If somebody wants to provide a server, I'd be happy to set up Bugzilla
for DRI. I have it running here at work and it's not that bad. If I
end up with some extra time, I might be able to bring it up on my
machines at home, but that's not a reliable enough connection for
general use. Email notif
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:42:06PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> I'm just in general not a big fan of the bug tracker. I've got a bunch of
> bugs that I can choose from at any time without having to go through some web
> form that requires me to log in and wait for slow queries. It doesn't g
Howzit?
> I see that there is a very active development community and three big projects
> in the works (radeon, radeon T&L, and mach64).
Yes I've slowly realise that this is what goes on in the DRI project, a thought has
been rattling around in my head of late of a simple list of who is workin
--- David Willmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > OK, maybe I'm getting carried away.
> >
> > But as I see it, there aren't many people in total on dri_devel+dri_users.
> > The only people who can really answer dri_users questions are on dri_devel
> > anyway. Why h
--- José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 18:49 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > ...
> >
>
> I totally disagree here...
>
> >
> > That class of power users haven't really emerged, if anything it is the
> > power users who are crying for help in the blackness of dri-users, as
> >
>
> There aren't a great number of dri_users questions anyway and a good=20
> percentage of them probably should be on dri_devel as it stands now (they=
> 're=20
> proper bugs, or whatever).
>
> So, I guess I still think the second list:
> - doesn't serve it's intended audience well
>
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
> OK, maybe I'm getting carried away.
>
> But as I see it, there aren't many people in total on dri_devel+dri_users.
> The only people who can really answer dri_users questions are on dri_devel
> anyway. Why have two lists?
>
> There aren't a great number of dri_users
On 2002.06.12 21:53 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:28:45 -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > I'm certainly as guilty as anyone for letting the cruft build up in the
> > SF bug tracker. However, from a TG commercial perspective, I will need
> > to closely track all bugs spe
For what it's worth, it runs great now here. I've actually finished a
game or two without any lockups.
Adam
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Michael wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:57:37PM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >
> > Two quick questions :-)
> >
> > First, can anyone tell me if the issue
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:28:45 -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
> "Peter Soetens (Kaltan)" wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:49, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > >
> > > The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class of
> > > 'power users' out there who would altruistically he
"Peter Soetens (Kaltan)" wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:49, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> > The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class of
> > 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get their
> > setup working so that 'real developers' coul
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:49, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class of
> 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get their
> setup working so that 'real developers' could concentrate on loftier ideas.
>
> That clas
> I personally think we shouldn't do this, but I'll go for what the majority
> decides - after all it's what's the majority will do in the end that will
> really matter. So, speak up now, or forever remain quiet...
I think if someone posts a good bug report, maybe even 1/2 a fix and is
willing
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:31:29 +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >Yeah! Let's burn Rome! ;o)
>
> OK, maybe I'm getting carried away.
>
> But as I see it, there aren't many people in total on dri_devel+dri_users.
> The only people who can really answer dri_users questions are on dri_devel
> anyw
On 2002.06.12 19:31 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> José Fonseca wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>
>> To separate the development issues from, .e.g, installation problems. I
>> personally wouldn't like to have my dri-devel mbox full with cryies for
>> help - if that happened I effectively would make my procmail sep
José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 18:49 Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>
> I totally disagree here...
>
>> The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class
>> of 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get
>> their setup working so that 'real d
On 2002.06.12 18:49 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> ...
>
I totally disagree here...
> The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class
> of 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get
> their setup working so that 'real developers' could concentrate on
>
On 2002.06.12 18:42 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm just in general not a big fan of the bug tracker. I've got a bunch
> of bugs that I can choose from at any time without having to go through
> some web form that requires me to log in and wait for slow queries. It
> doesn't give *me* an
José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 17:57 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
>>
>> Two quick questions :-)
>>
>> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon
>> driver
>> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
>>
>> Secondly, does anyone regularly go through the
José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 17:57 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
>>
>> Two quick questions :-)
>>
>> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon
>> driver
>> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
>>
>> Secondly, does anyone regularly go through the
On 2002.06.12 17:57 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> Two quick questions :-)
>
> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon
> driver
> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
>
> Secondly, does anyone regularly go through the bug reports on
> sourceforge?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:57:37PM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> Two quick questions :-)
>
> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon driver
> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
Keith fixed a problem with line loops that was causing crashe
Two quick questions :-)
First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon driver
from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
Secondly, does anyone regularly go through the bug reports on sourceforge?
There are a huge number of bug reports, some from over two yea
23 matches
Mail list logo
