[Issue 7714] Building d-programming-language.org fails to build phobos when built with multiple jobs.

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7714 Seb changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 4780] d-programming-language.org: CSS is completely borked

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4780 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|D1 D2 |D2 --

[Issue 7714] Building d-programming-language.org fails to build phobos when built with multiple jobs.

: ../d-programming-language.org/std.ddoc -Df../d-programming-language.org/web/phobos/std_algorithm.html std/algorithm.d std/c/string.d(12): Error: module string is in file 'core/stdc/string.d' which cannot be read Somehow, I cut off the full compile line. This should be: ../dmd.2.058/src/dmd

[Issue 7714] New: Building d-programming-language.org fails to build phobos when built with multiple jobs.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7714 Summary: Building d-programming-language.org fails to build phobos when built with multiple jobs. Product: D Version: D2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status

Re: Intrusive Makefile for d-programming-language.org

On 1/15/12 9:19 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 1/15/12 7:09 AM, Peter Alexander wrote: I'm not particularly well versed in Makefile ethics, but this caught me by surprise. Suppose I clone d-programming-language.org into my home directory (as I did), do some work, then later on run make

Intrusive Makefile for d-programming-language.org

I'm not particularly well versed in Makefile ethics, but this caught me by surprise. Suppose I clone d-programming-language.org into my home directory (as I did), do some work, then later on run make clean. git clone https://.../d-programming-language.org.git cd d-programming-language.org

Re: Intrusive Makefile for d-programming-language.org

On 2012-01-15 14:28, mta`chrono wrote: If I had a web dir in my home directory (not exactly uncommon), it would have been deleted without warning. Luckily, I didn't. I now have it cloned into a separate dir where it can do no harm. Is it normal for Makefiles to be so intrusive? IMO, Makefiles

Re: Intrusive Makefile for d-programming-language.org

On 1/15/12 7:09 AM, Peter Alexander wrote: I'm not particularly well versed in Makefile ethics, but this caught me by surprise. Suppose I clone d-programming-language.org into my home directory (as I did), do some work, then later on run make clean. git clone https://.../d-programming

[Issue 6020] Dead link: http://d-programming-language.org/32-64-portability.html

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6020 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: Apache redirect digitalmars.com/d/2.0 - d-programming-language.org

Turns out all .htaccess use was disabled by the admin (Jan Knepper). He added the redirect straight to the config file of the server. Now everything with the prefix http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ or http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ should redirect to the respective page on d-programming

Re: Apache redirect digitalmars.com/d/2.0 - d-programming-language.org

/ should redirect to the respective page on d-programming-language.org. Let us know how that works! Thanks, Andrei It seems to be working quite nicely. My old bookmarks now redirect to exactly what they should. Thank you.

Apache redirect digitalmars.com/d/2.0 - d-programming-language.org

Hello, I wrote this to the site admin (Jan Knepper) too. Walter and I are trying to set up the digitalmars.com server such that all request for pages under digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ go to the corresponding file in d-programming-language.org/. I experimented on my own website and here

Re: Apache redirect digitalmars.com/d/2.0 - d-programming-language.org

Apache rewriting is the hardest thing in the world. But I'd try putting a [R] at the end of that redirect line and if it fails, check the error log. tail /var/log/httpd/error_log or whatever it is on your box. Sometimes there's something helpful in there.

Re: Apache redirect digitalmars.com/d/2.0 - d-programming-language.org

On 11/12/2011 7:45 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 11/12/11 9:37 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: tail /var/log/httpd/error_log or whatever it is on your box. Sometimes there's something helpful in there. The [R] applies to RewriteRule, not RedirectMatch. Walter, could you please take a look at

Re: Apache redirect digitalmars.com/d/2.0 - d-programming-language.org

On 11/12/11 9:37 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: Apache rewriting is the hardest thing in the world. But I'd try putting a [R] at the end of that redirect line and if it fails, check the error log. tail /var/log/httpd/error_log or whatever it is on your box. Sometimes there's something helpful in

