reinholdk wrote:
> Or you can use the command line tool metaflac from FLAC tools
> (https://xiph.org/flac/documentation_tools_metaflac.html).
Another vote for metaflac. It's the final stage of my ripping process.
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Personally I stockpiled SBTs on ebay so have a never ending supply of
touchscreen bit-perfect digital sources to feed to whatever DAC takes my
fancy. :)
Right now it's a Mytek DSD192 (also scalped used from Ebay for a
sensible price). Prior to that it was a Naim Supernait built-in DAC.
I would
dolodobendan wrote:
> I was just stupid. :rolleyes:
>
> (For the other stupid people out there: Check the server's Allow/Deny
> list...)Lol
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300
Richer sounds is too low end... lol
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
https://youtu.be/WboggjN_G-4
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
There are many great creative ways of hiding cables.. these are probably
more successful than wireless speakers ever will be, imho.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450
Though sonos had a Bluetooth receiver iirc. You will never be truly
wireless unless you run batteries so I'd suck it up and run at least
power and ethernet, or good old speaker wires (much underrated!).
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x
If only the world was run by us feckless wasters huh?
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Man in a van wrote:
> Well, partially. She was only meeting the brief.
>
> The bloke behind the farewell is more to blame as well as the folk in
> the shadows.
>
> The BBC original remit was one of Public Service Broacasting.
>
> Undoubtedly it had many flaws (which could be debated until
peterw wrote:
> "needed"? I've been using a cheap, old one meter RCA analog cable from
> an SB3 to a Denon AVR digital input for about eight years, never had a
> problem. I think it might even just be one side of a stereo cable pair,
> as most of my single RCA cables have bright colored
Another odd little problem. I'm going to assume this is not an encoding
problem and the files themselves play ok on other playback systems
without volume fluctuations.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
jimzak wrote:
>
> Unfortunately buying 4-6 high capacity NAS drives will NOT come cheaply.
No but you will be surprised to find how much you can get back when you
sell your old drives. This will be enough to take some of the pain
away... Hehe
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
I would definitely look to stay ahead of your storage requirements by
buying fewer larger drives. You can get four 8tb without having to ride
the bleeding edge of price or performance and have two copies and room
to spare; then you're looking at a simple 4 bay pc like the hp
microserver or
Tbh given how many apps go for the complexity of full blown
mysql/postgres when they are only storing a few configuration items I'm
amazed lms works so well with sqlite underneath.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS
Cunning plan..
Though I was thinking of the spatial stereo encoding systems that used
to use phase encoding to enhance the stereo beyond the speakers
themselves.
Is that what the Boom does? Knew I wanted one. Now I know why...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x
Guess not! Perhaps I should move my speakers a bit further apart...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Anyone got a sound processing plugin that can apply that 80s style
spatial stereo sound expansion when the speakers are a bit too close
together?
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300
I think they rarely go full scale DC for any number of samples on any
recordings, they are pushing it too hot but it's compression not
"distortion" as such, (though we choose to call it such because we are
pedants..) so wouldn't see that level of distortion.
Extreme compression is pretty
JJZolx wrote:
> "LP playback system" ... A turntable? You can play CDs on a turntable
> now? That's pretty cool.
>
> Reading audiophile forums is how you get good playback of badly mastered
> CDs?
Pedantry will get you everywhere.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware:
I am depressed to say that there's a secondary problem. Due to loudness
wars so many CDs are so badly mastered that they probably benefit from
the softening and flattering bass of an LP playback system.
I'm starting to think the game is lost, home playback of high quality
music is dead, unless
SlimChances wrote:
> Despite the quote below I don't have much use for vinyl.
>
> Vinyl is written in stone. I think if its made it for 120 years now,
> its here forever. Thats a beautiful thing to think about.
> Jack White
>
>
toolapcblack wrote:
> better to stick than twist then!
>
> yeah i get all the tech i am an electronics engineer and have contracted
> for some high end manufacturers in my past(worked for ATC for a while &
> spent a considerable amount of time in their listening room, dont think
> they liked it
All it really requires is a fairly skilled DSP programmer to come up
with a vinyl simulator and we're done. Probably just needs a random low
frequency rumble adding, boost and blur the bass temporally, roll off
the treble and compress the dynamics to about 60db dynamic range and you
are *sorted*.
