On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 07:33:45 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
The GTK/Qt battle on Linux was won by GTK+2 hence GNOME over
KDE as the default for Debian and Fedora. Whether this was
right or wrong is left as a choice for the reader!
Linux is not only the desktop, and Qt simply dominates in
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 14:56:37 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 13:48:32 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
If `@nogc` could be relaxed for `new Error` exactly for that
reason, pieces of Phobos could be turned `@nogc`...
But I admit that that change would be
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 14:24:56 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 12:43 +, tide via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
I mean it *may* work, but that isn't the problem if the
developers completely lack support for the platform. I can
download Qt with prebuilt libraries and i
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 17:14:12 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 9/20/18 12:24 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 15:52:03 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I needed to know what the slice parameters that were failing
were.
Aye. Note that RangeError is cal
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 21:14:54 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 20:59:59 UTC, Erik van Velzen
wrote:
[...]
Quite a simple reason: it was years ago, however old you are
now you were younger and less experienced, and probably didn't
understand something ba
On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 21:55:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The problem, of course, is that they are also charged
particles, and the electromagnetic forces that hold the atom in
place would be greatly disturbed if two atoms were to occupy
the same space simultaneously, leading to a (very
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 06:20:02 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:05 AM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[... all text ...]
OMFG, I just spent about 3 hours writing a super-detailed reply
to all
of Timon's posts in aggregate... I clicked send... and it's
gone.
I don't
On Wednesday, 17 October 2018 at 20:03:23 UTC, lagfra wrote:
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 21:26:52 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
I have done two mistakes: I underestimated the scope of the
project and overestimated my capabilities. This caused a chain
reaction, which in turn made the first milest
On Saturday, 6 October 2018 at 18:55:48 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Saturday, 6 October 2018 at 05:36:59 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
[...]
In the 90s I used to add the C preprocessor to other languages
which lacked efficient constant definition (i.e. compile time
constructs). AutoLISP
On Friday, 5 October 2018 at 19:04:26 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 10/04/2018 11:40 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
[...]
It's not *my* statement about newer/older. If you recall the
programming atmosphere around 2000, OO was widely being touted
as a newer thing, superior to "old-fa
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 08:10:31 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
On 04/10/18 11:05, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
On Thursday, 4 October 2018 at 03:06:35 UTC, Shachar Shemesh
wrote:
[...]
For the love of Pete, that program was an example of how a
move hook should work, *not* a demonstration o
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 07:03:51 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 September 2018 at 05:15:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
A delicious Turkish desert is "kabak tatlısı", made of squash.
Now, it so happens that "kabak" also means "zucchini" in
Turkish. Imagine my shock when I came
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 at 16:22:31 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
This is just so reminiscent of the Python 2 / Python 3 fiasco.
Python 3 was clearly an improvement over Python 2, but the way
in which the changes came to the community caused a violent
split. Even after many years, there are
On Wednesday, 19 September 2018 at 06:05:38 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
Operating on paths longer than MAX_PATH is not a typical
situation.
https://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.dub/thread/1499/
The worst situation was node.js on Windows, anyway...
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 11:51:04 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 11:02:39 UTC, Michael wrote:
It has been occurring for the past two weeks now, at least.
When I try to load the forum (on different networks) it will
often hang for a while, and when it does
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 07:23:57 UTC, Chris wrote:
Seriously, people need to get over the fantasy that they can
just use Unicode without understanding how Unicode works.
Most of the time, you can get the illusion that it's working,
but actually 99% of the time the code is actually wr
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 05:32:43 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 21:40, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
"A handwavy description"!
What do you mean? I started the email with the code... if you
compiled
it you would have reproduced those error messages. Yes the l
On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 14:26:46 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I just spoke with Dicebot about work stuff. He incidentally
mentioned what I said before based on my impressions. The
people doing work with a language have better things to do than
spend a lot of time on forums. And I think
On Monday, 27 August 2018 at 01:15:49 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
It's simple, I went to GitLab to see the code of the tool, and I
found the articles among the other projects of the author.
I don't think he was very happy about the process around
DIP1000 but I am not myself well placed to judge
On Sunday, 26 August 2018 at 22:54:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/26/2018 1:55 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
I will tiresomely ask again, do you have a list of each and
every aspect of the poor integration?
