Sidd, there is no need to increase the length of the passwords. I understand
that passwords are good for those people who print their PIKs and may loose
them; it's a simple security backup system. For such a case, passwords need
to be short to be easily remembered. Also, people who log-in from a
On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, at 04:50 AM, FileMatrix wrote:
However, this still leaves an account opened for automated password
cracking. Therefore, the system has to lock (for 24 hours) an account
for
which there are too many consecutive failed log-ins (for example, 10).
This
means that
Right, Patrick. For a moment I forgot that only a few elements from the PIK
are used in a log-in. A separate, unique, private log-in ID is required.
Besides, as Ian Green points out, locking out an account for repeated
invalid login attempts can have some very bad unintended consequences:
I
On Wednesday, November 26, 2003, at 11:46 AM, FileMatrix wrote:
Right, Patrick. For a moment I forgot that only a few elements from
the PIK
are used in a log-in. ...
Gotcha.
... A separate, unique, private log-in ID is required.
Besides, as Ian Green points out, locking out an account for
However, this still leaves an account opened for automated password
cracking. Therefore, the system has to lock (for 24 hours) an account for
which there are too many consecutive failed log-ins (for example, 10).
This
means that each PIK must be unique, so that the system can at any time
Danny,
The accounts can only be indentified by the 'password', since I have to
enter only 4 characters from the PIK, and there must be other accounts
with
the same characters in the same places here and there.
We have to assume that their system checks to make it impossible that two
I wonder if it is possible for a user to make his account balance public, but
not to everybody?!
This is currently possible - somewhat; the read-only access level.
However, the password would have to be changed soon after to make it
temporary.
I mean, the user should be able to send a
George,
Viking Coder wrote:
I wonder if it is possible for a user to make his account balance public, but
not to everybody?!
This is currently possible - somewhat; the read-only access level.
However, the password would have to be changed soon after to make it
temporary.
A better way to do it
Sidd wrote:
Send the e-mail address to the person who must view the account. Once
they have viewed the account, change the e-mail address in the account
back to your normal one.
Er... and remember to turn public viewing off again.
Regards,
Sidd.
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list
Dear Sidd,
This will reveal your limited access PIK... use the limited
access PIK to log in with limited access, and likewise use
your read-only PIK for read-only access.
Ah, I see. That's nifty.
You can also activate PGP security for your account
Yes, I've done so. It is also spiffy.
Sidd,
For those who only use one computer and who have a fixed IP address,
the IP security is also available (George?)
I prefer to keep my options open. You never know what can happen. Besides,
I'm on dial-up for the moment and I can't be sure if the next time the IP
will be even in the same
Only in that case, the security of Pecunix will be above the others, not
before that. Most people don't use IP lock or PGP log-in, they use
passwords - it's easier.
I was, of course, referring to the security of the log-in process. The rest
is better, considering the PGP integration.
George
On Sunday, November 23, 2003, at 07:34 PM, Jim Davidson wrote:
I believe Patrick made the point
But the way Pecunix displays the PIKs makes it difficult if not
impossible to copy and paste them.
... Since we know
that keystroke loggers and clipboard loggers are out there,
it seems uncommonly
Dear Jim,
Jim Davidson wrote:
One of the things I'm not clear about is how one goes
about logging into a Pecunix account with less than full
access.
Log in to your Pecunix account with full access and click Account
Details Access Levels
Look for Limited Access and Click here to view or update
Hello George,
FileMatrix wrote:
Someone could still your wallet, or take a photo of your PIKs, or simply
copy the PIKs... and you would never know.
George, by far the greatest problem is the theft of passwords by
virus/trojan type keyloggers... In all my years in this community, I
have never
Hi Joris,
Last time I checked the auditors were BDO International.
Yes, that is still correct.
Is that the 4-monthly audit? If not, can you tell me where I can
find the last audit done by BDO International?
It is here:
http://pecunix.com/money.refined...ind.mintInstructions
Click on the
Finally, who does my wife have to sleep with to get a spot in the e-gold
merchant listings page
Hello Mark,
I suppose that depends on her looks?
Serious, if you are a mercahny, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They'll then add your site, some time in the future.
If you are an exchanger /
OOOPS!
Mark, I didn't know you were 'that' Mark :o)
Only realized it when I read the other messages afterwards.
To get gold-pages.net listed, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then be 'very
patient'.
Took about 9 mnths to get CyberFrontier / Cyberica.Net in there and I'm
obviously still waiting for
Dear Mark,
Thanks for your comments...
