I have been lurking through this thread and am still unsure about how
the remote controls the receiver. Is it through wifi where I just need
to be in range of wifi router to change music or internet radio (like in
by back yard) or do I need line of site? Sorry if this has been
answered and I
hey guys...
im just wondering about the battery on the remote.
is this going to be like a ipod situation where we have to send it
back to get put in?
also, if i happen to buy a spare battery, does the cradle have spot to
charge it without it being in the remote?
one last question;
are
johnzm;269229 Wrote:
im just wondering about the battery on the remote.
is this going to be like a ipod situation where we have to send it
back to get put in?
also, if i happen to buy a spare battery, does the cradle have spot to
charge it without it being in the remote?
The battery
kdf;269164 Wrote:
djfake,
The 'fanboy' example, mis-attributed as it was, is the counterpart of
term 'troll'. None of it really helps.
No need to be so defensive yourself.
-kdf
Agreed. But my intention was never to troll, I believe I stated that
out.
It was my intention however
johnzm wrote:
hey guys...
im just wondering about the battery on the remote.
is this going to be like a ipod situation where we have to send it
back to get put in?
also, if i happen to buy a spare battery, does the cradle have spot to
charge it without it being in the remote?
one
johnzm;269229 Wrote:
are there any ideas in putting wireless charging into the remote, like
whats seen here?
http://www.epn-online.com/page/9980/wireless-recharging-system-replenishes-mobile-devices.html
or does it already support it?
I don't see any advantage over the cradle except that
djfake;269161 Wrote:
I'm very suspicious when someone in his position gets so defensive to
comments made in a forum. We all should be...
I was not defensive regarding your critique of the decisions around how
the Squeezebox Receiver works. If I was defensive about anything, it
was your
djfake;269159 Wrote:
Jim, those are your words, not my intent; so please do not speak for me.
Then what did you mean when you said...
...but why do I get the feeling this list is apologetic to Logitech?
If I've misunderstood your intent, please use this opportunity to
explain what you
JimC;269540 Wrote:
With a 30-day return policy increasingly common around the world (and
virtually ubiquitous in the US), we need to consider the fact that a
standalone, displayless Squeezebox, while appealing to a subset of
customers, could easily be purchased by someone wrongly assuming it
JJZolx;269544 Wrote:
Not having read every post in this 50+ page thread, does this mean that
the receiver as a standalone product will _not_ be offered? To
someone, for instance, wanting to add a zone to an existing system
consisting of an SBR and SBC.
We will offer the Squeezebox Receiver
Hello
I have lots of cd's and music on my computer(imac or pc)
what I want is the possibility to play the music which is on my
harddrive through external speakers which are connented to the
computer.
i think things as the squeezebox duet are suitable for this .
when the music is on my hard
ok thank you for your remarks.
I wonder whats the difference between the one you have and the duet,
the transporter is out of my budget.
The way you explain it ,than i could just connect my speakers
(monitors)
to the computer and then use the software you mention.
the set speakers i have are
rene50;268916 Wrote:
ok thank you for your remarks.
I wonder whats the difference between the one you have and the duet,
the transporter is out of my budget.
The way you explain it ,than i could just connect my speakers
(monitors)
to the computer and then use the software you mention.
rene50;268899 Wrote:
Hello
I have lots of cd's and music on my computer(imac or pc)
what I want is the possibility to play the music which is on my
harddrive through external speakers which are connented to the
computer.
i think things as the squeezebox duet are suitable for this .
mvalera;268629 Wrote:
Robin's developing a plug-in to solve that. The SB Receiver will get an
IP address thru DHCP automatically on the Ethernet port (didn't know
that till today) so his plug-in will be able to find and configure the
receivers without too much trouble. The hard part for
djfake;268947 Wrote:
Also, why doesn't the old remote for the Squeezebox not work with the
SBR?
The SBR has no infra-red detector. And even if it did have one, there's
no screen to get any visual feedback from your IR remote's commands.
--
mflint
'LiveDepartures plugin'
djfake;268947 Wrote:
Mike - when Robin does get this plugin written, I hope Logitech does
something very nice for him. I'll buy one, that's for sure.
