If somebody wants to provide a server, I'd be happy to set up Bugzilla
for DRI. I have it running here at work and it's not that bad. If I
end up with some extra time, I might be able to bring it up on my
machines at home, but that's not a reliable enough connection for
general use. Email notif
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:42:06PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> I'm just in general not a big fan of the bug tracker. I've got a bunch of
> bugs that I can choose from at any time without having to go through some web
> form that requires me to log in and wait for slow queries. It doesn't g
Howzit?
> I see that there is a very active development community and three big projects
> in the works (radeon, radeon T&L, and mach64).
Yes I've slowly realise that this is what goes on in the DRI project, a thought has
been rattling around in my head of late of a simple list of who is workin
--- David Willmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > OK, maybe I'm getting carried away.
> >
> > But as I see it, there aren't many people in total on dri_devel+dri_users.
> > The only people who can really answer dri_users questions are on dri_devel
> > anyway. Why h
--- José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 18:49 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > ...
> >
>
> I totally disagree here...
>
> >
> > That class of power users haven't really emerged, if anything it is the
> > power users who are crying for help in the blackness of dri-users, as
> >
>
> There aren't a great number of dri_users questions anyway and a good=20
> percentage of them probably should be on dri_devel as it stands now (they=
> 're=20
> proper bugs, or whatever).
>
> So, I guess I still think the second list:
> - doesn't serve it's intended audience well
>
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
> OK, maybe I'm getting carried away.
>
> But as I see it, there aren't many people in total on dri_devel+dri_users.
> The only people who can really answer dri_users questions are on dri_devel
> anyway. Why have two lists?
>
> There aren't a great number of dri_users
On 2002.06.12 21:53 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:28:45 -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > I'm certainly as guilty as anyone for letting the cruft build up in the
> > SF bug tracker. However, from a TG commercial perspective, I will need
> > to closely track all bugs spe
For what it's worth, it runs great now here. I've actually finished a
game or two without any lockups.
Adam
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Michael wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:57:37PM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >
> > Two quick questions :-)
> >
> > First, can anyone tell me if the issue
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:28:45 -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
> "Peter Soetens (Kaltan)" wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:49, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > >
> > > The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class of
> > > 'power users' out there who would altruistically he
"Peter Soetens (Kaltan)" wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:49, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> > The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class of
> > 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get their
> > setup working so that 'real developers' coul
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:49, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class of
> 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get their
> setup working so that 'real developers' could concentrate on loftier ideas.
>
> That clas
> I personally think we shouldn't do this, but I'll go for what the majority
> decides - after all it's what's the majority will do in the end that will
> really matter. So, speak up now, or forever remain quiet...
I think if someone posts a good bug report, maybe even 1/2 a fix and is
willing
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:31:29 +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >Yeah! Let's burn Rome! ;o)
>
> OK, maybe I'm getting carried away.
>
> But as I see it, there aren't many people in total on dri_devel+dri_users.
> The only people who can really answer dri_users questions are on dri_devel
> anyw
On 2002.06.12 19:31 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> José Fonseca wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>
>> To separate the development issues from, .e.g, installation problems. I
>> personally wouldn't like to have my dri-devel mbox full with cryies for
>> help - if that happened I effectively would make my procmail sep
José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 18:49 Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>
> I totally disagree here...
>
>> The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class
>> of 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get
>> their setup working so that 'real d
On 2002.06.12 18:49 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> ...
>
I totally disagree here...
> The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class
> of 'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get
> their setup working so that 'real developers' could concentrate on
>
On 2002.06.12 18:42 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm just in general not a big fan of the bug tracker. I've got a bunch
> of bugs that I can choose from at any time without having to go through
> some web form that requires me to log in and wait for slow queries. It
> doesn't give *me* an
José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 17:57 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
>>
>> Two quick questions :-)
>>
>> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon
>> driver
>> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
>>
>> Secondly, does anyone regularly go through the
José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 17:57 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
>>
>> Two quick questions :-)
>>
>> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon
>> driver
>> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
>>
>> Secondly, does anyone regularly go through the
On 2002.06.12 17:57 Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> Two quick questions :-)
>
> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon
> driver
> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
>
> Secondly, does anyone regularly go through the bug reports on
> sourceforge?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:57:37PM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> Two quick questions :-)
>
> First, can anyone tell me if the issues with tuxkart and the Radeon driver
> from the TCL branch (well, now the trunk) have been fixed?
Keith fixed a problem with line loops that was causing crashe
22 matches
Mail list logo
