ested. the
uk version is here
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/data-protection-principles/a-guide-to-the-data-protection-principles/the-principles/storage-limitation/
which show you can keep data as emails as long as you want, providing
you have a reason.
reg
recent versions of denyhosts offer protection for dovecot imap if
enabled by scanning logs and adding firewall rules as well as hosts.deny
rules.
that may help
On 17/11/2023 10:18, Nick Lockheart wrote:
My original reason for asking was, in addition to setting up a new mail server,
there was a
I think with the soon-to-be-next-release of Tika, you can turn off throwing
zero-byte file exceptions via the config. The exceptions should be
harmless and you can safely ignore them. For some users, they need to know
that there's a zero-byte file, hence the default behavior. It can also be
usef
Am 06.03.23 um 16:45 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 06/03/2023 16:52 EET Tim Evers wrote:
Am 06.03.23 um 15:29 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 06/03/2023 15:56 EET Tim Evers wrote:
Am 06.03.23 um 14:49 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 06/03/2023 15:45 EET Tim Evers wrote:
Am 06.03.23 um 14:00 schrieb
Am 06.03.23 um 11:59 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 06/03/2023 12:44 EET Tim Evers wrote:
Am 06.03.23 um 11:42 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 06/03/2023 12:32 EET Tim Evers wrote:
Hi,
since I did not get any feedback on my bug report post regarding
corrupted sizes while using zlib
(https
Am 06.03.23 um 11:42 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 06/03/2023 12:32 EET Tim Evers wrote:
Hi,
since I did not get any feedback on my bug report post regarding
corrupted sizes while using zlib
(https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2023-February/126105.html) I
would like to confirm that this bug
how to post it in a way
that spawns some action.
Thx
Tim
#x27;t know if that is of any significance, but they are no longer in
chronologically descending order.
Please not that in the config zlib is off for lmtp to reduce the impact
of this issue. It was on when this mail was delivered.
I will be more than happy to provide further information.
Tha
s far as I see it I can not nail it down to specific accounts, POP3 vs.
IMAP, LMTP delivery vs. IMAP store or Sieve vs. non-Sieve etc.
Tim
Am 02.02.23 um 17:55 schrieb Christopher Wensink:
Can you isolate the problem account on a separate VM to see if the
problem follows the account or the ori
corruption
underneath.
Tim
Am 02.02.23 um 16:43 schrieb Christopher Wensink:
Something to try, this all could be happening because of underlying
disk failure on the array it is running on. If this is a VM, can you
move the operation to another host or data store to rule out hardware
issues?
On
Am 02.02.23 um 16:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
On 02/02/2023 17:19 EET Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-02-01, Tim Evers wrote:
I run a fairly large Dovecot Installation (around 100k mailboxes) on
several servers.
gzip compression is on.
Every once in a while I get the dreaded "
2816 (as expected)
Message with seq=41 is correct with both vsize in cache and decompressed
size being equal.
Before the POP3 access that produced the error both mails were only ever
touched by the dovecot lmtp delivery process.
Am 01.02.23 um 14:13 schrieb Tim Evers:
Hi,
I run a fair
old_stats mail_log notify zlib sieve quota"
}
protocol imap {
mail_max_userip_connections = 50
mail_plugins = " old_stats mail_log notify zlib imap_old_stats quota
imap_quota imap_sieve"
}
protocol pop3 {
mail_max_userip_connections = 50
mail_plugins = " old_stats mail_log notify zlib"
}
Tim
you would want to backup your dovecot/postfix config files and mail
certificates as well, and your database if you are using one for
authentication, and user list, just in case.
On 11/10/2022 16:26, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
Is that a divorce? Or else a little bit better spelling and respect
This looks like zero-bytes are getting passed to Tika via dovecot. I don't
know enough about dovecot to figure out what's going on.