Also, why doesn't the old remote for the Squeezebox not work with the
SBR?
We're very familiar with Robin. He's one of our best
ok I connect the sqeezebox or the duet to a receiver/amplifier ,is it
also ok to connect it to a monitored system as the sub has allkind of
connections.
But what i do not understand is how it plays the mp3 on my hard drive
or does that work through the wireless router etc.
So it connects with
Rene50, I get the impression you just want to play music on your
PC and connect your speakers to the PC. That may work very well if you
have a good soundcard. You only need to download the free squeezecenter
software and the freen sofsqueeze software to do that. It seems you may
not have much
djfake wrote:
Yeah, cough is right. Why can't you configure it via wired ethernet?
Most every network device embeds something to do this - I have a NAS
device that does this.
Okay, Logitech's first priority was to sell the duet combo. But if
Logitech wanted, they could have created the SBR
rene50,
First of all, welcome to the forum. Würden Sie lieber in deutscher
Sprache zu sprechen? Ou en Français?
There are regular posters who speak both as their first language if
that is easier for you - try the German or French forums if so.
I would take a look at the Beginners Guide in the
rene50;268977 Wrote:
ok I connect the sqeezebox or the duet to a receiver/amplifier ,is it
also ok to connect it to a monitored system as the sub has allkind of
connections.
But what i do not understand is how it plays the mp3 on my hard drive
or does that work through the wireless router
djfake;269013 Wrote:
Thanks for the reply. A desktop PC would work too, correct?
Yes - plug it (the SB) into any computer running SqueezeCenter
(directly or via a switch/router etc)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call
Peter;268998 Wrote:
djfake wrote:
Yeah, cough is right. Why can't you configure it via wired ethernet?
Most every network device embeds something to do this - I have a NAS
device that does this.
Okay, Logitech's first priority was to sell the duet combo. But if
Logitech wanted,
maybe time for a Dutch sub-forum? (after all, there seem to be a few
users in the Netherlands and our French and German friends are catered
for!
:o)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
Peter wrote:
Some people have no trust in this community. Is your plugin going to
include setting up a wireless WPA key so that we can configure an SBR
over ethernet and then continue using it over Wifi? I trust it will, but
perhaps you'd better confirm that to the doubtful part of the
Robin Bowes wrote:
ceejay wrote:
Robin Bowes;268276 Wrote:
What part of it can also be configured via the ethernet port do you
not understand?
R.
Robin
Actually, the whole point of this part of the discussion is that the
SBR CAN'T be configured by its ethernet port.
Peter;268990 Wrote:
Rene50, I get the impression you just want to play music on your
PC and connect your speakers to the PC. That may work very well if you
have a good soundcard. You only need to download the free squeezecenter
software and the freen sofsqueeze software to do that. It
djfake;269013 Wrote:
Thanks for the reply. A desktop PC would work too, correct?
Yes, sorry that too.
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Systems
slimdevices.com
mvalera's
mvalera;268969 Wrote:
We're very familiar with Robin. He's one of our best community guys.
The reason the old remote won't work is there is no IR receiver on the
SB Receiver. To control the it without the SB Controller using Robin's
plug-in you will need to interface with SqueezeCenter
mvalera wrote:
djfake;268947 Wrote:
Mike - when Robin does get this plugin written, I hope Logitech does
something very nice for him. I'll buy one, that's for sure.
Also, why doesn't the old remote for the Squeezebox not work with the
SBR?
We're very familiar with Robin. He's one of our
djfake wrote:
mvalera;268629 Wrote:
Robin's developing a plug-in to solve that. The SB Receiver will get an
IP address thru DHCP automatically on the Ethernet port (didn't know
that till today) so his plug-in will be able to find and configure the
receivers without too much trouble. The hard
djfake;268274 Wrote:
Yeah, cough is right. Why can't you configure it via wired ethernet?
Most every network device embeds something to do this - I have a NAS
device that does this.
