same here; spottify connect not playing the current song. I've tried
toggling the 'Optimize Pre-Buffering', but this doesn't appear to help.
I know spotify connect is an issue, and it works fine through LMS -
although browsing songs/artist and albums takes a while to load??
(logging not set to d
I have the exact same problem. Could you please help with the solution?
staxza's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=73079
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=117007
_
Well the legend that is Ronnie has sorted the problem for me, don't aske
me how or what he did but its sorted.
Spotify is now playing perfectly, being controlled from my phone app.
:)
Hilts's Profile: http://forums.slimd
Thanks Ronnie for your perseverance with this .
Unfortunately this way above my head but hopefully someone can help out
with this.
Hilts's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=73122
View this thread:
I have been playing with this again today, after last night's post
I had some early success with the Bullseye Lite OS but eventually had to
concede defeat.
It was not possible to play more than two tracks consecutively from
either a Android or iPhone.
I tried adding Raspotify into the mix but
I have been trying to help Hilts with this, (Hi Andrew :)) and failed
:(:(
Just to add my tuppence to this
I assembled a similar set-up; ESS9023 DAC HAT on rpi3B, LMS v8.3.0 on
a rpi4b
one SD card with pCP 8.2.0 Squeezelite player:- gives the following
error and is not available as a Spotify-
Firstly I must apologise for jumping straight in with trying to sort my
problems out for my first post.
So here goes. I have a Raspberry Pi 3 with a dac hat AUDIOPHONICS
DAC I-Saber V3. Its loaded with PiCorePlayer v8.0.0 and Logitech Media
Server Version: 8.2.0 I have the Spotty (v4.8.4) pl
d6jg wrote:
> Thats just LMS transcoding 320kbps Ogg Vorbis to PCM for your
> particular player. Not High Res at all Im afraid
>
Note the smiley :-D
...pablo
Server: Win10 and LMS 8.2.0
System: SB Touch --optical->- Benchmark DAC2HGC --AnalysisPlus Oval
Copper XLR->- NAD M22 Power Amp --An
pablolie wrote:
> 36883
>
> My LMS shows high rez with Spotty, too... :-D
Thats just LMS transcoding 320kbps Ogg Vorbis to PCM for your
particular player. Not High Res at all Im afraid
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jim
https://jukeradio.double6.net
VB2.4[/B] STORAGE *QNAP TS419P (
36883
My LMS shows high rez with Spotty, too... :-D
+---+
|Filename: slim spotify.png |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=36883|
+-
mherger wrote:
> Once it's really available. Right now we have nothing but the
> announcement of a plan.
And now we have a new status for Spotify HiFi of "Under Consideration":
"... we don’t have timing details to share yet."
https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/All-Platforms-Music-Hi
so my son who uses his account on his smartphone, will see the radio
were his spotty account is activated? but not the other radio's...
Correct. Unless "local announcements" are possible.
What are local announcements?
Spotty tries do broadcast its existence in your network. Spotify clients
mherger wrote:
> >> Are you using multiple accounts (or a Family account)?
> >
> > Yes
>
> Then the missing Radio probably is using another account than yours. And
>
> local announcements are failing. In that case you'd only see the players
>
> connected to your account.
so my son who uses
Are you using multiple accounts (or a Family account)?
Yes
Then the missing Radio probably is using another account than yours. And
local announcements are failing. In that case you'd only see the players
connected to your account.
___
discuss mai
mherger wrote:
> >
> Are you using multiple accounts (or a Family account)?
Yes
johan d's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48838
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=1
I do have WIFI 2.4 and 5.0 setup, and I do have some repeaters in my
WIFI. Might that be a problem?
As long as they all end up in the same IP segment, then you should be good.
Are you using multiple accounts (or a Family account)?
___
discuss mailing
johan d wrote:
> Yes they are.
> I do have WIFI 2.4 and 5.0 setup, and I do have some repeaters in my
> WIFI. Might that be a problem?
> Sometimes the WIFI icon on the SBR's is blue (I never saw this before)
>
> 35678
>
> 35679I find that sometimes a player will disappear if the Daemon crashes
mherger wrote:
> > Is this on the squeezebox itself, or on the LMS webpage settings?
> Both
> > SB radio's have this option ticked.
>
> Are both of these players connected to the same LMS? One has the
> "Autoplay" option present, the other does not. As if they weren't using
>
> the same Spott
Is this on the squeezebox itself, or on the LMS webpage settings? Both
SB radio's have this option ticked.