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 7:51 PM PGNet Dev wrote:
> i'm running
>
> dovecot 2.3.19.1 + fts
> tika-server-standard 2.4.1
>
> dovecot is feeding tika
On 29/04/2021 10:22, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-29 01:45 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 28 Apr 2021, at 12:49, Steve Dondley wrote:
I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software
working well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I
don't have Outlook and it wou
pty wether the expunge has expunged some
emails or not:
[['doveadmResponse', [], 'tag1']]
Other then the cli command wich outputs a list of the mails that were expunged.
Is this a bug?
Best regards,
Tim
to date experience regarding how many user (current and
new/s) a single Dovecot Director/proxy node could handle and how many director
nodes in a ring are known to work (well)?
Best regards,
Tim
f417c61f0] -> #29 _start[0x55d6521b2670] -> #30 [no
start/end information]
Regards,
Tim
high
> volume with 7k logins.
Thanks for the hint! We were able to identify a user with a look in the core
dump and i think we were able to find the issue. Some user try to authenticate
with an "alias user" which typically missing the mailbox host information.
Currently we do some test to verify the issue. If it is so we will modify the
database lookups to prevent this circumstances.
Tim
> }
> > service doveadm {
> > group = pop
> > inet_listener {
> > port = 12345
> > }
> > user = pop
> > }
> > service imap-login {
> > process_min_avail = 24
> > service_count = 0
> > }
> > service pop3-login {
> > process_min_avail = 24
> > service_count = 0
> > }
> > ssl = required
> > ssl_cert = > ssl_cipher_list =
> > ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA128-SHA:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:AES128-GCM-SHA256:AES256-GCM-SHA384:AES128-SHA256:AES256-SHA256:AES128-SHA:AES256-SHA:CAMELLIA128-SHA:CAMELLIA256-SHA
> > ssl_dh = # hidden, use -P to show it
> > ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it
> > verbose_proctitle = yes
Best regards,
Tim
Hi,
currently we deploying Dovecot as imap/pop3 proxy. Every few minutes some
panic/assert occurred (we connect roughly 7k - 8k user at one imap proxy with a
connection rate of 200/s).
We activate core dumps. Concerning the sensitive information in the dump we
would prefer to not share the dum
On 20/01/2019 11:29, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 20/01/2019 om 00:21 schreef Tim Dickson via dovecot:
On 19/01/2019 17:54, Stephan Bosch wrote:
relevant info from /var/log/dovecot.log (domain changed for privacy)
Jan 19 09:27:09 lda(tim): Debug: Loading modules from directory:
/usr/lib64
On 19/01/2019 17:54, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 19/01/2019 om 10:51 schreef Tim Dickson via dovecot:
On 19/01/2019 08:01, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 19 January 2019 at 02:07 Tim Dickson via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote:
i recently upgraded a
On 19/01/2019 10:02, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 19 January 2019 at 11:51 Tim Dickson via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote:
On 19/01/2019 08:01, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>> On 19 January 2019 at 02:07 Tim Dickson via dovecot <
>> dovec
On 19/01/2019 08:01, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 19 January 2019 at 02:07 Tim Dickson via dovecot <
dovecot@dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote:
i recently upgraded a server from dovecot 2.1 to 2.3
unfortunately sieve does not appear to be working. The user scripts have
not
z_limit = 128 M
}
ssl = required
ssl_cert = Any pointers on what might be wrong or how to test would be appreciated,
thanks, Tim
(the os is 64bit slackware 14.2, in case it is relevant)
Ok, thanks a lot for the reply. I'll keep digging then :)
On 12/21/18 4:19 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 21.12.2018 15.01, Tim Mohlmann via dovecot wrote:
>> Hi, I now this is kinda impolite to ask, but I would like some feedback
>> on this issue. I'm representing the Mailu
changing the
image to Debian instead?
Or maybe you don't consider the trace good enough to work on? Also that
I would like to know.
Many thanks in advance!
Tim
On 12/20/18 9:49 AM, Tim Mohlmann via dovecot wrote:
> I'm really sorry, but it was a long day yesterday. I forgot to menti
n the
container and pushed the resulting image as muhlemmer/dovecot:debug.
https://cloud.docker.com/repository/docker/muhlemmer/dovecot/tags. Don't
know if its of much use by itself, without the Mailu ecosystem around.
