Martin Spott wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>> I don't know about that. I can forsee IGP becoming _the_ standard
>> method for video. Look at sgi... all of their video systems use
>> system memory, [...]
> Really ? Which one ?
> I know the O2 does, but MGRAS and VPro ? I'm not absolutely s
Alex Deucher wrote:
> --- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Really ? Which one ?
>> I know the O2 does, but MGRAS and VPro ? I'm not absolutely sure
>> but I assume they have memory on their respective graphic boards, at
>> least they have texture memory,
>
> I though they used syst
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Part of the point is that Linux has always be useful on "yesterday's"
> hardware. Thanks to organizations like FreeGeek.org (they're in my
> local area), hardware that you and I call garbage is getting a new lease
> on life. It would be a shame to
--- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> > I don't know about that. I can forsee IGP becoming _the_ standard
> > method for video. Look at sgi... all of their video systems use
> > system memory, [...]
>
> Really ? Which one ?
> I know the O2 does, but MGRAS and
Alex Deucher wrote:
> I don't know about that. I can forsee IGP becoming _the_ standard
> method for video. Look at sgi... all of their video systems use
> system memory, [...]
Really ? Which one ?
I know the O2 does, but MGRAS and VPro ? I'm not absolutely sure
but I assume they have me
Jon Smirl wrote:
I wasn't thinking about IGP style hardware when I answered. But you do have to
wonder if that solution will still be around two years from now. It probably
will be but it will be the most basic, cheapest solution that ships for free on
every motherboard. It may become tomorrow's
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 08:42, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I don't know about that. I can forsee IGP becoming _the_ standard
> method for video. Look at sgi... all of their video systems use
> system memory, once you have a high speed video<->memory bus in place,
> I see video cards simply becoming ju
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wasn't thinking about IGP style hardware when I answered. But you
> do have to
> wonder if that solution will still be around two years from now. It
> probably
> will be but it will be the most basic, cheapest solution that ships
> for free on
> every
I wasn't thinking about IGP style hardware when I answered. But you do have to
wonder if that solution will still be around two years from now. It probably
will be but it will be the most basic, cheapest solution that ships for free on
every motherboard. It may become tomorrow's minimal VGA standa
I'm cc'ing this back to the cairo list since they did the orginal benchmarking.
Maybe be someone there can do an i815 or sis315 run for you. I don't have that
type of hardware. I suppose that any type of IGP chipset graphics would do the
trick.
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mer, 200
On Mer, 2004-04-21 at 02:03, Jon Smirl wrote:
> coming of MS Longhorn is going to cause of shift in typical PC configurations to
> ship with 3D hardware standard. Microsoft is going to cause this shift no matter
> what happens with Linux. It's just up to us to decide if we want to take
> advantage
--- Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For one benchmark on a high end 3D card. For a lot of hardware the
> same will not be true - although it is likely to be for things like
> alpha blend which a lot of chips can't do in the 2D engine although some
> could.
It's going to be two years before x
On Maw, 2004-04-20 at 18:35, Jon Smirl wrote:
> This is a post from the Cairo list. It benchmarks a Cairo program against image,
> xrender, glx implementations of Cario. You can see that 2D drawing is a the
> minimum 10x faster and sometimes 200x or more when using the 3D hardware. Data
For one be
We need to build the open source version first in order to provide an API
standard for the closed source ones to develop too. Once we get xserver server
up on mesa-solo I wouldn't expect it to be too long until we have closed source
solo versions from ATI and NVidia for all of their hardware.
---
Jon Smirl wrote:
This is a post from the Cairo list. It benchmarks a Cairo program against image,
xrender, glx implementations of Cario. You can see that 2D drawing is a the
minimum 10x faster and sometimes 200x or more when using the 3D hardware. Data
like this is the driving force for bring up x
This is a post from the Cairo list. It benchmarks a Cairo program against image,
xrender, glx implementations of Cario. You can see that 2D drawing is a the
minimum 10x faster and sometimes 200x or more when using the 3D hardware. Data
like this is the driving force for bring up xserver on a standa
16 matches
Mail list logo
