On Friday, 12 October 2018 at 16:26:49 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 21:22:19 UTC, aberba wrote:
"It takes care of itself
---
When writing a throwaway script...
...there's absolutely no need for a GC. In fact, the GC runtime
will only
On Thursday, 11 October 2018 at 06:58:08 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
unittest {
auto x = fun($); // What does it even mean?
}
After some reading through the whole thread I think his "$ idea"
can only be applied to a RandomAccessRange (and similar) where
the size can be known...
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 16:21:45 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Like most of the responses in this thread, I have no idea why
you're stumping for in-person interaction, when all my
suggestions were geared around having _more in-person
interaction_.
If you're still not sure what I mean, read this
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 18:35:58 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 09/26/2018 04:37 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 13:03:30 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
I'm playing with a branch of DMD that would warn on unused
imports:
I humbly believe this does not
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 at 06:26:30 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'm sure some thought and planning is now going into the next
DConf, so I'd like to make sure people are aware that the
conference format that DConf uses is dying off, as explained
here:
https://marco.org/2018/01/17/end-of-conference-e
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 at 13:03:30 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
I'm playing with a branch of DMD that would warn on unused
imports:
I humbly believe this does not belong to the compiler. These sort
of things belong to a static code analyser TOOL. Think of
checkstyle/findbugs in Java, or
On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 08:09:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I contacted one of the few companies putting out RISC-V dev
boards, Sifive, a couple weeks ago with the suggestion of
making available a paid RISC-V VPS, and one of their field
engineers got back to me last week with a note that the
On Monday, 10 September 2018 at 13:43:46 UTC, Joakim wrote:
LDC recently added a linux/AArch64 CI for both its main
branches and 64-bit ARM, ie AArch64, builds have been put out
for both linux and Android. It does not seem that many are
paying attention to this sea change that is going on with
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 07:00:49 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The D foundation is planning to add a way for us to pay for
changes we'd like to see in D and its ecosystem, rather than
having to code everything we need ourselves or find and hire a
D dev to do it:
I would donate again to DFounda
On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 13:04:28 UTC, Chris wrote:
I've been working with Java recently and although it is not an
exciting language, it does the job and it does it well. You can
rely on it to get the job done - and get it done fast. And you
know that your code will still work next week, mo
On Friday, 29 June 2018 at 10:55:27 UTC, kinke wrote:
Phobos. I understand the separate 'minimal runtime' need for
bare metal (no Type- and ModuleInfos etc.), but I can't help
myself in seeing betterC as, nicely put, worseD. I acknowledge
I *completely* agree. However, I have nothing against b
On Sunday, 3 June 2018 at 17:40:46 UTC, I love Ice Cream wrote:
Is D really a top 20 language? I don't remember seeing it
anywhere close to the top 20.
https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ has them in 31
Top comment is kind of depressing.
The right place to look is https://www.tiobe.com/tiob
On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 07:20:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
There have been 6 major releases of dmd over the last year,
with ldc trying to keep pace, currently only one release
behind. This is a big jump up from the previous release
schedule, I see 2 major releases in 2014, 3 in 2015, and 3 in
2016.
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 22:04:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 21:22:01 UTC, Timothee Cour
wrote:
would a PR for `dmd -unittest= (same syntax as -i)`
be welcome?
so when this came up on irc earlier (was that you?) this was
the first thought that came to my mi
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 14:56:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello, for all of you with expertise in graphics, we'd be in
your debt if you could create a logo for DConf 2018. Proposals
would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Andrei
Why a new logo? The last year's one is superb and shoul
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 09:42:50 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
I strongly agree with you.
As I wrote earlier int this thread. Kotlin has the `?.` operator
for the same reason. I honestly can't think of a more obvious
operator for that purpose...
On Saturday, 28 October 2017 at 11:38:52 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Walter and I decided to kick-off project Elvis for adding the
homonym operator to D.
Razvan Nitu has already done a good part of the work:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7242
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/191
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 at 13:20:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A person who donated to the Foundation made a small wish list
known. Allow me to relay it:
* RSA Digital Signature Validation in Phobos
* std.decimal in Phobos
* better dll support for Windows.
Andrei
First two are in m
On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 06:30:01 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
A direct question to Walter and Andrei really.
If someone, let us say Russel Winder, create a CMake/Ninja
and/or Meson/Ninja build for DMD, is there any chance of it
being allowed to replace the Make system?
