--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave" wrote:
>
> Does anyone use JT65A on 17 or 30 meters, and if so, what frequency is used
> on both?
>
> Tnx es 73
> Dave
> KB3MOW
>
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the 80 meter jt65A contact tonight. Most use 10.139 for jt65a but it
is crowded with Winlink, Propn
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien wrote:
>
> I'll agree with John, while many here will find ALE400 easy to
> tackle, many "average" hams will be intimidated by an unfamiliar
> process. That is why Skip Teller's concepts behind NBEMS are good,
> using mode that many hams use every
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley wrote:
>
> Hey man you are preaching to the choir!!! ALE400 is a great mode, >even at
> higher latitudes such as I am.
>
>
> Now if we can only convince people to give it a try.
>
>
> John
>
> VE5MU
Echo, preaching to the choir!
I fi
Hi Jim,
Been awhile since I have see Picture Packet. If your version is "missing"
features you probably have the "lite" version. See:
http://www.huntting.com/picturepacket/
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jim seeber wrote:
>
>
> Hi, new user here, Jim kw3u in NE Pa.
> o
I have not been able to get it to boot; no problems with the earlier release.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W wrote:
>
> Have you been able to get this alpha to boot up?
>
> (Note: you have to change erac to esrac in the main url to access the site.)
>
> 73,
>
> Ri
Thanks for the information, actually a good idea. Believe we used to have our
original FeldHell club net in that area or up from there a bit; not a heavily
used band slice usually, but might need to dodge some Winlink Pactor I and II
stuff.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Just copied a most interesting CQ message on 20 meter PSK31 (call sign
> purposely deleted)
>
> "CQ Moon...CQ Mars...CQ Nearby Star Systems...CQ Alien Lifeforms Or Fellow
> Men In Black...DE X Calling CQ and Standing By"
>
> An
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "doug_helbling" wrote:
>
> Thanks for the welcome and the great advice and counsel,
> Patrick/Andrew/Christian/Marc/Simon/Siegfried et al.
>
> I did some more poking around on my rig, and found that my audio input to the
> PC was indeed the Mic input, not Li
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Fred VE3FAL" wrote:
>
> What frequency you folks been using?
No idea where Kim is listening; I am usually on 3.576 near or after sunset and
occasionally on 14.076 on the weekends during daylight.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
You might try reducing the AF level into your sound card; sounds like it is
being over-driven...aim for about 0 db in your "Rx noise" box assuming you are
using WSJT.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Kim" wrote:
>
> There is a VA3 station on JT65A the past two days who is
Hello Ed,
Most likely JT65A as activity on 20 meters is generally centered
around 14.076. This mode is part of WSJT's suite of modes. It excels
at weak signal work using very brief message formats and 60 second
xmit/rx sequences.
See http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/ for details.
73,
B
To echo what Rick stated,
FAE400 is an extremely useful ARQ mode that has a lot of potential;
robust yet reasonably narrow. Works very well, just a shame so few use it.
NBEMS is also a good ARQ suite, but a lot slower when using HF
friendly modes. No sure the lock-up time using MFSK16 has been
re
Hello Francois,
What frequency was it on? If it was on or about 14.070 USB dial
frequency, it was most likely JT65A. JT65A sounds like very very slow
DominoEX.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Francois Rochon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I am listening on 20 meters to a v
Sorry for the typo, meant ZL/VK...keys far too close together!
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Mel,
>
> Well from North America I work South Africa nightly on 7.076 using
> WSJT modes. The ZK/VK stations co
Hi Mel,
Well from North America I work South Africa nightly on 7.076 using
WSJT modes. The ZK/VK stations come later here, 0300 local or so. A
few EU stations on 7.039/7.038 but difficult to copy here due to CW
traffic.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Mel" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Frank,
I am running it under Vista on this box without any problems. I like
Multipsk for a variety of reasons. It offers many modes and despite
what some claim is a "cluttered" interface, I prefer being able to
change modes without fighting through numerous pull-down menus.
Suspect the biggest
Hello David,
I have not had that exact problem, so others might be able to shed
more light than I can.
First thing I would do is check for an open ground or a ground loop.
Also consider that your ptt "ground" is not necessarily your audio
"ground".
Does the problem go away when you transmit into a
no excuse.
73,
Bill
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:16 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot
>
>
>
> Hello John,
>
> We
Hello John,
Well I have seen no others, aside from you, complaining about qrm when
operating Pactor modes on the sole basis that you were using Pactor.