Because there are a lot more variables in this setup than in a NAS
setup. For example, what if you don't run
rene50 wrote:
Peter;268990 Wrote:
Rene50, I get the impression you just want to play music on your
PC and connect your speakers to the PC. That may work very well if you
have a good soundcard. You only need to download the free squeezecenter
software and the freen sofsqueeze software
Peter wrote:
rene50 wrote:
hallo mooi nederlands,ja ik heb veel mp3's op de pc staan of op de
apple imac.
ik heb een goede geluidskaart,maar ik vraag mij af of dat nodig is
,maar dat is misschien een domme opmerking.
IK HEB EEN FOCAL ICUB SET DIE ZEER GESCHIKT IS OM TE VERBINDEN MET
JimC;269051 Wrote:
There is a member of the community developing a SqueezeCenter plug-in
to configure the SBR without a Squeezebox Controller. If/when that's
released, you should be able use the SBR without the SBC.
== Jim
Thanks for letting me know what you think. As a user of Slim
djfake;269141 Wrote:
Jim - was this really necessary to direct at me? I never used the word
fanboy in any of my communique, and I don't think I ever digressed
into anything remotely personal or negative for that matter. Quite
disappointing to read from someone in your position.
Sorry, I
On Feb 13, 2008 7:37 PM, djfake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fanboy in any of my communique, and I don't think I ever digressed
into anything remotely personal or negative for that matter. Quite
disappointing to read from someone in your position.
So apparently everyone is all for free speech
On 13-Feb-08, at 6:56 PM, djfake wrote:
JimC;269147 Wrote:
Sorry, I was mistaken regarding the exact word. You used
apologist and
I conflated it with another thread where the same people were called
fanboys under the same circumstances.
I am of the mind that both are equally as
Ben Sandee;269151 Wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008 7:37 PM, djfake
djfake.34qz0n1202953201 (AT) no-mx (DOT) forums.slimdevices.com
wrote:
fanboy in any of my communique, and I don't think I ever digressed
into anything remotely personal or negative for that matter. Quite
disappointing to read
On 13-Feb-08, at 6:58 PM, djfake wrote:
I'm very suspicious when someone in his position gets so defensive to
comments made in a forum. We all should be...
into conspiracy theories then?
Hardly defensive, it's a fair evaluation given the perspective of the
other side of the wall. It's
Robin Bowes;268276 Wrote:
What part of it can also be configured via the ethernet port do you
not understand?
R.
Robin
Actually, the whole point of this part of the discussion is that the
SBR CAN'T be configured by its ethernet port. It will only, AFAIK,
initially talk wirelessly to an
On 12-Feb-08, at 12:40 AM, ceejay wrote:
Robin Bowes;268276 Wrote:
What part of it can also be configured via the ethernet port do you
not understand?
R.
Robin
Actually, the whole point of this part of the discussion is
...due to those who are missing the hints
-kdf
kdf;268345 Wrote:
due to those who are missing the hints
And those who choose to think the 'Lord of the web' has even a passing
clue about what he's talking about.
--
JJZolx
Jim
JJZolx's Profile:
Easy JJ...
I work on the knowledge I have at the time.
I'll talk to the engineers tomorrow to see what's what.
Mike
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Systems
slimdevices.com
djfake;268393 Wrote:
It's not. Buy any NAS device and it will automatically configure itself
to DHCP.
The part where the guy from Logitech says it can only be configured via
the SBC. Am I to believe that the guy from Logitech Lord Of The Web
knows less than posters on this forum?
Robin Bowes;268405 Wrote:
ceejay wrote:
Robin Bowes;268276 Wrote:
What part of it can also be configured via the ethernet port do
you
not understand?
R.
Robin
Actually, the whole point of this part of the discussion is that the
SBR CAN'T be configured by its ethernet
Robin Bowes;268405 Wrote:
Aw, gee, I guess I'd better stop developing this plugin that configures
SBRs, from SC, over a wired network.
Shoot, and I reckon it would have been useful to some folk.
;)
R.
You keep on developing that Robin, I am counting on you!
--
Kiwi
ceejay wrote:
Robin Bowes;268276 Wrote:
What part of it can also be configured via the ethernet port do you
not understand?