Just in case.
Cheers!
On 12/20/18 2:04 AM, Tim Mohlmann via dovecot wrote:
> I
oloop.c:723
__func__ = "io_loop_run"
#23 0x7f165471b3d5 in master_service_run (service=0x55945e4afb40,
callback=0x55945e4ab5ed ) at master-service.c:775
No locals.
#24 0x55945e4ab7ce in main (argc=1, argv=0x55945e4af8e0) at
indexer-worker.c:78
service_flags = (MASTER_SERVICE_FLAG_KEEP_CONFIG_OPEN |
MASTER_SERVICE_FLAG_SEND_STATS)
storage_service_flags = (MAIL_STORAGE_SERVICE_FLAG_USERDB_LOOKUP
| MAIL_STORAGE_SERVICE_FLAG_TEMP_PRIV_DROP |
MAIL_STORAGE_SERVICE_FLAG_NO_IDLE_TIMEOUT)
c = -1
On 12/19/18 8:15 PM, Tim Mohlmann via dovecot wrote:
m
/usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#18 0x55d9471cdfa9 in main ()
No symbol table info available.
On 12/19/18 8:08 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>> On 19 December 2018 at 20:00 Tim Mohlmann via dovecot <
>> dovecot@dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.
filesystem and a google search. But nothing
specific showed up.
I am starting to feel this bug is more musl related than Dovecot. Since
this has bitten our project more in the past, I'm considering to move
the project to Debian based images. But I want to be 100% sure this is
not a dovecot bug.
Note, earlier I created an image with Alpine:edge with musl 1.1.20-r2
and Dovecot 2.3.3. Running that image I saw the same error symptoms (Was
just a hopeful trail and error). I did not do any debugging on that one.
Thanks in advance! Tim
but didn't load.
chmod 644 /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.cert /etc/ssl/private/dovecot.key
fixed the problem
regards, Tim
On 16/12/2018 14:33, C. Andrews Lavarre wrote:
For what it's worth, this gives the server an A:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=mail.privustech.com
So there
#x27;1' and
'pop3'='sieve' ) ) and aktiv_abruf='1'
So
%{env:CLUSTERNAME}
was parsed to
env:CLUSTERNAME}
which is not what the doc (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Variables) says, and
it also seems like the parser somehow sees this as a short variable
(removing %+{).
Any hints what might be happening here / how I can make it work.
Regards,
Tim
On 20/01/16 12:15, Brendan Kearney wrote:
when i telnet to the sieve instance running with dovecot, i see that
SASL is supported, but i cannot get thunderbird to connect to the
sieve instance. it seems that i am not providing the right auth
methods for sieve to work.
"IMPLEMENTATION" "Doveco
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:28:42 +1100 Timo Sirainen wrote
> Looks like a bug in clucene library. I don't know if there's anything that
> can be done about it on Dovecot side. I recommend switching to fts-solr.
Either that or fts-elasticsearch[1]
Regards
On 10/09/2015 22:43, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've been once in a while over the years thinking about implementing CalDAV
(and CardDAV) to Dovecot. It might be time to start that soon. Does anyone have
any suggestions? So far my main goals would be:
a simple method for handling calender permission
03 etc.
Have you come across any issues after enabling the haproxy on the
inet_listeners?
Would love to hear if everything is still going OK. I would love to throw
a similar configuration into production.
Regards,
Tim
-proxy
server smtp2 ip.of.server2:25 check-send-proxy check inter 10s
send-proxy
Regards,
Tim
Hey James,
I did make progress, however, I have dropped the code that I was working on
in favor of Joshua Atkins' work on fts-elasticsearch.
Check it out here: https://github.com/ascendantcom/fts-elasticsearch/
Regards,
Tim
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 03:09:12 +1000 James Devine
ird email client, and one of those
users has over 24000 emails.
if using a different email client it is worth experimenting on a test
account first.