Are both of these players connected to the same LMS? One has the
"Autoplay" option present, the other does not. As if they weren't using
the same Spotty version.
Is this on the squeezebox itself, or on the LMS webpage settings? Both
SB radio's have this option ticked.
35660
+---+
|Filename: Knipsel.JPG |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/
johan d wrote:
> Another small issue.
> I have idendicat SB radio's (red one bleck one :=) ) and only the red
> one is visible in the spootify app. They have the same software. Were
> should I look?Have a look at player settings. Make sure the Spotify Connect
> Endpoint
box is ticked.[image:
h
Another small issue.
I have idendicat SB radio's (red one bleck one :=) ) and only the red
one is visible in the spootify app. They have the same software. Were
should I look?
johan d's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.
ok thanks, It should work is what I understand. I will mess around a bit
to get it solved.
I have 2.4 and 5 Hz wifi configured as well as a DEVOLO powerline to
some cabinet in the garden, but as far as I know The SB radio and my
phone are on the same network.
I will look for the "local announceme
The windows desktop app of spotify seems to find the squeezebox radio,
but my android app on my phone doesn't, even if the radio is on.
Is that normal behaviour?
I think my response to this (rather popular) question always starts with
an "it's complicated". Visibility of a player not only depen
Man in a van wrote:
> Played one track then stopped, hit the Advance arrow to get the next
> track playing :rolleyes:
>
> ronnie
You can download the app for desktop, mobile, and tablet.
'Download the app' (http://www.spotify.com/download)
*Supported versions*
*iOS*
iOS 12 or above
*
Man in a van wrote:
> I have just checked with a SBRadio.
>
> iPhone, iOS 14.6 connects immediately
>
> Moto G Android 5.1, connects after a struggle, restart of phone and
> another struggle; error messages on the Radio, but does eventually work.
>
> ronnie
Played one track then stopped, hit
johan d wrote:
> The windows desktop app of spotify seems to find the squeezebox radio,
> but my android app on my phone doesn't, even if the radio is on.
> Is that normal behaviour?
I have just checked with a SBRadio.
iPhone, iOS 14.6 connects immediately
Moto G Android 5.1, connects after
johan d wrote:
> The windows desktop app of spotify seems to find the squeezebox radio,
> but my android app on my phone doesn't, even if the radio is on.
> Is that normal behaviour?Strange, they should both see any squeezeboxes if
> they are selected as
Spotify Connect players in the plugin se
The windows desktop app of spotify seems to find the squeezebox radio,
but my android app on my phone doesn't, even if the radio is on.
Is that normal behaviour?
johan d's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?
slartibartfast wrote:
> You asked the same question in June.
> https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?p=1024753
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
ohw ok sorry, must have gone out of my head.
johan d's Prof
Is it possible to have my squeezebox radio's listed in the spotify app
as endpoints?
So my radio can be used as a speaker to listen to my spotify playlists,
with my smartphone as a rmote control.
You can enable Connect mode in the Spotty settings. It's not perfect,
but mostly works :-)
___
johan d wrote:
> Is it possible to have my squeezebox radio's listed in the spotify app
> as endpoints?
> So my radio can be used as a speaker to listen to my spotify playlists,
> with my smartphone as a rmote control.
>
> BR, JohanYou asked the same question in June.
https://forums.slimdevices
Is it possible to have my squeezebox radio's listed in the spotify app
as endpoints?
So my radio can be used as a speaker to listen to my spotify playlists,
with my smartphone as a rmote control.
BR, Johan
johan d's Profi
slartibartfast wrote:
> I see. It wasn't April 1st was it? [emoji1787]. I wonder why Spotify
> would stream PCM rather than FLAC.
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
Haha! Maybe it was. Looks like the post is two weeks late in that case.
SB Touch optical to Hegel H90, Speakers Larsen 4
bernt wrote:
> This is from a Facebook group. You need to be a member I think.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/846387368736533/permalink/5351118688263356/
>
> 34194I see. It wasn't April 1st was it? [emoji1787]. I wonder why Spotify
would stream PCM rather than FLAC.
Sent from my Pixel 3a
slartibartfast wrote:
> Thanks. Interesting thread (Google translate worked perfectly [emoji3]).
> The only evidence there appears to be that someone downloaded some files
> from Spotify and Qobuz etc and they appeared to be the same. Nobody
> actually saw the information on their DAC as far as
bernt wrote:
> https://www.faktiskt.io/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=71930Thanks. Interesting
> thread (Google translate worked perfectly [emoji3]).
