Martin Spott wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:59:21AM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > --- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [... Mike wrote ...]
>
> > > > I have a good start on a Linux DRM update. [...]
> > >
> > > > The patch is avaliable http://The Low Bandwidth Server
> > >
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 11:59:21AM -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> --- Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [... Mike wrote ...]
> > > I have a good start on a Linux DRM update. [...]
> >
> > > The patch is avaliable http://The Low Bandwidth Server
> > > /~cheako/linux-drm-4.2.0-kernel-2.4.
Mike,
On 2002.05.08 20:35 José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.05.08 20:03 Martin Spott wrote:
>> [... Mike wrote ...]
>> > I have a good start on a Linux DRM update. [...]
>>
>> > The patch is avaliable http://The Low Bandwidth Server
>> > /~cheako/linux-drm-4.2.0-kernel-2.4.18-patch.gz
>>
>> Has an
On 2002.04.25 23:22 Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >...
> >
> > It should be fairly easy to examine the differences in interfaces and
> > make only the minimal set of changes. There isn't *that* huge of a
> > difference.
>
> I will take a look. Is there a document on these
--- Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens Owen wrote:
> >
> > Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > >
> > > sis renamed to i830 (or one was removed and the other added),
> >
> > I recommend leaving the SiS support in the kernel, for now. Also, the
> > sis_ds.c patch appears to be reversed.
>
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> >
> > Jens Owen wrote:
> > > > So far, nobody could explain to me what direction the current
> > > > development is going which makes it necessary to update the SiS driver
> > > > in a way that requires additional docs. The 3D routines are al
Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
>
> Jens Owen wrote:
> > > So far, nobody could explain to me what direction the current
> > > development is going which makes it necessary to update the SiS driver
> > > in a way that requires additional docs. The 3D routines are all there,
> > > changing the API is p
Jens Owen wrote:
> > So far, nobody could explain to me what direction the current
> > development is going which makes it necessary to update the SiS driver
> > in a way that requires additional docs. The 3D routines are all there,
> > changing the API is primitive... I am far from being an exper
Thomas,
I'll let Mike respond to most of your questions, since he's creating the
patch.
Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> So far, nobody could explain to me what direction the current
> development is going which makes it necessary to update the SiS driver
> in a way that requires additional docs.
--- Jens Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > *** FIX ME ***
> > *** removing agpgart dependency on radeon ***
> > was the only big change I made.
>
> Was this because the PCI GART functionality was added to the Radeon
> driver?
>
> > Other changes made
Jens Owen wrote:
>
> Mike Mestnik wrote:
> >
> > sis renamed to i830 (or one was removed and the other added),
I don't know about 830, but SiS has been added. These are not the
same...
> I realize the SiS driver is lagging behind in the current development
> branch and will probably end up with
Mike Mestnik wrote:
>
> I have a good start on a Linux DRM update. Alan was right all linux-drm-2.4.0
> needed was rming Make.linux Imake mv Make.kernel to Make, theses are a given
> for any and Linux DRM update,
Great.
> and *** FIX ME ***
> *** removing agpgart dependency on radeon ***
> was
I have a good start on a Linux DRM update. Alan was right all linux-drm-2.4.0
needed was rming Make.linux Imake mv Make.kernel to Make, theses are a given
for any and Linux DRM update, and *** FIX ME ***
*** removing agpgart dependency on radeon ***
was the only big change I made. Other changes m
13 matches
Mail list logo