If the answer is no, t
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 13:37:41 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Exactly my point. Using SQLAlchemy made me actually enjoy
writing database code. Which I did last year having avoided it
Using ORM like SQLAlchemy certainly has benefits but like any
other ORM, it generates hideous SQL code, somet
On Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 09:38:49 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 20:07 +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
At the risk of starting a flame war:
The memory safety is currently in the works.
We just have one std-lib now.
GC is slow, yes.
I don't care, it d
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 at 12:05:15 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
Hi,
do someone have any experience with pImpl and inheritance in D?
Some parts of Phobos use it. Example:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/master/std/stdio.d
Have a look at the struct ByLine
It has something like:
struct ByLin
I know people her do not like to see proposals that change (add
stuff to) the language. However, I strongly feel that for the
testing purposes D should provide means to patch any object (no
matter whether it is final or not!). Therefore I wonder what
people think of adding a `patch(obj) {}` or
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 03:24:31 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've seen a lot of talk on the forums over the past year about
the need for database support in the D Standard Library and I
completely agree. At the end of the day the purpose of any
programming language and its atten
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 08:33:55 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
? I am on fedora and I have dmd, so it is not true :P
Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d
napsal St, pro 21, 2016 v 6∶36 :
On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 16:41:56 UTC, hardreset
wrote:
Moving the reference compiler to LLVM as
On Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 16:41:56 UTC, hardreset wrote:
Moving the reference compiler to LLVM as was suggested in the
list.
LDC is the only compiler on Fedora/CentOS anyway!
I have mentioned this on IRC quite few times in the past years,
as well here on the newsgroups...
I really think the D runtime should have a std.api package
containing what I call "module interfaces" (something similar to
how Modula-3 treats interfaces and modules), and all existing std
modul
On Tuesday, 18 October 2016 at 18:03:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Interesting work:
http://concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com/2016/10/crturn-queue-first-mpmc-memory.html -- Andrei
I could not help but paste something from the paper: "We chose
C++14 because
it is a native language that is su
On Tuesday, 18 October 2016 at 23:02:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I have a friend who has started writing a library in D.
Although I recommended that he should use a recent dmd or ldc,
he thinks gdc is a better candidate because it's "available to
the masses" through Linux distros similar to how
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 23:14:38 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/blob/master/src/gc/gcinterface.d
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/blob/master/src/gc/impl/manual/gc.d
What else do you need to start working on a new GC
implementation?
That is actually the only ca
...I could care less why you are switching to Go...
On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 at 12:57:59 UTC, TencoDK wrote:
I dropped D once about a year ago because the new DMD version
has broken backward compatibility. Some libraries have stopped
You could have used STABLE DMD (v1), right? Assuming that you
*intentionally* used the unstable (v2) DMD,
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 17:41:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I wish we could amass the experts able to make similar things
happen for us.
I humbly believe it is not just about amassing experts, but also
making it easy to do experiments. Phobos/druntime should provide
set of APIs for l
On Monday, 27 June 2016 at 14:10:15 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
With the latest popularity of Machine Learning, and all the
achievement we see, where is the D alternative in this area?
C++'s offering makes lot of use of meta-programming already:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4
What's the main difference between it and just pointing your
browser at the downloaded html files? Search and index?
Well, seach and index are not the only operations you need.
One of the common operation with every CHM viewer is to bookmark
something for an example. I've just checked the Zeal
On Thursday, 16 June 2016 at 02:32:05 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 10:58:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
So I'm wondering if in 2016 someone really needs an offline
copy of a website shipped with a binary release?
For offline browsing, Windows and Linux users can use Zea
I still use CHM document as it is absolutely the best solution
compared to anything else. I think it is a mistake to compare
CHM with PDF... They are made for different things...
I forgot to mention - I use CHM on Linux. It is not my fault that
opensource community could not come up with a bet
On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 10:58:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
It's a huge maintenance effort for us to produce the chm files.
We no longer generate documentation on Windows, but just for
the chm generation we have dedicated tools [¹] to create an
index (from a json generated via ddoc) and cop
On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 06:10:34 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
We plan to add a set of numeric packages and this would be real
pain if they would be one-by-one moved from experimental to
stable std. So sci.* should be considered as experimental
during few years.
https://github.com/dlang/ph
On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 19:24:14 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Pretty much as per title. I has that in the back of my mind for
a while. Would that work ?