I am sure it happens as we all get benign qrm. As I have posted often,
it is sad some think Pactor modes are the issue when it is the Winlink
sys
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John Becker, WØJAB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Gee I did no make the list.
Well, John, you did at least as well as I did or better.
73.
Bill N9DSJ
Hello Jose,
You are correct, it does not seem that "attended" stations are always
"listening" stations. Have seem many clients qrming each other and
probably, to some locations, qrming the PMBO itself as they are
calling the PBMO that is already linked.
Might explain why, even though supposed "busy
Hello Lynn,
That is not a normal install. Perhaps you inadvertently unzipped the
files into your desk top? You might also ask on the dedicated Multipsk
group - alot of very helpful people there, although I am sure Patrick
monitors this group also.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups
Ok, I admit it, I mandated Rick to ask questions.
But seriously, why the concern about asking for clarification? And
yes, it does seem personal.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote:
> >My preference
Hello Leigh,
Yes this happens, but more commonly using MS -- check out "random
hours(s) sometime.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> This brings to mind the converse: it would be interesting if
possible to
> have multiple TX
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" wrote:
> >
> > Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
> > teapot.
> >
All,
ARQ FAE in ALE400 has proven, in my limited experience, to be
extremely robust compared to other ARQ modes and occupies reasonable
bandwidth. How difficult would this mode be to port to FLARQ/NBEMS?
It seems to me to be tailor-made for this application (but what do I
know?). Is it a matter of
Or "This Was" :)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patricia \(Elaine\) Gibbons"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> That's the way I look at it, Bill ...
>
>
>
> A sounding message is simply the station's callsign as the ALE ID,
> and soundings are only done if the station has an operator
Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
teapot.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After Tony Blair has solved the Israel-Palestine issue, he may be
> needed to address those old fashioned RTTY folks w
And this:
As of 2008-01-12 21:51:22 UTC database contains 244754 entries with
2326 unique callsigns.
I know this is culled regularly by Joe for false decodes and incorrect
frequencies and such..but note that these are only JT65A
receptions; does not include the other WSJT modes.
73,
Bill N9
Yes. A radio. No re sparkI even hear CW from time to time!
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" wrote:
> > One I had trouble with
>
> It is not that simple, after all, at least, so far.
>
> 73,
>
> Jose, CO2JA
>
> ---
>
> Bill McLaughlin wrote:
>
> > Hello Jack,
> >
> > In MultiPSK, the "RS ID" provides this function...automatically
> > changes mode and fre
Hello Jack,
In MultiPSK, the "RS ID" provides this function...automatically
changes mode and frequency also, when implemented. Not sure of any
other software that uses this function but it works very well and can
decode mode and center frequency fairly deep into the noise.
73,
Bill
--- In digit
Hi John,
If you want to set up a sked this weekend let me know. I use Winmail
to genrate NBEMS data mostly because I hate Outlook :)
Also, to be fair, FLARQ seemed to prefer the Winmail format to any
Outlook file I could generate. Maybe outlook express does better but
not willing to chance it.
An
You might try creating a shortcut to the mail folder and then drag the
shortcut wherever you desire.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to follow the instructions in
> VBdigi under Help->Radio email setup.
>
> I navi
Yes for receive. Also, MultiPSK can also receive and transmit Pactor I
FEC.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Roger J. Buffington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sholto Fisher wrote:
> >
> > You know I head a Pactor-1 FEC call around 14,061 a couple days ago
> > but I don't
Hello Howard,
I use Pactor I every now and then for keyboard to keyboard. It is hit
and miss for me; more a novelty than an oft-used mode.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "w6ids" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> There have been recent comments attesting to the demise of
> PA
Hello Rick,
There are at least two threads in the "talk" section of qrz.com that
relate to this...
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wish that Mark, N5RFX, would put this on QRZ.com since there would
> many hams who might comment pro or c
Hello Craig,
For only packet try:
http://www.uspacket.org/flex32/flx_32.htm
For multimode I know Mix and Multipsk does ax25 packet also.
Good luck and 73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Craig M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> HELP!!!
>
> I got my 857D all hooked up and foun
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I am confused. Sholto said it was Pactor 2, not Pactor 3. I don't
know
> that Winlink is involved at all. But there is so much mystery about
> these modes, and it seems like an archive would be a good idea
I suspect you are hearing JT2 which is very narrow and uses 2FSK and
DBPSK modulation for sync and data or JT4A at 17.5 BW and 4.375 spacing.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Around 2045Z Friday the 30th
>
> Freq. 14076+1750
>
I tend to agree with Charles in regard to a packet-only setup;
Flex32/Paxon is pretty slick.
