Sidd wrote:
EJ has stated in the past:
"there is not always the necessity to back Standard Gold 100% with
E-Gold" and
"there is a market where those individuals and businesses may need
capital to grow. Standard Reserve will be in that market providing
capital from its asset backing"
On 11-29-00 I wired a sizeable amount of money to Flat Rate Gold for deposit
into my E-Gold acct. The next day there was a service message on their site
stating there had been money orders totaling over $250k returned as
fraudulent, resulting in a mandatory 30 day hold on all incoming wires,
It would not take mauch to provide e-gold users with a substantial
benefit in their online purchasing. Say, a 5% discount and 3% from the
better security and speed of settlement and lower fees would add up to
enough to cover in-exchange costs and make it more efficient. Factor in
falling
Bearerinstruments.com intends to provide a rotating banner
ad at the bottom of it's home page. There's an example there
now:
http://www.bearerinstruments.com/
Info is at:
http://www.bearerinstruments.com/html/advertising.html
If anybody has a suggestion before programing begins,
please send it
At 11:41 PM 12/29/2000 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would not take mauch to provide e-gold users with a substantial
benefit in their online purchasing. Say, a 5% discount and 3% from the
better security and speed of settlement and lower fees would add up to
enough to cover in-exchange costs
Volume has nothing to do with it. The discount should be based on the savings
possible because of our process. Any retailer
should be able to offer that - whether they be pure play (online only) or clicks and
mortar.
I must disagree with you here George. Higher volume means higher
At 09:02 AM 12/29/2000 -0800, Khurram Khan wrote:
Volume has nothing to do with it. The discount should be
based on the savings possible because of our process. Any retailer
should be able to offer that - whether they be pure play
(online only) or clicks and mortar.
I must disagree
WE have noted the comments about our egold sale
and want to add our 2 cents worth.
1. WE did some checking on our customer and do not
believe that they are involved in anything illegal.
2. we do not believe in the current know your customer rules
and support the old fashioned values of
The SS# requirement also stopped my application for their debit account.
I'm also curious why SR want this number.
I can see the need for a passport number or driver's license number for
identification purposes (even though it is pretty useless without
verification). But AFAIK a social
George,
Please let me be one of the first SR Agents and e-gold Market Makers to
publicly thank you for your efforts:
Ours is not an anonymous service, never has been,
and was never touted as such. Rather, we actually verify that
the applicant is who they say they are. We owe that to
Destiny Worldwide,
and all others interested in doing business with Standard Reserve.
Our application form currently demands a SSN because the US-based identity
verification service requires it. We use this service because it quickly
and cost effectively ascertains the consistency of the
I personally am VERY skeptical about giving mine
over the Internet no matter WHO is asking and
HOW secure they claim to be. I prefer to mail it
by snail mail.
Interesting. I personally have always been more comfortable providing my
details over a 128-bit encrypted SSL session than providing
The issue of identifying people is not the issue. The real issue is with
mishonoring created credit on or to a stolen credit card.
E-gold started out in the right direction in dealing exclusively with funded
accounts. Can't spend what you don't have. Like cash in the pocket.
Credit cards are a
"Loryn E. Jenkins" wrote:
I personally have always been more comfortable providing my
details over a 128-bit encrypted SSL session than providing them
over-the-counter or through-the-mail. But perhaps that's just me ...
Interesting. Providing personal information to ANY person should always
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 09:55:58 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Vinnie Moscaritolo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reminder... Mac Crypto Jan 29th - Feb 1st
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all;
Below is a preliminary list of talks scheduled for the Millennium
Edition of the
1. WE did some checking on our customer and do not believe that they
are involved in anything illegal.
Not to pick nits but the issue which concerned me is not whether they
are involved with anything illegal (after all taxation is legal) but
with anything dishonest. I think this is what you
Contrary to the comments of Matyjewicz and Jenkins, Standard Reserve
has no legitimate business concern with establishing anyone's
identity. Their actual business interest is only in establishing that
their accounts are controled by the true owners of the funds therein.
These are two
At 07:45 PM 12/29/2000 -0500, CCS wrote:
I also suggest that SR would be better served by firing their
verification service and devising a real way to accomplish their
actual objective that is compatible with the interests of their
potential customers.
Any suggestions? We have been searching
Loryn,
But we do hope that most financial criminals will
avoid doing business with us.]
This is the least we can do for our Agents. For it is our Agents who
absorb the risk that enables all of us to move from non-trusted,
non-trustable, always-reversible transactions systems to a
You may subscribe to my e-group also. for
updates and news.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind regards,
Michael Moore[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.gold-today.comSign up with
e-gold today and get grams of e-gold here.https://www.e-gold.com/newacct/newaccount.asp?cid=129542
- Original Message
20 matches
Mail list logo
