- it is *certainly* going to confuse a few users
- it might confuse some browsers (though I guess you've tested this)
An alternative would be to write something like
class=DEF-x-y_z-t
(but I admit it's much uglier) :)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss
hello people
$([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is obsolete and replaced by E:checked isn't it?
I ask because http://docs.jquery.com/DOM/Traversing/Selectors still mentions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in an example
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http
@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Fil, did you ever get a definition of DOM 0 expandos...
Now I got plenty, thanks :)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
/spip.php?article42
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
(on the css/xpath selectors especially)?
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
of
encodeURIComponent, but you'll need to test it everywhere.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
is in
PHP and I haven't seen any functions to iso encode with but I think I'll
write my own little function. That seems to be the only way.
You can probably use utf8_decode(), see
http://www.php.net/manual/da/function.utf8-decode.php
-- Fil
___
jQuery
characters (b1 then b2, which is displayed on screen like Ä^@) instead
of one two-byte character (b1b2, displayed as you want it to be).
hope this helps
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
this? As the
docs are generated from the original (source) scripts, my idea would be to
maintain our own fake version of the scripts (keeping only the comments),
in each language. But where? And, has anyone got a better idea?
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
and chosing a less agressive contrast would
probably do.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
bientôt
(in English: I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing-list)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
','');
}
)
This is what I did for http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/
This way you can search for search :)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
a corrected version at this site (for example):
http://www.spip.net/dist/javascript/jquery-1.1.js
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
).next()
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
know! :)
That's exactly the point. Are we building this on the official server or
spreading it all over? I have my own mailing-list server, so it's not a
technical problem, just an organizational choice.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
and try not to antagonize people who could be willing to
participate, but might be tempted to exit if this community appears to be
another part of the great macho internet.
(I can provide references if you wish, but you can google debian women or
flosspols to find them by yourself.)
-- Fil
.compressor version for, well, people like me?
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi, I just translated John's blogs about 1.1 into French.
Salut je viens de traduire les blogs de John à propos de la version 1.1
http://www.jquery.info/spip.php?article30
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com
. But
it's very strong in France and Spain, and is doing well in Latin America, it
seems. Very few in Germany, as typo3 holds the market :)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
or, a rather old website (founded circa 1994) that has launched a new
version, jquery-ed. http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/
thanks John, Jörn and all
jQuery is credited @ http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/diplo/logiciels/
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing
@ Olivier Percebois-Garve [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
The new design is great. Very readable. I noticed that you are using a
non-compressed version a jquery...
It's compressed server-side with mod_gzip, no need to slow down the client
-- Fil
___
jQuery
) following:
length: 1
0: node0
1: false
2: node2
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
://www.nabble.com/.filter%28array%29-bug%2C-and-patch-tf2718768.html#a7582383
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Fil
@ Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Bug report: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/446/
Thanks for being so fast Brandon :)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
section to see
which tests exactly have failed.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
If you are looking for a CMS that is powered by jQuery, Drupal version
5 (currently in Beta) is using jQuery as it's core JS library, and is
integrating it into the main API.
Same story for SPIP : the next version will be fully jquery-aware.
-- Fil
jquery.php?modules=core,forms,sha,bang,foo,barpack=yo!
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
2006/span
ul style=overflow: visible; display: block; height: 294px;
lia href=2006-08-31-TerrorismeTerrorisme/a
/li
...
Any idea? (jquery-1.0.2)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hello,
has anyone measured the speed of unpacking jquery (or any other script, for
that matter)?
I would suspect that uncompressing/executing jquery.pack.js generates a
small time overhead, but how long does it take? Compared to the time
overhead of downloading the full-size jquery.js?
-- Fil
().parent().siblings();
return this;
}
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I do it this way:
$.fn.plugin = function() {
this.find().filter().parent().siblings();
return this;
}
That would return the modified jQuery object.
Oh my goddess! Thanks for correcting this :-/
I need to proof my code now...
-- Fil
commiters, with no conflict as code
is always progressing (or forked when visions differ). The only base for
participation is accepting a Charter that basically says that everything
we do there is free software around SPIP, for the common good, with no
advertising/self-promotion.
-- Fil
/010451/
(then he got sick)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Yes. I see now. Unfortunately, as Klaus said, jQuery no longer has this edge
as other developers have cottoned on to this.
Why unfortunately? A great concept was invented here, and that's *very*
fortunate. Thank you John, be proud :)
-- Fil
getting back to my translation
of the docs.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I'm not sure if this overhead should be removed, eg. by the build script
when packing the code.