MultiPSK in packet mode is more than just a terminal program; it needs
no external driver and does APRS, digipeats and mail (and probably
more). It is abit of a learning curve after using a more conventio
Agree,
After several ARQ FAE qsos and some via unproto, the ALE400 mode does
surprisingly well both on the lower and higher bands...well worth
further investigation.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think Patrick may be on to
Hello Omar and all,
http://www.w1hkj.com/emcpup.html
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "o." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew and also hello to Darrel and all the group.
> Thank you for the information. Where do I get to download the
software?
>
> Best 73
>
> Omar
*confused look*
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bill N9DSJ wrote:
> > JT65 is not an automatic or semi-automatic mode in any sense of
the
> > definition.
>
> Bill,
>
> JT65a is certainly an automatic mode.
> It is as automatic as any ot
Hello Bonnie,
Not sure I proved anything :)
If I fall asleep on my keyer is that an unattended CW mode?
If I leave my vox on and background noise keys the xmitter is that
an "attended SSB mode"?
What is at issue is *intentional* automatic modes, not my cat
stepping on the ptt.
JT65 is not an
Yes,
In a sense - it actually switches to the next *manually selected*
sequence when the time clicks; it is in no-way linked to any "over"
by another station (I know you know this Leigh, but just to clarify
for others).
It is the same as sending any macro or otherwise pre-canned message
on
Yes,
In a sense - it actually switches to the next *manually selected*
sequence when the time clicks; it is in no-way linked to any "over"
by another station (I know you know this Leigh, but just to clarify
for others).
It is the same as sending any macro or otherwise pre-canned message
on
Sorry for being late to respond, was out of the state on business and
have not read the replies so forgive me in advance. A few factors; time
of yearOlivia and especially DominoEX (moreso with FEC) perform
very well on 80 were few venture (aside from a few lame people like me)
in the warmer
Thanks to Joe's efforts the below site is highly recommended for anyone
working JT65A on HF:
http://jt65.w6cqz.org/
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Thanks to Joe's efforts try this site for a very useful JT65A HF site.
Thanks for your efforts, Joe.
Bill, N9DSJ
Hi,
GMDSS DSC is receive only in Multipsk and the frequency mentioned was
correct...corresponds to channel "70" on the marine VHF allocations.
Am sure someone will correct me if this is not correct
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi,
The appeal of JT65 is multi-faceted...works great deep into the noise
so I can work stations as meager as more own at some distance. Also
the freq tolerance, as you mentioned.
It is automated so a double right click on another call sets things
in motion - sit back and watch!
Socially it me
Hello Leigh,
Guess it depends on the operator, but do not think time is an issue
if the end result is worth itin the EME and MS world, an HF JT65A
contact speeds along, usually. Not to mention endless time some spend
in a pile-up, waiting for a net to come around to one or listening to
whi
No offense Bonnie,
But if you believe there is no activity on the freqs/times you
mentioned below you really need an antenna (and doubt you do as I can
work you often). Guess it all depends on how one defines "nearly
vacant". And of course that will change drastically with the sunspot
cycle.
Hi,
Well with and JT65/JT6M/FSK441 modes you will not see a "qso" as
such...that you see shorthand messages like RO and OOO says your
setup is ok...these modes are not "qso" modes...it is for exchange of
calls, location and report and little more. You should see calls and
grid locations on the
Can see no valid reason for encryption on our frequencies. If one
could provide an single example I would be interested..
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If it was really child's play, it would have been done several
years
> ago. I too use
Easy answer$$$
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "N6CRR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
> wrote:
> >
> > > ARRL Withdraws "Regulation by Bandwidth" Petition
>
> Good why don't they resubmit with a new regulatory standard that no
> pr
Yes,
Thanks Joe..
Worked Cesco using PSKAM10, a mode I suspect few would otherwise look
for blindly.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks to tremendous work of Joe N8FQ, we now have a new method of
> interacting and arra
Hi Bonnie,
I think PactorII is better than PactorIII in terms of being
efficient; it is why Winlink systems revert to PactorII when
conditions become tough (for an example of my subjectivity).
But it all depends on how one defines "better", as I said in an
earlier postalot of factors invol
Got 1.5 out of 4 right :)
To qualify: Think the best "path test" for HF is JT65A, soon to be
more versatile for that..