The only evidence there appears to be that someone downloaded some files
from Spotify and Qobuz etc and they appeared to be the same. Nobody
actually
slartibartfast wrote:
> Do you have a link to the thread? I can try Google translate [emoji3]
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
https://www.faktiskt.io/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=71930
SB Touch optical to Hegel H90, Speakers Larsen 4.2
Spare SB3
AirPlay Bridge to Audio Pro A10
Squeez
bernt wrote:
> It shows in the Dac display. Some say it sound better, some have
> captured the stream and compared it with Tidal and so on.Do you have a link
> to the thread? I can try Google translate [emoji3]
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
--
slartibartfast wrote:
> Maybe Spotify are testing lossless streaming in Sweden. Don't the
> discussions say how they know the bitrate?
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
It shows in the Dac display. Some say it sound better, some have
captured the stream and compared it with Tidal and so
bernt wrote:
> Dont know. Its a discussion about it on two different swedish hifi
> forums right now.
>
>
> Skickat från min iPhone med TapatalkMaybe Spotify are testing lossless
> streaming in Sweden. Don't the
discussions say how they know the bitrate?
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
slartibartfast wrote:
> Ah OK. Which DACs display bitrate then? Most just display sample rate.
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
Dont know. Its a discussion about it on two different swedish hifi
forums right now.
Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk
SB Touch optical to Hegel H90,
bernt wrote:
> Yes, but this is from people that dont use LMS.
>
>
> Skickat från min iPhone med TapatalkAh OK. Which DACs display bitrate then?
> Most just display sample rate.
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
slartibartfast wrote:
> Spotify tracks are transcoded to PCM or FLAC by LMS. Yours must be set
> to PCM.
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
Yes, but this is from people that dont use LMS.
Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk
SB Touch optical to Hegel H90, Speakers Larsen 4.2
Spare S
bernt wrote:
> I've seen people reporting that they get 1411 kbps in there DAC:s then
> streaming from Spotify (Connect?).
>
> Anyone else noticing it?Spotify tracks are transcoded to PCM or FLAC by LMS.
> Yours must be set
to PCM.
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
I've seen people reporting that they get 1411 kbps in there DAC:s then
streaming from Spotify (Connect?).
Anyone else noticing it?
SB Touch optical to Hegel H90, Speakers Larsen 4.2
Spare SB3
AirPlay Bridge to Audio Pro A10
Squeezelite-x connected to home LMS with ZeroTier One.
SB Radio
Ready
pablolie wrote:
> Amen, btw.
LMS on a dedicated server (FitPC3)
Transporter (Ethernet) - main listening, Onkyo receiver, Paradigm
speakers
Touch (WiFi) - home theater 5.1, Sony receiver, Energy speakers
Boom 1 (WiFi) - work-space
Boom 2 (WiFi) - various (deck, garage, etc.)
Radio (WiFi) - hom
garym wrote:
> No shouting on this forum. My favorite forum for getting along with
> everyone! Regarding transparency of different codecs, In the distant
> past, I did some ABX (double blind) tests of lossless vs various flavors
> of mp3 (320kbps down to 64kbps I recall). I found most things
>
philippe_44 wrote:
> I
> Again, everybody is perfectly entitled to have fun building or buying
> complex and expensive gears. But itÂs about aesthetic and hobbies, what
> is incorrect is to claim it is better from a signal theoryÂs point if
> view.
Perfectly put.
The valid analogy is not a 3
mcduman wrote:
> actually, everything about cd format was kind of arbitrary in order to
> fit Beethoven's 9th in one single portable cd.
> (https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/why-is-a-cd-74-minutes/). it
> could have been 14 or 20 bits depending on how much fit in one cd. i am
> sure all th
Since it seems Kees Schouhamer himself answered some points :-D just
briefly:
The bit depth and sampling rate for the CD format were never a
compromise. You can mathematically prove you can *perfectly* reconfigure
any analog signal if you sample it at twice the frequency. And the best
golden ear
philchillbill wrote:
> They only went on to do SACD for marketing reasons, not technical. If
> people will buy bottled leprechaun pee then some entrepreneur will
> bottle it because there are buyers for it.
>
> I never understood the fascination with vinyl over CD. Dont people hear
> the surfa
d6jg wrote:
> Careful.
> We will all end up downstairs with the audiofools if we are not careful!
Amen!