R.
Robin
Actually, the whole point of this part of the discussion is that the
SBR CAN'T be configured by its ethernet port. It will only, AFAIK,
initially talk
ceejay;268337 Wrote:
The other school of thought in this debate seems to be that it should
instead have been made to allow some sort of default (DHCP) connection
wired. I have to say that sounds quite hard to make work in practice,
and I have a hard time sympathizing with the heat coming
mvalera wrote:
Our first priority is to get Duet out the door. I'm sure once things
are settled a bit, either we or someone else in the community will
come up with a way to configure a SB Receiver without a SB
Controller.
*cough*
But it will have to be on a WiFi enabled device, like a
djfake;268009 Wrote:
Logitech - this stinks. Why will you not sell a reasonably priced
hardware device for use with Slimserver? All I need is a wired-only, no
display device.
You have to realize that without a display or an IR receiver, the only
way to talk to a SB Receiver out of the
djfake;268009 Wrote:
Well the first question is then definitely FALSE. One cannot just buy
the SBR and expect to use it like the old Squeezebox.
1. False - To configure the SBR, you must have the SBC.
So you can buy as many SBRs as you want, but none of them will work
without
djfake wrote:
Robin Bowes;268246 Wrote:
It can also be configured via the ethernet port.
Yeah, cough is right. Why can't you configure it via wired ethernet?
Most every network device embeds something to do this - I have a NAS
device that does this.
Okay, Logitech's first priority was
Robin Bowes;268246 Wrote:
mvalera wrote:
Our first priority is to get Duet out the door. I'm sure once things
are settled a bit, either we or someone else in the community will
come up with a way to configure a SB Receiver without a SB
Controller.
*cough*
But it will have to
Zaragon;267684 Wrote:
Mmmm...
Forcing particular answers doesn't always get you the information you
were after or rather it does but it isn't always the answer you need.
Yes you can connect a SBR by ethernet though you currently must first
configure it using a Squeezebox Controller (SBC).
djfake;268009 Wrote:
Well the first question is then definitely FALSE. One cannot just buy
the SBR and expect to use it like the old Squeezebox.
Logitech - this stinks. Why will you not sell a reasonably priced
hardware device for use with Slimserver? All I need is a wired-only, no
Well, I've trudged through these posts looking for answers to the
following
True or False:
I can buy a Squeezebox Receiver for $149, connect it via wired ethernet
to my home network, and use Slimserver software to play music through
it.
True or False:
If I buy a Squeezebox Receiver, and do
djfake;267681 Wrote:
Well, I've trudged through these posts looking for answers to the
following
True or False:
I can buy a Squeezebox Receiver for $149, connect it via wired ethernet
to my home network, and use Slimserver software to play music through
it.
True or False:
If I buy
Bay City;267779 Wrote:
I was told by someone that he runs his squeezebox off of itunes directly
and bypasses the squeesecenter software.
That's not possible. Was he perhaps talking about the 'SoundBridge?'
(http://www.rokulabs.com/products_soundbridge.php)?
--
dem
Dave
I was told by someone that he runs his squeezebox off of itunes directly
and bypasses the squeesecenter software.
Since I am planning on buying the Squeezebox Duet I was wondering if he
can do this and if possible how would one configure it to operate this
way
thanks
--
Bay City
Bay City;267789 Wrote:
It did not sound possible to me, I just though I`d ask around to see if
it was possible or not
thanks
A Squeezebox MUST talk to a controlling server either Slimserver,
SqueezeCentre or SqueezeNetwork otherwise it is a pretty box with
lights on.
I wouldn't say it is
dem;267787 Wrote:
That's not possible. Was he perhaps talking about the 'SoundBridge?'
(http://www.rokulabs.com/products_soundbridge.php)?
It did not sound possible to me, I just though I`d ask around to see if
it was possible or not
thanks
--
Bay City
Zaragon;267792 Wrote:
..he could have written a Slimserver emulator plugin for iTunes but I
really don't think that is the case.
I agree, as a plugin such as this would be well known throughout this
community.