As a long time devotee of LMS I say stick with the SBT there's nothing
wrong with it, particularly as a digital source. Modify the sound to
your taste with an offboard DAC. The Chord FPGA-based DACs make a
noticeable difference, but I've gone with a Mytek myself.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain
Wirrunna wrote:
> re-calculate RPG for my whole library, and for DrMatt I use
> BulkFileChanger to manipulate the file Modified Time to preserve the New
> Music order.
I'm on Linux, I'd script it myself. But then, I'm not going to be using
dbpoweramp either!
-Transcoded from Mat
I don't think so. Straightforward though I agree it is the sheer
overwhelming quantity of stuff on every screen is what puts people off
these things. Even if you don't have to change anything at all,
presenting that many choices scares the living bejeezus out of anyone
who isn't techie.
Just to
I've always used metaflac but never investigated the algorithm in
detail. I took the view as long as it was consistent I didn't care
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as
Well, off topic, but, dither is the reason. Applied correctly or not.
Argue at length..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
I've not noticed any either tbh, but I leave it off because then I have
to blame the mastering engineers not replaygain for the sound being not
to my satisfaction, and like the OP, I'm ok with operating my volume
control about once every 45 minutes... :)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by
Mnyb wrote:
> Some tagging software has options to not touch the timestamps .Yeah and you
> can record mtime and set it back manually after the
retagging via a script or a short program but you can't fix the ctime,
which some programs use instead of mtime to determine what's new and
what's not
slartibartfast wrote:
> It would be nice if an on/off switch for replaygain was available on
> players and control apps and not just hidden away in player settings of
> the web GUI.
>
> Sent from my SM-G900F using TapatalkTrue, but personally I have more than one
> player and tend to leave it
I don't see the downside.. for non critical listening replaygain in
album mode is perfectly good, and when you feel like properly listening
to something, turn replaygain off. Bingo the music data is the same and
sounds the same as it did before the file was tagged.
The one and only pain in the
cd /music
find . -type f -exec applygain {} \;
.. wait ..
It's just tagging, tags can be removed just as easily.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k
I've had no problems getting acceptance of the squeezebox setup. A few
reasons.
1) all the CDs went in a box in the loft... and I sold all the CD
players! ;)
2) universal remotes make switching the audio on easy in each room (even
for the TV to ensure the TV speakers don't get used)
3) we
Re: buttons. Dead easy to implement on a Pi type thing. And you get to
wire the buttons to any style of button you like, anywhere you like.
Big red nuclear button for your favourite track? Check. "Break glass
here" safety button for peppa pig theme tune? Check...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain
majones wrote:
> The feature of the Boom and Radio that matters in my household is that
> we can just walk up, press some buttons, and listen to exactly what we
> want with decent sound quality. No bluetooth, no phone screens, no
> tangles of cables. That's proving very hard to replace with
Greg Erskine wrote:
> hi w3wilkes,
>
> Yes, it's all very subjective and I didn't do proper abx tests, but
> worth checking out if people have the equipment at hand.
>
> regards
> GregWell, battery power is usually beneficial for sq but I've not found the
sound quality from the controller to
Not quite "one box", but an android device and Bluetooth speaker would
fit the bill.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
KeBul wrote:
> Assume drmatt actually means "but the Joggler would regularly fail" and
> I would agree with this from my experiences
Well spotted.. :)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian
I also found the squeezebox build on Joggler wasn't so stable for long
term playback. My touch will stream iPlayer live radio for days and days
without hiccup, but the touch would regularly fail and require a power
cycle (same if it was streaming local media tbh). Maybe that's just
mine, don't
Paul Webster wrote:
> Openpeak/Joggler make good Touch alternatives - I have spares for these
> as well.
>
Even they are hard to get hold of these days. And frankly the analogue
sound output quality is pretty awful. They work great as a
display/controller though.
-Transcoded from Matt's
castalla wrote:
> Quite frankly. I don't really care anymore - there are much more
> important issues they're buggering up than listening to my constant
> moaning about 'going to hell in a hard-cart'"Arguing that you don't care
> about the right to privacy because you have
nothing to hide is no
(There's a new Pi 3B+ with much improved CPU and network throughput by
the way .. Should be rock solid reliable, mine are.)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of
Buy plenty of spares..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
One option: https://sites.google.com/site/picoreplayer/home
This is an OS image that can run LMS and a squeezebox client on a
raspberry pi, including managing the storage (external USB drive). There
are other such images. This gives you server and client in one tiny low
powered box.