It is also a good idea to backup the emails first "just in case".
regards, Tim
Kind Regards Jas Reehal
nc support dsync notification when
all users are chrooted? lmtp does not seem to have this problem so new
mails get replicated, but status changes don't.
Thanks.
-Tim
Config on source:
# 2.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: OpenBSD 5.7 amd64
auth_debug = yes
auth_mechanisms = plain log
code, but maybe someone
already has a better idea?
Thanks.
-Tim
Config on source:
# 2.2.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: OpenBSD 5.7 amd64
auth_debug = yes
auth_mechanisms = plain login
auth_verbose = yes
dsync_remote_cmd = /usr/bin/ssh imap.netsend.nl
first_valid_gid = 3
f
lient issues a log in, I don't know which uid\gid
to assign to them.
Many thanks,
Tim Jones
Software Development
+34 612345678
C/ Quintanavides 15, Edificio 2, Planta 1ª
Parque Empresarial Vía Norte de Metrovacesa
Las Tablas
28050 Madrid
Skype: tim.jones.fon
All information in this email is confidential
the %d domain name variable. So
the error makes sense.
My problem is that the userdb is being checked upon connection rather
than login, is there a way to bypass or disable that. Or maybe a
'failover' userdb to try if the correct one fails.
Many thanks,
Tim Jones
Software Development
+34
I'm missing some other config required for this to work.
Many thanks in advance,
Tim Jones
Software Development
+34 612345678
C/ Quintanavides 15, Edificio 2, Planta 1ª
Parque Empresarial Vía Norte de Metrovacesa
Las Tablas
28050 Madrid
Skype: tim.jones.fon
All information in this email is confidential
course, only for users of
example.com.
Checking the wiki (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase#Userdb_settings)
clearly states that the default_fields values support %variables, so I'm
not sure if I'm missing some other config required for this to work.
Many thanks in advance,
[image: F
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Tim ODriscoll wrote:
I've gone through all the documentation I can find but still can't
sort this out. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Obviously not *all* the documentation because I've recently found a
piece about file/group/g+s permissions an
lect \HasNoChildren) "/" shared
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" INBOX
. OK List completed.
I've gone through all the documentation I can find but still can't
sort this out. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Tim
My dovecot config:
# 2.2.9: /etc/dov
On 21.11.2014 14:04, Tim wrote:
> On 21.11.2014 11:58, Toni Mattila wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think your issue is due to your corrupted maildir sizes in filenames
>> so you got corrupted index that way to your mdbox. That is not
>> something you can easily fix afterwo
n migrate to mdbox.
>
well, I don't have the maildir files anymore or they are way out of
date. I can try to mirror the directory structure with doveadm to create
another mdbox instance. maybe this will it also fix.
> Best Regards,
> Toni
>
> On 21.11.2014 11:59, Tim wrote:
>>
Hi Timo,
sorry for the late reply, missed this mail.
On 15.10.2014 05:05, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2014, at 17:48, Tim wrote:
>
>> unfortunately I'm getting the following two kinds of error messages for
>> all mail boxes in my mail.log:
>>
>> Error:
Hi guys,
anybody else with an idea? timo maybe?
On 04.11.2014 21:07, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 11/01/2014 07:15:40 AM, Tim wrote:
>> Hi Karl
>>
>> On 31.10.2014 12:58, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>>> I was poking around in the code and I think there's
>>> o
e wrong value (v2.2.9,
> Subject: Bug in fts (solr?, Maildir?) incorrect last_indexed_uid)
> in some cases. Your error feels like the same kind of thing.
>
> On 10/31/2014 05:47:51 AM, Tim wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I'm still getting theses errors while fetchin
Mails/dovecot.index.cache:
Broken virtual size for mail UID 1823
I tried to export them with doveadm fetch. this works fine and doesnt
create any errors at all at the loge file. Any further toughts here?
Timo maybe?