--
EnochLight
sebp wrote:
maggior;263731 Wrote:
My point is that though there is a headphone jack on the SB3, it isn't
exactly a good one and probably not up to the task for a lot of people.
I'm not sure it will be missed much.
Well, I guess everybody around here who's using the SB3 as an alarm
maggior;263731 Wrote:
My point is that though there is a headphone jack on the SB3, it isn't
exactly a good one and probably not up to the task for a lot of people.
I'm not sure it will be missed much.
Well, I guess everybody around here who's using the SB3 as an alarm
clock and relies on the
It will be possible and the cost is $300 for the controller alone, IIRC.
On Feb 7, 2008 2:49 PM, mxmerc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've seen posts which seem to indicate the controller for the Duet
will work with SBv3. My question is, will it be possible to order just
the remote? And if so
So I've seen posts which seem to indicate the controller for the Duet
will work with SBv3. My question is, will it be possible to order just
the remote? And if so how much will it be?
--
mxmerc
mxmerc's Profile:
Duets were first on the production line. When they are done with the
first Duet run they will produce the Squeezebox Controller and
Squeezebox Receiver whiteboxed standalone products.
We should have them for sale some time in March. Possibly a bit sooner
if we pre-order them.
Mik
--
mvalera
Any word when the Squeezebox Duet will be available yet?
--
Bay City
Bay City's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15076
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
Before the end of February.
On Feb 6, 2008 10:46 AM, Bay City
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any word when the Squeezebox Duet will be available yet?
--
Bay City
Bay City's Profile:
Bay City;266262 Wrote:
Any word when the Squeezebox Duet will be available yet?
judging from the pre-order page on this website, I'd guess within 3
weeks (+\- a day or two)...
--
EnochLight
EnochLight's Profile:
How about throwing us who pre-ordered a bone and post the manual. :)
--
rkb0378
rkb0378's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=197
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
As soon as I receive the final one, I will post it.
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Systems
slimdevices.com
mvalera's Profile:
That rocks; thanks!
--
EnochLight
EnochLight's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3392
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
The warranty period will be 2 years for the Duet.
Our standard out of warranty charge is $90.
Mike
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Systems
slimdevices.com
mvalera's
mvalera;265497 Wrote:
The warranty period will be 2 years for the Duet.
Our standard out of warranty charge is $90.
Mike
Hi Mike,
Does that include the remote controller too?
Jim
--
Jim Holtz
Jim Holtz's
The Squeezebox Receiver and Controller will both have 2 year warranties
as well.
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Systems
slimdevices.com
mvalera's Profile:
mvalera;265527 Wrote:
The Squeezebox Receiver and Controller will both have 2 year warranties
as well.
Sorry Mike,
I'm trying to pin you down on the repair cost of a controller that
would cease to function after the warranty expired. I'm not talking
about dropping it in water, stepping on it
Jim Holtz Wrote:
The question is, will the $90 flat rate fix the controller too if
there's no sign of abuse?
mvalera;265497 Wrote:
The warranty period will be 2 years for the Duet.
Our standard out of warranty charge is $90.
I think he's been pretty clear, the Duet (which includes the
I have one more question. Is there an extended warranty or a set fee to
repair the remote if it should fail once it's out of warranty? I would
hate to have to shell out $300 for a new remote.
I have a universal remote I control all of my components with now and
the originals are tucked away.
Jim Holtz;265043 Wrote:
I have one more question. Is there an extended warranty or a set fee to
repair the remote if it should fail once it's out of warranty? I would
hate to have to shell out $300 for a new remote.
Can't give you the official answer, but the fee for an out of warranty
seanadams;264779 Wrote:
As a digital transport, Duet's Receiver performs identically to SB2 and
SB3.
That's good to hear and provides tremendous value to previous SB2/SB3
owners. No fear of sudden obsolescence!
Can't wait to order my Controller!
--
crooner
Customized dual chassis Super
Michaelwagner;264621 Wrote:
I'd be curious to know, in more detail, what opposite means here.