I'd favor a three file organization: a full-debug jquery-debug.js (that
includes the Logging object, a logging interface and so on); a normal
jquery.js; and a packed jquery-packed.js
-- Fil
before (and didn't know what DEVO was until I
googled it).
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
? And it's already integrated as a standard feature in Drupal SPIP...
The motto will be I never liked javascript, until I met jQuery.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
by 2k before packing.
I'd love to hear opinions on this.
For what it's worth, we have just integrated jQuery into SPIP as a standard
feature (yes!), and the file contains jquery+form, packed.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http
-name-it for products
(hReview), hAtom (for articles)...
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
tools will be available for your data, and
the tools you write will be more generic.
And they are a perfect match for jQuery's xhtml processing capabilities.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
@ Dylan Verheul [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Something like this:
http://www.dyve.net/jquery?googlemaps
This is great Dylan; could be coupled with the geo microformat to give a
generic tool. See http://www.jquery.info/spip.php?article7
-- Fil
___
jQuery
-quotes here).
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
-in *very* easily:
http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/009428/
http://jquery.com/discuss/2006-August/009429/
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
/html/19_typewriter.html
As you can see it works, but it's still a bit rough, especially with the
contents' spaces and tags.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
to the word text.
This is the same on all platforms: it's treating the content char by char,
and shows the of the i tag...
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
of
the element that should be the container. With my code people who have JS
switched off can read the content - they just miss the fancy typewriter.
it works too, try
lynx http://www.jquery.info/IMG/html/19_typewriter.html
-- Fil
___
jQuery
, what should I do now with this plugin?
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
+']'
);
});
this works, but it's too much code, I would dream of having a one-liner:
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]').after('nbsp;['+this.hreflang+']');
It doesn't work (or, not this way), because 'this' is not the current DOM
node, but the HTMLDocument itself.
-- Fil
/artikkel/4060/
that could be added for non-safari browsers, I guess
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I didn't released the plugin yet. Will be documented. Still has some bugs on
IE, after this are killed will be released
It doesn't work on Safari (at least on my tests).
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
lighter, I would recommend that everyone be careful not
to copy the whole post when they answer (especially removing all
signatures).
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
wants to play with it, go ahead!
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
the code for real.
Needless to say, improvements are very welcome, especially CSS/effects.
The to-do list would be:
- debug on IE :-(
- document the code
- create random board at init
- have nice images instead of dumb letters
- generally speaking, have a nice CSS presentation of the game
-- Fil
$(p).css({ color: red, font-weight: bolder });
Try
$(p).css({ color: red, font-weight: bolder });
(The dash needs quoting, I think.)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
/?id_syndic=7lang=en )
BTW there's a bug on trac
for example at http://jquery.com/dev/svn/rev/271/
I can't set a cookie to view differences / side by side (which is my
favorite view of changes)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http
).
* http://fil.rezo.net/slideshow_safari.png
But before being in that state, it first displays two pictures of cars,
floating above the gray square.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
= this.attributes.action.value;
One of these patches might apply to jquery.js and/or form.js
There is definitively a bug here, that doesn't let ajax calls access the
action input value of a form.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
= src;
i.onload = f;
this.appendChild(i);
});
}
Then call this plugin like:
$(#container).image(http://jquery.com/images/hat2.gif,function(){
alert(The image is loaded now);
});
This works nicely with FF, but not with Safari. Or am I doomed?
-- Fil
).image(http://jquery.com/images/hat2.gif,function(){
alert(The image is loaded now);
});
});
Give it a try here:
http://www.jquery.info/IMG/html/8_charger_une_image.html
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
, as with FF it displays and
alerts in both cases.
Might this help explain a part of Safari's oddities (??).
I like the idea of having the callback for image loading - a smart move.
Me too. It was sDisk's idea.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss
difficult, but I think it's a nice way to show of how these
two techniques can mix, this is why I care to mention it here.
The example is at
http://www.jquery.info/IMG/html/5_geo.html
explanations (in French) at
http://www.jquery.info/spip.php?article7
-- Fil
I want the expression to verify that the link is in the correct data
structure, i.e. inside a dt that is inside a dl and where
$(this).parent().next() is a dd.
Said differently: I want to tell my script if the link is inside a dt
then show() the corresponding dd (if it exists).
That's why I was
@ Simon Jobling [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
That doesn't seem to help.
Well, it does work at http://fil.rezo.net/test_jquery.html
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
don't think it's difficult to add. I have no idea of the syntax to
use, nor if this has already been implemented.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
benn jqueried (jquerized ?)
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
67 matches
Mail list logo