On 13.10.2014 10:20, Tim wrote:
> all mails are stored on an xfs filesystem and only the local
On 13.10.2014 02:37, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Maybe the index is corrupted too and the index.cache is a cached version of
> the corrupted index?
>
> Are you using NFS with mdbox and accessing one nfs mailbox directory
> concurrently from several dovecot hosts?
>
all mails are stored on an xfs
all mails are stored on an xfs filesystem and only the local dovecot
accesses it. Possible to fix the index.cache files? I havn't found
anything suitable in the docs. The doveadm-index commands are only for
the fts plugin I think.
On 13.10.2014 02:37, Daniel Parthey wrote:
> Maybe the index is co
Hi,
I mv'ed all dovecot.index.cache files for one mailbox away but I still
get error messages:
Oct 12 22:47:12 mail01 dovecot: imap(foo...@example.com): Error:
read(/home/vmail/example.com/foobar/mdbox/storage/m.1):
FETCH BODY[] for mailbox INBOX UID 3 got too little data: 738 vs 1543
On 30.09.2014 15:41, Tim wrote:
> On 30.09.2014 11:24, Toni Mattila wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> You have broken maildir files with wrong S= in them. Usually produced
>> by maildrop or courier imap's tools. You can fix them with
>> http://www.dovecot.org/tools/ma
eems like the tool only fixes maildir
format? possible to fix my mdbox? Also I never noticed any error
messages while using maildir.
> If you compare ls -la and S= in the files you will see the difference.
>
> Cheers,
> Toni
>
> On 30.9.2014 10:05, Tim wrote:
>> Hi guys,
&
Hi guys,
does nobody has any thoughts on this error?
On 28.09.2014 02:48, Tim wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm running dovecot/postfix on my Debian Jessie maschine:
>
> # dovecot --version
> 2.2.13
> doveconf -n output: http://p.bastelfreak.de/HsVwS/
>
> today I migra
mailbox %maildir UID 2564 got too little data: 2417
vs 6319
please let me know if you have any suggestions for fixing this issue or
if you need more information.
kind regards, Tim
having had the same issue)
Regards, Tim
On 19/08/2014 15:20, Peter Bell wrote:
I'm not sure when this problem first occurred - it is many months
since I last editted a sieve filter. I am certainly several versions
of Thunderbird and, probably, a few versions of Dovecot on from when I
last edit
ta-warning {
user = vmail
}
user = dovecot
}
ssl_cert = ssl_cipher_list =
SSDH+ECDSA+AESGCM:EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM:EECDH+ECDSA+SHA256:EECDH+aRSA+RC4:EDH+aRSA:EECDH:RC4:!aNULL:!eNULL:!LOW:!3DES:!MD5:!EXP:!PSK:!SRP:!DSS
ssl_key =
--
Tim Smith
Tel: 01423 564078
Mob: 07984 398 299
Email: t...@titan21.co.uk
Web: www.titan21.co.uk
Is there any chance that the current dovecot-2-2-pigeonhole (hg) can be
"released" so that there is a released version (eg 0.4.4) that works
with the current released version of dovecot (2.2.13) ?
thanks.
Tim
On 30/07/2014 04:38, Tamsy wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote on 29.07.2014 18:
I've recently encountered an issue with my IMAP folders on Dovecot
2.0.19. When I telnet into my account and perform a list, I get the
following response:
A list "" "*"
* LIST (\Unmarked) "." "INBOX"
A OK List completed.
However I know there are subfolders here and have examined the server
di
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 09:41:25 +1000 Bob Miller wrote
> check out rsnapshot. Tried, tested, and true on my systems for just
> short of a decade now...
+1 for rsnapshot. With the config file you can determine how many backups
for different days that you want to keep.
eg from the co
- Original Message -
>
> the same for the class of not that critical passwords, generated
> with random algorithms and because that stored in password safes
> which *may* be compromised but better than "shitpwd-year-moth-123"
>
> so stop this polemic, there is no asbolute right solution
On 05/02/2014 03:50, LuKreme wrote:
On 30 Jan 2014, at 11:50 , Tim Dickson wrote:
I am trying to filter mail with .exe and .zip attachments, to no success.
