The 80 m dipole feed with ladder line and a tuner can work well even with
multi lobes on the higher bands.
See any edition of the ARRL Antenna book or handbook for typical patterns,
or www.cebik.com antenna web site for patterns. If you take into account
the lobe directions you will have fine
Hi Guys, my main rig is a K1 feeding a multi dipole for 80/40/20 with no
ATU. I am thinking of taking down the dipoles and trying a full size G5RV.
Questions:
Will the KAT1 ATU tune up on all bands from 80-15m
I will be using about 80 feet of 50ohm coax to get from the matching
section
Hi all,
My base station rig is a K1 that I did not build. Is there an easy way to
determine the actual transmit offset? It doesn't seem to be available from the
menu.
The manual section on offset adjustment says to place switch S2 on the bottom
of the rf board in the test position. Is t
While the G5RV has a lot of advocates for multiband use, it works much
better if you bring the parallel feedline all the way to the tuner. When
used for multiband, with coax and the matching section, you will likely find
a higher than desirable SWR on the coax except on 20 meters. I have found
th
Martin,
Before going to a G5RV, I would try feeding your 80 m dipole with 450
ladder line to a (good) 1:1 current balun and use a short run of coax to
the K1. I use this setup to feed 102' and 44' wires. My Ks tune them
on any of the bands they cover (you need a bit of additional L/C help on
It was stated:
> Hi Guys, my main rig is a K1 feeding a multi dipole for 80/40/20 with no
> ATU. I am thinking of taking down the dipoles and trying a full size G5RV.
Don wrote:
> ... I have found the claims for the G5RV antenna to be highly exaggerated.
> For good unbiased information on the G5
Hello all,
Someone made the suggestion that I include 6M and it's a good one!
So 6M is another band added to the WA3WSJ Summit Program. If you're
interested in having some fun this fall, take a look at:
http://www.wa3wsj.com/SummitProgram.html
Remember that there's no time limit to grab an awa
Hi Guys, my main rig is a K1 feeding a multi dipole for 80/40/20 with no
ATU. I am thinking of taking down the dipoles and trying a full size
G5RV.
Questions:
Will the KAT1 ATU tune up on all bands from 80-15m
--snip--
Howdy Martin:
Since you are
I have built over 100 K2's to date, and all of the other Elecraft kits as well.
Let me build your radio. My rates are reasonable and you get a built
radio ready to play.
73
Alan
W1HYV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must
What is the difference between the G5RV and the twinlead-fed 102'
doublet with a current balun at the coax-to-balanced transition
mentioned as an alternative? Is it just the random length of twinlead
rather than a calculated length? Or is it a long run of coax vs. a
short one?
I know some p
'Crafters,
KN5G/P is operating on 14.260 (1820Z) from Galveston Is. with his K2 running
5W into a 1/2-wave vertical.
Cheers,
Colin -AC0S
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subsc
> Your multi-dipole will be more efficient on 80 meters, and can be fed
> directly with coax and no tuner. If I were in your shoes, I would leave
> well enough alone unless there is some other overriding reason to change
it.
FWIW I had a multi-band trap dipole from Spi-Ro that worked OK but was
f
Here is a note I received from our compatriot across the Pacific. I think
he lives near "The Island of the Day Before" for all you Ecco fans! He
lists a few stations he heard on the net with their RST.
Looks like yesterday was a booming signal day across the world. Hope to
hear you all next
Hey it only took you nine days to advertise again amazing in that time I
have seen no one else advertising
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 4:37 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Let m
Sorry, Don. I didn't mean to spam you, I forgot to make sure the TO:
address was going to the reflector!
I meant for this to go out to everyone. Sorry
Original Message
Hi, Guys.
The thing you have to remember is that the G5RV originated in the days
of final
amplifiers bui
Ya know? If we would simply read his message and not comment on it
there wouldn't be enough traffic to cause a problem.
Personally, I don't see a problem with the message, but neither of us
are empowered to police this list.
Mark
On 9/26/05, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey it only took yo
KN5G/p is on 14024 on Galveston Island QRP at 1915Z.
Paul w0rw
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/li
Hello,
The WA3WSJ Summit program would like you to take a look at the new
WA3WSJ Summit Website. A new Yahoo Group has also been created. If you
are interested, take a look at:
http://www.wa3wsj.com/SummitProgram.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wa3wsjsummits
If you like what you see, please
I have built 100+ K2's to date. Let me build one for you. My prices are
reasonable, and you receive a K2 ready to play and enjoy.