*Home:* Pi4B-8GB/pCP7.x/4TB>LMS 8.1.x>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(all ethernet)
*Cottage:* rPi4B-4GB/pCP7.x/4TB>LMS 8.1.x>Touch>Benchmark DAC I, Boom,
Radio w/Battery (Radio WIFI)
*O
philchillbill wrote:
> They only went on to do SACD for marketing reasons, not technical. If
> people will buy bottled leprechaun pee then some entrepreneur will
> bottle it because there are buyers for it.
>
> I never understood the fascination with vinyl over CD. Dont people hear
> the surfa
toby10 wrote:
> Bigger / newer / faster / more
isnt always better.
>
> You can grow a bigger tomato, but that doesnt make it a better tomato.
> You can use a newer and technologically advanced HD TV antenna, but
> you wont get a better HD TV picture than your grand parents 1948 TV
> a
mcduman wrote:
> hi philchillbill,
>
> i remember that even sony and philips recognized the shortcomings of
> the cd format and went on to introduce the sacd. why do you think that
> happened?
>
> anyways, i do not need to mention that i will upgrade to spotify hi-fi
> when it is available. i
PS and it would be much more fun in a Ferrari
VB2.4[/B] STORAGE *QNAP TS419P (NFS)
[B]Living Room* Joggler & Pi4/Khadas -> Onkyo TXNR686 -> Celestion F20s
*Office* Joggler & Pi3 -> Denon RCD N8 -> Celestion F10s
*Dining Room* SB Boom
*Kitchen* UE Radio (upgraded to SB Radio)
*Bedroom (Beds
d6jg wrote:
> Sorry to be pendantic but you would get there marginally faster in a
> Ferrari due to its faster acceleration from 0-60 and better brakes
> assuming that both vehicles travel at the maximum permitted speed limit.
>
> Each time there was a speed limit change the Ferrari would gain
toby10 wrote:
>
> You can buy a 200 mph Ferrari, but you wont get from London to Paris
> any faster than a Honda Civic.
>
Sorry to be pendantic but you would get there marginally faster in a
Ferrari due to its faster acceleration from 0-60 and better brakes
assuming that both vehicles travel
philchillbill wrote:
> I worked as an engineer at Philips CD Lab from 1985-1990 and I can
> reassure you that the 74 minutes requirement only directed the choice
> for the diameter of the disc (otherwise it would have been a bit smaller
> to only handle 60mins of audio like a C60 cassette tape).
slartibartfast wrote:
> Your link is more about the physical size of the CD to achieve 74
> minutes than the resolution or sampling frequency.
>
> Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
sorry. 14 -16 bit discussion is in this link.
https://www.openculture.com/2018/01/the-story-of-how-beethove
Falling down from 3rd floor on head comment [emoji23] maybe bit harsh as
one cannot ever perceive other person experiences as we are all limited
by our own senses.. (BTW That's why you get so many freaks in talent
shows..)
Anyway even when I can get around 70-80% of ab blind tests correctly I
co
mcduman wrote:
> .. more of every thing in technology from cpu power to screen
> resolution is good, whether you need it or not. but when it comes to
> audio resolution, less is good. how can this be true?
Bigger / newer / faster / more
isnt always better.
You can grow a bigger
mcduman wrote:
> actually, everything about cd format was kind of arbitrary in order to
> fit Beethoven's 9th in one single portable cd.
> (https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/why-is-a-cd-74-minutes/). it
> could have been 14 or 20 bits depending on how much fit in one cd. i am
> sure all th
mcduman wrote:
> actually, everything about cd format was kind of arbitrary in order to
> fit Beethoven's 9th in one single portable cd.
> (https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/why-is-a-cd-74-minutes/). it
> could have been 14 or 20 bits depending on how much fit in one cd. i am
> sure all t
actually, everything about cd format was kind of arbitrary in order to
fit Beethoven's 9th in one single portable cd.
(https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/why-is-a-cd-74-minutes/). it
could have been 14 or 20 bits depending on how much fit in one cd. i am
sure all the engineers from sony and
pablolie wrote:
>
> 320k is awesome sound quality.
I agree with all of this, and I shall be resisting the temptation to
fork out more each month for lossless streaming. I suspect Spotify know
all this too, and have previously resisted the move to lossless not
because of the technical challeng
mcduman wrote:
> when the cd was invented in the 80s it offered a resolution of 1411
> kbps. when you bought a computer at that time it came with a 320x240
> screen.