Re: Apache redirect digitalmars.com/d/2.0 - d-programming-language.org

file in d-programming-language.org/. I experimented on my own website and here is the appropriate .htaccess rule that works: RedirectMatch ^/d/2\.0/(.*) http://d-programming-language.org/$1 With this, e.g. http://digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_algorithm.html should automatically redirect

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 2011-07-05 08:31:46 +0300, Dmitry Olshansky said: On 05.07.2011 1:10, bearophile wrote: Steven Schveighoffer: Or, use a separate type which throws the errors if you wish. I have recently explained why this is not good enough, or even currently impossible:

Re: d-programming-language.org

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 16:16:04 -0400, eles e...@eles.com wrote: Yes non-relase mode is slower, but we are probably talking about a very significant slowdown here. A lot of integer math happens in D. What about testing only for user selected variables/types? That's fine, just define a new

Re: d-programming-language.org

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:10:04 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote: Steven Schveighoffer: Or, use a separate type which throws the errors if you wish. I have recently explained why this is not good enough, or even currently impossible:

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 05.07.2011 10:35, Max Klyga wrote: On 2011-07-05 08:31:46 +0300, Dmitry Olshansky said: On 05.07.2011 1:10, bearophile wrote: Steven Schveighoffer: Or, use a separate type which throws the errors if you wish. I have recently explained why this is not good enough, or even currently

Re: d-programming-language.org

Note that I've proposed a solution elsewhere to use c* (i.e. cint, clong, cuint, culong, etc.) to mean checked integral, then you can alias it to int or alias it to your struct type depending on debug flags you pass to dmd. This should be a reasonable solution, I might actually use it in

Re: d-programming-language.org

eles wrote: ... It does not mean that dormant bugs like overflows cannot exist and, in the long run, they could be as dangerous (for example, they may also lead to memory corruption if positive index becomes... negative - ie. overflows). Besides, yes, memory corruption is a dangerous bug but

Re: d-programming-language.org

I have an idea - how about the notation Uncircular!uint to designate such a type? Andrei Either put it into the standard language, either I have a better one. what about dropping printf and start using: mov ah, 9 int 0x21 instead? I am sure it can be done. So, why not dropping all D and

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/3/11 3:50 PM, bearophile wrote: Andrei: Safe on top of flexible is the best design. If there is anything preventing you from defining a type with the behavior you mention, you may want to file a bug. I am not a believer. Compile time/run time integral overflows to be good enough need to

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/4/11 1:49 PM, eles wrote: I have an idea - how about the notation Uncircular!uint to designate such a type? Andrei Either put it into the standard language, either I have a better one. what about dropping printf and start using: mov ah, 9 int 0x21 instead? I am sure it can be done.

Re: d-programming-language.org

Automatic built-in overflow checking is a choice in the language design space that has distinct consequences. It's easy to execute in the compiler so the entry barrier is low. To claim that language designers who didn't go that way simply missed the point makes for a weak story. Andrei Well,

Re: d-programming-language.org

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:49:03 -0400, eles e...@eles.com wrote: I have an idea - how about the notation Uncircular!uint to designate such a type? Andrei Either put it into the standard language, either I have a better one. what about dropping printf and start using: mov ah, 9 int 0x21

Re: d-programming-language.org

Steven Schveighoffer: To the point -- lots of existing D and C code uses the properties of integer overflow. If integer overflow is assumed to be an error, then that code is broken, even though the code *expects* overflow to occur, and in fact might *depend* on it occurring. In this

Re: d-programming-language.org

I think that's a really good idea. I'm sure there's a great assembly newsgroup or forum where you can post your ideas and mock the D community for the bunch of boobs that we are. For the record, I have nothing against the D community. Nor against the D language and I wouldn't spend time here

Re: d-programming-language.org

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:48:12 -0400, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote: Steven Schveighoffer: To the point -- lots of existing D and C code uses the properties of integer overflow. If integer overflow is assumed to be an error, then that code is broken, even though the code

Re: d-programming-language.org

Yes non-relase mode is slower, but we are probably talking about a very significant slowdown here. A lot of integer math happens in D. What about testing only for user selected variables/types? I think a much more effective fix for the language would be to make slice length a signed type.

