I have a problem with the radeon drm in kernel 2.5.73. When modprobing the
module, it comes back with radeon: Unknown symbol flush_tlb_all and won't
load. This has been happening for at least 5 kernel versions I believe. Is
there a known fix or patch that has not made it into the kernel proper?
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 04:53, Warren Turkal wrote:
I have a problem with the radeon drm in kernel 2.5.73. When modprobing the
module, it comes back with radeon: Unknown symbol flush_tlb_all and won't
load. This has been happening for at least 5 kernel versions I believe. Is
there a known fix
I'm still looking at the large differences in the 2D driver code, so I
thought I'd ask if someone wanted to step up and fix the 3D driver which
will also need some fairly large changes to get it to compile.
Alan.
---
This SF.Net email is
[This e-mail has been automatically generated.]
You have one or more bugs assigned to you in the Bugzilla
bugsystem (http://bugs.xfree86.org/) that require
attention.
All of these bugs are in the NEW state, and have not been touched
in 7 days or more. You need to take a look at
On Maw, 2003-06-24 at 10:19, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I'm still looking at the large differences in the 2D driver code, so I
thought I'd ask if someone wanted to step up and fix the 3D driver which
will also need some fairly large changes to get it to compile.
Ditto the CLE266 via driver. So far
Hi,
I have some questions about OS specific ways to find out the name of a
running programme outside function main. The following section verbosely
introduces the problem and what information I found so far. You may just
skip down to Questions. I hope someone can fill in the blanks.
The new
24 2003 15:19 Alan Hourihane :
I'm still looking at the large differences in the 2D driver code, so I
thought I'd ask if someone wanted to step up and fix the 3D driver which
will also need some fairly large changes to get it to compile.
What need to be fixed in 3D driver ?
Dimitry
Felix Kühling wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions about OS specific ways to find out the name of a
running programme outside function main.
extern chat *__progname;
works on OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux.
-d
---
This SF.Net email is
i am reading the list and i have not seen a fix for this.
maybe the root cause is somewhere else,
like using an uniprocessor config of an alternate CPU
or a non current CPU desing (i686).
if you hear about an answer, then please post to the list
for letting people fix that.
-Alex.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:00:57PM +0600, Dimitry N. Naldaev wrote:
24 2003 15:19 Alan Hourihane :
I'm still looking at the large differences in the 2D driver code, so I
thought I'd ask if someone wanted to step up and fix the 3D driver which
will also need some fairly large changes to
Please try this diff - it may fix the problem in a lot of cases.
Keith
Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding.
Index: radeon_tcl.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_tcl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
what about https://savannah.nongnu.org/
Alex
--- Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jos? Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If not then the solution would imply moving the CVS repository to a
new
machine, but where would that be? XFree86.org? Some SF look-a-like?
As far as I know
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Please try this diff - it may fix the problem in a lot of cases.
I'll try it later to see if I'm missing something here, but the first thought
is that NEW_BUFFER() isn't called because GET_CURRENT_VB_MAX_ELTS() always
returns 300?
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
[...]
If not then the solution would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Please try this diff - it may fix the problem in a lot of cases.
I'll try it later to see if I'm missing something here, but the first thought
is that NEW_BUFFER() isn't called because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Please try this diff - it may fix the problem in a lot of cases.
I'll try it later to see if I'm missing something here, but the first thought
is that NEW_BUFFER() isn't called because
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
[...]
If not then
Probably it is a good idia to have local cvs repository of DRI but how to keep
it updated (ie sync it with main DRI repository on sf.org)?
I probably not need full mirror of master repository --- only smal subset of
branches.
May be there are some common techniques for this task or some usefull
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:31:59PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Please try this diff - it may fix the problem in a lot of cases.
I'll try it later to see if I'm missing something here, but the first
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:31:59PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Please try this diff - it may fix the problem in a lot of cases.
I'll try it later to see if I'm missing something
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:13, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Please try this diff - it may fix the problem in a lot of cases.
Tried it with the r200 driver, bzflag caused a lockup pretty early on
startup, with
[drm:radeon_cp_cmdbuf] *ERROR* bad cmd_type 0 at 100f26f8
in the kernel output. I guess that
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:34, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 07:07 am, Alexander Stohr wrote:
i am reading the list and i have not seen a fix for this.
maybe the root cause is somewhere else,
like using an uniprocessor config of an alternate CPU
or a non current CPU desing (i686).
if you hear about an answer, then please post
At 09:13 AM 24/6/2003, you wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:00:57PM +0600, Dimitry N. Naldaev wrote:
В сообщении от 24 Июнь 2003 15:19 Alan Hourihane
написал:
I'm still looking at the large differences in the 2D driver code, so I
thought I'd ask if someone wanted to step up and fix the 3D
CVS at sourceforge is using the backup server which has data that is
24+ hours old. I wasn't able to get it either.
Alex
--- Maximo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:13 AM 24/6/2003, you wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:00:57PM +0600, Dimitry N. Naldaev wrote:
В сообщении от 24 Июнь 2003
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
I mentioned XFree86.org because (supposedly) it has the bandwith and
machine resources to host the DRI repository, and obviously XFree86 and
DRI are two very close entities. That
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:19:33PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I wonder if it's really such a pressing problem though.
Imagine you're working with somebody testing some code, but that person
has no CVS write access. After you
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:34, Keith Whitwell wrote:
[SNIP]
To XFree86? Well, that's another question.
That sounds more negative than I wanted. Basically, after the drivers are
living in Mesa cvs, we could well end up just submitting patches to XFree86
for the rest - but
I'm rounding out the final bits of support for SGI_make_current_read.
I've hit a (hopefully) minor snag, and I'd like some advice on how to
proceede. At this point, *all* of the client-side support, both in
libGL.so and in at least one driver, is in place. I'm now working on
the server-side
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 21:19, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 17:37, José Fonseca wrote:
I mentioned XFree86.org because (supposedly) it has the bandwith and
machine resources to host the DRI repository, and obviously
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 21:53, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:34, Keith Whitwell wrote:
[SNIP]
To XFree86? Well, that's another question.
That sounds more negative than I wanted. Basically, after the drivers are
living in Mesa cvs, we could well
Ian Romanick wrote:
I'm rounding out the final bits of support for SGI_make_current_read.
I've hit a (hopefully) minor snag, and I'd like some advice on how to
proceede. At this point, *all* of the client-side support, both in
libGL.so and in at least one driver, is in place. I'm now working
I'm still trying to track down the cause of the Torque Engine radeon
crash. I've instrumented the calls Torque makes to gl so I can work
out what's happening when it dies. The sequence of gl calls from the
frame where it crashes can be downloaded at:
http://www.zikzak.net/~zik/crash_frame.c.txt
Zik Saleeba wrote:
I'm still trying to track down the cause of the Torque Engine radeon
crash. I've instrumented the calls Torque makes to gl so I can work
out what's happening when it dies. The sequence of gl calls from the
frame where it crashes can be downloaded at:
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 18:08, Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Am 2003.06.23 12:17:26 +0200 schrieb(en) Michel Dänzer:
On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 14:14, Andreas Stenglein wrote:
+ init_rgba_st_st_st();
+ init_rgba_spec_st_st_st();
+ init_st_st_st_n();
+ init_rgpa_spec_st_st_st_n();
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 20:24, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
These sourceforge backup server move is very annoying.
It's hindering open source so much.
Do we have other options?
[...]
If not then the solution would imply moving the
37 matches
Mail list logo