73
Alan
W1HYV
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
S
Charles,
With dual band close spaced beams, everything interacts.
You can try adjusting the wire lengths by the percentage you were off your
target frequency, or just operate them as they fell. They will vary with
height, and there is no compelling need to have them exactly resonant in
cases l
Certainly, traps and baluns "may" contribute some losses as well as loading
coils may.
Tune losses in a decent tuner are pretty low, unless you are trying to match
outside its design range.
There is no advantage save not having a reactance term to match out, to
having resonance on the antenna.
hi Aki - absolutely right - for contest situations, it is especially
useful to not have to worry about readjusting the radio when changing
bands. But even for casual operating, its nice to be able to set the
mode and go, without having to make adjustments.
This past weekend, I operated the CQW
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 14:33 -0700, Jeff Stai wrote:
> you cannot zero the RIT by computer command
Sure you can. Use the RC command.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info
Am 26. Sep 2005, um 14:16:42 schrieb Mark Bayern:
> Personally, I don't see a problem with the message, but neither of us
> are empowered to police this list.
Sure we are. Its called mail filtering, and most mail programs nowadays
support it.
Mario
--
Mario LorenzI
You are (of course) correct. I won't filter his message -- but clearly
there is someone else on the list who should!
Thanks,
Mark AD5SS
On 9/26/05, Mario Lorenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 26. Sep 2005, um 14:16:42 schrieb Mark Bayern:
>
> > Personally, I don't see a problem with the mess
Hey Alan:
Just ignore the negative comments on the reflector. If you enjoy building
the Elecraft gear then good for you. It gives you something to do plus
provides you will a few extra bucks. Besides your providing a valuable
service for
some of the hams. Not everyone has time to build t
OR THE ABILITY... These builders also help Elecraft sales. I wonder
what the real problem is with this person?
Phil K2/KAT100
Philip LaMarche
LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
www.instantgourmetspices.com
727-944-3226
800-395-7795 pin 02
FAX 727-937-8834
NASFT #30210
W9DVM
-Original Mess
My problem is that I had him filtered and don't see any postings from
him at all any longer, but when people reply to his messages without his
address in the header, I see it again.
I just get tired of the repeated messages, whether it's Eric (not the
Elecraft Eric) talking about how CW is useles
Personally I think its kinda neat keeping track of how many K2's Alan has
built. I have no problem with him asking to build them. I had someone else
finish mine for me or else I would have asked Alan. For some folks a project
like a K2 is quite a chore to build. So keep it up Alan ! ! ! There is
a
Guys - Let's end this thread. We're taking care of this off line.
I am adding an addendum to the list guidelines that asks for commercial postings
(including those for builders for hire) to be limited to one per month each to
keep the signal to noise level reasonable on the list.
In general w
I appreciate Alan's occasional reminder of his available Elecraft building
services. Alan recently upgraded my auction acquired K2 #2318 with SSB and IO2
to a revision B K2/100 adding the NB, DSP, PA100, 60M, and 160M modules.
The upgrade job was complicated by the fact that the rig had been
ELECRAFT eMail LIST GUIDELINES
For those of you who are new to the list, (and for those of us who have
rapidly failing memories..), here is a quick list of things to remember when
posting to this list. Please save this for future reference.
The most important thing to remember is that this is on
At 02:45 PM 9/26/2005, Brian Mury wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 14:33 -0700, Jeff Stai wrote:
>> you cannot zero the RIT by computer command
>
>Sure you can. Use the RC command.
u - OK, so I downloaded the K2 programmers reference, which I have never
looked at. If I understand correctly, that
I am at the beach and decided to 'play' in last weekend's rtty contest with my
K2/100. I also have the KAT100 with me, and used the Rigblaster nomic as the
sound card interface.
I was pretty impressed with the rx in the contest. I am sure 80% of the qsos
did not show any deflection on the s-met
Indeed, I was fortunately able to have the time to build my K2, but since
receiving the KPA100 in early July, I got very busy at work & have not yet
completed it. It doesn't look as though it will be ready for the Worked All
Germany contest in mid-October, which was my goal. As far as I can see,
On Monday 26 September 2005 23:03, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> My problem is that I had him filtered and don't see any postings from
> him at all any longer, but when people reply to his messages without his
> address in the header, I see it again.
