On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 23:33 +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
2. Have the 2d driver probe first for via_dri.so and then for
unichrome_dri.so and hand over one of the names to libGL. If the
unichrome_dri.so is the default driver, the only reason for precense
of via_dri.so is that the user
Mike Mestnik wrote:
What are you talking about??
look...
radeon == radeon;
radeon:r200 != radeon; /* don't fix it if it ant broke */
For ANY driver that is broke. A simple Makefile update to 'ln -s radeon
radeon:r200' gets done where we replace radeon with radeon:r200(The
calling funtion) and NOT
Hi!
Ian Romanick wrote:
Mike Mestnik wrote:
What are you talking about??
look...
radeon == radeon;
radeon:r200 != radeon; /* don't fix it if it ant broke */
For ANY driver that is broke. A simple Makefile update to 'ln -s radeon
radeon:r200' gets done where we replace radeon with radeon:r200(The
On Sad, 2004-06-12 at 00:53, Ian Romanick wrote:
I think I would actually prefer it if the 3D were named unichrome_dri.so
and the DDX were changed. The reason being that there will likely be
future via chipsets that may share the 2D driver but not the 3D. The
current situation of
Hi!
Ian Romanick wrote:
Thomas
Hellstrom wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Where can I get / how can I build a DDX
driver for the Unichrome chipset that will work with the DRI drivers?
I tried just pulling the code from unichorme.sf.net's xfree86 module
into
an option to choose which. That way the DDX
would stay in sync as it gets updated since there'd only be one.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Hellstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 08:46:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [Unichrome-devel] Re: Via DDX for DRI?
To: Ian Romanick [EMAIL
Hi
Ian Romanick wrote:
Where can I get / how can I build a DDX driver for the Unichrome
chipset that will work with the DRI drivers? I tried just pulling the
code from unichorme.sf.net's xfree86 module into
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/via in my DRI tree. I couldn't
get that to
Alex Deucher wrote:
Sorry for the top reply, but I couldn't get the formatting right.
Anyway, perhaps we could use the 3d driver name to differenciate
between the drivers: via_dri.so - closed source; unichrome_dri.so -
open source. we could then have the DDX probe for one first then the
other or
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 20:34, Mike Mestnik wrote:
Ohh, is it realy that hard of a feature to add??
foo:bar
Old systems try to open path/foo:bar_dri.so and maby thay will fail or
there will be a symlink there. A simpl parser could be added, making a
new system pars for the ':' and try each
Yes, is this not the esiest way to extend the protocol, by adding a new
field to a string value?
--- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 20:34, Mike Mestnik wrote:
Ohh, is it realy that hard of a feature to add??
foo:bar
Old systems try to open
What are you talking about??
look...
radeon == radeon;
radeon:r200 != radeon; /* don't fix it if it ant broke */
For ANY driver that is broke. A simple Makefile update to 'ln -s radeon
radeon:r200' gets done where we replace radeon with radeon:r200(The
calling funtion) and NOT where radeon(The
Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Where can I get / how can I build a DDX driver for the Unichrome
chipset that will work with the DRI drivers? I tried just pulling the
code from unichorme.sf.net's xfree86 module into
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/via in my DRI tree. I
On Gwe, 2004-06-04 at 01:10, Dave Airlie wrote:
Do you know if the VIA DRM is considered secure with respect to DMA
buffers and the like? I've been thinking of pushing it to Linus,
It certainly needs further review. As I understand it the VIA one should
be ok, but the S3 one that went over the
Alan Cox wrote:
On Iau, 2004-06-03 at 22:35, Alex Deucher wrote:
Ian, I don't know that there is a DDX that works with the Via DRI
driver in mesa. As I recall, Erdi imported it for use with directfb or
fbdev. I'm not sure anyone has actually tried to build X against the
DRI/mesa trees. your
Where can I get / how can I build a DDX driver for the Unichrome chipset
that will work with the DRI drivers? I tried just pulling the code from
unichorme.sf.net's xfree86 module into
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/via in my DRI tree. I couldn't
get that to build even after fixing
--- Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I get / how can I build a DDX driver for the Unichrome
chipset
that will work with the DRI drivers? I tried just pulling the code
from
unichorme.sf.net's xfree86 module into
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/via in my DRI tree. I
On Iau, 2004-06-03 at 22:35, Alex Deucher wrote:
Ian, I don't know that there is a DDX that works with the Via DRI
driver in mesa. As I recall, Erdi imported it for use with directfb or
fbdev. I'm not sure anyone has actually tried to build X against the
DRI/mesa trees. your best bet may be
The DDX in Xorg should work fine with the DRI modules assuming they
applied the patches. If not then Mike Harris has the right driver
bits in the current Fedora 1 XFree86 4.3.x tree. I've not had time to
finish up the 2.6/Xorg porting (real world got in the way) but plan to
do so at some
18 matches
Mail list logo