- Original Message -
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: We like Pecunix very much, I have just found these documents:
:
: http://pecunix.info/Pecunix_pxi.htm
You may also find http://pecunix.info/Pecunix_pri.htm to be very useful,
this is the
Drew Gardner writes:
:At 12:00 AM -0500 11/22/02, e-gold Discussion digest wrote:
:These incompetent attorneys have failed to check that
:Pecunix.com was registered almost a YEAR EARLIER in June 2000.
:This is very simple to verify in 2 seconds by doing a check on
:the Domain Records, freely
Hi,
Just opened an account with Pecunix, and I am very happy to see
implemented there some of the ideas I have expressed here 9 months ago, and
for which I was called stupid
Actually I am still waiting for the $100 from jpm for the turingdecoder I
made in 24 hours as part of the bet here.
Danny Van den Berghe:
:Just opened an account with Pecunix, and I am very happy...snip
Excellent Danny.
Danny Van den Berghe:
:Now Pecunix has done a great job.
Thank you Danny.
Danny Van den Berghe:
:Still I see some possible improvements.
:1) All GBC I have seen so far make the same mistake:
We welcome Pecunix to the GBIC community. Just like any other customers -
we, as a competitor, were waiting to see what Pecunix will bring to the
industry after all the promises we heard on the list.
Unfortunately we don't see many new features, especially not the kind of
features that will
Aviv Shaham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We welcome Pecunix to the GBIC community.
Thank you Aviv.
: Unfortunately we don't see many new features, especially not the kind of
: features that will convince users to make the transition from existing
: digital currencies. What we have here is e-gold
Hello,
What we are talking about here is that Pecunix actually has 3 different
levels
of access. The Full access level allows the account holder to make
adjustments
to account settings, contact details etc. The Limited access level
(recommended
-- Quote Rule Breaker
for daily use) only
A five year old child examining the engines of a Ferrari and a Daihatsu
would probably also only see a cosmetic difference between the two Aviv.
And you're saying you're the Ferrari? :)
: They strive to offer customers absolute privacy, yet failed to provide
this by identifying an account by
I was finished with this topic, but since I still have a post left
today, I thought it would be a shame to waste it ;)
--- F. Marc de Piolenc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me for stating the obvious, but all value is perception, as
there is no value without a valu-er. So if you say that
Does this apply to everyone or only to us rude outspoken people?
--- Lyris List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, your message was not sent out to 'e-gold-list' because you
have exceeded the maximum number of messages per day, per user.
The maximum number of messages per day, per
Claude Comier has brought to our notice some inaccuracies in a promotional
document about the Pecunix share offer on the PVCSE web site . The Directors
of Pecunix would like to thank Claude for pointing these out.
The document was posted by an over zealous and inexperienced promotions
assistant
Forgive me for stating the obvious, but all value is perception, as
there is no value without a valu-er. So if you say that the [capital]
market value of a stock does not reflect the value of the enterprise,
you are talking nonsense, because the market is the ONLY forum where
people and
Hello Snipper,
I've been looking at Pecunix. But I don't think that the group does everything
to look serious to potential investor like me.
Statements like the ones below are not exactly responsible.
It is conservatively estimated that the shares will reach a value of
US$17.00 within the
--- C. Cormier - Ormetal Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Snipper,
I've been looking at Pecunix. But I don't think that the group does
everything to look serious to potential investor like me.
Obviously not a very experienced or knowledgable potential investor.
I don't know the
you explain to me how they will do that?
I certainly like the idea of Pecunix. The more solid and reputable GBIC we
have, the better it is for the gold economy.
Mr Cormier,
A couple of points,
Firstly this is a Panamanian Corporation and not subject to US, or New
Zealand regulations.
Hi guys
I don't know the regulations of the Security Exchange commisions in
New Zealand, but here in Canada and to a lesser degree in the USA as
well, a public junior company listed on our exchanges would be asked
to remove this publicity immediately.
What have the SEC in NZ, Canada or
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here you show your glaring lack of knowledge. When has stock value
ever represented the enterprise value? Ever heard of the PE ratio?
Huh??? The total stock value is the total enterprise value. You can't
really argue with that one. If I want to buy the
http://biz.yahoo.com/p/y/yhoo.html. Stock prices are NEGOTIABLE - if
you want to buy the enterprise you offer to buy the stock for whatever
you PERCIEVE is a fair value. If others won't sell to you, they
PERCIEVE the value to be higher - it is ALL just smoke and mirrors.