Best for HF email: either PSKmail, PAX/PAX2 or some AX.25 varient
Best weak signal keyboard chats: depends on how you define "weak
signal" - too many candidates to mention unl
Hi,
7L4IOU and EA7DUD are both real;
Don't under-estimate yourself or the mode!
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, WN1Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Howdy folks,
>
> I had my first JT65A qso with wb6mlc, just
> maybe 200 miles distant, no challenge there ...
> we often
Hi Brian,
It is under "options" on the main program window, not the SpecJT window.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "c6alk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> I have not been able to find how to turn off the "Deep Search"
> function in WSJT version 5.9.0. The exce
No argument from me. Alot to be garnered from this...both technically
and socially. The discussion alone is of value. The mode suite is
pretty much what it is in context of its intent. That it provokes
interest on HF might be an arrow pointing towards abit different
goal. Might even mean that b
All,
Actually an old controversy re JT65* modes in the EME community, dead
horse oft beaten but still think it is the mode suite of choice for
MS and EME; also think more to the point is what other weak signal
modes work as well or better with bandwidth taken into balance on HF?
If for a 60 s
I don't believe it happened.
Would need to see it myself.
Opps, I did see it happen
Good going Tony and Al.
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Managned to work Al, XE2AT on JT65 with 5mw this
> evening on 20 meters. All was usin
ECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:19:11 -0000
> "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Per topic, deepsearch is great for EME, a wonderful feature. But
on
> > HF is is of little value and will only le
All,
Per topic, deepsearch is great for EME, a wonderful feature. But on HF
is is of little value and will only lead to false decodes and "stations
answering you when you haven't transmitted".
Decode menu, JT65, check "No deep search"
Hope this helps..
73
Bill N9DSJ
Hi Howard,
Congrats!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "w6ids" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello, All.
>
> I've been playing with this mode and making piece meal contacts as
> it were while learning. Mostly, I've been receiving.
>
> I know the thing works, but there's
Well Jerry is from Iowa so not sure it counts :)
Also liked Cesco (HB9TLK) working the US on 80 meters with his
antenna at 10 feet high.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's one of my favourite entries from the N0UK JT65A T
Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work although with little
margin!
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All:
>
> Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20
> meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would seem
> there was some room
Hi,
Also go to the "decode" psuedo-button and disble "deepsearch"
options...might miss a weak sign in the deepsearch file but will
speed up the decodes...
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Darrel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc
>
> With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz
Well done! Congratulations...
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Juan Carlos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Andrew anda John:
>
> Oh. Sorry by delay in the answer, but today I was involved in a
local
> special "Radio & Chidrens Event", a kind of field-day to show how
t
In WSJT, F5 key is your friend!
"RO" means you received the "OOO"
it is a shorthand "roger" for the "OOO" report...
Bill N9DSJ
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tony, I got confused when trying to explain, maybe you will be
better. Can
> you explain
Glad I have never ever done that! (and if you believe that..)
Bill N9DSJ
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], KT2Q <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andy,
>
> Not sure what that was about -- could be that he
> forgot to click the next message -- it happens
> ).
>
> Tony
Hi Andy,
May well be, what JT65 decode parameters do you have set? It is a
valid call in the deep search file: JA7BJP,QM07GNnote the "0 10"
decode at the end of the line -- it gives one a clue as to
the "source" of the decoded text/call - in this case "0" means no
Reed-Solomon decode but
Hi Bill,
Not ignorance at all, it is not very intuitive!
It means (basically) that Tony heard WD4KPD calling CQ DX in JT65 mode
on 14.076.
file ID (time based): 001000
sync: 5
strength: -11 db
time offset: -0.2 (in seconds)
freq offset: 277 (in Hz)
sync width: 3
message type: normal (*)
hence:
TED]> wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Nice going and yes, it does say a lot for this
> mode. Been a while since we QSO'd on 6 meter
> meteor scatter. Worked Jerry (KC0HLN) the other
> day...
>
> 031800 11 -5 0.1 -16 3 # KT2Q N9DSJ EN52
> OOO 1 0
>
&
A tribute to my Big 15 Wattson an 80 meter antenna :(
says alot about the mode
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
> wrote:
> >
> > Good contact Tony. Let me see Cesc
Hello Dan,
First, congratulations on the General ticket!
Am sure if you give us details as to the software you are using and
what modes are of interest (hopefully they coincide!), there are many
here that would be glad to help you. Suspect PSK31 would be the
easiest mode to start with; the usual
Hello Dan,
First, congratulations on the General ticket!
