Re: Google App Engine / Django / Django-nonrel Best Practices

2014-07-18 Thread Adam Simon
Thanks Russ. I don't mean to answer my own question, but this is what I found to date: There is a website: http://django-nonrel.org I found that seems to be pretty recent even though for some reason it has a copyright of 2011 There's also an installation guide at: https://media.readthedocs.

Re: Google App Engine / Django / Django-nonrel Best Practices

2014-07-17 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Adam Simon wrote: > > > Hello, > > What is the status of Django-nonrel, it seems that there have been a few > changes recently on github, but not much overall news, especially on their > website? > The honest answer is "no idea". The original driving force behind

Re: Google app engine django 1.2 localization

2011-03-12 Thread Nick Rosencrantz
Many thanks for the idea! I'll try the setup you're referring to. Regards, Nick Rosencrantz On Mar 12, 9:48 am, Jiten Singh wrote: > Hi Nick, > > While working with GAE I use django provided onhttp://allbuttonspressed.com, > it is django non rel i know you must > have heard about it. > > I have

Re: Google app engine django 1.2 localization

2011-03-12 Thread Jiten Singh
Hi Nick, While working with GAE I use django provided on http://allbuttonspressed.com, it is django non rel i know you must have heard about it. I have django1.2.4 final installed in my machine , however i use django non rel for GAE apps.. and make it part of my gae project by symlinking to it d

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-10 Thread Chris Hoeppner
There's something that I don't really grasp about appengine models. I see the similarities between them and django models, tho Django knows where to look for them, and thus knows how to manage those classes. Appengine has it's own stuff, and at the bottom of the django page it's said that you do

RE: Google App Engine Django??

2008-04-09 Thread Mat
Ah well, shame, never mind then. Mat -Original Message- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Parker Sent: 09 April 2008 15:44 To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Google App Engine Django?? On 09 Apr 15:35, Mat wrote: > Just fo

Re: Google App Engine Django??

2008-04-09 Thread Brett Parker
On 09 Apr 15:35, Mat wrote: > Just found the current project on code.google.com > > > > I'm not too upto date with django as you may know, but to me this looks like > a few googlers are working away at integrating appengine db into django > models. > > > > http://code.google.com/p/google-a

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Rock
Brox ... Nice writeup! Many thanks! Now for my thoughts... I have been using PyTables as an adjunct datastore along with the Django ORM for almost a year. To me, BigTable looks a lot like PyTables and, as such, I know that it can be be a great supplement to the Django ORM in certain scenarios.

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread brox
I was able to get a simple Django application up and running: http://blog.broxrost.com/index.php/2008/04/08/django-on-google-app-engine/ I agree with the other posters that the model API seems a bit lacking. Without having studied it too closely, it seems that using GQL in model queries is the n

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread ydjango
These question are better for BIgtable forum than Django forum. But If I consider moving to Bigtable in future, I need some visibility into 1) Is BIGTABLE fully acid complaint? from what I have read it is not atleast in some cases. 2) in what cases is it not acid complaint? Moving from RDMBS wor

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread James Bennett
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:36 PM, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It pretty much excludes data driven and data intensive applications > where data consistency and reliability is very critical (ACID > properties). Yeah, Google certainly use their platform to do any data-driven or data-inten

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Eduardo O. Padoan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:36 PM, ydjango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree, with no support for Django Models and relational databases > like mysql and postgressSQl, Google Apps Engine usefulness appears to > be limited to more Content Management kind of web application. > It pretty much e

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread ydjango
I agree, with no support for Django Models and relational databases like mysql and postgressSQl, Google Apps Engine usefulness appears to be limited to more Content Management kind of web application. It pretty much excludes data driven and data intensive applications where data consistency and re

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Mike Axiak
I've posted a message [1] on google's App Engine group asking for some insight into the DataStore <--> Django Models mapping problem. Hopefully it won't get lost amid the influx of emails on that list. Cheers, Mike 1: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/7f26edc0

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread David Larlet
Le 8 avr. 08 à 14:16, Marc Garcia a écrit : > > For know I think that it's too early to migrate, because probably > isn't a very mature project, and specially because it's working on > django 0.96 (and most django users use trunk or sometimes newforms- > admin, like me). You can use your own ver

RE: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Mat
al Message- From: django-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Willis Sent: 08 April 2008 14:11 To: Django users Subject: Re: Google App Engine & Django Bigtable doesn't support joins so its probably going to be quite hard to integrate django ORM with it. Co

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Sam Willis
t; On Behalf Of Marty Alchin > Sent: 08 April 2008 13:33 > To: django-users@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Google App Engine & Django > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Marc Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it seems that you just need to migrate your django

RE: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Mat
nt: 08 April 2008 14:01 To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Google App Engine & Django On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why don't we start a new branch (probably off query-set) to include bigtable > support into the ORM, shouldn

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Marty Alchin
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why don't we start a new branch (probably off query-set) to include bigtable > support into the ORM, shouldn't all other modules work after the model > system is updated? They should, although it shouldn't need a whole new branch

RE: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Mat
n Sent: 08 April 2008 13:33 To: django-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Google App Engine & Django On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Marc Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it seems that you just need to migrate your django models to > appengine models. The trouble is wh

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Marty Alchin
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Marc Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, it seems that you just need to migrate your django models to > appengine models. The trouble is who "you" are. I make use of a number of third-party apps, and I don't much enjoy the idea of having to migrate *their*

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Marc Garcia
Well, it seems that you just need to migrate your django models to appengine models. Anyway, I think that there is an important day for django. I haven't enought time to check it all, but I think in a close future we'll be able to run our django 1.0 projects on google infrastructure. For know I t

Re: Google App Engine & Django

2008-04-08 Thread Marty Alchin
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Ramin Firoozye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Caveat: there's a waiting list for signing up. Another caveat, according to that same page you linked: "Since App Engine does not support Django models, leave all DATABASE_* settings set to an empty string. The authenti