Are you using postfix with dovecot?
I am, (standard slackware) but I will be moving to dovecot-lda so that I
can use sieve and imap
On 05/02/2014 00:21, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Hi,
On 1/30/2014 7:50 PM, Tim Dickson wrote:
is there any chance of rfc5703 (mime support/extension) being added to
pigeonhole?
There are plans for that, but there is no concrete timeline.
hopefully soon :-)
I am trying to filter mail with .exe and
is there any chance of rfc5703 (mime support/extension) being added to
pigeonhole?
I am trying to filter mail with .exe and .zip attachments, to no success.
I have tried
*header :contains "x-attached" [".zip", ".exe"]
*but emails i'm getting don't have x-attached.
a sample snippet is below.
Subj
vecot
wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
>> Date: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 07:11:40 PM +0200
>> From: Tim Schneider
>> To: dovecot@dovecot.org
>> Subject: [Dovecot] Deleting messages with Mac Mail via IMAP
>>
>> Hello mailing l
Hello mailing list subscribers!
When I delete a message in Mac Mail 6.5 (OS X 10.8.4),
with the option to move messages to the trash set in Mac Mail account
preferences,
the message is copied to the trash, and markes as trashed in the cur/inbox
directory on the server (STa flag in the file name)
wn the reason for a random crash that happens every
now and then) but I would be more then happy to share the code with you
when I am done if you are interested?
Regards,
Tim
- Original Message -
> On 2013-04-30 8:00 PM, Tim Groeneveld wrote:
> > After thinking about it a little bit more, I have determined
> > that just recombining the messages to send them to the client
> > will be too intensive, and will cause extra latencies when
hen
retrieving emails.
Regards,
Tim
ensure that each part of the email will only be saved once.
This means that attachments & common parts of the body will only be
saved once inside the storage.
How achievable would this be with the current state of dovecot? Would it
even be worth doing?
Thanks,
Tim
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:03:50AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 22.1.2013, at 21.44, Tim Marston wrote:
> > # chgrp mail /usr/bin/dovecot
> > # chmod g+s /usr/bin/dovecot
> >
> > I am still able to use IMAP normally, and I am now also able to set up
Hi,
I got no reply about this, so I thought I'd just follow-up...
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:33:08PM +0000, Tim Marston wrote:
> Would it be acceptable to setgid the dovecot executable and change it's
> group to "mail" (i.e., `chgrp mail dovecot` and `chmod g+s dovecot
another solution...
Would it be acceptable to setgid the dovecot executable and change it's
group to "mail" (i.e., `chgrp mail dovecot` and `chmod g+s dovecot`)?
Would this pose some kind of security risk? Would this actualy do what
I want, or am I missing a bigger picture?
Kind regards,
[1] http://wiki.dovecot.org/PreAuth
--
Tim Marston
ed.am
egrate the
pigeonhole source into the dovecot source.
<http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/precise/mail/dovecot>
On 21/12/12 12:15, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Hi Tim,
Tim Smith wrote:
I'm using an Ubuntu Server OS (10.04) and it seems that the latest
package they provide is 1.2.9.
Do you k
Thanks Ben,
I'm using an Ubuntu Server OS (10.04) and it seems that the latest
package they provide is 1.2.9.
Do you know if anyone has had any success getting a Dovecot 2 package on
this Ubuntu distro and how they went about it (Not comfortable compiling
sources at this point!!)?
Ti
;external" processes, for example Postfix who would use
the info to determine if a user existed. Would you say this is a fair
(albeit) dumbed down!!) synopsis of sockets and their purpose?
Thanks in advance!
Tim
e does not seem to be an option to specify the type of mechanism
within their interface so I think I have to offer PLAIN along with SSL.
Has anyone else had any experience of using the GMail import settings?