I know you don't like filing bug reports. I'll make it easy for
you.
Every time someon
On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 21:57:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 21:53:18 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I think it's clear by now that most of D's woes are not really
technical in nature, but managerial.
Agreed.
I'm not sure how to improve this situation, since I'm no
manager t
On Friday, 24 August 2018 at 19:26:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/24/2018 6:04 AM, Chris wrote:
For about a year I've had the feeling that D is moving too
fast and going nowhere at the same time. D has to slow down
and get stable. D is past the experimental stage. Too many
people use it for
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 11:59:37 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
Just found by chance, if someone is interested [1] [2].
/Paolo
After having seen all the discussions around Mihails post in
these days, I'm puzzled by one fact.
There was no discussions around one paragraph:
"
Just found by chance, if someone is interested [1] [2].
/Paolo
[1]
https://gitlab.com/mihails.strasuns/blog/blob/master/articles/on_leaving_d.md
[2]
https://blog.mist.global/articles/My_concerns_about_D_programming_language.html
On Saturday, 28 July 2018 at 14:09:44 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Saturday, 28 July 2018 at 13:55:31 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
Perceptions, expectations, prediction... an easy read I
suggest on the latest trends [1], if someone is interested...
I forgot the link... here it is:
https
On Saturday, 28 July 2018 at 12:43:55 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
each project I
start I give some very hard thought about which development
environment I'm going to use, and D is often one of those
options. The likely future of D on the different platforms is
an important part of that assessme
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 21:59:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Somebody had posted an article here on how well different
languages matched certain requirements of a certain coding
safety standards.
I remember D was doing pretty well and I think Ada (or SPARK?)
was included as well. What ar
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 17:52:00 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 16:43:38 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
That's an opinion, naturally.
No I am expressing an argument not an opinion.
I don't know what vocabulary you are used to consult, but your
'
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 13:36:38 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 12:40:16 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
That proposal is a 'Syntactic Sugar' feature, that simply hide
what normally need to be explicitly coded: proved a temp
rvalue, pass it to a callable
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 08:34:30 UTC, Manu wrote:
With UFCS as a super popular feature of D, 'this' is not really
much of a
special guest at all.
It's just as much the first argument of a function as the first
argument of
*any* UFCS call.
Guido van Rossum has raised an objection on th
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 at 02:21:18 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jul 2018 19:22:05 +
schrieb 12345swordy :
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 08:55:59 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
> Frankly speaking, my feeling is that D is becoming a
> horrible mess for the programmer...
&g
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 01:31:13 UTC, JohnB wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:41:54 UTC, RhyS wrote:
Customers do not understand about programming. Your lucky
if most clients can even get a proper specification formulated
for what they want. If clients are that knowledgeable we do
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 00:41:54 UTC, RhyS wrote:
I am sorry to say but to succeed as a language beyond being a
small or hobby language it takes: Being established already or
having a big name to hype behind your "product". Anything
beyond that will have topic derail and frankly, its more
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 12:54:28 UTC, JohnB wrote:
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 08:55:59 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
Frankly speaking, my feeling is that D is becoming a horrible
mess for the programmer...
I'm starting to think that only a D3, with a lot of thing
reorganised wi
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 05:40:24 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
It is not just the avoiding copying, if it were I'm not sure
I'd support it. For me the greatest benefit is the increase in
readability due to not having useless temporaries everywhere in
ref heavy code (that may not be under AP
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 09:44:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/18/18 1:58 AM, John Carter wrote:
With web services, most of the time the shared state you want
elsewhere anyway (to make it persistent), so it's a better fit
for processes than most program domains.
Sharing a _comp
On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 13:15:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 7/13/18 8:55 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 12:45:40 UTC, crimaniak wrote:
This error handling policy makes D not applicable for
creating WEB applications and generally long-running services.
You u
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 16:00:11 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 15:30:23 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Andrei wrote in the message
I am looking for folks to assist me in creating a DIP for that.
