Strange question, but I have the need to keep using the decoder crutch
and...
Is there a way to pipe in audio from a different radio and let the K3
decode the CW?
I have an IC-910 and I work satellites. Sometimes the other ops go
9billion WPM and I sorta need to figure out who the heck th
I am surprised to see that the CW decoder interprets the break sign
(-...-) as BT rather than as =. I note that the full stop, comma,
stroke (US slash), @ and the question mark are all correctly
interpreted, but the inverted commas (.-..-.) are missing.
I am presuming that these refinements w
Hi Brett
The way I guess almost all of us operate on CW when in "normal QSO mode"
is to pace the transmission even though the actual keyer speed may be
higher than we are really sending, this is especially the case for
complicated words, and doesn't need a menu item to use it. If something
is
I didn´t get the point yet.
The manual says to try change the THR from Auto to 5.
The speed is right but even strong sigs it´s hard to find the point and decode
it.
Also the manual says to move the WIDTH from.50 to 100-200hz but
Any trick ???
Tnx a lot
PY2ADR / ZY2C
__
I, for one, am looking foward to seeing lots of folks who do not
normally "do" CW start to show up during the CW contests. 99% of the
code sent during the contest is nearly perfect. so I am hoping that
the decoding will be pretty good...good enough to encourage those
normally too timid to try CW t
:43 -0500 (EST)
>From: "d...@lightstream.net"
>To: "Tom Blahovici"
>Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
>Message-ID:
> <54088.71.74.118.201.1417441963.squir...@mail.expedient.net>
>Content-Type
Hello Jeff,
I work the satellites all the time. Just send "QRS" and I'm sure the op will
slow down. Very seldom one won't. 98 percent of the cw ops will be glad to
slow down and work you.
Don...w2xb
Jeff Wandling W7BRS via K3List wrote:
>
>
> Strange question, but I have the need to keep us
I don't own a K3 yet but from the research I've done (and I've done a
LOT) I think the K3 is where I'm going to go. When i say a lot thats to
say that I've read at least 15 or 20 QST reviews and I've read 80%+ of
the manual for 8 or 9 rigs. The K3 really shines!
Now for the request. Its somet
I think Farnsworth spacing control for the keyer memories is a great
idea. I have a related suggestion which maybe isn't so great, but here
it is anyway:
How about a keyer memory which would work with a straight key. It
would faithfully record straight key CW, preserving the
non-machinelike timin
I'm not completely adversed to that idea either.
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 08:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about a keyer memory which would work with a straight key. It
> would faithfully record straight key CW, preserving the
> non-machinelike timing & spacing,
__
Yes and this is how I would like to operate. But I'm unable to get the
memory keyer in my K1 to call CQ in that fashion. That way I feel rude
when I switch to talking that way after someone has replied to my CQ.
Maybe that person answered my CQ because I was calling at a very nice
slow character
I would use keyer memories more myself if that were the case.
I use a bug or straight key 99% of the time and, recognizing that no hand
key has the perfection of machine keying, I avoid the memories unless I also
send on paddles. A significant number of Hams today rely on their CW
decoders to rec
ces are it will decode. If YOU can't understand the code, don't
expect the K3 to be able to.
> From: adriano.pera...@uol.com.br
> To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:37:58 -0200
> Subject: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder
>
> I didn´t get the point yet.
&
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:37:58 -0200, "Adriano" wrote:
Adriano,
You may be trying to decode someone who is sending with their right foot
(sending bad CW ). When using decoders the characters must be formed correctly.
That is, the Dahs, Dits and spacing must be in the correct proportion or very
clo
The CW decode displays it's output to the VFO B window. But most of the time
that window is displaying the VFO 'B' frequency.
Question is How do I remove the VFO 'B' frequency info and display ONLY the CW
decoded info?
Phil
Santa Fe
Thanks
Listening for SOTA on 14.061
___
Tap the display button.
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill Conkling
Sent: Monday, 13 August 2012 11:27 AM
To: Phil Townsend; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder question
<[hidden email]>
>To: "Tom Blahovici" <[hidden email]>
>Cc: [hidden email]
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
>Message-ID:
> <[hidden email]>
>Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
>Tom,
>
>Congratulations on
Thanks for bringing this up. I was afraid I was the only one who wanted
this option.