> fast forward to today, and the most popular streaming service offers 320
> kbps. when you buy a high end computer it comes with
mcduman wrote:
> when the cd was invented in the 80s it offered a resolution of 1411
> kbps. when you bought a computer at that time it came with a 320x240
> screen.
> fast forward to today, and the most popular streaming service offers 320
> kbps. when you buy a high end computer it comes with
pablolie wrote:
> So sue me but I am perfectly happy with the SQ of the current 320k
> stream. Plenty of listening tests out there show how hard it is to tell
> the difference between 320k/CD quality/HighRez. There are preciously few
> albums that are recorded with the required resolution, and e
Likewise I expect there will be a clamour to get Spotify lossless on
board but as far as I am concerned they have missed the boat. Unless
its massively cheaper (unlikely) and fully supported here (as you say
down to Michael) why would I want the hassle of transferring my library
from one to other
+1 as well
But I pity Michael for having to deal with the likely oncoming demands
for what may be a Herculean task. As much credit as Michael gets here,
it still is not enough imo.
TomAmes's Profile: http://forums.slimdev
garym wrote:
> No shouting on this forum. My favorite forum for getting along with
> everyone! Regarding transparency of different codecs, In the distant
> past, I did some ABX (double blind) tests of lossless vs various flavors
> of mp3 (320kbps down to 64kbps I recall). I found most things
>
d6jg wrote:
> Generally I am also +1
> But, dont shout at me, I listen a lot using my iPhone, an Audioquest
> Dragonfly and a pair of B&W P7s. I can tell a 320kbps mp3 from a FLAC
> and very occasionally I can detect a HiRes FLAC.
> However I am not going to replace all my ripped CDs with 24bit
> kidstypike;1011916
Generally I am also +1
But, dont shout at me, I listen a lot using my iPhone, an Audioquest
Dragonfly and a pair of B&W P7s. I can tell a 320kbps mp3 from a FLAC
and very occasionally I can detect a HiRes FLAC.
However I am not going to replace all my ripped CDs with 24bit
garym wrote:
> I couldnt agree more.
*Server - LMS 8.2.0 *Pi4B 4GB/Argon one case/pCP v7.0.1 - 75K library,
playlists & LMS cache on SSD (ntfs)
*Study -* Pi3B/pCP 7.0.1/pi screen/Hifiberry DAC HAT Ruark MR1 Mk2
*Lounge* - Pi2/pCP 6.0.0 > HiFiBerry DIGI+ > AudioEngine DAC1 > AVI DM5
*Garage* -
pablolie wrote:
> So sue me but I am perfectly happy with the SQ of the current 320k
> stream. Plenty of listening tests out there show how hard it is to tell
> the difference between 320k/CD quality/HighRez. There are preciously few
> albums that are recorded with the required resolution, and ev
So sue me but I am perfectly happy with the SQ of the current 320k
stream. Plenty of listening tests out there show how hard it is to tell
the difference between 320k/CD quality/HighRez. There are preciously few
albums that are recorded with the required resolution, and even when
you're very fami
garym wrote:
> wasn't the original RadioParadise flac stream actually an Ogg/FLAC
> stream? (whether that matters, I have no idea)
My (currently on pause) radio station had an Ogg/FLAC stream with
metadata. It wasnt difficult to put together. The technical issue was
with the player software th
d6jg wrote:
> Ogg/FLAC? Given that they are not (apparently) considering HD might be
> doable at 16/44.1 on existing hardware.
> Chromecast, Airplay etc devices are all capable enough.
wasn't the original RadioParadise flac stream actually an Ogg/FLAC
stream? (whether that matters, I have no
mherger wrote:
> > Spotify claims it will be compatible with existing Connect speakers,
> so
> > if we're lucky Spotty will just work ;)
>
> I seriously doubt it. Their current streams are Ogg. I would be
> surprised if _any_ Connect speaker would work without a firmware update.
Ogg/FLAC? Giv
Spotify claims it will be compatible with existing Connect speakers, so
if we're lucky Spotty will just work ;)
I seriously doubt it. Their current streams are Ogg. I would be
surprised if _any_ Connect speaker would work without a firmware update.
_
mherger wrote:
> I'll repeat what I just wrote in another thread, to hopefully continue
> the discussion here.
>
> Whether Spotify HiFi will ever work with Spotty, I can't say. When that
>
> would be even less so. It will certainly not be available when HiFi
> starts. As Spotty is using an o
I'll repeat what I just wrote in another thread, to hopefully continue
the discussion here.
