Off and on I've been working on an unattended build system for the
hostmot2 firmware images. I think this is now at the point where it
would be useful for others to test my work.
If you have a hostmot2 system that can (even temporarily) run the
development version of emc2, then you can help by te
Jeff Epler wrote:
> Off and on I've been working on an unattended build system for the
> hostmot2 firmware images. I think this is now at the point where it
> would be useful for others to test my work.
Cool!
> I've done minimal testing of 5i20 and 7i43-400, but don't have any other
> cards to
Thanks for testing. I suspect/hope I've simply overlooked something
about the 3x20 (or maybe all boards that are 9054-style), as I
originally did with the 7i43 and got non-working firmwares as a result.
Jeff
--
Throughou
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:04:57 -0700
> From: Sebastian Kuzminsky
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Request for testers: new builds of the hostmot2
> firmware images
>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 05:29:49PM -0800, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> Being unable to reconfig the FPGA usually means that the FPGA is driving some
> line that messes up the bridge (for example hold-holda or /ready are a couple
> of fatal pins if driven wrong). When I have that problem, it usually
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:39:20 -0600
> From: Jeff Epler
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Request for testers: new builds of the hostmot2
> firmware images
>
> On Tue, Jan 19,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:42:52PM -0800, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> No, unlike the 7I43, the 3X20 doesnt care about config options so this is
> fairly mysterious. If you point me to the bad bitfile I'll give it a try here
> and do some probing about.
The file that seb tried was SV24S.BIT from
ht
>
> No, unlike the 7I43, the 3X20 doesnt care about config options so this is
> fairly mysterious. If you point me to the bad bitfile I'll give it a try here
> and do some probing about.
Well, turns out thats not quite true, the 3X20 doesnt care about DONE but it
DOES care about the order of "Re
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:45:53PM -0800, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> Well, turns out thats not quite true, the 3X20 doesnt care about DONE but it
> DOES care about the order of "Release_Write_Enable" and "Enable_Output"
Thanks for the explanation. I'll incorporate your suggestion in my
build rul
Is this going to be the same for all 9054-style cards?
Jeff
--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
attend
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:12:21 -0600
> From: Jeff Epler
> Reply-To: EMC developers
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Request for testers: new builds of the hostmot2
> firmware images
>
> Is this going to
11 matches
Mail list logo
