Can I just remind you that there is no reset for 'humour failure'
exceptions!
The IT Crowd link was meant to lighten the tone on the recent mysb.com
situation.
--
castalla
castalla's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com
> The IT Crowd link was meant to lighten the tone on the recent mysb.com
> situation.
Unfortunately it's not available in the country I'm living in...
--
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailm
mherger;654812 Wrote:
> > The IT Crowd link was meant to lighten the tone on the recent
> mysb.com
> > situation.
>
> Unfortunately it's not available in the country I'm living in...
>
> --
>
> Michael
Have you tried switching your PC off and on again? :)
--
castalla
erland;654797 Wrote:
> Have I missed something, doesn't Custom Skip work in 7.6.1 ?
Might have described it wrong, it could just be the sql playlists.
Before MusicIP I used sql playlists with I thought used custom skip?
Anyway what I ran has stopped working with SQL errors. It used to Skip
1
No I didn't try Music IP yet. Looking at the website I see I did use
their tagger, Picard, which worked very nice for me.
I will give it a try, but I guess it needs some study.
--
Bert003
Bert003's Profile: http://forums.
ralphy;654578 Wrote:
> Should I wait to post the binary on googlecode until you have one that's
> been proven a bit more?
@ralphy,
I would like to test it a bit more over the weekend. Will get back to
you early next week. Thanks.
--
s7mx1
-
I have no problem switching between two SBS servers and MySB using the
players menu. SBS web UI "grabbing" players has been broken for quite
a while.
--
toby10
toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?us
MusicManiac;654505 Wrote:
> Nicely done s7mx1. Works quite well.
>
> What kind of cpu usage are you seeing with the file types you're
> streaming?
>
> Edit: It doesn't seem to enjoy my flac files very much (stock speeds)
@MusicManiac
1) Check your wifi ap/router. In the worst case it will nee
Blisteringblue;654816 Wrote:
> One other question for the MusicIP Guru's, what is the difference
> between saying a song is mixable and the fact it is taking 3 days to
> analyse all my tracks? Does MusicIP already know about all the tracks
> for it to say it is mixable? Or is it just a number,
Bert003;654817 Wrote:
> No I didn't try Music IP yet. Looking at the website I see I did use
> their tagger, Picard, which worked very nice for me.
>
> I will give it a try, but I guess it needs some study.
Picard is MusicBrainz, not MusicIP. MusicIP and MusicBrainz are not at
all the same thing
aubuti;654868 Wrote:
> Not sure I understand what the "difference" is between mixable status
> and length of time it takes to analyze. My (admittedly imperfect)
> understanding is that the number of mixable tracks is the number of
> tracks that have been analyzed _and_ determined to be mixable. I
mherger;654803 Wrote:
> From what I can tell it's not available through their API yet. It took
> them a while to implement the "Add to library" call...
Thanks. I was thinking that may be the answer, and really hoping it
wasn't
--
aubuti
> Thanks, 17k tracks still to analyse !! Should be done by the end of
> the weekend LOL
When I run my first analysis of my (at the time) about 8k tracks, it took
more than a week to finish on my poor Via C3/1GHz box :-)
--
Michael
___
discuss maili
Ok, thanks. I did a quick search at google and the first hit pointed me
to Musicbrainz.
--
Bert003
Bert003's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31132
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/sh
castalla;654814 Wrote:
> Have you tried switching your PC off and on again? :)
perfect!!! ;-)
--
garym
System 1: Vortexbox Appliance (1.5) > SbS 7.5.4 > Transporter, Touch,
Boom, Radio w/Battery (all ethernet except Radio)
System 2: Win7(64) laptop > SbS 7.6.1 > Touch, Boom, Radio w/Batter
toby10;654841 Wrote:
> SBS web UI "grabbing" players has been broken for quite a while.
How so?
--
JJZolx
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.c
You don't see other servers' players.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and
*New: iPeng for iPad*, at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View
pippin;654918 Wrote:
> You don't see other servers' players.
I certainly see them. I thought that bug had been completely fixed,
even players attached to mysb.com (although I haven't verified that
part).
--
JJZolx
JJZolx
They indeed look nice. But talking about support: Some people here are
complaining about Logitech's support, but with the Philips players the
support is non-existent. I have one Streamium device (NP2900). Now
waiting for more than a year for a promised firmware update that will
fix some bugs.
They got the look; Radio can still hold its own, but the 3300 makes Boom
look like a cheap plastic box.
--
slate
Main: Receiver (Audiocom) -> Beresford Caiman+ (Gatorized) -> Carver
A-500x -> B&W 704
Office: Receiver -> Luxman L-210 -> Stax SR84 Pro/Superlux HD668B
Server: Zotac IONITX-A, 4 GB
Players on MySB: yes
Players on other servers: no
At least that's what I see.
