Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot

2001-12-06 Thread Jos Fonseca
On 2001.12.06 05:59 Dieter Nützel wrote: Jose Fonseca wrote: BTW my X-Server is running now but I get strange authentification failures: the DRM module isn't allowed to write to X while I'm not logged in as root. kdm also fails on startup with XDM-AUTHENTIFICATION failure Does

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot: part 3,success

2001-12-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 01:00, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: 1. Probably, we could investigate the issue with striping. What could be wrong here? Nothing. Obviously strip removes information needed by the XFree86 module loader, so XFree86 shouldn't be stripped, at least not with those options. --

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot: part 3,success

2001-12-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 11:24, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 01:00, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: 1. Probably, we could investigate the issue with striping. What could be wrong here? Nothing. Obviously strip removes information needed by the XFree86 module loader, so XFree86

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot: part 3,success

2001-12-06 Thread Sergey V. Udaltsov
3. There are serious problems with textures - in most (all?) apps they are not loaded. Is it me or server or ...? BTW - I found the matter of problem. I have 8M video RAM. And use resolution 1280x1024 (I have LCD so lower resolutions look bad). Even in 16bpp, all buffers take almost 8M - so

Re: [Dri-devel] Module stripping Was: First experience with binary shapshot: part 3, success

2001-12-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 10:24, Michel Danzer wrote Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! The competition ends 16 th of December 2001.

Re: [Dri-devel] Module stripping Was: First experience with binary shapshot: part 3, success

2001-12-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
Sorry for the duplicate e-mail. Problems with the yahoo webmail... On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 10:24, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 01:00, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: 1. Probably, we could investigate the issue with striping. What could be wrong here? Nothing. Obviously strip

Re: [Dri-devel] Module stripping Was: First experience with binaryshapshot: part 3, success

2001-12-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 11:51, Jose Fonseca wrote: I have to disagree with you Michel. Surely that the X server doesn't need debugging info in its modules to load them. You're right. I remember having problems when I stripped the modules a long time ago but that has probably been fixed in the

RE: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot: part 3, success

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
BTW - I found the matter of problem. I have 8M video RAM. And use resolution 1280x1024 (I have LCD so lower resolutions look bad). Even in 16bpp, all buffers take almost 8M - so only 192K remains for textures (actually, on 32bpp the server does not start at all). When I experimentally

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa-4-0-branch/tdfx

2001-12-06 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dieter Nützel wrote: Oh, I've forgotten to send you a little screenshot. It shows some texture/clipping errors, too. I don't have this, and I haven't been able to see anything similar in other programs. Can you retest? Q3A 1.30 (final) is running at the same speed as with the

[Dri-devel] AGP and DRI

2001-12-06 Thread Thomas Dodd
I finall got a new(er) video card, a Rage128Pro in my box (damned NVIDIA mess) The AGP and DRM kernel modules are not auto loading. If I load them first, then I get Direct, HW accel rendering. But the don't load on their own. Should they? Am I missing something in modules.conf? It a Red Hat

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot

2001-12-06 Thread Dieter Ntzel
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2001 17:16 schrieb Andreas Karrenbauer: Dieter Nützel wrote: Jose Fonseca wrote: BTW my X-Server is running now but I get strange authentification failures: the DRM module isn't allowed to write to X while I'm not logged in as root. kdm also fails on startup with

Re: [Dri-devel] Fwd: [Newbie]Dell Optiplex GX1 and Accelerated Graphics

2001-12-06 Thread Frank Earl
On Thursday 06 December 2001 01:16, Punt Runt wrote: i've been checking dri.sourceforge.net almost daily since i've discovered that the problem (below) is related to lack of real mach64 support. can you please update us on the status of this project? should we hope for any support, or is

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot

2001-12-06 Thread Andreas Karrenbauer
Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2001 17:16 schrieb Andreas Karrenbauer: Dieter Nützel wrote: Jose Fonseca wrote: BTW my X-Server is running now but I get strange authentification failures: the DRM module isn't allowed to write to X while I'm not logged in as root. kdm also

Re: [Dri-devel] Fwd: [Newbie]Dell Optiplex GX1 and Accelerated Graphics

2001-12-06 Thread Gareth Hughes
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:53:41AM -0600, Frank Earl wrote: Manuel Tiera migrated the old codebase to something relatively close to the head of the CVS tree. This code didn't work very well because the DMA test would hang your machine up hard. If you didn't load the DRM module, you

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot

2001-12-06 Thread Manuel Teira
El Mié 05 Dic 2001 15:02, escribiste: Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: Hi all Thanks to Jose, I got some binary stuff to test: lib/modules/2.4.9-13/kernel/drivers/char/drm/mach64.o usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ati_drv.o usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/atimisc_drv.o

