John Levine writes:
If you're referring to the ASRG wiki, the person responsible for it is
me. I am unaware of any signup problems, and there are multiple
people contributing to it.
I'm not sure what ASRG refers to, perhaps http://wiki.asrg.sp.am/?
I was referring to
On 09/18/2014 07:30 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I was referring to
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dmarc/trac/wiki/MilestoneOneWiki
I had no trouble working through the automated sign-up. What trouble
(error message?) are you having with your email address(es)?
- Roland
All,
On 09/15/2014 07:39 PM, Henrik Schack wrote:
In Denmark we have a somewhat large (10K+ domains) anti-virus/spam
provider breaking DKIM signatures.
They break DKIM signatures on incoming email by adding a Virus
scanned by line to the body of the email.
Not sure how to fix this, but
Rolf E. Sonneveld writes:
started, titled 'Indirect mail flows'. In my view both John and Henrik
tried to make (a start of) an inventory of all sorts of real-life
situations that potentially can break DKIM signatures or more in
general: cause DMARC failures for legitimate mail flows
it's nice to see how many respondents in this thread gave all sorts of
advise to Henrik how to deal with a problem, which basically cannot solved
by him because it is caused by some 3rd party (modifying the body of a mail
for adv. purposes).
I interpreted Henrik's mail as a followup to the
IMO, the place to record the inventory is the wiki. Mailing lists are
not a good place to keep such records.
I would love to add it to the Wiki, unfortunately the Wiki signup features
seems to be broken, wont accept any of my email addresses.
And the person responsible does not respond
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Henrik Schack henrik.sch...@gmail.com
wrote:
it's nice to see how many respondents in this thread gave all sorts of
advise to Henrik how to deal with a problem, which basically cannot solved
by him because it is caused by some 3rd party (modifying the body of
In Denmark we have a somewhat large (10K+ domains) anti-virus/spam provider
breaking DKIM signatures.
They break DKIM signatures on incoming email by adding a Virus scanned by
line to the body of the email.
Not sure how to fix this, but perhaps some day they'll get tired of my
bi-monthly
In this case it's not a header, but a line added to the body of the email
Br Henrik Schack
On Sep 15, 2014 8:51 PM, Tomki dmarci...@tomki.com wrote:
Henrik,
I think that the fact of virus scanning is more commonly just another
header in the message, which would not break a properly created
On Sep 15, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Henrik Schack henrik.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
In Denmark we have a somewhat large (10K+ domains) anti-virus/spam provider
breaking DKIM signatures.
They break DKIM signatures on incoming email by adding a Virus scanned by
line to the body of the email.
No it's not at all a free service. But they advertise anyway :-(
Br
Henrik
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Franck Martin fmar...@linkedin.com wrote:
On Sep 15, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Henrik Schack henrik.sch...@gmail.com
wrote:
In Denmark we have a somewhat large (10K+ domains) anti-virus/spam
Though I would never put such a thing in a standards document, OpenDKIM
does have the capability to rewrite arriving header fields prior to
signing/verifying to overcome things like this. Your ESP's verifier could
be trained to ignore the added line prior to verifying, or better yet, do
DKIM
, 2014 2:16 PM
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: hen...@schack.dk
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect mail flows: DKIM signature breakage by
cloud anti-virus/spam provider
In article CAGfQzLTvB9C97s=cGZ-k17ynv0=JUr6pygEbVnohhA=
t00p...@mail.gmail.com you write:
-=-=-=-=-=-
-=-=-=-=-=-
In Denmark we
S. Kucherawy [mailto:superu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 5:21 PM
To: Terry Zink
Cc: John Levine; dmarc@ietf.org; hen...@schack.dk
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect mail flows: DKIM signature breakage by cloud
anti-virus/spam provider
How will most mail clients know
On 9/15/2014 5:26 PM, Terry Zink wrote:
Having the Virus scanned by xxx ***in a header*** defeats the purpose
of advertising since most clients won’t display it. A/V filters put
those taglines in there to advertise, not just to tell the mail client
that their mail has been scanned.
And
On 9/15/2014 7:00 PM, Roland Turner wrote:
As I understand it, most advertisers maintain a nuclear ambiguity
about the effectiveness of their activities, making measurements rather
difficult to obtain.
Every presentation I've seen from usability (human factors, UX, ...)
specialist has said
On 09/16/2014 11:42 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 9/15/2014 7:00 PM, Roland Turner wrote:
As I understand it, most advertisers maintain a nuclear ambiguity
about the effectiveness of their activities, making measurements rather
difficult to obtain.
Every presentation I've seen from usability
17 matches
Mail list logo
