Hi. It looks a great application. Really what I was looking for. I have
a couple of questions.
1. I tested on my htc touch pro. At start it says that it is turning
the wi-fi on, then it says it has done so, but wi-fi is still off. Not a
big deal since I can turn it on manually before I start the
Just wanted to say that the station's (D-Dur) homepage has a fantastic
free flac download offer of the 6 Brandenburg Concertos by Musica
Florea.
They sound fantastic.
http://www.rozhlas.cz/d-dur/english
Will vote for the bug as soon as my Bugzilla account is created.
--
ian_heys
Gibbo wrote:
I'm intrigued, what are the chances of SC being able to run on the
'C-200'
(http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/index.php?pluginoption=productspecitem_id=12)?
They have a new model, cool...
It'd make my year if it were possible.
Naah, get squeezeplay to run on it.
Yes, they are very good.
--
Labarum
Brian
Squeezebox 3 Classic and Virgin Cable Box
Beresford DAC TC-7520SE (Caiman) - Quad 405-2 refurbished by 405man
Quart 980s Speakers
Boom in kitchen.
Labarum's Profile:
How would that be better? People have actually created squeezeplay style
programs for the A series popcorns. It'd be nice I grant you that...
What we are looking for is full control that means the home PC doesn't
need to be turned on to play music. I don't own a NAS and don't see the
point in me
Aguida;445608 Wrote:
1. I tested on my htc touch pro. At start it says that it is turning
the wi-fi on, then it says it has done so, but wi-fi is still off. Not a
big deal since I can turn it on manually before I start the program, but
I thought I would report it.
Hi Aguida
I've got an
the same: 0.95
--
Aguida
Aguida's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9285
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64537
___
Gibbo wrote:
How would that be better? People have actually created squeezeplay style
programs for the A series popcorns. It'd be nice I grant you that...
1. It would be better because that way I'd have one less device in my
living room. Since my house is equiped with a 24/7 server I have
Obviously peter this solution isn't one for everyone.
But if I already own a home PC, 2 SB's and am going to buy a C-200 then
this solution would be perfect for me.
I do see your point about squeezeplay, and that would be better for
you, and if I had a low power server it would also be a good
On 04/08/09 05:18, daviseh wrote:
I am having a problem figuring this out. I have a wired setup with the
following specs
IP Address = 192.168.0.105
Gateway = 192.168.0.1
Squeezecenter address=192.168.105
So I reset the SBR and entered the following:
discover
conf 1
set interface=0
Gibbo wrote:
Obviously peter this solution isn't one for everyone.
But if I already own a home PC, 2 SB's and am going to buy a C-200 then
this solution would be perfect for me.
I do see your point about squeezeplay, and that would be better for
you, and if I had a low power server it would
;) all very true, I just like to argue...
I don't want to become restrictive, i'd actually quite like an open
discussion of all the possibilities of the C-200 combined with the SB,
including squeezeplay, so long as people keep an eye on the ball from
time to time. =)
--
Gibbo
I've been suffering rebuffering for a while now, after a couple of years
of stable performance, and I'm fed up so I'm trying to take action.
I've ordered some more ethernet over power (Netgears HDX101) which
successfully stream video to PS3 (which had been unstable over wi-fi),
but until they
Just wanted to add my thanks to chp for a great job. Also vagskal for
instructions even I could follow and gazjam for adding the final clue to
substitute ip address for local host. They finally got me there, the
final step in a system that does all I require of it.
Mike
--
noguru
DigitalMitch;445679 Wrote:
Other than voting for the bug and implementing a ethernet over power, is
there anything else I should be trying?
Surely you have a friend that has either a laptop, USB/PCI wireless
adapter, Smartphone with wifi, or some other device that you could use
(invite them
My brother just had his basement redone and it's in a very large U
shape. He plans on putting a surround sound/home theater somewhat in the
middle. At one end there's a bar, and at the other end a a big pool
table area. He'd like to put speakers in the bar area, and another pair
in the pool table
I've updated my windows home server to squeezcenter 7.3.3. but when i
wan't to play some FLAC (original AC3) the SB says that it runs out of
memory ?