Re: d-programming-language.org

eles wrote: Yes non-relase mode is slower, but we are probably talking about a very significant slowdown here. A lot of integer math happens in D. What about testing only for user selected variables/types? [snip.] How is Uncircular!uint not up to that particular task? Arguably, it can be

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/4/11 2:48 PM, bearophile wrote: Steven Schveighoffer: To the point -- lots of existing D and C code uses the properties of integer overflow. If integer overflow is assumed to be an error, then that code is broken, even though the code *expects* overflow to occur, and in fact might

Re: d-programming-language.org

Steven Schveighoffer: Or, use a separate type which throws the errors if you wish. I have recently explained why this is not good enough, or even currently impossible: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.Darticle_id=139950 I don't want runtime errors

Re: d-programming-language.org

Andrei: unsafe(overflows) { // code here } This approach has a number of issues. This approach is the one used by Delphi, Ada and C# (C# has a way to specify even inside a single expression), so somehow it's doable. First, addressing transitivity is difficult. If the code in such a scope

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/4/2011 12:48 PM, bearophile wrote: In this case you wrap the code in something that allows it to overflow without errors, like: unsafe(overflows) { // code here } Regardless of the merits of doing overflow checks, this is the completely wrong way to go about it. This must be a

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/4/11 4:40 PM, bearophile wrote: Andrei: unsafe(overflows) { // code here } This approach has a number of issues. This approach is the one used by Delphi, Ada and C# (C# has a way to specify even inside a single expression), so somehow it's doable. I didn't say it wasn't doable.

Re: d-programming-language.org

Since I didn't see this being mentioned anywhere, I thought I'd mention it... On 7/4/2011 1:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/4/11 2:48 PM, bearophile wrote: In this case you wrap the code in something that allows it to overflow without errors, like: unsafe(overflows) { // code here }

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/4/2011 7:38 PM, Mehrdad wrote: Actually, there is **NO** performance issue -- at least not in C#. In fact, if you run this program (with or without optimizations), you will see that they're literally the same almost all the time: using System; static class Program { static long globalVar

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/4/11 7:38 PM, Mehrdad wrote: Since I didn't see this being mentioned anywhere, I thought I'd mention it... On 7/4/2011 1:58 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/4/11 2:48 PM, bearophile wrote: In this case you wrap the code in something that allows it to overflow without errors, like:

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/4/2011 5:38 PM, Mehrdad wrote: Actually, there is **NO** performance issue -- at least not in C#. In fact, if you run this program (with or without optimizations), you will see that they're literally the same almost all the time: It's a bit extraordinary that there is no cost in executing

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 05.07.2011 1:10, bearophile wrote: Steven Schveighoffer: Or, use a separate type which throws the errors if you wish. I have recently explained why this is not good enough, or even currently impossible:

d-programming-language.org

1. please update http://www.d-programming-language.org/faq.html#q6 (Why fall through on switch statements?). The reason D doesn't change this is for the same reason that integral promotion rules and operator precedence rules were kept the same - to make code that looks the same as in C operate

Re: d-programming-language.org

On Jul 4, 11 02:40, eles wrote: 1. please update http://www.d-programming-language.org/faq.html#q6 (Why fall through on switch statements?). The reason D doesn't change this is for the same reason that integral promotion rules and operator precedence rules were kept the same - to make code that

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/3/2011 11:40 AM, eles wrote: I know that is implemented that way (and vala and python went with it). What would be the cost to replace those X..Y with X..(Y-1)? Aren't the above reasons worthy to consider such a change? Regardless of the merits of your argument, such a change will

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/3/11 8:40 PM, eles wrote: -logic (not just code-writing or compile-writing easiness) consistency -the fact that multi-dimensional slicing (possibly, a future feature) is far more convenient when x..y is inclusive (just imagine remembering which those elements are left out on those many-

Re: d-programming-language.org

Am 03.07.2011 20:40, schrieb eles: 2. http://www.d-programming-language.org/faq.html#case_range (Why doesn't the case range statement use the case X..Y: syntax?) saying that Case (1) has a VERY DIFFERENT meaning from (2) and (3). (1) is inclusive of Y, and (2) and (3) are exclusive of Y.