--
Tim Smith
Tel: 01423 564 078
Mob: 07984 398 299
Email: i...@titan21.co.uk
Web: www.titan21.co.uk
Added these lines to /etc/dovecot.conf
namespace { separator = / inbox = yes
}
Ran the command and it works. However it doesnt keep the UID as the thunderbird
client redownloads all the POP3 mails.
From: Tim E.
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday
imap4flags copy
include variables body enotify environment mailbox date
mbox_write_locks = fcntl
passdb {
driver = pam
}
plugin {
sieve = ~/.dovecot.sieve
sieve_dir = ~/sieve
}
protocols = imap pop3
ssl_cert =
To: Tim E.
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:48 PM
Subje
will the clients have to
redownload their emails as I described in the first post.
From: Timo Sirainen
To: Tim E.
Cc: Dovecot List Mailing
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.x POP3 to Dovecot 2.x POP3 mbox to Maildir
the first time each mailbox is read? Does this option need
to be used after the first time (it is not set by default in my new server
config).
____
From: Tim E.
To: Dovecot List Mailing
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2012 3:32 PM
Subject: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.x POP3 to
I have a box running Dovecot 1.x POP3 only server using mbox format. I want to
port the mail over to a Centos 6.3 box running a Dovecot 2.x POP3 only server
using Maildir format. The main thing I want to do is support
XUID/read/unread status so the transfer is transparent for the end user. I ha
My next guess was the upstream data rate. My router states that the
upstream is 10x slower than downstream so I guess this is the culprit.
Time to move to a VPS methinks...
On 24/08/12 13:50, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/24/2012 5:53 AM, Tim Smith wrote:
Hay Tim,
Having set up my mail server
Thanks Robert. That's what I thought. I couldn't make the connection.
Will try the Postfix list!
On 24/08/12 12:06, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 12:53, schrieb Tim Smith:
Hi,
I didn't know where to post this one so I'll start off with you guys and
then try Postf
ibly saving the sent item?) The mail is being delivered
successfully but the amount of time it is taking to complete the action
is far too long!
Sorry this is a bit vague but any advice on trying to diagnose the
problem would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Tim
thanks very much,
Tim
On 17/07/2012 13:31, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.7.2012, at 19.17, Tim Dickson wrote:
version: using dovecot 2.1.8 or 2.0.12
bug: installation - some files missed
details: dovecot-openssl.cnf and mkcert.sh are not copied from the src/doc
folder to the installation doc
chance of updating the build scripts to include these files?
thanks,
Tim
Sorry - seem to have missed the crucial part of my email!! I meant to say:
Do u not need a separate user_query in your dovecot-sql.conf to return
the userdb data?
Sorry!
On 20/05/12 12:25, Tim Smith wrote:
Do u not need a seperate user_query in your dovecot-sql.conf to return
the. Dovecot
_listener dict {
}
}
I enabled logging in 10-logging.conf, enabled ssl in 10-ssl.conf and put the
path in 10-mail.conf. Beside this I didn't change the defaults.
Thank you for help!
frank
--
Tim Smith
Tel: 01423 564 078
Mob: 07984 398 299
Email: i...@titan21.co.uk
Web: www.titan21.co.uk
entication mechanism 'SHA'
You're confusing the difference between authentication mechanism and password
scheme. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication
You want to use SHA1 as password scheme but still PLAIN mechanism.
--
Tim Smith
Tel: 01423 564 078
Mob: 07984 398 299
Emai
user_query = SELECT maildir, mailuser as uid, mailgroup as
gid,concat('*:bytes=',quota) as quota_rule FROM virtual_mailbox WHERE
username = '%u'
and maildir should return example.com/subdomain/tim for this particular
user
>What does your user_query look like in dovecot-sq
er where I want it to. Ideally
I would like to have a structure so that mail is delivered to
/var/mail/example.com/subdomain/user
My users are stored in MySQL and they are being pulled out correctly,
but dovecot is delivering to
/var/mail/subdomain.example.com/tim
Looking at my logs it seems tha
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
