Guys,
Please be careful with the wording that you are throwing out. Open Development
and Open Source are very different things. Closed Development and Closed Source
are also very different things.
The Apple iPhone is semi-Closed Development, but Closed Source. Windows is Open
Development,
Very well put, Ed. I agree with your sentiments about open vs. closed
and how it can be applied to different pieces of D-STAR differently, and
that was the whole point of my reply and questions.
Comparing D-STAR to iPhone is somewhat an Apples-to-Oranges (pun
intended? - GRIN!) comparison
] Re: Honest questions .
Very well put, Ed. I agree with your sentiments about open vs. closed
and how it can be applied to different pieces of D-STAR differently, and
that was the whole point of my reply and questions.
Comparing D-STAR to iPhone is somewhat an Apples-to-Oranges (pun
intended
How many manufacturers have the code for their microprocessors published?
Yes it is the same thing. Over the air is published, while a number of off
the air items aren't published. I'd really like to get into the source code of
some of my radios and change the way it does things, but I can't.
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one find information on them?
Did they publish
[mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:09 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions .
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't
On May 17, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren’t open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where
At 03:57 AM 5/18/2010, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
This also has precedent. The exact same thing happened with
Echolink,
At 05:22 AM 5/18/2010, you wrote:
But if you would do a little legwork and reading, you'll find that
indeed, the hotspots access the DPlus network and that the G4ULF
repeater is accessing the G2 network.
I think Nate is asking for the results of the reverse engineering,
not (closed)
On 5/17/2010 1:22 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nope, they aren't readily available for you to read. Did you see that
written anywhere in what I said? Did you see me publish a URL to it?
That's all I asked. Thank you for confirming that the answer is no, and
that D-STAR development is as
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions .
On 5/17/2010 1:22 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nope, they aren't readily available for you to read. Did you see that
written anywhere in what I said? Did you see me publish a URL to it?
That's all I asked
On 5/17/2010 1:51 PM, John Hays wrote:
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren’t open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 05:31:49PM -0400, Ted Wrobel wrote:
Take a deep breath, climb down off your high horse and find something else
to do! You critical, repetitive comments add nothing to the group.
If you dislike D-Star, or wish it was something else, why don't you go and
create that
on the ID-1,
it's fully documented and capable of millions of applications.
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:01 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions
14 matches
Mail list logo