Players on other servers was the question here.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and
*New: iPeng for iPad*, at penguinlovesmusic.com
---
JJZolx;654922 Wrote:
> I certainly see them. I thought that bug had been completely fixed, even
> players attached to mysb.com (although I haven't verified that part).
that should be fixed was it not a 7.5.x problem for a while, it has
been broken on earlier versions to, but afiak it should work
switching to and from mysb.com works as it should in 7.6.2 just tried
mysb.com also worked ;) so it was possible to try
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621 MeridianG98DH 2 x
MeridianDSP5200 MeridianD
pippin;654940 Wrote:
> Players on MySB: yes
> Players on other servers: no
>
> At least that's what I see.
>
> Players on other servers was the question here.
Works perfectly for me. Are we still talking about the web interface,
or are you talking about using the CLI from your iPeng app?
--
JJZolx;654944 Wrote:
> Works perfectly for me. Are we still talking about the web interface, or
> are you talking about using the CLI from your iPeng app?
No. CLI from iPeng works just fine but then iPeng looks for servers
itself.
Right now I'm running three servers here, all on the same networ
This is my 7.6.2 server, which sees players connected to my 7.5.6
server.
+---+
|Filename: 2011-09-02_100029.jpg|
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=12429|
+-
I don't doubt that, I just say it seems to be unreliable.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and
*New: iPeng for iPad*, at penguinlovesmusic.com
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.p
Or are others here concerned about Logitech's medium to long term
commitment to Squeezebox?
--
ShutterShock
Tim
Living Room: Touch, Bryston B60R w/built-in DAC, PMC FB1i Speakers
Kitchen: Boom
Bedroom: Boom
Controller for all
---
Is it possible to setup the above device without a remote. I just moved
and can't find the remote. I just want to get back to my music. Any
ideas?
--
rcmcdougle
rcmcdougle's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member
ShutterShock;654955 Wrote:
> Or are others here concerned about Logitech's medium to long term
> commitment to Squeezebox?
>
We probably all are, we all see the trend, but can you mention anyone
except Sonos and possibly Apple which you don't think the same about ?
I'm definitely not less conce
If you keep or mimic your old network setup then you should be able to
just plug everything in and it should work.
The following software tool is a little geeky, but it should work for
the Squeezebox as well as it does for the Receiver.
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57861
--
rcmcdougle;654956 Wrote:
> Is it possible to setup the above device without a remote. I just moved
> and can't find the remote. I just want to get back to my music. Any
> ideas?
What model exactly ?
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: To
Do any of your SBS boxes have more than one active ethernet?
I haven't yet tracked down the exact problem, but I think something odd
is happening with SBS broadcasts on boxes with more than one interface.
--
pallfreeman
Always look before you leap. He who hesitates is lost.
SAVE THE KITTEN,
JJZolx;654950 Wrote:
> This is my 7.6.2 server, which sees players connected to my 7.5.6
> server.
Yes, but the 7.5.6 server is active. If it were not, the only way to
move the players is via menu on the device or using Duet. Additionally,
each player must be selected and changed individually.
pallfreeman;654975 Wrote:
> Do any of your SBS boxes have more than one active ethernet?
>
> I haven't yet tracked down the exact problem, but I think something odd
> is happening with SBS broadcasts on boxes with more than one interface.
No. One ethernet to a customer.
p
--
pski
real ster
I have two Linux servers running in my home (Vortexbox and Linkstation),
and all is golden regarding seeing players on the "other" server, and
moving them around from the web interface. I suppose Linux hosts are
less likely to have security software that could defeat the discovery
mechanism?
--
I cloned my live server (after moving the players to my backup server)
and used the web interface to update VB.
No errors reported.
Rescan results:
1. discovering files/directories 27212 in 52 seconds (Wow!)
2. scanning new files 23756 in 19:24 (Wow!)
3. pre-caching arwork 1888 of 1908 in 17:08
dsdreamer;654982 Wrote:
> I have two Linux servers running in my home (Vortexbox and Linkstation),
> and all is golden regarding seeing players on the "other" server, and
> moving them around from the web interface. I suppose Linux hosts are
> less likely to have security software that could defe
version 1.8.2 has been released and improves compatibility with server
version 7.6.x
- SqueezePad crashed on startup when SB-Server 7.6.0 sometimes created
a corrupt playlist for a player. Now when the server is into this
state, you'll see a message in the playlist window kindly asking you to
upg
pski;654978 Wrote:
> Yes, but the 7.5.6 server is active. If it were not, the only way to
> move the players is via menu on the device or using Duet. Additionally,
> each player must be selected and changed individually.
Has it ever worked differently? The list of available players that you
see
If you want faster scanning performance, install a 2 TB SATA drive in
your VB and use it for your music library instead of a NFS network
drive.