Yes, exactly. The
On 23 Jul 2001, at 15:35, Goldlist Cynic wrote:
Obviously not a very experienced or knowledgable potential investor.
Dear Goldlist Cynic,
I've only been in this business for more than a decade, am a
graduate of the Canadian Securities Institute and have been writing
a newsletter about
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://biz.yahoo.com/p/y/yhoo.html. Stock prices are NEGOTIABLE -
if
you want to buy the enterprise you offer to buy the stock for
whatever
you PERCIEVE is a fair value. If others won't sell to you, they
PERCIEVE the value to be higher - it is ALL just
On 23 Jul 2001, at 22:46, The Snipper wrote:
Firstly this is a Panamanian Corporation and not subject to US, or New
Zealand regulations.
OK... I understand that. But I think you will agree that the higher
are Pecunix standards the better it is to attract potential investors.
What I am
I've been looking at Pecunix. But I don't think that the group does
everything to look serious to potential investor like me.
Obviously not a very experienced or knowledgable potential investor.
It depends on if you mean experienced with the OTC BB stock scams that were
running rampant
Of course they don't mention scams in a prospectus. But mentioning MLM and
Gaming is exactly the same.
That is like saying all women are the same or that all cars are the same.
There is such a thing as differences, similarities and identities. Are all
Woudts the same?
I do not see that
It is called: Private Venture Capital Stock Exchange or PVCSE.
The first share offering at this Stock Exchange is for PECUNIX Venture
Holdings Inc which is offering THIRTEEN MILLION (13,000,000) Shares at
US$0.50 per Share payable in full on application to raise between
US$5,000,000.00 and
Why are they trying to raise 6.5 million dollars to build another Digital
Currency, when E-Gold and GoldMoney did it for only a couple hundred
thousand dollars?
Probably because they are trying the old maneuver of 'if a few hundred
thousand dollar startup funds did this, then we should
Viking Coder wrote:
Probably because they are trying the old maneuver of 'if a few hundred
thousand dollar startup funds did this, then we should sweep the market
with $6.5 million startup'. That was the one of the driving points behind
the dot-com boom. They probably also don't want to wait
I seriously doubt that they did it for a couple
hundred thousand.
If they did, then no wonder about all the flaws.
Maybe these people want to do it right? :-)
Dagny Taggart
Why are they trying to raise 6.5 million dollars to
build another Digital
Currency, when E-Gold and GoldMoney did it
I seriously doubt that they did it for a couple
hundred thousand.
If they did, then no wonder about all the flaws.
Maybe these people want to do it right? :-)
Seriously... What flaws does e-gold have?
Craig
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To
--- "Viking Coder" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why are they trying to raise 6.5 million dollars to build another Digital
Currency, when E-Gold and GoldMoney did it for only a couple hundred
thousand dollars?
Seriously, what makes you think that e-gold and GoldMoney started off
Is it true that the bloke behind !!PECUINX!! is the SAME bloke behind
CharityChase, EMutualFun, and DigitalStocks?
Anyone know?
Yes, I know!
The guy behind the now defunct Charitychase.com was a guy from NZ
called Danny.
The guy behind emutualfun was a guy from Oregon called Kelly Chohan.
OOOPs!!!
It sounds like I helped DigitalStocks with their programming... not
so!
My company helped CharityChase and Emutualfun with their
programming
Sidd.
Is it true that the bloke behind !!PECUINX!! is the SAME bloke behind
CharityChase, EMutualFun, and DigitalStocks?
Anyone know?
Wander over to http://www.pvcse.com/, follow the link to "investor
information", and download the business plan and prospectus. The
primary principal behind Pecunix is Simon Davis, the gentleman in New
Zealand who brought CharityChase, EMutualFun, and DigitalStocks to
e-gold.
The guy
At 01:40 PM 3/23/2001 +1200, Sidd wrote:
Is it true that the bloke behind !!PECUINX!! is the SAME bloke behind
CharityChase, EMutualFun, and DigitalStocks?
Anyone know?
Yes, I know!
The guy behind the now defunct Charitychase.com was a guy from NZ
called Danny.
The solicitation spam for
George Matyjewicz wrote:
It amazes me to think that somebody believes that today's
investors will invest in a dream. Now-a-days they want to see a
working proof of concept - that the plan is developed, tested and
it works.
Yes, isn't it fantastic that e-gold has done this for us.
And, that you
52 matches
Mail list logo