Whether Spotify HiFi will ever work with Spotty, I can't say. When that
would be even less so. It will certainly not be available when HiFi
starts. As Spotty is using an open source implementation of a
garym wrote:
> I haven't seen this posted anywhere on this forum. Interesting
> development.
> https://9to5google.com/2021/02/22/spotify-hifi-lossless-audio/
Beat me to it :cool:
2 x Touch
2 x Radio
2 x Boom
1 x Intel-NUC server/squeezelite running LMS 7.92 (from nightlies) on
Windows 10
1
I agree that it will be a real plus for the largest streaming service to
finally offer CD quality at least as lossless downloads . Spotify has
enough of a lead in this market to withstand the troubled economic times
we find ourselves in . This will mean as stated above that should one of
the smal
d6jg wrote:
> Too late I feel. My Qobuz library is already 500+ albums. Am I really
> going to switch back to Spotify?
Probably not (I wouldn't). But I do think it is good news (for lossless
streaming) that Spotify will be in that space. I forget the percentages,
but Qobuz and Tidal are very t
Too late I feel. My Qobuz library is already 500+ albums. Am I really
going to switch back to Spotify?
VB2.4[/B] STORAGE *QNAP TS419P (NFS)
[B]Living Room* Joggler & Pi4/Khadas -> Onkyo TXNR686 -> Celestion F20s
*Office* Joggler & Pi3 -> Denon RCD N8 -> Celestion F10s
*Dining Room* SB Boom
Great news! I hope it will be available in Canada and for only a few
dollars more for lossless streaming like Amazon Music HD. I have tried
Tidal (too expensive) and AM HD (reasonably priced), but have always
reverted back to Spotify because it is best at personalizing playlist.
I haven't seen this posted anywhere on this forum. Interesting
development.
https://9to5google.com/2021/02/22/spotify-hifi-lossless-audio/
*Home:* Pi4B-8GB/pCP7.x/4TB>LMS 8.1.x>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(all ethernet)
*Cottage:* rPi4B-4GB/pCP7.x/4TB>LMS 8.1.x>Touch>Benchmark DAC I, Boo
Does anyone else see the issue that I am seeing?
tricia's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5895
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=112504
_
Hi again
Turns out I am using the MIS. I have just one setting set, that being
"Extended Text Display" which is set to "Use screensaver settings." So
I am just wondering why when playing songs via Spotty is slightly
different to playing song from the locally stored Artists I have. Are
you sur
Currently when I press NOW PLAYING, the right-hand screen shows
" by from " for 30 seconds UNTIL the 30
seconds timer times out, and then it displays Album Artist.
What you're seeing there might just be the "playlist format" as defined
somewhere in the LMS settings. From LMS' point of view it
Hi
Sorry for the confusion. I don't actually need the MusicInfoSCR plugin
I believe. It's just a Spotty "fix".
All I want is this:
When it is playing an album from Spotty, then when I press the NOW
PLAYING button on the Transporter (or Remote control), I want the
left-hand screen to display t
Is this easily fixable? :-)
I'm sorry to say that there's too much information spread across too
many postings for me to digest easily... I'm not sure what you're doing,
what is happening, what you want. Could you please start over? And
describe in detail your MusicInfoSCR configuration.
-
Ah ha. I think it must be a bug because I can trick it into doing the
right thing. To trick it, do this:
STEP 1: Whilst track 3 is playing, arrow up to track 2 so that Current
Playlist is showing on the left-screen rather than Now Playing, and the
desired Album/Artist is showing on the the righ
Ok thanks for your reply - so don't update LMS then. :)
I guess my questions are this:
1. For the left-hand screen
Although I can configure what to display in the Current Play List in the
Screensaver, if I select screensaver as my choice of Customize Playlist
Display, then it behaves oddly: s
reboot the LMS server once I have settings how I want them? Or does I
need a later version of LMS?
You certainly won't need a newer LMS, as development of the MIS plugin
has stopped long ago...
--
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.sli
Well, I've been fiddling with the MusicInfoScreen plugin config and
almost got it how I want it. But it went a bit wierd and had the same
track title in there multiple times. So I rebboted the transporter and
it's a it happier now. But the Playtime_remaining no longer counts down,
it's static, w
I've installed the MusicInfoSCR plugin. The right-hand display still
displays the single scrolling line of info when on Now playing BUT, if I
use the remote control and press Arrow UP or DOWN, to see the previous
or next track on the left screen, then the right-hand screen suddenly
changes to di
1 - 100 of 785 matches
Mail list logo