There will be a _lot_ of work involved, so don't take it
li
On Monday, 2 April 2018 at 13:55:25 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
No, the reason nothing gets done is because "that would break
code" is used to kill every proposal that comes along. Someone
that only responds to proposals with "write a DIP" proceeds to
announce a major piece of the language will be d
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 05:27:20 UTC, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 04:15:26 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/03/2018 5:05 PM, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2018 at 03:53:07 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/03/2018 4:43 PM, Norm wrote:
[...]
You just said the magic word,
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 16:04:50 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07.03.2018 16:30, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 15:26:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07.03.2018 15:08, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:55:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 15:26:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07.03.2018 15:08, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:55:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
Jonathan, I understand your point, but still I can't find an
answer to clarify my doubts.
Are we askin
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:55:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 07, 2018 13:24:19 Paolo Invernizzi via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
That would make assertions a lot worse to use, because then
they would be in production code slowing it down. Also, as it
stands
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:32:37 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 08:58:50 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
Just to understand, otherwise, if the assert is removed and it
does not hold, you are in UB,
You're not. Just let the compiler treat the code as if the
as
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 11:52:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 07, 2018 09:22:40 Paolo Invernizzi via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 09:11:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
>> So, the request is to just leave assert active as a default
>&
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 09:11:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
So, the request is to just leave assert active as a default in
@safe code, like the bounds checks?
No. I'm saying that no optimizations should be enabled which
introduce potential memory corruption. Assertions should have
z
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 00:11:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06.03.2018 19:49, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
I simply don't understand why enforce or a custom check can't
be used @safe code, if you want that behaviour.
...
I have explained why. UB is non-modular and you don&
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 23:50:20 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06.03.2018 10:02, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/6/2018 12:45 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
Anyway, "do not use assert" is not the solution, as I have
explained many times now.
My interpretation is you want D assert to behave like C assert.
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 20:03:11 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2018 18:49:42 Paolo Invernizzi via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I simply don't understand why enforce or a custom check can't
be used @safe code, if you want that behaviour.
If the program must HALT
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 17:34:08 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 17:24:35 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, March 06, 2018 16:30:09 John Colvin via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 02:05:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> [...]
So, to clarify, adding
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 16:30:09 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 02:05:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/5/2018 2:30 PM, John Colvin wrote:
This just feels bad. Adding extra failsafes for my debug
program shouldn't make my release program less safe.
Then use `enforce()
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 18:07:34 UTC, carblue wrote:
(It may be absolutely unrelated, but there once was a very
productive and knowledgeable compiler et. al. contributor,
9rnsr, Hara Kenji; though not contributing to dmd since ~ 1.5
years any more, he's still ranked #1 in number of
contrib
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 10:41:05 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 09:59:53 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Honestly, this is not that hard. It's very hard in DMD because
it doesn't go through an SSA like form at any point. It's
rather disappointing to see the language spec being de
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 17:46:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 17:41:07 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
And just about every new dmd release, people fume on this
forum about regressions and gratuitous code breakages.
Not all deprecations/code breakages are *regressio
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 15:32:32 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 14:13:18 UTC, Joe wrote:
Again, coming from Python, I'm familiar with RTD
So I actually just made this extension to my dpldocs website:
http://ddb.dpldocs.info/ddb.postgres.html
You can try
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 09:10:03 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 08:32:38 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 07:57:47 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 05:33:56 UTC, Joe wrote:
4. ddb. About the same number of
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 07:57:47 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Saturday, 24 February 2018 at 05:33:56 UTC, Joe wrote:
4. ddb. About the same number of downloads as the above.
Implemented on top of front/backend protocol. No documentation
although repository has a folder with two sample progr
On Monday, 5 February 2018 at 23:18:58 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05.02.2018 22:56, Walter Bright wrote:
It's necessary. Working C expressions cannot be converted to D
while introducing subtle changes in behavior.
...
Neither byte nor dchar are C types.
The idea is a byte can be implicitly
On Friday, 2 February 2018 at 18:17:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 03:06:57PM +, Mark via
It has, to some extent. But the fundamental problem remains
that more manpower is needed so that he can be freed up to do
the more important things. Having to personally review all
On Friday, 2 February 2018 at 08:21:33 UTC, Martin Tschierschke
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 February 2018 at 22:38:36 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/1/2018 3:11 AM, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
Idea: There should be some kind of news ticker for all
enhancements and important decisions, maybe at first j
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 at 11:42:14 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 at 10:35:06 UTC, Benny wrote:
[...]