I am not sure about that... I would rather have a completely new
type (`set`) for this purpose.
On Monday, 28 March 2016 at 10:49:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It would be useful with a wiki page, or similar, that describes
and compares different ways of doing concurrency in D, both
built-in and third party libraries like this and vibe.d. Also
compare against other languages like Go, Erla
On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 04:47:05 UTC, cy wrote:
I'd honestly worry more about the compiler hiding
implementation, that could have been used to make things easier
for programmers.
You worry too much.
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 15:57:41 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 13:29:03 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I am not sure I agree with this. "->" will make it *visible*
what is going on, while "." can mean many things, and I would
have to investigate what .something in part of a c
On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 23:59:49 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hey,
I am just curious whether you have already considered moving
from Bugzilla to the Github issue system and where your current
opinion is.
GitHub issues is okay for one-man projects or small teams that do
not want to bother much with
On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:00:30 UTC, Erik Smith wrote:
I'm back to actively working on a std.database specification &
implementation. It's still unstable, minimally tested, and
there is plenty of work to do, but I wanted to share an update
on my progress.
I suggest you call the package
On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 10:16:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
As for a pipe operator, I expect that it wouldn't really help
any. It would be a lot like . vs -> in that it's an unnecessary
complication, but it would actually probably be worse. If |
I am not sure I agree with this. "->" w
If you really want to be serious about the XML package, then I
humbly believe implementing the commonly-known DOM interfaces is
a must. Luckily there is IDL available for it:
https://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/idl/dom.idl . Also,
speaking about DOM, all levels need to be supported!
Also,
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:08:46 +, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 February 2016 at 07:59:49 UTC, w0rp wrote:
>> Personally, I find this proposal for C++ to be laughable. It's like
>> hitch hiking from New York to California, and only getting as far as
>> Texas and calling it good.
>>
Steven, this is superb!
Some 10+ years ago, I talked to Tango guys when they worked on
I/O part of the Tango library and told them that in my head ideal
abstraction for any I/O work is pipe and that I would actually
build an I/O library around this abstraction instead of the
Channel in Java o
Lots of programmers out there use and love languages that are far
slower than any code DMD produces (think JavaScript, Python,
Ruby). So I see no point here. If someone is learning D, and they
know there are different compilers available, they would find out
what are the differences. OpenJDK's
I am sure nobody will disagree with this post. Thing is, whenever
there are people, there will be disagreements. I remember "final
by default" vs "virtual by default" thread. I remember people
whining and leaving the D community for X various reasons.
What made me personally stick to D is that
I think this is a huge task and requires a (huge) DIP, and
collaborative effort of coming up with a good, really good, API
for BOTH synchronous and asynchronous IO. As mentioned in the
previous messages, there is already an asyncio library, although
I am not sure it is good enough to be in Phob
It was quite interesting! Take a look:
https://skillsmatter.com/skillscasts/7185-london-d-meetup
Thanks Ross!
On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 07:06:47 UTC, cym13 wrote:
It's all true, D rose up 6 positions:
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
I don't quite know what the leading factor for that change was
but it sure will be great for its image.
Well, people who observe
Finding a balance is hard, and I humbly believe having all the
features C++ has in D will help...
Correction: ...WILL NOT help...
I humbly believe D should not care about C++ any more. It should
take own path, and attract developers not just from the C++ camp.
No matter from which camp someone comes, that person will
complain about something. Obviously, C/C++ programmers complain
about GC because they are used to manage
On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 14:19:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
This is mostly to prevent ugly hacks like Flag [1].
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
[1] https://dlang.org/phobos/std_typecons.html#.Flag
I already see confusing code like:
foo(10, 20, width: ((big) ? 600 : 200), height: ((big) ?
Adam, I wonder could we also have information since what Phobos
version particular symbol is available from. For an example, from
which version of Phobos we have findSkip() ??
https://github.com/libtrading/libtrading/blob/master/docs/quickstart.md
Nice project - I did not know about it! Thanks!
Major problem in writing a library which implements FIX protocols
is lack of a good XML package. Yes, we have std.xml but it is far
from good, and as we all know, it needs a
I suggest we do not try to reinvent the wheel.
Simply take a look how existing, large communities do this kind
of work.
Example: https://jcp.org/en/jsr/all
For each large feature (a good example in the D case would be
pattern matching, allocators, reference counting, additional
garbage colle
Just imagine a Slack channel with 100+ people where every second
someone posts a code snippet, a picture, etc. :) Brr, I had
that picture in my hear for few seconds and it looked scary.
