Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 15.06.15 13:54, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Are you sure you're not confusing GitHub with SourceForge? There was a > recent brouhaha with SF downloads of several projects. > > > > > This is not a tasty turn of events since github changed hands a while > > back. > > Yup, that's probably Sourcefo

Re: [Emc-users] self-locking tapers vs self-ejecting tapers vs steel and alu Q

2015-06-16 Thread andy pugh
On 16 June 2015 at 00:44, Gene Heskett wrote: >> The spindle speed is likely to be too slow for any work that you (or >> I) can lift. > > Good point, I can't begin to lift the chuck itself. My back is too far > gone. To expand on that, my 1930s Colchester Triumph has spindle speeds (if I recall

Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread Dave Cole
Github was in the news recently regarding their valuation and this: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-15/github-said-to-seek-2-billion-valuation-in-latest-financing So apparently someone thinks that they have some great value. Not that I agree.. Dave On 6/16/2015 3:39 AM, Erik Chr

Re: [Emc-users] self-locking tapers vs self-ejecting tapers vs steel and alu Q

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 02:51:21 Gregg Eshelman wrote: > On 6/15/2015 9:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 15 June 2015 20:59:12 Gregg Eshelman wrote: > >> On 6/15/2015 5:11 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >>> But I keep dreaming of having a lathe that big, someday... > >> > >> Too bad you don't li

Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 03:39:48 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 15.06.15 13:54, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > Are you sure you're not confusing GitHub with SourceForge? There was > > a recent brouhaha with SF downloads of several projects. > > > > > This is not a tasty turn of events since github c

Re: [Emc-users] self-locking tapers vs self-ejecting tapers vs steel and alu Q

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 05:29:37 andy pugh wrote: > On 16 June 2015 at 00:44, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> The spindle speed is likely to be too slow for any work that you > >> (or I) can lift. > > > > Good point, I can't begin to lift the chuck itself. My back is too > > far gone. > > To expand on

Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 07:54:12 Dave Cole wrote: > Github was in the news recently regarding their valuation and this: > http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-15/github-said-to-seek- >2-billion-valuation-in-latest-financing > > So apparently someone thinks that they have some great valu

Re: [Emc-users] Driver for 48V BLDC servo motor

2015-06-16 Thread Marius Alksnys
I integrated a lot of 7i39's, thus I know them well enough. But they are rated at 250W, HV version limited to 7.5A per phase, which, when reached, makes quite big torque gap, so it is not recommended to use 7i39 near its maximum current limit. I even found better lead angles not to trigger 7i39

[Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings all; The screw kit came in today, looks to be decent, but came with Lovejoy style couplers, 2 for a 3/8" shaft motor and one for a 1/2" shaft motor. Unforch, the 470 oz/in XY motors have an 8mm shaft, where the 1600 oz/in Z motor has a 14mm shaft. This kit as bought from a separate v

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Todd Zuercher
You can buy just the individual hubs from MSC. - Original Message - From: "Gene Heskett" To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 4:01:31 PM Subject: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match Greetings all; The screw kit came in today, looks to be decent, but came with

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 16:34:37 Todd Zuercher wrote: > You can buy just the individual hubs from MSC. > Those that pop up under a search for lovejoy, have only the faintest resemblance to these, and are easily 4 or so times bigger. > - Original Message - > From: "Gene Heskett" > To: emc

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 16:34:37 Todd Zuercher wrote: > You can buy just the individual hubs from MSC. The only one that resembles these is their # 35407022, but it says the max bore is .500", and I need a 14mm bore while still being a 2 legged hub. I'll go measure these for OD & see if they ha

Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread George Ramsower
On 6/16/2015 11:12 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 June 2015 03:39:48 Erik Christiansen wrote: > > And its the main reason I host my own meager efforts right here on this > machine. I have been a fan of the TRS-80 Color Computer since the 80's, > and an os9/nitros9 author since the late

Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 17:58:05 George Ramsower wrote: > On 6/16/2015 11:12 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 June 2015 03:39:48 Erik Christiansen wrote: > > > > And its the main reason I host my own meager efforts right here on > > this machine. I have been a fan of the TRS-80 Color Comp

Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread George Ramsower
On 6/16/2015 5:11 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> That's all I really wanted to >> do anyway! I'll end up with labels and tags on several things around >> here. Then I can get back to building parts for my next steam engine. >> >> George R > while I have your attention, the hobby shops sell brass tu

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread John Thornton
LoveJoy connectors come in many different diameters... and have size numbers like L035. So only L035 will work with L035 spiders and couplings. http://www.lovejoy-inc.com/products/jaw-type-couplings/l-type.aspx JT On 6/16/2015 3:34 PM, Todd Zuercher wrote: > You can buy just the individual hubs

Re: [Emc-users] GutHub getting sneaky? Yes.

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 18:51:44 George Ramsower wrote: > On 6/16/2015 5:11 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > >> That's all I really wanted to > >> do anyway! I'll end up with labels and tags on several things > >> around here. Then I can get back to building parts for my next > >> steam engine. > >> > >

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Dave Cole
I know this sounds crazy; But I bought a couple of sets of Lovejoy couplings on Amazon this last winter and while they had an incomplete selection, I got what I needed and the prices were very good and with free two day shipping as I am a Prime member. Your mileage may vary Dave On 6/16

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread jeremy youngs
Gene again I must point you towards surplus center. They have them for a few bucks -- ___ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/list

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 19:13:29 John Thornton wrote: > LoveJoy connectors come in many different diameters... and have size > numbers like L035. So only L035 will work with L035 spiders and > couplings. And how do I cross ref the L035 with the actual size (diameter) of the unit. Everyone seems

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 21:40:20 Dave Cole wrote: > I know this sounds crazy; But I bought a couple of sets of Lovejoy > couplings on Amazon this last winter and while they had an incomplete > selection, I got what I needed > and the prices were very good and with free two day shipping as I am a >

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 21:40:20 Dave Cole wrote: > I know this sounds crazy; But I bought a couple of sets of Lovejoy > couplings on Amazon this last winter and while they had an incomplete > selection, I got what I needed > and the prices were very good and with free two day shipping as I am a >

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Todd Zuercher
To be honest I'm not a big fan of jaw couplers, and after a bought of breaking flexible dual beams, I've switched over to flexible steel disk type couplings. You get what you pay for. - Original Message - From: "Gene Heskett" To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, June 16,

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 21:40:52 jeremy youngs wrote: > Gene again I must point you towards surplus center. They have them for > a few bucks all in inch only, and set screw, not clamping binder screws for smooth shafts. Only the Z motor has flats. I'll figure something out in due time. Cheers,

[Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread richshoop
Gene: McMaster Carr has metric version lovejoy couplings available, in most of the standard sizes. - Original Message - From: emc-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 3:11:58 PM Subject: Emc-users Digest, Vol 110, Issue

Re: [Emc-users] Lovejoy size miss-match

2015-06-16 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 23:05:37 richsh...@comcast.net wrote: > Gene: > McMaster Carr has metric version lovejoy couplings available, in most > of the standard sizes. Sure, at $50+ a copy. I can make me something for that. > > - Original Message - > > From: emc-users-requ...@lists.sourcefo

Re: [Emc-users] look ahead---?

2015-06-16 Thread yann jautard
last time I had do to something similar, I splitted the last move and inserted my M code between the two moves. Worked well. Le 08/06/2015 08:59, a k a écrit : > Hi > i think that instead of look ahead for G0 it will be better to have/create > new M code (M100 or M(n)) that will: > after runni

[Emc-users] KiCAD schematic Anilam Crusader M Conversion

2015-06-16 Thread Mark Johnsen
I've been messing around w/ KiCAD and did a schematic for my Anilam Crusader M to a Mesa 5i25 & 7i77 conversion. In the github repository there's a Auto_Mesa.lib that includes a component for a 7i77. Since KiCAD is meant for circuit layout, I didn't know how to include the jumpers so left those o