The flac are 5.1 flac, when i test this flac on a PC with for example
foobar everyting is working fine .
Somebody with the some problem, or a
See if the homeowner will let you try to temporarily connect it directly
to his router via ethernet cable. That would just be a test to sort out
whether or not the problem is with the WiFi.
--
TiredLegs
TiredLegs's
I connected the box directly to the ethernet port on my iMac (which is
connected to the home network) and shared the internet access, and I got
the Squeezecenter running that way.
--
foffster
foffster's Profile:
Hello
I have a Transporter, a Classic and two Booms running different flac
files over WiFi at the same time without any problem...
Christian
--
Schindler
Schindler's Profile:
First thing that comes to my mind, since you have one big directory with
subdirectories for all artists, why do you use 'Browse Music Folder' at
all? Browse through your music with 'Library - Artist' instead, that's
what the scan at the beginning is for. :)
signorRossi.
--
signor_rossi
Robin Bowes;445630 Wrote:
On 04/08/09 05:18, daviseh wrote:
I am having a problem figuring this out. I have a wired setup with
the
following specs
IP Address = 192.168.0.105
Gateway = 192.168.0.1
Squeezecenter address=192.168.105
So I reset the SBR and entered the following:
Aguida;445620 Wrote:
the same: 0.95
For Users that like to upgrade their old PDAwith windows 6.5.
I did bought aHTC Blue Angel shortly for just 30 Euro, and i saw AES
encription is not inside the Win Mobile 2003. So my thinking to upgrade
the ROM to 6.0 was full in hope there will be a AES
The performance of Browse Music Folder will always be related to the
number of items in the folder, so yes, reducing that will help. However,
as signor_rossi mentioned, you're missing out if you're only using BMF.
The whole point of the scan is to populate the db so you can
browse/search it
Schindler;445739 Wrote:
Hello
I have a Transporter, a Classic and two Booms running different flac
files over WiFi at the same time without any problem...
Christian
No one denies that this system -can- work very well, and probably in
most installations it still does. But you don't even
YanniG;445473 Wrote:
Finally, after a long trip my new Squeezebox arrived at home.
I thought I had to inform you all here about my process.
After unpacking it, it tool me two minutes to set it up playing...It
showed me its pin, so I updated my account on squeezenetwork with this
new player
VIA boards make excellent and cheap servers. Can't really beat a C7 on
price and power usage. Yes its not as low power as a NAS but at last it
has enough horse power to do other things.
Mine has 4x250GB in raid5 (will update to 4x1TB soon), samba,
appletalk, printing, itunes serving, ... and of
Please Please Please. I hope logitech is listening...
I think there needs to be a logitech Squeezebox Headset. Just like the
duet controller works as a receiver have a headset that works as a
receiver. As far as I know there arent any reasonably priced
WiFi/Network headphones. (correct me if
frisk;445537 Wrote:
The installation procedure looked simple enough but I can't get it to
work, perhaps someone can help me.
When starting spotify, dsbridge fires up and a blue dot appears in the
task bar with hoover text dsbridge, HttpServer. http://localhost:8124/
If I add a favourite
Aguida;445608 Wrote:
Hi. It looks a great application. Really what I was looking for. I have
a couple of questions.
1. I tested on my htc touch pro. At start it says that it is turning
the wi-fi on, then it says it has done so, but wi-fi is still off. Not a
big deal since I can turn it on
l.vervae...@telenet.be;445744 Wrote:
What else is there to speed things up?
Thinking of:
1. creating folders A to Z so the artists are no longer in one folder.
= Would this help alot or not?
2. add memory to readynas duo to for example 1GB.
= Some people say this doesn't help because
Why can't you just connect some wireless headphones to your Squeezebox?
I use these:
http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-RS120-Wireless-Headphones-Charging/
Except for being a bit to big for my head (no headbanging), I like them
pretty well. There is a bit of interference if I am walking around the
Locuth;66 Wrote:
If it is do-able, we are talking 4 to 6 weeks.
Hi Sebastian, did you work out if it's possible on Symbian?
--
dave77
dave77's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=26269
View
Unfortunately, I am not a home write now.