Am sure if you give us details as to the software you are using and
what modes are of interest (hopefully they coincide!), there are many
hear that would be glad to help you. Suspect PSK31 would be the
easiest mode to start with; the usu
Echo...
No need for everyone to be on the same exact freq..spread out abit.
200 Hz is usually enough. You can work multiple qso's at the same
time if you watch the DF...but not if everyone is one the same freq
during the same sequence..
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Da
Hi Andy,
Think there is a mixed bag; some of use have used the WSJT modes for
some time on vhf/uhf for EME and MS;p so we tend to stick to known
conventions. So far I have seen no reason to deviate from that...
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
3.576
seen both usb and lsb used..
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Sparks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Any idea what frequency is used for 80m JT65a?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, April 05,
Hi Les,
you were -15 to -21 db here but decoded well on my 80 meter antenna.
N5SIX heard you better on his 8ft wire :)
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Les Keppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
> > i need a vk/zl and a s.america for wac
Hi Danny,
Seems ok; select a mode then hit the "monitor" buttonscreen will
be black until you go into "monitor" mode...
Bill, N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK Guys Ive gotten hung up from the git go here on setting this
thing up.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "w6ids" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sheesh! What are you talking about, Andy?
{snipped}
I blame Joe Taylor.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
Hello Rick,
Try MT63 under heavy QRN conditions; alot of downsides but for
bucking qrn/qrm have found this about the bestCHIP modes also
seem to do well in high qrn environmentsboth are wide bandwidth
(relatively) so this may well be a part of it all..
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digita
Hello Jeff,
Congratulations on the upgrade. for BPSK31 your best bets are to poke
arounnd 3.580, 7.070 or 14.070 - that is where the bulk of activity
is depending upon conditions and time of day.
73 and good luck!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jeffnjr484" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Odd,
Posted this once and see mutiple instances of it --- believe the same
thing is being observed on other Yahoo groups but apologies in any case,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
{snipped}
Hi Joe,
my guess (and indeed it is a guess) is 4 or 5 baud DominoEX or one of
the JT65 (A,B,or C) modes...hard drive on the computer died so cannot
play it back to decode it until I get it all up and running
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Veldhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I can do a sked :)
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Serocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
{snipped}
> TRY to find someone on any rant on a digital mode.
{end snip}
pays him, but he earned his
> wage that day! He also gets impatient with some of the
> nit picking questions Hams ask, so I am "forced" to like him (HI).
>
> Vy 73,
> John
> K8OCL
>
>
> Original Message Follows
> From: "Bill McLaughlin" &l
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John,
I thought you said, "Kill all the lawyers", guess that does not
include the ARRL legal staff..
Prohibitions are fairly simple; and no, that is not the same
as "permissions" :)
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
{sni
Hi Bonnie,
Thanks for initiating this discussion:
Throw the prospect of incremental frequency shift keying into the mix
for discussion; know a few are working on this mode(s)also.
The OFDM (AM-QPSK)+6dB better SNR may or may not be an issue...it
depends on usagethe usual HF near LUF versus
To be argumentative, this quote was from the play "Henry VI", believe
Dick the Butcher made it. He also wanted to execute all those that
could read or write. Shakespeare apprenticed for a law firm and do
not think he would wish for my family to be deprived of income thru
death :)
Also doubt Sh
Hi Bonnie,
To condense, is your opinion as follows?
It is legal, in the US, for image or voice content on HF in the
image/voice subbands.
It is not legal at all, in the US, in the RTTY/data subbands.
Thanks,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED
Doubt you or Rick are missing anything.
300 baud ax.25 packet works poorly on HF unless near the MUF. I still
like the mode but after 20+ years I agree to its shortcomings...
PAX/PAX2/ARQ FAE all work better at the expensive of
bandwidthax.25 packet at 110 baud works better too when down fr
Hi Bonnie,
Excuse me for being dense (is what I do best)...is the difference in
this discussion MIL-STD-188/110 versus MIL-STD-188/141A ?
I know the /xxx takes precidence; as do all "slash sheets".
But am missing the point (I should read the MIL specs, but have to do
that everyday at work so win
I do not believe so, they use MIL-STD-188-141A
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Haven't the HF-LINK folks been using this mode for over 5 years?
>
> John. K8OCL
>
> ----Original Message Follow
the docs and noticed it's 2000
> baud!
>
> Tony - KT2Q
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:37 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re:
> RFSM2400/MIL-STD-188-110
>
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
