My experience with the WRT54GX4 was great until I got a Duet. And the
iPhone did not get along that great with it, either.
The dual band WRT610N has operated flawlessly at all levels. Signal
coverage is a bit compromised because of the internal antenna, but
other than that there have been no issu
I posted on these issues before, but I'll repeat it here:
- signal strength is not as important as the signal-to-noise-ratio!!!
- n-routers are better, even if you only have g-clients. they have mimo
technology for further range which helps g-clients too and a faster cpu
which is the biggest bott
I returned the WRT110 before learning of the frame burst issue.
Also, I have 2 SB3, a receiver, a controller, and 2 wireless computers
on the network, and the issue may be multiple stations.
So far, the Netgear 824 seems OK but not much better than my old
WRT54G, which is now working again. I c
Ross L;354434 Wrote:
> See also:
>
> http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/RouterStatus
>
> Seems we used to be OK with WRT110, I'll have to try to find one and
> test here in the QA lab. Thanks for sharing.Ross,
Any chance of some input to 'this'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?
I've learned something that might be useful.
After returning the WRT110, I reinstalled my failing? WRT54G. It
behaved similarly. In reading the Tomoto (alternate firmware - I'm not
using it - I run the latest linksys) it suggested two things.
1. Don't run in B only mode if there are G devic
I returned the thing. Happily, I'd bought it a radio shack, not on the
web, so they just scowled and took it back.
Reinstalled my failing WRT54G and all the (new) problems are gone. So
I'm pretty sure the WRT110 is not something you want to try!
It's final trick was to suddenly change into a s
Spoke to soon - it's back into that funny state.
WRT110 thinks it is associated.
Screen is blank.
Power button yields
Waking up SqueezeCenter ...
Connecting to SqueezeCenter ...
blank screen again
SB3 does NOT respond to pings.
Push and hold power till reboot and it reconnect on its own. T
Ross L;354434 Wrote:
> See also:
>
> http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/RouterStatus
>
> Seems we used to be OK with WRT110, I'll have to try to find one and
> test here in the QA lab. Thanks for sharing.
As an update - for the last 24 hours, things have worked - so I can't
even reproduce t
See also:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/RouterStatus
Seems we used to be OK with WRT110, I'll have to try to find one and
test here in the QA lab. Thanks for sharing.
--
Ross L
Ross Levine - Slim Devices Quality Assurance
--
mvalera;353914 Wrote:
> Exactly... turn your power way down.
>
> In reality this is not really ever a solution because you are
> increasing the power on only one side of a 2 way radio communication.
>
> Mike
As long as we're dredging up old threads... I followed the advice to
turn the power do
I just got a WRT110 - didn't search the forum first :-(
I'm seeing a reconnect failure with my SB3 - something I used to see
but not in a long while with my now dead WRT54G
The SB3 gets into a state in which its screen is blank. If you press
power on, it says trying to wake up squeezecenter, tr
lanierb;313801 Wrote:
> Are you suggesting that cranking up the transmit power can actually make
> reception worse? Should I turn it back down? I have one distant
> squeezebox that was at 30% SNR before I cranked the power, and now it's
> at about 45% with the power at 200 (from 40). I thought
My WRTG54 died several months ago and I replaced it with the WRT110. I
had all manner of problems with it. Most annoying was that occasionally
none of the devices connected to it (either wirelessly or wired) could
talk to any other of the devices, nor the internet. Only cyclying the
power on the r
not to thread hop, I havea wrt110 as well, and it works great for me. I
do have a client however that is constantly losing connection. She has
a linksys range expander, and they are expensive. I am considering
switching to another brand of wireless router. She still has the old
wrt54g, I am consid
I went back to using this router a few days ago after I continued
getting very poor network test results with my homeplugs. I upgraded
the firmware on the router to the latest that was offered, and when I
connected the Duet using wireless to the router, I still had dropouts
when I started playing
Thank you musictappy and jpastore for confirming that the Linksys WRT110
router, in its current incarnation, will encounter issues when you are
wirelessly streaming music on your home network to Squeezebox players.
It looks like the Linksys WRT110 needs bugs fixed in its firmware to
solve this pr
I also have this router, and have experienced issues playing flac files.
Sometimes the file would stop in the middle, and other times it would
not play a file at all. The duet controller would show that the file
is playing for about 20 seconds, but there would be no audio. After
about 20 seconds
I have a Dell m90 with a Intel3945 a/b/g card. When upgrading (if you
can call it that) to this router (WRT110) I noticed that large
throughput (bit torrent's, CentOS iso downloads, large db dump file
downloads) all cause my wireless to die and I have to manually
reconnect via network manager ever
in my exp, linksys makes junk. you never know if what you are buying is
going to be any good or not, and toms hardware routinely bashs them,
sometimes scathingly.
my advice to people who want really good wireless? get a so called
gaming router and spend the $100. its so worth it.
--
MrSinat
Is anyone else having an issue connecting Squeezeboxes to this router?
If so, please post in this forum the details about your problems.
We're still hunting down compatibility issues with routers, and if this
is posting reflects a typical experience then we'd like to fix it.
Thanks!
Mickey
--
Sike;313647 Wrote:
> The problem with that is that SNR is too high. (The signal is disturbing
> itself)
Are you suggesting that cranking up the transmit power can actually
make reception worse? Should I turn it back down? I have one distant
squeezebox that was at 30% SNR before I cranked the p
lanierb;313492 Wrote:
> Also, with the third party firmware you can pump up the transmit power
> and increase the range beyond that of the others.
The problem with that is that SNR is too high. (The signal is
disturbing itself) And the devices are not built for the "100%"
transmit power and will
Sike;313381 Wrote:
> Ahhh the WRT54GL.. a timeless classic. Ugly as hell but highly
> reliable.
>
> Range is not that great as it's not a MIMO.
>
>
I have played with several recent G routers (linksys and others) and
the WRT54GL had identical range to the others in my experience. (I
have pla
Just read up on it .. it is possible, only narrowband though .. dd wrt
has come a long way!
--
Sike
Sike's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2458
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showt
ralphy;313411 Wrote:
> I use it as a client bridge for an SB3 wired only.
>
> http://www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv3/index.php
>
> Ralphy
Is there a way of turning a Linksys N router in to a bridge yet? A
WRT160N for example?
--
Sike
-
Sike;313381 Wrote:
> Ahhh the WRT54GL.. a timeless classic. Ugly as hell but highly
> reliable.
>
> Range is not that great as it's not a MIMO.
>
> Linksys made this device due to all of the custom firmware made for the
> WRT54G, which was no longer supported by the WRT54G after version 4 of
>
Ahhh the WRT54GL.. a timeless classic. Ugly as hell but highly
reliable.
Range is not that great as it's not a MIMO.
Linksys made this device due to all of the custom firmware made for the
WRT54G, which was no longer supported by the WRT54G after version 4 of
the router (Version 5 of the router
Sike wrote:
> Routers are like a box of chocolates...
>
> I have a WRT160N and a WRT310N and bot work great
WiFi routers for sure. I've had great luck with the WRT54GL
--
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.s
Routers are like a box of chocolates...
I have a WRT160N and a WRT310N and bot work great without crashing or
any other wierd side affects. Routers are always a bit of hit or
miss...
--
Sike
Sike's Profile: http://forums.
29 matches
Mail list logo