Not sure why that's a bad thing. They all have their ups and
downs:
[...]
That's the most refreshing post on D future since a long time.
Thanks, really.
/Paolo
On Monday, 29 January 2018 at 10:34:35 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 19:11 +, Laeeth Isharc via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
People also continue to think and write as if the D Foundation
has this inexhaustible fund of resources (pecuniary and
people) that it can command to w
On Sunday, 28 January 2018 at 08:40:35 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 at 15:20:15 UTC, Benny wrote:
You know you're not the first coming with this topic. I've
developped a theory. You guys are looking for excuses to not
get into D. If IDE were okay you would find something
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 22:55:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 22:45:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I could easily spend 30 hours per day just reading the n.g.
Learn threads tend to be quite short. Just skim the first post
in a thread to see what people talk about.
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 13:02:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/5/18 6:04 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
Andrei recently posted that he is following less the forums as
he prefer to invest his time in a different way ...
Adam suggested Walter to follow the 'learn' forum
On Friday, 5 January 2018 at 01:29:04 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
So it's highly unusual sets of people like that, or like the
founders of Sociomantic, or like the EMSI guys, or Liran's guys
at Weka that are likely to be D adopters in the next wave. Not
people who can't see through error message
On Thursday, 4 January 2018 at 19:06:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, January 04, 2018 10:27:37 H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:23:57AM +, Paolo Invernizzi via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 January 2018 at 07:47:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh
>
On Thursday, 4 January 2018 at 20:05:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/4/18 2:21 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Another person I miss is bearophile... while AFAIK he did not
actually
contribute code, he was very active in submitting bugs and
enhancement
requests, many of which led to significant
On Thursday, 4 January 2018 at 10:18:29 UTC, Dan Partelly wrote:
Id rather use a nice language as D to write new software, not
to port old **working** tools which are only maintained and
not developed to it. I see no sense for that.
And the reality of having ported the DMD frontend to D and
On Thursday, 4 January 2018 at 07:47:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
I'm missing Kenji...
On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 18:01:46 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 16:50 +, Paolo Invernizzi via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
That's another things I really don't understand...
The community know of C, obviously. They know of C++ and have
consciously ignore
On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 16:42:49 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
D wasn't an option here due to lack of knowledge by the
GStreamer crew.
That's another things I really don't understand...
/Paolo
On Wednesday, 27 December 2017 at 15:37:22 UTC, rjframe wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:54:14 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/26/2017 1:03 AM, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
The point is that the presence of one @safe: line in the
module can be mechanically checked, over one million devs
working on
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 11:54:12 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 10:00:25 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
IMHO, the lost list of vulnerability in code shipped by "first
class enterprises" is just crying out that C/C++ is not
mechanically checkable.
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 09:21:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 09:03:31 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that the presence of one @safe: line in the
module can be mechanically checked, over one million devs
working on a codebase.
The whole point
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 07:01:16 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 04:47:35 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Only if someone considers this as fixed:
int foo(int* p) { return p[1]; }
int bar(int i) { return foo(&i); }
clang++ -c test.cpp -Wall
good examp
On Friday, 22 December 2017 at 09:46:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-12-22 00:11, Atila Neves wrote:
I tried lld on Linux for D binaries and some of them crash.
That might not mean anything on Windows, but given that I've
run into 2 dmd bugs so far in which picking one of ld.bfd or
ld.g
On Friday, 8 December 2017 at 02:14:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 07:20:57PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
In spite of the fact that CTFE is done at compile time, __ctfe
is a runtime thing - it's just that it's runtime from the
perspective of CTFE. S
On Tuesday, 28 November 2017 at 15:33:39 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 27 November 2017 at 10:20:17 UTC, Chris wrote:
There seems to be a problem with
http://code.dlang.org/
at the moment (27.11.)
Down again.
And so it was my CI pipeline...
/P
On Sunday, 3 September 2017 at 19:40:27 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> Hi Bearophile!
I'm afraid bearophile has moved to greener pastures. I've run
into bearophile on Reddit on Rust-related threads. He uses a
different name there.