Re: d-programming-language.org

eles wrote: 1. please update http://www.d-programming-language.org/faq.html#q6 (Why fall through on switch statements?). The reason D doesn't change this is for the same reason that integral promotion rules and operator precedence rules were kept the same - to make code that looks the same

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/3/11 1:58 PM, KennyTM~ wrote: On Jul 4, 11 02:40, eles wrote: 1. please update http://www.d-programming-language.org/faq.html#q6 (Why fall through on switch statements?). The reason D doesn't change this is for the same reason that integral promotion rules and operator precedence rules

Re: d-programming-language.org

On Jul 4, 11 04:16, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 7/3/11 1:58 PM, KennyTM~ wrote: On Jul 4, 11 02:40, eles wrote: 1. please update http://www.d-programming-language.org/faq.html#q6 (Why fall through on switch statements?). The reason D doesn't change this is for the same reason that integral

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/3/11 1:40 PM, eles wrote: 1. please update http://www.d-programming-language.org/faq.html#q6 (Why fall through on switch statements?). The reason D doesn't change this is for the same reason that integral promotion rules and operator precedence rules were kept the same - to make code that

Re: d-programming-language.org

Andrei: Safe on top of flexible is the best design. If there is anything preventing you from defining a type with the behavior you mention, you may want to file a bug. I am not a believer. Compile time/run time integral overflows to be good enough need to be built-in, more than associative

Re: d-programming-language.org

Regardless of the merits of your argument, such a change will silently break nearly every D program out there. It's way, way too late. forbid/or no the former (..) and introduce a new one (...) 2..4 = 2, 3 2...4 = 2, 3, 4

Re: d-programming-language.org

2..4 = 2, 3 2...4 = 2, 3, 4 alternative syntaxes could be (:) one could also have stepped ranges (inclusive or exclusive), let's say: 1:2:5 = 1, 3, 5 although this is not so practical for the compiler (I think that slices are kept through the pointer/length couple, so stepped slices would

Re: d-programming-language.org

various arguments. Please don't bring this up again. Thank you. I won't, but this is because I made that decision minutes ago. Well, (almost) enough for now. I also maintain that unsigned types should throw out-of-range exceptions (in debug mode, so that release will run as fast as it

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 7/3/11 4:23 PM, eles wrote: various arguments. Please don't bring this up again. Thank you. I won't, but this is because I made that decision minutes ago. Even better. Well, (almost) enough for now. I also maintain that unsigned types should throw out-of-range exceptions (in debug mode,

Re: d-programming-language.org

What I meant: Run-time: I have written an enhancement request for LLVM about optimizing much better the simple operations needed to spot and use the overflows. LLVM dev team has implemented it in 2.8 or 2.9. Such optimizations are not optional, if you want people to use overflow tests they

[Issue 6020] New: Dead link: http://d-programming-language.org/32-64-portability.html

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6020 Summary: Dead link: http://d-programming-language.org/32-64-portability.ht ml Product: D Version: D2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Status

Hidden links for Language Reference on d-programming-language.org

The links for Documentation: Language Reference gets hidden when you click on any of the following four items: o Lexical o Templates o Inline Assembler o Documentation Comments - Andrew

Re: Hidden links for Language Reference on d-programming-language.org

on Language Reference (http://d-programming-language.org/language-reference.html).

Hidden links for Language Reference on d-programming-language.org

The links for Documentation: Language Reference gets hidden when you click on any of the following four items: o Lexical o Templates o Inline Assembler o Documentation Comments - Andrew

Re: Hidden links for Language Reference on d-programming-language.org

on Language Reference (http://d-programming-language.org/language-reference.html).