...bill nr4c
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Droid
-Original message-
From: Phil Townsend
To: "elecraft@mailman.qth.net Reflector"
Sent: Sun, Aug 12, 2012 18:22:32 GMT+00:00
Subject: [El
Yeah, but that takes away the decoding as well, brings up other stuff...
...bc nr4c
-Original Message-
From: Adrian [mailto:vk4...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 10:14 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder question
Tap the display button
4tux
-Original Message-
From: Bill Conkling [mailto:n...@widomaker.com]
Sent: Monday, 13 August 2012 1:32 PM
To: 'Adrian'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder question
Yeah, but that takes away the decoding as well, brings up other stuff...
...bc nr4c
Hello friends,
I have been trying to get my K3 decoder to work better by trying,
cutting back on the RF gain, using narrow filtering, to limit noise.
tuning back and forth across the signal to find a good copy spot.
Just can't seem to get it to read very well no matter what I try...?
Even strong s
I have recently started to have more Scandinavian CW QSOs and use the CW
decoder from time to time. But in the middle of many words it just shows a
big * due to a lack of some non-English characters.
Would it be possible to add four characters which would cover German,
Swedish, Finnish, and sort o
Joe,
I do a LOT of RTTY work, and have since about 1972 and have tried nearly all
the supposed RTTY/CW decoders over those years and NONE of them have ever
decoded hand generated CW very well. They do okay on machine (keyboard)
generated CW, but hardly any copy on a fist. Humans just aren't co
Joe.
If you are trying to decode hand sent CW. you will likely have to
provide a lot of "fills" unless the sending operator is quite skilled at
timing and spacing. Machine sent (keyboard or computer) CW should be
easily decoded.
73,
Don W3FPR
Joe Reaves wrote:
> Hello friends,
> I have been
--
From: "Don Wilhelm"
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 9:06 PM
To: "Joe Reaves"
Cc: "elecraft mail"
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW Decoder, Not very good
> Joe.
>
> If you are trying to decode hand sent CW. you
Hi Joe,
If you've already narrowed the filter and tuned the signal in properly
(with the aid of CWT), the next step is to adjust the threshold of the
decoder. Hold the TEXT DEC switch, then use VFO A to adjust the
threshold until the CWT icon blink is closely correlated with the
incoming C
I think the K3 CW decoder is surprisingly good, but it will lose the signal
when it gets weak whereas I have seen the PC sound card decoder MRP40
continue to decode a signal that has gone into the noise and I can't hear.
All computer decoders tend to be thrown by noise, interference and irregular
n Tue, 6/15/10, Mike Kravitz wrote:
From: Mike Kravitz
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 CW Decoder, Not very good
To: w7...@yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 1:27 PM
Hi Joe,
I think the real problem is in trying to read hand generated code. If you copy
CW in a contest you will have pretty
available today. I think Morse
> code decoding should probably be allowed to remain in the wetware domain. If
> you "need" a CW decoder, let me suggest that PRACTICE has been known to work
> very well when applied consistently. :-)
>
> Bill W5WVO
>
> -----------
I've had some correspondence regarding my proposal for added characters.
Looking at the K3 display on page 12 in the K3 manual, it may be that the
display cannot show the details required for these characters. That gives
two options:
1. Show the three umlaut characters with a bar over instead. The
I have another suggestion, perhaps use double characters.
---. = OE (o with umlaut, two dots over o)
.-.- = AE (a with umlaut, two dots over a)
.--.- = AA (a with ring)
..-- = UE (u with umlaut, two dots over u)
Only disadvantage, it eats up one character space of available display
space. But
even when I could like have ñ, á..ú, and don't forget the french acute, Ç
and others
but Morse code have a standard and is ok that they follow it.
we NEED to learn morse to get our novice license, and my teachers never
tech me the morse for Ñ, just say: use N
and they have reason, because if I e
The importance of accented letters probably varies from language to language,
but in Scandinavia we actually both learn and use the Ä, Ö, and Å in Morse
code, so that is the reason for my request.
I know this is different in e.g. written French where it seems like one may
actually chose to include
I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code#Non-English_extensions
where are the letter that you ask for.