So I cannot install and test the Symbian dev environment just yet.
--
Locuth
Use your PDA as SqueezeBox remote -- http://www.sciatec.de/SlimControl
Locuth's Profile:
dsdreamer;445778 Wrote:
STREAMING IN 7.3.X:
A) Has been 100% reliable with all types of local music files in my
system
B) Required network upgrades since 7.3.x to become reliable
C) Occasionally fails in 7.3.x with local FLAC files =500kbos
D) Occasionally fails even with lossy compressed
I dont know about the rest of the wireless/ethernet PC based music
server folks out there, but I am definitely feeling a huge bias in the
audiophile community toward wired PC as music server connections, and by
far the most popular being USB! I'm not big on conspiracy stuff, but for
sure USB
earwaxer;445828 Wrote:
Wires have always been an overall better choice for analog
transmission. Digital lends itself to being transmitted in bit perfect
fashion over wifi. Forget about the jitter issue, and
clocking/re-clocking that plagues wired protocols.
I think what you're talking
shake-the-disease;445806 Wrote:
I run a QNAP TS-239 which is really the minimim I'd recommend once you
have more than a few thousand tracks. Once over 30k or so even a single
core Atom is possibly too slow and a dual core something should be
considered.
I disagree with that last bit - I
_USB_IS_EASY_TO_ADOPT_
USB is now ubiquitous on computers as a wired technology, and most
people already manage electronic music collections on the PCs already,
whether using iTunes, Windows Media Player, WinAmp, XMMS, Foobar2k,
Songbird or whatever.
Given that as a starting point, people
I think there are several reasons for this.
The USB DAC concept is much easier for them to grasp. Much of that
crowd is over 50, 60 years old and computers are a mystery to them.
Setting up a home network scares the hell out of them. These are guys
who quite honestly ask whether defragmenting
aubuti;445813 Wrote:
I don't think it would be useful. First there's the obvious selection
bias: people not having problems are unlikely to read the poll and much
less likely to be in the forums in the first place. Second, what do you
do with the results? From this thread I would predict
shake-the-disease;445806 Wrote:
I run a QNAP TS-239 which is really the minimim I'd recommend once you
have more than a few thousand tracks. Once over 30k or so even a single
core Atom is possibly too slow and a dual core something should be
considered.
I also tried running SC on an old
dsdreamer;445842 Wrote:
Good points all. I would hope that Logitech QA could take some actions
rather than leaving it to end users, though.
Agreed, but the usual rule applies: if they can't reproduce it, they
can't fix it (unless they just get lucky with collateral improvement).
There's an
aubuti;445847 Wrote:
Unless there's another bug report I've overlooked, that doesn't give QA
much to go on.
QA also have the ability (if not the resources) to create a controlled,
non-ideal network test environment to test performance under repeatable
network congestion conditions. The
JJZolx;445838 Wrote:
I think there are several reasons for this.
The USB DAC concept is much easier for them to grasp. Much of that
crowd is over 50, 60 years old and computers are a mystery to them.
Setting up a home network scares the hell out of them. These are guys
who quite
Goodsounds;445857 Wrote:
I think USB DACS are purchased by people who know more about computers
than about music/sound. Someone who knows nothing about PCs just uses
it as is, and doesn't tinker, add or subtract. People of my generation
who are afraid of computers don't use them to play
earwaxer;445828 Wrote:
It just seems to me that wireless has so many advantages, I cant help
but see any wired protocol as a first step in the PC as digital front
end trend, with wireless digital transmission being the goal.
Wires have always been an overall better choice for analog
radish;445833 Wrote:
I disagree with that last bit - I can't see why you need dual core for
SC in any circumstance, in fact seeing as most of SC is single threaded
(apart from things like transcoding) a faster-clocked single core would
be better. As it is, I run on the slowest CPU AMD make
JJZolx;445860 Wrote:
I disagree. I see _many_ threads in audiophile forums that begin
something like..
I'll defer to you, but I don't think I know too many computer-phobic
baby boomers who spend time in any internet forum. Or who would buy
something like a Mac mini that (I think) is neither
49 matches
Mail list logo