Or you can
Time for a raspberry Pi!
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
(fwiw the native android app stopped working ages ago...)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
I think you answered your own question..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Personally I would kill the idea of streaming flac to mobile devices and
just bandwidth limit the client in LMS. 320kb MP3 is undoubtedly good
enough when out and about. I would guess the limitation is insufficient
pre buffering, whereas internet video players would be more aware of the
Depends on the player. If the new player honour the gain tag then great,
but it was not a core feature.
Annoyingly android core media playback services do not honour replaygain
tags either, so I do wind up also permanently normalising my files used
for portable playback. Like you say, no issue
Yes you can create normalised mp3s, but the process is lossy.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
I've found most ICE systems have awful unresponsive UIs when it comes to
browsing large numbers of files on USB sticks, tbh. And there's no
search, obviously. And their format support is awful. I have everything
ripped to flac for home use and a mirrored archive of ogg vorbis files
for use
I on the other hand always request Bluetooth because unlike your Samsung
phone mine came with 128GB built in storage (and cost less most likely
too) .. the idea of taking a bunch of CDs is about as alien as the idea
of playing one at home.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
The CDs time is nearly up, apart from for albums likely to sell to old
people...
Though the irony is they probably still sell LPs...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450
JJZolx wrote:
> How do you determine that the connection is coming from "outside"? If
> someone is doing port forwarding in order to make the LMS server
> available to the internet, wouldn't the connection appear to come from
> the router on the same subnet?I think you answered your own
mherger wrote:
> > Ok, figured it might be something like that. Not an easy problem to
> > solve. In this circumstance it would be better to receive a page back
> > that says *why* the request was blocked and where to look to allow it
> > rather than a 403. Anonymise the hell out of the response
mherger wrote:
> >
> > Interested to see how the code can distinguish an external request
> from
> > internal though.[/color]
>
> It's not very sophisticated, and not even fully correct: when a request
> is coming from the network's default gateway, I'm assuming it's coming
> from the outside.
Clearly, computers should be licensed only to those who can pass a
test... (and device developers should be forced to use the products they
produce...)
Interested to see how the code can distinguish an external request from
internal though.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Seems likely the Huawei is presenting its WiFi clients only to the
internet, not to local networks. Check the settings..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k
There is a project to control a squeeze ecosystem from Alexa, but that
still won't route Cast audio to your squeezebox devices. Another
solution is just buy Bluetooth enabled amplifiers for each end point...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x
I think Spotify/tidal/iTunes are the future. Seems to me that buying
physical media or even bothering to purchase digital media will be a
side show, a curiosity for the old and nostalgic in ten years time. The
industry wants subscription, and now it has a taste for it physical
media in
Or, leave them on! :)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Seems likely that "class D" was not copyrighted by them, only their own
implementation was protected, hence the clones. They are the future of
amplification in the same way that digital cameras eradicated film...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x
Ok so maybe it doesn't use a Linux kernel, but it runs some software on
a CPU in the same way (except it's called firmware because you have to
flash it to a ROM chip!). The Touch and Radio both use a Linux kernel,
of that I'm sure.
Principle is the same - they use a few Watts and this translates
I don't think any of them really go "off" in standby, it's a computer
running a Linux kernel, so power consumption will be essentially
identical when off as when on.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS
They are so small you can buy the bare amp boards and mount them on the
back of a speaker (or indeed inside) for an "active speaker
conversion"..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300
Tbh they mostly sound very similar. The cheaper ones used to have pretty
poor analogue volume controls but now that's all digital frankly they
are as interchangeable as DACs. For the money (i.e. not a lot), pick the
one that has the features you need and looks nicest..