Re: [Dri-devel] Fwd: [Newbie]Dell Optiplex GX1 and Accelerated Graphics

2001-12-06 Thread Frank Earl
On Thursday 06 December 2001 10:58, you wrote: Frank, the buffer management problem has largely been solved. So has the PCI-based DMA (pcigart in r128). Just get it working in the context of the existing code, and then move onto more fancy things that are perhaps more suited to the Rage

[Dri-devel] Re: First experience with binary shapshot: part 3, success

2001-12-06 Thread Mike A. Harris
On 6 Dec 2001, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: 2. Could please someone make these binary snapshots periodically (probably, some cleanup of /usr/X11R6-DRI is necessary - I am still not sure everything is necessary there). About kernel modules: for me, RH7.2 with the latest kernel update would be good

[Dri-devel] AGP and DRI

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
From: Thomas Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How do I speed up AGP? It looks to be in 1x mode, not 2x. start X11 and respective driver. then login as root and tryout this: /sbin/lspci - | less then you will spot capabilites for AGP on host bridge and on grafics adapter. See AGP[+/-],

[Dri-devel] Radeon QD PCI

2001-12-06 Thread Bow-Yaw Wang
Hi, I need more info regarding Radeon QD PCI. In 4.1.0, only AGP is supported on Linux-ix86. I spent a few days reading and modifying the 4.1.0 source code. Now I'm stuck. Any help will be appreciated. Here are what I do. I define PCIGART_ENABLED to use PCI DRI init code for Alpha. I also set

RE: [Dri-devel] Radeon QD PCI

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
But it hangs with a blank screen. I can only do CTRL-ALT-DEL to restart the machine. You might be able to log into your computer via telnet or ssh. Then you will have the chance to analyze what went wrong in that particular moment. Theres a tool in svgalib that is called vga_reset - run as

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa-4-0-branch/tdfx --- Optimization

2001-12-06 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2001 13:50 schrieb Keith Whitwell: Dieter Nützel wrote: Oh, I've forgotten to send you a little screenshot. It shows some texture/clipping errors, too. I don't have this, and I haven't been able to see anything similar in other programs. Can you retest?

Re: [Dri-devel] AGP and DRI

2001-12-06 Thread Thomas Dodd
Alexander Stohr wrote: From: Thomas Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How do I speed up AGP? It looks to be in 1x mode, not 2x. start X11 and respective driver. then login as root and tryout this: /sbin/lspci - | less For the AM-751: Status: RQ=15 SBA+ 64bit- FW- Rate=x1,x2

Re: [Dri-devel] AGP and DRI

2001-12-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 16:47, Thomas Dodd wrote: The AGP and DRM kernel modules are not auto loading. If I load them first, then I get Direct, HW accel rendering. But the don't load on their own. Should they? The X server should load the r128 module. Is there something in the log about why

RE: [Dri-devel] AGP and DRI

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
From: Thomas Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] For the AM-751: Status: RQ=15 SBA+ 64bit- FW- Rate=x1,x2 Command: RQ=0 SBA+ AGP+ 64bit- FW- Rate=x1 for the R128-PF Status: RQ=31 SBA+ 64bit- FW- Rate=x1,x2 Command: RQ=15 SBA+ AGP+ 64bit- FW- Rate=x1 So how to set rate=x2? Possibly

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot

2001-12-06 Thread Leif Delgass
oops, forgot to cc: the list... On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Manuel Teira wrote: [snip] BTW, Leif, have you investigated any further on the VT change locks. Perhaps we have forgot to lock some other function... I haven't done much with this lately, as I've been waiting for the DMA stuff first. I

[Dri-devel] 744 Your Vacation Winning ! 29314

2001-12-06 Thread 14293travelincentives
You have been specially selected to qualify for the following: Premium Vacation Package and Pentium PC Giveaway To review the details of the please click on the link with the confirmation number below: http://vacation.81832.com Confirmation Number#Lh340 Please confirm your entry within 24

[Dri-devel] [patch] encapsulate AGP/GART mask bits

2001-12-06 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
In the Linux AGP/GART driver, the agp_memory struct contains a memory[] array with the physical address of every page in the block. Currently, the elements of the memory[] array are the actual values put into the GATT, i.e., they contain the valid bit and any other bits required by the GART

RE: [Dri-devel] [patch] encapsulate AGP/GART mask bits

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
These mangled physical addresses are used by DRM, for example in DRM(vm_nopage), where those extra chipset-specific bits have to be masked out to obtain the actual physical address. And your change simplifies a lot. I see and would subscribe to it. I propose a change along the lines of