Slim is open source, and the future version nightlies are released,
well, nightly... to all those interested.
Both Propellerhead and Adobe wouldn't dream of releasing their software
before a
I've participated in another beta test situation, many years ago, and it
was quite different and secretive. I find the Slim openness quite
refreshing. For Betas that don't require special hardware, basically
anyone can participate. If you don't have the skills, you probably
shouldn't, but no one
EnochLight wrote:
Marc Sherman;264410 Wrote:
..If I recall correctly, SS6 was still getting last minute bug fixes
right up to the day that transporters were available in stores...I'd
also expect a few point releases to follow very shortly afterwards.
- Marc
The way Slim Devices works, in
I've done testing for a number of companies and there is certainly a
range of attitudes in regard to the level of secrecy etc. To me it
seems that the more innovative and interesting the product, the more
open the dev test process. From my experience on the open side you
have companies like
The other key difference in approach (IMHO) is the committment to cycle
of continuous improvment in both release and beta software. This may
be what Robin was referring to above about the open source approach?
Can't think of too many other companies that do nightly releases of
their
Bay City;264753 Wrote:
I was just over to a friends house looking at his Sonos system, I was
very much impressed.
However I am waiting to buy the Squeezbox Duet when it is released. The
main reason is the price, Sono cost way to much for me.
One question, on his Sonos he has his itunes
I was just over to a friends house looking at his Sonos system, I was
very much impressed.
However I am waiting to buy the Squeezbox Duet when it is released. The
main reason is the price, Sono cost way to much for me.
One question, on his Sonos he has his itunes library playing on a NAS
hooked
Have the jitter figures been announced yet and how do they compare to
the Squeezebox? I'm using a modified SB2 as a transport right now. I
wouldn't mind selling the SB2 and getting a Duet if it's as good of
transport as the SB2 is.
Jim
--
Jim Holtz
Jim Holtz;264776 Wrote:
Have the jitter figures been announced yet and how do they compare to
the Squeezebox? I'm using a modified SB2 as a transport right now. I
wouldn't mind selling the SB2 and getting a Duet if it's as good of
transport as the SB2 is.
Jim
As a digital transport,
seanadams;264779 Wrote:
As a digital transport, Duet's Receiver performs identically to SB2 and
SB3.
Thanks Sean! Exactly what I wanted to hear.
Jim
--
Jim Holtz
Jim Holtz's Profile:
Martin_z;264282 Wrote:
Has the controller got a headphone socket? (Even if it's not
implemented yet?)
Yes - and it's not implemented yet :-)
Martin_z;264282 Wrote:
I have two squeezeboxes so I think I only need a controller - right?
Right.
Martin_z;264282 Wrote:
And where do I find
...but with nearly fifty pages to scroll through, it wouldn't be a
surprise if it was missed.
Has the controller got a headphone socket? (Even if it's not
implemented yet?) I think the idea of picking up the controller,
dialling up what you want and playing it through headphones (as opposed
to
Thanks for that rapid response.
A bit puzzled about the SqueezeCentre 7 - if Squeezebox Duet is just
about to be released, and it only works with SC 7, I would have sort of
expected a formal release of SC 7 by now
...still...
--
Martin_z
Martin_z wrote:
Thanks for that rapid response.
A bit puzzled about the SqueezeCentre 7 - if Squeezebox Duet is just
about to be released, and it only works with SC 7, I would have sort of
expected a formal release of SC 7 by now
If I recall correctly, SS6 was still getting last minute
They don't call it the bleeding edge for nuthin' :-)
--
Michaelwagner
Michaelwagner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
Marc Sherman;264410 Wrote:
..If I recall correctly, SS6 was still getting last minute bug fixes
right up to the day that transporters were available in stores...I'd
also expect a few point releases to follow very shortly afterwards.
- Marc
The way Slim Devices works, in regards to
On Jan 31, 2008 10:39 PM, EnochLight
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way Slim Devices works, in regards to SqueezeCenter (or SlimServer
before it) is quite... unique.. compared to other software companies.
The problem is that they aren't really a software company. If you want to
draw a
101 - 200 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