Re: d-programming-language.org

changes. The result is in http://d-programming-language.org. It has (or at least should have) no new content, only style changes. I added a simple site index, see http://d-programming-language.org/siteindex.html. It's not linked from anywhere but gives a good entry point for all pages

Re: d-programming-language.org

Gölgeliyele wrote: Can the D logo (as in the github site: https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1fe90c0586802aee103ff9ac0b8f3fbe?s=140d=https://github.com%2Fimages%2Fgravatars%2Fgravatar-140.png) located on the left top area where the digital mars logo used to sit? the empty space looks a little

Re: d-programming-language.org

changes. The result is in http://d-programming-language.org. It has (or at least should have) no new content, only style changes. I added a simple site index, see http://d-programming-language.org/siteindex.html. It's not linked from anywhere but gives a good entry point for all pages on the site. One

Re: d-programming-language.org

changes. The result is in http://d-programming-language.org. It has (or at least should have) no new content, only style changes. I added a simple site index, see http://d-programming-language.org/siteindex.html. It's not linked from anywhere but gives a good entry point for all pages on the site

Re: d-programming-language.org

Ary Manzana The only think I don't like is the background image. I mean, I like the background, it just doesn't have to be an image. Each time I go to another page it shows me a white page and then loads everything. That's not the image's fault. The image is cached and background loaded, so

Re: d-programming-language.org

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:03:08 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote: I've had some style updates from David Gileadi rotting in a zip file in my inbox for a good while. It took me the better part of today to manually merge his stale files with the ones in the

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 1/31/11 11:50 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: BTW, in perusing the site, I noticed the language reference does not contain a navigation menu. I can only get to the lexical page, not any other pages of the language reference. Andrei e-mailed me about this. It's due to some Ddoc macros that

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 1/31/11 12:50 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote: On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:03:08 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote: I've had some style updates from David Gileadi rotting in a zip file in my inbox for a good while. It took me the better part of today to manually merge

d-programming-language.org

-language.org. It has (or at least should have) no new content, only style changes. I added a simple site index, see http://d-programming-language.org/siteindex.html. It's not linked from anywhere but gives a good entry point for all pages on the site. One other link of possible interest is http

Re: d-programming-language.org

Andrei Alexandrescu napisał: In agreement with Walter, I removed the Digitalmars reference. The message is simple - D has long become an entity independent from the company that created it. (However, this makes the page header look different and probably less visually appealing.) The

Re: d-programming-language.org

On 01/30/2011 09:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: In agreement with Walter, I removed the Digitalmars reference. The message is simple - D has long become an entity independent from the company that created it. (However, this makes the page header look different and probably less visually

Re: d-programming-language.org

is in http://d-programming-language.org. It has (or at least should have) no new content, only style changes. I added a simple site index, see http://d-programming-language.org/siteindex.html. It's not linked from anywhere but gives a good entry point for all pages on the site. One other

Re: d-programming-language.org

-Language/d-programming-language.org -- Best regards, Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net

Re: d-programming-language.org

://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org o wow, somehow I missed that. That's great!

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

Looks good. May I use it on d-programming-language.org? Andrei This should be answered by Marcel Martin. (I will send a copy of this email to the email-address on the website) I've found this image through this website: http://dlogo.chinese-blog.org/ greets Matthias For now I snatched

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

Matthias Pleh wrote: ... there is already a SVG logo for the D-man since 5 years, but obviousily it get not adopted :/ http://w148.de/~mmartin/d/logo.html Looks good. May I use it on d-programming-language.org? This should be answered by Marcel Martin. (I will send a copy of this email

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

/~mmartin/d/logo.html Looks good. May I use it on d-programming-language.org? Andrei I could have a crack at cleanly redesigning C-man and the C++-anchor using my n#822;o#822;n#822;-#822;e#822;x#822;i#822;s#822;t#822;e#822;n#822;t#822; Inkscape skills, if I get a moment or two of spare time

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

Am 2010-09-02 14:46, schrieb retard: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:31:03 +0100, Gareth Charnock wrote: PS: Google Chrome on a 1680x1050 resolution display. I'm afraid I really like the red flare; it makes the website look more visually appealing. A solid background colour would just look blander.