No, Slack is not for large communities (IRC), but for small,
private teams.
Who cares? - Good luck in the .NET world.
On Tuesday, 6 October 2015 at 16:12:12 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Has anyone got a small example of microservices using D, with
Vibe.d or otherwise, that I can make use of? I need some
examples of small microservices for a session at μCon 2015.
As far as I know, there is no implementation of mi
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 16:22:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 16:19:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
You can get that behavior with static imports in D, but having
to use the whole import path while referencing symbols gets
ugly fast.
Check example again, you are o
You will not believe how many D programming related blogs are out
there...
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 16:10:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/products/windows-server-2003/
Which means that (strictly speaking), in 3 weeks time, there
will be *no* operating system that supports CodeView debugging.
This is an elongated way of as
I must admit I only quickly read the post - I think this can
relatively easily be done as a template, and (depending on the
quality of that template) it could go into Phobos.
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 12:13:47 UTC, ref2401 wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 10:29:35 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
I am working on dip which will try to addressed negation of
attributes issue.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP79
You propose to add extra difficulty to the language and the
only reas
On Friday, 15 May 2015 at 19:51:09 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Friday, 15 May 2015 at 19:44:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, 15 May 2015 at 18:42:31 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Many STL types inherit from base classes, yet they are used
as value types: std::string, std::vector etc. Are there pla
On Sunday, 17 May 2015 at 16:32:31 UTC, Liam McSherry wrote:
Phobos currently has packages for working with various archives
(Zlib/Gzip, Zip), and it's probably reasonable to expect that
support for more archive formats will be added in future.
Before any more are added, it would probably be be
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 20:40:59 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Hi,
For a comparison with the Java language, I'm trying to come up
with some good examples of custom types that should be value
types (but that must be ref types in Java). I think the most
obvious ones are numeric types. So BigNum, M
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 17:25:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The current D associative array algorithm
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/blob/master/src/rt/aaA.d
uses an array of buckets with a linked list attached to the
buckets to resolve collisions.
Linked lists a
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 09:29:40 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
http://hammerprinciple.com/therighttool/statements/this-language-is-best-for-very-large-projects
Nice one - I wonder what people answered to "PROGRAMS WRITTEN IN
THIS LANGUAGE WILL USUALLY WORK IN FUTURE VERSIONS OF THE
LANGUA
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 14:17:26 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:48:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every
day.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particula
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 18:48:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'm fed up with this problem. It is actively hurting us every
day.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14307
Anyone want to take this on? Shouldn't be particularly
difficult.
I could take this task, with help of Brian's
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 20:15:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I've often thought, as do many others here, that immutability
should be the default for variables.
[This is a long term issue. Just thought maybe it's time for a
conversation about it.]
Because immutable is transitive, declarin
On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 06:57:29 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 20:24 -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
There's no doubt about it, people like simple languages. We
should very much keep that in mind when evaluating proposals
for new features.
How about
On Tuesday, 3 March 2015 at 18:43:50 UTC, Aram wrote:
Hi all
I've been thinking over a GUI framework for D for some time,
and ended up with idea expressed by Andrew Fedoniouk here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/32633.html.
That is, having a separate drawing layer, and wi
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 17:40:06 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Just wondering what the general sentiment is.
For me it's these 3 points.
- tuple support (DIP32, maybe without pattern matching)
- working import, protection and visibility rules (DIP22, 313,
314)
- finishing non-GC memory ma
Saying that there are "2 types of D users" is the same as saying
"I see the world black and white". :) - It is far from reality. D
community has lots of "groups" if you look closely.
Examples:
1) OOP vs functional/declarative group.
2) system programming vs business programming group.
3) no-GC
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 08:45:30 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
There's usually no problems with Python on Posix, but on
Windows, I really don't want that. I really like that DMD has
so few dependencies.
Same here. I prefer the current situation where we build DMD and
runtime using Make.
I never liked SCons for some reason. I prefer CMake over it. Waf
is IMHO better than SCons too. Maybe it is more fair to compare
SCons and Waf as they both are Python-based.
Anyhow, use whatever works for you. :)
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 12:55:01 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
The same thing in D should be done,now.Otherwise，no big
projects can be done like C#. Add another keyword,and update
the compiler.