-Transcoded from Matt's
If you're still being hacked after genuinely disabling the port from
internet access that means the hackers are already inside your
network... Suggest you look at intrusion detection software.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP
God I recently had to write a stack of scripts to strip the id3 tags
from my flacs and apply vorbis comments in their place. Apparently grip
was always writing id3 even when it was set to output flac. Pain in the
butt because the files can't be read by all the tools unless you strip
them, and if
Presumably because there's something else hitting the disk at the same
time? Anti Virus or a Windows indexer or patching or god know what
windows expends all my cash on all day paying for a hot CPU and a
thrashed hard drive...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch,
While I agree with the above, I'd also say the x40 will produce a
technically superior result. ;)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x
... AND the attacker has to be both quicker and nearer to the end point
to override the signal coming from your router. Long shot at best.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as
Too old to be vulnerable.. haha
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Let's not overreact It's just a hard to execute proof of concept
crack of a security protocol which will likely be fixed on most things
you care about before there are exploits in the wild. Keep your knickers
untwisted.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x
pippin wrote:
> Doesn't really help on a home network. You'd have to use certificate
> pinning as well because you can't identify the server and that would
> probably beyond "usable".I would think a VPN bridge would be the only
> workable way, bridging
between the wired segments of your network
Time for an SSL wrapper
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
slartibartfast wrote:
> Unless they were neighbours.
>
> Sent from my SM-G900F using TapatalkYou have nice neighbours..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k
Life will go on. Like with most vulnerabilities someone would have to
drive by and target you.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x
Only if you enable it.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
And yet BSD got a fix out in less than a month. Apple should just pick
that up.. ;)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
About zero. The Krack has no known exploits in the wild by the look of
it, for now. And I doubt you're that worried about the security of the
data going to your squeezeboxes..?
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
This is why PiCorePlayer exists..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Apesbrain wrote:
> I use a Harmony 650 to control a Touch.Via infrared presumably. It would be
> interesting to know if there are
vestiges of the LMS cli over Ethernet, is the point of the original
question if I read it right. Personally I very very much doubt it, but I
wouldn't be surprised if
In broad sweeping terms only.. a lot of time has passed. I've no doubt
the hub has a huge amount more power and features compared to the
duet/receiver.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music:
So Sox is refusing to convert it? What's the CPU you are asking to do
this downsample job?
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
Do they contain more than two channels?
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Easiest is to tell LMS to resample for you on the fly. Very unusual DAC
that can't do 48k these days though, even a Chromecast can do anything
up to 24b/96k..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Like all individual's opinions, we are really not interested how they
were decided upon.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
Pi has analogue audio output, as do most DAC hats, so yeah they can
"sound".
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
Years of experience tells us that people will pay lots and lots of money
for a nice case...
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
The march of cheap, convenient, mediocrity will always win in the long
term.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x 24/44k
albums..
(Needs an idiot guide to getting MusicIP working. I've looked into it a
few times and banged my head so hard against "obsolete, unavailable,
proprietary software" that I couldn't be bothered any more..)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers,
At least until the law catches up with this latest abuse of consumer
rights and stops them, yes..
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than 3x
This is normal for user agreements See the recent DJI firmware
updates; they will brick your drone if you don't update.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of
Mnyb wrote:
>
> Anyhow some stubborn fellow wants to sync 24/192 pcm over 5 players :D
> and comes to our forum.
Hah, works for me :)
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300
Sonos also made the executive decision to cripple their digital outputs,
for reasons no one can fathom; nor do they seem interested in sorting it
out.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music:
Those are "new, old stock" transporters. There is no manufacturing for a
decade or so.
LMS was always too hard for people, Sonos fixed that and appeals to the
Apple buying industrial design generation to boot, despite being broadly
mediocre for various reasons. Logitech had a ground breaking
The word "better" is absolute and needs to be based on a measurable
quantity. Truth is it sounds "different", maybe, but not "better".
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450
If the NAS has a gigabit port it should autodetect crossover. But the
Receiver won't it's only 100Mb.
-Transcoded from Matt's brain by Tapatalk-
--
Hardware: 3x Touch, 1x Radio, 2x Receivers, 1 HP Microserver NAS with
Debian+LMS 7.9.0
Music: ~1300 CDs, as 450 GB of 16/44k FLACs. No less than
Actually I suspect you'll find a lot of people on the forum are quite
happy with the status quo. The Pi/DAC/open source LMS solution is very
compelling. Any reignite of Logitech official Interest could well see
them grabbing that back in-house. At the very least it would likely be
based around
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