*sigh*
On Friday, 11 August 2017 at 13:06:54 UTC, aberba wrote:
So I'm into this platform with a vibe.d api server + back-end
and I'm confused/curious to know the hosting package to use. I
will have a lot of images uploaded by users.
[...]
We are using dockerized vibe.d containers in a docker swarm
On Friday, 23 June 2017 at 10:38:23 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
350 issues, 42 pull requests. I have to admit I am shocked.
+1
/Paolo
On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 07:00:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-06-16 08:30, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
A direct question to Walter and Andrei really.
If someone, let us say Russel Winder, create a CMake/Ninja
and/or
Meson/Ninja build for DMD, is there any chance of it being
On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 20:04:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:41:13PM +0300, ketmar via we have to
basically build the entire OS along with all its utilities and
other application software that will run on it.
... and tup can do it [1]... ;-P
/P
[1] http://gittup.org
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 at 18:51:58 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Things like this make you *really* appreciate D features
and the oft-maligned but life-saving GC.
+1000! GC is an opportunity, not a burden! :-P
/Paolo
On Sunday, 4 June 2017 at 19:12:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-06-04 20:15, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 15:19:29 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Array bound accesses should be easy to intercept and have
them just
kill the current thread.
Ideally, fiber, as
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 10:47:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 10:21:03 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
It doesn't seems to me that the trends to try to handle
somehow, that something, somewhere, who knows when, has gone
wild it's coherent wit
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 09:48:05 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 03.06.2017 08:55, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 23:23:45 UTC, nohbdy wrote:
It's exacerbated because Walter is in a mindset of writing
mission-critical applications where any detectable bug means
you ne
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 07:51:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 3 June 2017 at 06:55:35 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The worst thing happened in programming in the last 30 years
is just that less and less programmers are adopting Walter
mindset...
Really?
On the contrary
On Friday, 2 June 2017 at 23:23:45 UTC, nohbdy wrote:
It's exacerbated because Walter is in a mindset of writing
mission-critical applications where any detectable bug means
you need to restart the program. Honestly, if I were writing
flight control systems for Airbus, I could modify druntime
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 19:20:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01.06.2017 10:47, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 06:11:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:24:02AM +, John Carter via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
[...]
[...]
Again, from an engineering
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 18:54:51 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01.06.2017 14:25, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
I can detail exactly what happened in my code -- I am
accepting dates from a given week from a web request. One of
the dates fell outside the week, and so tried to access a 7
element
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 10:26:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 5/31/17 9:05 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/31/2017 6:04 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Technically this is a programming error, and a bug. But
memory hasn't
actually been corrupted.
Since you don't know where the bad i
On Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 06:11:43 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:24:02AM +, John Carter via
Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
[...]
[...]
Again, from an engineering standpoint, this is a tradeoff.
[...]
That's exactly the point: to use the right tool for the
requirement
On Wednesday, 17 May 2017 at 16:32:45 UTC, juanjux wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 May 2017 at 11:08:00 UTC, ezneh wrote:
[...]
I use D with the Vim plugin, Dutyl. The installation of
dependences is somewhat manual but once it installed it works
perfectly well. Compared with the Go plugin the only t
On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 11:31:12 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
And the most impressive to me is actually the way Walter
answers to D users. If you are reading this forum since years
you know what I mean. I try to emulate some of this with
customers.
That's really true: I sincerely thin
On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 at 02:36:37 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Education isn't a bad idea, but I think hearing from people who
are using it to do things is most powerful in persuading people
at this stage. So the talks from Ethan of Remedy and Liran of
Weka were very important
That's exa
On Thursday, 23 March 2017 at 11:56:45 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 24/03/2017 12:29 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 23 March 2017 at 11:15:45 UTC, Георгий wrote:
On Thursday, 23 March 2017 at 11:09:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
[...]
I don't agree. On the web, in production
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 23:49:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:49:25PM +, Mike via
We would love to change the defaults, but unfortunately that
boat has already sailed a long time ago. If we could do it all
over again, I'm sure a lot of defaults would be the o
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 21:55:40 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 19:25:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli
Regarding that, I have trought that wouldn't it be better if it
was bounds checking instead of debug vs release what determined
if in contracts are called? If the contract had
1 - 100 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