This certainly made me laugh... I work on a very big project
(Java / JBoss / Swing) and we do no
On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 at 08:14:24 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
2. Easy to write ugly code: It suffers from the same issues as
macros.
It is easy to write ugly code in D without string mixins.
Just take a look at the (ab)use of UFCS...
Yesterday I stumbled upon this excellent research paper:
Reconsidering Custom Memory Allocation - (PDF:
http://people.cs.umass.edu/~emery/pubs/berger-oopsla2002.pdf )
It got the "Most Influential OOPSLA Paper Award" in 2012.
Abstract (for those lazy to read it):
"Custom memory management is
On Monday, 21 July 2014 at 02:43:51 UTC, Vic wrote:
(I hope OK to post:)
Location: Silicon Valley /San Jose, CA/ or Dallas TX.
Current 'app' version is mostly Java/Tomcat, so will need to
maintain that while writing a new version, likely mostly D (
possibly Qt depending on GC ). (Also a few li
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 13:53:04 UTC, MacAsm wrote:
To call decode() from std.encoding I need to make sure it is an
UTF (may ne ASCII too) otherwise is will skyp over ASCII
values. Is there any D native for it or I need to check byte
order mark and write one myself?
You may want to take
Please no. See: javax
Spelling out 'experimental' is probably the best, for all those
reasons
already stated.
What's wrong with javax?
I'd call this "INVALID WON"T FIX" :) D module system is defined
to have strong 1-to-1 matching with file system. Any attempt to
circumvent that in favor of personal preferences is asking for
trouble and is not worth supporting.
I can only agree with this, but fact is that D allows flattened
p
John wrote:
> dlang.org website has a quick try editor with D code example.
> Please remove that feature (at least the buttons to run it) as it
> takes ages to run the example and leaves an impression that D is
> very slow!!
>
> This is only good if it can run quickly like the similar feature
> a
On Thursday, 5 June 2014 at 10:57:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 21:12:25 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
I've been looking at ways to optimize the D lexer's operation
using SIMD instructions. I'm not yet sure if I'll need to
change the lexer generator's API to do this. I'm going
Dicebot wrote:
> Have just found https://www.globalsign.com/ssl/ssl-open-source/ ,
> states to provides certificates (including wildcard ones) for
> free if your project complies to:
>
> - Must be licensed with a license approved by the Open Source
> Initiative
> - Project must be actively mainta
On Sunday, 8 June 2014 at 15:37:06 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Finally got to cleanup and submit this PR:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3651
While proposed change is very small (and backwards-compatible)
and not worth separate DIP, it is still a language change and
needs community a
Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Is there a good reason why the dmd Fedora 20 package pulls in the
> following as dependencies:
>
> cyrus-sasl-libi686 2.1.26-14.fc20fedora
> 152 k
> glibc-devel i686 2.18-12.fc20 updates
> 1.0 M
> lib
On Friday, 6 June 2014 at 12:05:36 UTC, Robert Schadek via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 06/06/2014 12:29 PM, Tom Browder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Can anyone point me to a text version of the D grammar in some
kind of
BNF or EBNF format? The D lang web site's info is close, but
it's
buried in html
Slashdot thread:
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/11/06/15/0242237/c-the-clear-winner-in-googles-language-performance-tests
Research paper:
https://days2011.scala-lang.org/sites/days2011/files/ws3-1-Hundt.pdf
I wonder what would be situation if they included D, Rust and
even Ur in that b
One 'other' vote was spoiled. It turns out that the free
SurveyMonkey account only allows 100 votes max, but the profile
has been much the same since 50 votes so I think the ratios are
clear.
Perhaps you should try http://www.surveygalaxy.com . That is what
I use when I need a survey.
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 17:57:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/4/2014 7:59 AM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
I humbly believe programmer who does not spend spare time
reading
literature related to his/her work is most likely going to
lose the job
at some point, as people who DO spend time in the
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 09:45:21 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
I think too that main branch of D should be LDC.
Proprietary backend is one big mistake.
No matter how I like LDC, I disagree.
People obviously forget the fact that DMD is a REFERENCE
IMPLEMENTATION of a D compiler. - Nobody has to use
On Friday, 30 May 2014 at 11:35:19 UTC, Chris wrote:
Reading through Adam's book at home made me think about how
much time I've spent reading / learning / thinking about
programs outside the office. I read TDPL in my spare time. I
checked out things in the D Cookbook in my spare time and
appli
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