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

The main page has a quote from Michael. Who the hell is Michael? The Michael? The archangel? On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Thomas Mader thomas.ma...@gmail.comwrote: Am 2010-09-02 14:46, schrieb retard: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:31:03 +0100, Gareth Charnock wrote: PS: Google Chrome on a

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

On 2010-12-31 10:45, Thomas Mader wrote: [...] How about a new logo for D in general? Are there any plans to make a contest or something similar to create a new D logo which has a modern looking design? vote ++ I also think that making the site valid is a very important thing, so are

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

Am 2010-12-31 11:35, schrieb Matthias Pleh: On 2010-12-31 10:45, Thomas Mader wrote: I also think that making the site valid is a very important thing, so are there any plans to do so? If nobody wants it to do I could help. I think a better marketing of the D community would not only attract

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

On 2010-12-31 11:40, Thomas Mader wrote: Am 2010-12-31 11:35, schrieb Matthias Pleh: On 2010-12-31 10:45, Thomas Mader wrote: I also think that making the site valid is a very important thing, so are there any plans to do so? If nobody wants it to do I could help. I think a better marketing

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

for d-programming-language.org. Andrei

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

: We need a more professional looking SVG version of the D man then! ... there is already a SVG logo for the D-man since 5 years, but obviousily it get not adopted :/ http://w148.de/~mmartin/d/logo.html Looks good. May I use it on d-programming-language.org? Andrei

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:30:54 -0600 Andrei == Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Andrei Looks good. May I use it on d-programming-language.org? How is it that I didn't know before about that site? Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: CDBF17CA

Re: Please comment on http://d-programming-language.org/

BTW: Am 2010-09-02 14:46, schrieb retard: We need a more professional looking SVG version of the D man then! ... there is already a SVG logo for the D-man since 5 years, but obviousily it get not adopted :/ http://w148.de/~mmartin/d/logo.html Looks good. May I use it on d-programming

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

: http://d-programming-language.org/phobos/phobos.html And I've had an idea to make the documentation website a little easier to navigate. Here's what the docs look like with their old design: http://imgur.com/8Vdrj.jpg Now, that's quite a mess to look at. The text isn't aligned

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

:04 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: The D website is 404'ing for the library page: http://d-programming-language.org/phobos/phobos.html And I've had an idea to make the documentation website a little easier to navigate. Here's what the docs look like with their old

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I'll share the tool when it's more complete, if this is something that is wanted for phobos I am willing to put it together. Yes please. Other Phobosites? Andrei I'm sorry, I did not understand what you meant.

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:56:25 -0600 Jimmy Cao jcao...@gmail.com wrote: With the json files dmd produces it can be automated, and you can do it the ddoc way (so latex and other formats would also be supported.) A disadvantage is that ddoc processor has to be ran twice plus an additional pass

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

On 12/11/10 1:33 PM, Lutger Blijdestijn wrote: Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: I'll share the tool when it's more complete, if this is something that is wanted for phobos I am willing to put it together. Yes please. Other Phobosites? Andrei I'm sorry, I did not understand what

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

I don't know JavaScript but I've managed to make it look similar if it helps. Methods for classes and structs don't show. http://imgur.com/rfRUc.jpg

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

On 12/10/10 12:38 AM, duckett wrote: I don't know JavaScript but I've managed to make it look similar if it helps. Methods for classes and structs don't show. http://imgur.com/rfRUc.jpg Looks interesting, could you please share the code in a bugzilla enhancement report? And welcome aboard!

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5339

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:04:22 -0500, Andrej Mitrovic and...@none.net wrote: The D website is 404'ing for the library page: http://d-programming-language.org/phobos/phobos.html And I've had an idea to make the documentation website a little easier to navigate. Here's what the docs look like

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: On 12/9/10 8:04 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: The D website is 404'ing for the library page: http://d-programming-language.org/phobos/phobos.html And I've had an idea to make the documentation website a little easier to navigate. Here's what the docs look like

http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

The D website is 404'ing for the library page: http://d-programming-language.org/phobos/phobos.html And I've had an idea to make the documentation website a little easier to navigate. Here's what the docs look like with their old design: http://imgur.com/8Vdrj.jpg Now, that's quite a mess

Re: http://d-programming-language.org/ 404 small proposal

Andrej Mitrovic and...@none.net wrote in message news:ids8s6$21g...@digitalmars.com... And I've had an idea to make the documentation website a little easier to navigate. Here's what the docs look like with their old design: http://imgur.com/8Vdrj.jpg Now, that's quite a mess to look at.

  1   2   >