SBS 7.6.1 works very well on my VortexBox Appliance with this setup.
Scanning times are significantly faster than with SBS 7.5.x.
--
Ron Olsen
---
I am experiencing the EXACT same problem that you describe.
The photos display just fine when running Squeezebox Server as a Web
application on my PC, but won't display on my Squeezebox Radio. I've
tried everything that I can think of to correct this problem with no
success. Can anyone help?
My
Ron Olsen;655010 Wrote:
> If you want faster scanning performance, install a 2 TB SATA drive in
> your VB and use it for your music library instead of a NFS network
> drive.
>
> SBS 7.6.1 works very well on my VortexBox Appliance with this setup.
> Scanning times are significantly faster than wi
Hi PW,
Glad to hear I'm not the only one, but sorry you are getting the same
error.
I get the error on my Squeezebox Radio, Controller and on Squeezeplay.
I hadnt thought to try the Facebook app through the web interface. That
works fine here as well.
My setup is:
Logitech Media Server Versi
Bump... anyone out there with Rhapsody? Can you check this please?
--
MeSue
SUE
1 Duet | 2 Booms | 1 Radio | 1 Touch | 1 SB2
HP MediaSmart EX470 | Squeezebox Server 7.6 | iPod Touch & iPad w/
iPeng
Find me on 'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/MeSue) | 'Twitter'
(http://twitter.com/suechasta
s7mx1;654856 Wrote:
> @MusicManiac
>
> 1) Check your wifi ap/router. In the worst case it will need about 180
> KB/s bandwidth. Make sure the latency between your squeezeserver and
> touchpad is low otherwise it will take a lot time to buffer.
> 2) Flac decoding is not CPU intensive which is in
Ron Olsen;655010 Wrote:
> If you want faster scanning performance, install a 2 TB SATA drive in
> your VB and use it for your music library instead of a NFS network
> drive.
>
> SBS 7.6.1 works very well on my VortexBox Appliance with this setup.
> Scanning times are significantly faster than wi
JJZolx;655009 Wrote:
> Has it ever worked differently? The list of available players that you
> see in the web interface is pulled from other servers on the network.
>
> I suppose it would be nice if it also listed unattached players, but if
> I ever need to use the feature I either remember to
pski;655058 Wrote:
> Since discovery IS on a dedicated and formally assigned port, I really
> don't see why the code would be complicated.
Probably just very little call for it. I imagine the main focus of the
feature is being able to pull players away from mysb.com, in which case
it means that
Except if you use the Controller or iPeng which both can connect
unconnected players - although I'm not 100% sure iPeng will always work
for all player models.
--
pippin
---
see iPeng, the Squeezebox iPhone remote and
*New: iPeng for iPad*, at penguinlovesmusic.com
---
JJZolx;655062 Wrote:
> Probably just very little call for it. I imagine the main focus of the
> feature is being able to pull players away from mysb.com, in which case
> it means that you do have both servers running.
>
> Other than that, unattached players have always had to explicitly
> connec
JJZolx;655062 Wrote:
> Probably just very little call for it. I imagine the main focus of the
> feature is being able to pull players away from mysb.com, in which case
> it means that you do have both servers running.
>
> Other than that, unattached players have always had to explicitly
> connec
My device is a SlimDevices SqueezeBox v3. I'll take a look at the
thread suggested above as well. I also do have a few universal remotes
and wonder if anyone know of possible codes that might work for the
SqueezeBox.
--
rcmcdougle
--
The thread posted is for setting up a receiver without the controller
(assuming you had a Duet, which isn't the case).
As that poster also mentioned, if your new network "looks" like the old
network, it should just work. Did you change your network settings of
network name? The server name or se
tcutting;655075 Wrote:
> The thread posted is for setting up a receiver without the controller
> (assuming you had a Duet, which isn't the case).
I've never used it, but my understanding was that the script should
work for any ip3k based player: SB1, SB2, SB3, Transporter or Boom.
--
JJZolx
-
Wonder if the jvc code support is at the fw level, the server
understands it and you can disable/eneble it on the server. So can a
jvc remote access th fw menus ?
--
Mnyb
Main hifi: Touch + CIA PS +MeridianG68J MeridianHD621
odd design decision anyway , I can imagine players getting lost in space
when mysb.com is involved.
Web UI should be able to fetch player unconditionally any bug on this
?
there are thoose running recievers without a controllers, I know they
should be completely aware that that mode of operation
I added tranck and album gain tags to all my files b/c I often listen in
random mode and got tired of constantly adjusting the volume.
In general, using the "smart gain" setting seems to work fairly well.
However, I find that for some tracks (source is very loud?) I still
fill the need to turn th
58 matches
Mail list logo