Filter 'Let me build' in the subject;
that will
On Sep 26, 2005, at 7:08 PM, NR5A wrote:
Personally I think its kinda neat keeping track of how many K2's
Alan has
built. I have no problem with him asking to build them. I had
someone else
finish mine for me or else I would have asked Alan. For some folks
a project
like a K2 is quite a ch
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
I am adding an addendum to the list guidelines that asks for commercial
postings (including those for builders for hire) to be limited to one
per month each to keep the signal to noise level reasonable on the list.
Gee man,
only a few caused the proble
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 16:52 -0700, Jeff Stai wrote:
> But, the K2 uses the last control action, so if I send an RC it will
> clear a pot command, but as soon as I touch the pot it will use the
> current pot position worst case is the next needed position for
> the RIT knob is on the other side
Has anyone used the Z-11 with their K1?
(It's a attempt to save some money by not buying the auto tune option
because I already own Z-11).
Ron wb1hga
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the l
Whether 'tis nobler to bear the slings and arrows of outrageous
propagation or with a kit end them?
You guys and all this talk of kit building is making my nose twitch and my
fingers itchy. The soldering station is ready, pad wet, and rosined
solder to the fore. Now which shall it be? My
Pauli, EA3BLQ built a couple of Digital Interface boards for the K2. Knowing
that Pauli passed away earlier this summer, does anyone know of a source for
his circuit boards?
Bob
WB8DDI
K2/100 #4998
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailma
At 05:25 PM 9/26/2005, Brian Mury wrote:
>> - something I could probably get used to...
>
>You might find the white line on the knob to be of use - at least you
>can see where the RIT will jump to when you touch the knob.
yeah, if I'm looking at the knob...! adding something tactile to the knob w
Ron & group,
I initially used a predecessor to the Z-11, the LDG QRP autotuner (the early
version without latching relays) with my (then) basic cw K2it worked pretty
welllater I added the Elecraft internal K2 autotuner ...it works a
little better and is much handier (no jumper cable
Sorry, I failed to notice that your inquiry was about using a Z-11 with a
K1.but I think my commects about using the LDG with a K2 will still apply
to the K1.
Rich K2CPE
-- Original message --
> Has anyone used the Z-11 with their K1?
Based on replies I got recently, and what I have heard for a while, it seems
pretty easy.
If you want something really easy to grab and go, especially light camping and
pedestrian mobile, go KX1.
If you want something for easy mobile, camping with some extra weight and room,
and for hotel duty, g
This evening I heard a station sending CW with an unusual call, RU3HD/ANT.
What is the /ANT?
Mark Saunders, KJ7BS
Glendale, AZ
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscribe
ANTARCTICA. Vlady, RU3HD is QRV for about four months as R1ANN and
RU3HD/ANT from Saam Novolazarevskaya base, IOTA AN-016. Activity
will be on all HF bands. QSL via RZ3DJ.
A good search engine is very useful!!
Try www.google.com
73
Jim W7RY
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PR
That is interesting. Too bad he was right at my noise level and I don't
have my beam up yet.
Mark Saunders, KJ7BS
Glendale, AZ
-Original Message-
From: W7RY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, ron wrote:
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
I am adding an addendum to the list guidelines that asks for commercial
postings (including those for builders for hire) to be limited to one per
month each to keep the signal to noise level reasonable on the list.
Gee
The G5RV may work well, but I doubt if it'd work "better".
For most of my Ham "career" my mainstay antenna has been a doublet. That's a
center fed wire as long as I can make it (seldom over 150 feet since and
currently only about 50 feet) and as high as I can get it. It's fed with
open wire line
Hi,
For people that do a lot of field radio operation, carrying an
antenna analizer like a MFJ-259B could become anoying and also a
waste of space in your luggage. We nearly always tune the antenna at
the same frequency on the same band. So instead of carrying a big
box, why not carrying
Thanks for information. I shall introduce it to local ham radio club in
VR2.
73
Johnny Siu VR2XMC
builder of s/n 1146,4165,4255, 4597
- Original Message -
From: "JEAN-FRANCOIS MENARD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Elecraft - Maling List Elecraft - Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, September
Leigh,
My doublets work great on the higher bands. In theory, the lobe
configuration does changes with wavelength n of the wire, so you have
roughly 2n lobes. But you also get some gain, and, more importantly, a
lower peak angle of radiation. You can read all about it in W4RNL's
great write
54 matches
Mail list logo