elaborate on what issues you see with NVI. After all it's only the
final public
method that needs to call the virtual private methods.
As I explain in that bug report, NVI can be acheived with protected rather
than private.
On 02/14/2012 12:26 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 00:15:40 Martin Nowak wrote:
Can you elaborate on what issues you see with NVI. After all it's only the
final public
method that needs to call the virtual private methods.
As I explain in that bug report, NVI can be
On Monday, 13 February 2012 at 15:50:05 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to
get things going, I have volunteered to manage the review of
Jose's std.log proposal. Barring any objections, the review
period starts now and ends in three
On 2/14/12 12:14 AM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:54 PM, John Arrizzacppge...@gmail.com wrote:
In our env we use reviewboard. Its a web based code review tool that works very
well for keeping track of reviews, comments, statuses, etc. If you have lots of
reviews it
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 00:36:31 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 12:26 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 00:15:40 Martin Nowak wrote:
Can you elaborate on what issues you see with NVI. After all it's only
the final public
method that needs to call the virtual
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:26:14 +0100, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 00:15:40 Martin Nowak wrote:
Can you elaborate on what issues you see with NVI. After all it's only
the
final public
method that needs to call the virtual private methods.
As I
On 02/14/2012 01:28 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 00:36:31 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 12:26 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 00:15:40 Martin Nowak wrote:
Can you elaborate on what issues you see with NVI. After all it's only
the final
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 01:55:51 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 01:28 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It would break information hiding. A private method declared in a
different module is not supposed to be visible (hopefully will get
fixed), let alone overrideable.
You misunderstand then.
On 02/14/2012 01:55 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
There are no performance implications because the compiler has the whole
module ready to analyse. Therefore it can de-virtualise any calls to
private members that are never overridden. A trivial addition to the
class layout could furthermore allow the
In D.learn there is an interesting thread (Instance-specific unittests) about
D idioms to use unittests in templated classes/structs:
http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.learnarticle_id=32490
A comment from Jonathan M Davis:
And yes, this can be useful.
On 14 February 2012 14:25, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
In D.learn there is an interesting thread (Instance-specific unittests)
about D idioms to use unittests in templated classes/structs:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, David Nadlinger s...@klickverbot.at wrote:
On 2/13/12 4:50 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
https://github.com/jsancio/phobos/commit/d114420e0791c704f6899d81a0293cbd3cc8e6f5
Docs: http://jsancio.github.com/phobos/phobos/std_log.html
A few small points from a
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 17:49:49 David Nadlinger wrote:
You define the Severity enum members starting with fatal as 0. Why not
the other way round – so that severityA severityB would do what you
(or at least I)
On Monday, February 13, 2012 23:58:38 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 17:49:49 David Nadlinger wrote:
You define the Severity enum members starting with fatal as 0. Why not
the other way
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 02:43:29 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, not being able override what cannot be accesses is a quite basic
requirement of security. Private members cannot be overriden in a
different module.
Have you ever read up on NVI?
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see a simple example of how to specify the filename of the log
file.
Fair enough...
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org wrote:
On Feb 13, 2012, at 12:44 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
A first quick observation:
I vote for a debug severity level. Then make that default to the template
parameter for log:
template log(Severity severity = Severity.debug)
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM, jdrewsen jdrew...@nospam.com wrote:
A first quick observation:
I vote for a debug severity level. Then make that default to the template
parameter for log:
template log(Severity severity = Severity.debug)
That would make it nice for good old print
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Sönke Ludwig
lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de wrote:
Log levels debug and maybe also trace would be useful, but I see that
vlog(n)() is meant for that purpose. I would just prefer explicit names
instead of just numbers.
Is there a compelling reason why
On 2/13/12 1:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Agreed. There are two issues I see here in my opinion. First, putting
some of our manpower in a small subset of D for tiny embedded systems is
a misplaced investment because it would make a small impact at best.
Second, coming up with another
On 02/11/2012 07:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, February 12, 2012 01:40:50 Zachary Lund wrote:
Btw, I'm not very fluent in the inner workings of a garbage
collector implementation but how does one go about concatenating
to an array in a garbage collector as compared to manual memory
On 02/14/2012 03:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 02:43:29 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, not being able override what cannot be accesses is a quite basic
requirement of security. Private members cannot be overriden in a
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:12 PM, James Miller ja...@aatch.net wrote:
On 14 February 2012 10:17, Sönke Ludwig
lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de wrote:
Log levels debug and maybe also trace would be useful, but I see that
vlog(n)() is meant for that purpose. I would just prefer explicit names
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 03:45:54 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 03:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 02:43:29 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, not being able override what cannot be accesses is a quite basic
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:37 PM, so s...@so.so wrote:
On Monday, 13 February 2012 at 15:50:05 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
There are several modules in the review queue right now, and to get things
going, I have volunteered to manage the review of Jose's std.log proposal.
Barring any
On Monday, February 13, 2012 20:41:01 Zachary Lund wrote:
On 02/11/2012 07:00 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, February 12, 2012 01:40:50 Zachary Lund wrote:
Btw, I'm not very fluent in the inner workings of a garbage
collector implementation but how does one go about concatenating
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 23:58:38 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 17:49:49 David Nadlinger wrote:
You define
On 2/13/12 8:28 PM, Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM, jdrewsenjdrew...@nospam.com wrote:
A first quick observation:
I vote for a debug severity level. Then make that default to the template
parameter for log:
template log(Severity severity = Severity.debug)
That
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 01:16:29 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 23:58:38 Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On 02/14/2012 03:54 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 03:45:54 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 03:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 02:43:29 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Well, not being able override what
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 04:39:18 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 03:54 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 03:45:54 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 03:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 02:43:29 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/14/2012 02:16
On Monday, February 13, 2012 20:25:46 bearophile wrote:
Time ago I have suggested the static static idea, an usage example:
[snip]
I would point out that two different instantiations of the same template have
_nothing_ in common with one another. It's as if you instantiate a template
with two
On 2/13/12 9:50 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
Please post all feedback in this thread, and remember: Although
comprehensive reviews are obviously appreciated, short comments are very
welcome as well!
Thanks Jose and David. I made a pass, here are a few thoughts:
* different verbose level -
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com wrote in message
I think it starts with a runtime library that is written for the given
architecture in mind. The compiler is already there in my opinion,
and I have seen little reason for it not to be.
Is the compiler really ready?
Assuming that it's possible
Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:rdluxkzwxsxlxfgca...@dfeed.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net...
On Sunday, 12 February 2012 at 17:45:46 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Turns out I can't help myself:
https://github.com/yebblies/dmd/tree/microd
hmmm
Do you see anything
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