I don't know if those are ITU official or not, but if are, will be nice
that engineer add support to those chars, I don't believe that could be
really hard to add (I'm computer prog
Here is the official ITU paper on the International Morse code. The only
accented character is e ..-..
http://www.g4dmp.co.uk/itu-rec-m1677.pdf
73 de David G4DMP
In a recent message, Gustavo Villada writes
>I found this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code#Non-English_extensions
>
>where ar
The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
On 4/24/2013 10:11 AM, David G4DMP wrote:
Here is the official ITU paper on the International Morse code. The only
accented character is e ..-..
http://www.g4dmp.co.uk/itu-rec-m1677.pdf
73 de David G4DMP
In a recent mess
Hi
Just thought I'd drop a note about the Elecraft CW decoder. I've been on the
air for a number of hours hunting new DXCC's with the K3's built in CW decoder.
This was my first time using CW, I only know the letters CQ 5NN TU and that's
it! ( OK E also) Never been on CW before so all DXCC's wer
Tom,
cwops.org and click on CW Academy.
73,
Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
- www.cqp.org
On 11/30/2014 3:32 PM, Tom Blahovici wrote:
This was a
new experience and introduced me to CW. Now I want to learn it so the
next
You will find that your DX increases a lot if you use CW! :)
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
This also was my first contest with my new KX-3. I didn't use the decoder
because I use mostly CW in my every day ops. The interface with my new logging
program with its access to DX spots gave me the most DXCC contacts ever! I
worked the world in couple of hour with only 5 watts.
Sent from
If you want to work more DX than you ever thought possible:
1. Learn enough CW to do basic exchanges.
Your speed and proficiency will increase dramatically by just doing it.
2. Get on 30 meters. Other countries have not abandoned CW
like the USA has. You will work DX after DX station.
You ca
That sounds interesting. I tried calling CQ with the terminal but that was a
disaster. Inevitably, the answering station was enough off frequency that the
radio wouldn't decode.
Also one thing I noticed with the decode. 9 out of 10 times the station
returned my call, the first letter was decode
Even better than calling CQ, listen. Then, follow the advice of The Old
Timer:
"When you hear 'em, call 'em!"
It's just that simple.
Mastery of CW will pay rich dividends if you want to be a DXer. All the
top ones have mastered it.
73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 7:08 PM, lmar
lmarion"
Cc: "elecraft"
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 8:13:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
That sounds interesting. I tried calling CQ with the terminal but that was a
disaster. Inevitably, the answering station was enough off frequency that the
ra
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: htt
And, don't forget that CW is almost an international language. Even
if you don't speak any of the many foreign languages, most DX
operators understand the characters that we use for a QSO... QTH,
name, WX, RST. And when it's a DX station running... well, all you
get is your call and repor
Ok
So I'm sure this is going to get a lot of opinions... What's the best key to
start with?
With the k3 of course.
On Nov 30, 2014 10:04 PM, Ray Sills wrote:
>
> And, don't forget that CW is almost an international language. Even
> if you don't speak any of the many foreign languages, most D
Tom ... get a paddle and plug it into your K3! Many will tell you you
need to start with a straight key, and only when you're competent can
you actually try out a paddle. You will find they are universally old,
as am I, but get a paddle, plug it in and send!
I use the Bencher HexKey from Ele
A straight key ... any quality straight key. Don't move to
paddles or a bug until you learn proper timing/spacing.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2014-11-30 10:27 PM, Tom Blahovici wrote:
Ok
So I'm sure this is going to get a lot of opinions... What's the best key to
start with?
With the k3 of co
I like the Vibroplex straight keY--it's smooth. For paddles, the Brass Racer
paddle (also Vibroplex, both current production). If you get the Bug bug, buy
an older Vibroplex bug with the "I" style damper, and a Vari-Eze (bar style) to
slow it down. You can send perfect code from 11wpm up. Th
Hi
I knew I shouldn't of asked I now have suggestions of probably about 40 or
so keys...
I'll think I'll start pure.. Just a straight key. I had one, but the spring
flew out and I never found it. So I guess the vibroflex?
On Nov 30, 2014 10:52 PM, Eric Norris wrote:
>
> I like the Vibrop
>
> A straight key ... any quality straight key. Don't move to
> paddles or a bug until you learn proper timing/spacing.
>
I have to agree. Straight key first, without question. VIbroplex, J-38, yada
yada, just about anything that is a decent key. Many to choose from. Learn
the code and
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of GRANT
YOUNGMAN
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:11 PM
To: Elecraft List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
>
> A straight key ... any quality straight key. Don't move to paddles or
> a bug until you learn
I agree, straight key first--unless you have tendon or other issues in your
hand/wrist/arm--in which case go to paddles. I can't use a straight key any
more for more than 20 minutes without a lot of pain.
Have fun! Oh, one more thing--there are fewer lids, asholes, and many more
superb ops an
ginal Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of GRANT
YOUNGMAN
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:11 PM
To: Elecraft List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
A straight key ... any quality straight key. Don't move to paddles or
a b
Does not a paddle and keyer give you perfect timing?
Leroy AB7CE
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf
Of GRANT YOUNGMAN
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:11 PM
To: Elecraft List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
I don't agree. How does a straight key help you achieve proper spacing? Some of
the worst sending I've ever heard comes from straight keys. Just get a paddle
and let the keyer do its job. Your job will be to pay attention to the letter
and word spacing.
Also, as others have said, don't get an e
Go with a paddle and electronic keyer, or use the inbuilt rig keyer, Iambic
or not is up to you, also Mode A or B whichever feels comfortable.
You can play with the straight if you wish key when you know how good CW
sounds.
Most important... LISTEN to what good CW sounds like, using programs such
I'll second that. Propoer spacing is completely independent from the key
used, it's a matter of OP skills! I had at least 2 guys calling me last
weekend in CQ WW using a hand-key that I simply had to send elsewhere as
their CW was not understandable at all, completely weired spacing!
A frien
Hi Tom,
Also one thing I noticed with the decode. 9 out of 10 times the station
returned my call, the first letter was decoded incorrectly, and no, I did
send a V.
73's Tom
certainly due to clipping the first letter on their side, i.e. not fast
enough relays in PA stages, etc. It's a quit
I agree totally, skip the manual key, it's 2014, and you own a really
hot radio, skip the 1890 technology, and get a paddle... Best is a
Vibroplex...
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mix
Found in this thread:
>I can't use a straight key any more for more than 20 minutes without a
>lot of pain.
Yes, get a straight key, there is a great reason for one
Start out with a Paddle... I wish I had...
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z
Tom,
Congratulations on your discovery of CW, and on your desire to learn it
and use it. I've been using CW for about 48 years now for about 90% my
operating. Tons of fun!
But PLEASE DO develop the habit of using the characters "DE" to preface
the sending of your callsign, whether calling CQ or i
On Mon,12/1/2014 5:52 AM, d...@lightstream.net wrote:
But PLEASE DO develop the habit of using the characters "DE" to preface
the sending of your callsign, whether calling CQ or in exchange with
another station.
NO, NO, NO! (CAPS added for emphasis). When a contester (or DXpedition)
is running
Sorry - I wasn't clear. Of course it makes no sense to send "DE" prior to
calling anyone if the only thing you're sending is your own call.
I was referring mostly to folks who are calling CQ, especially those with
a bad fist, and under poor conditions. I've heard stations with an unusual
callsign
n.qth.net
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
Sorry - I wasn't clear. Of course it makes no sense to send "DE" prior to
calling anyone if the only thing you're sending is your own call.
I was referring mostly to folks
.net"
> To: j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
> Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 3:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW decoder and CQ CW contest
>
> Sorry - I wasn't clear. Of course it makes no sense to send "DE" prior to
> calling
HiHi...that's a good one.
No mention in this thread about using a single lever paddle as a sideswiper. It
may sound strange, but it's now my favorite form of sending CW. Like using a
straight key on steroids.
On the other hand, using a straight key still gives me warm fuzzies.
Best 72/73
Stev
Hi
I just connected an external superkeyer to the straight key port of my k3.
The internal cw decoder does'nt decode my cw!
Something wrong?
thanks
luca
73 de iz0fyl
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/k3-cw-decoder-and-external-keyer-does-it-work-tp5948183p59
The output of external keyers normally looks like a straight key to the
device they are connected to. The internal decoder only works with paddles.
iz0fyl wrote:
>
> Hi
> I just connected an external superkeyer to the straight key port of my
> k3.
> The internal cw decoder does'nt decode my c
70 matches
Mail list logo