Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-05 Thread Mark Wendt (Contractor)
At 02:10 PM 1/4/2009, you wrote: >I did, indeed, bring home a MicroVAX-II with no graphics for a couple >months. It was smashed by a shipper, and abandoned for months. >But, they eventually wanted it back for salvage. I had to buy a >KA-630AA CPU board for $6800, certainly the most expensive "toy

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Dave Engvall
On Jan 4, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > Dave Engvall wrote: >> >> since I didn't find Jon's post on the interrupt process. >> >> >> Some reading of pdp wiki, etc refreshes memory (slowly). >> >> There were 4 interrupt lines which gave only 4 levels of interrupt. >> Then interrupts were f

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Jon Elson
Dave Engvall wrote: > > since I didn't find Jon's post on the interrupt process. > > > Some reading of pdp wiki, etc refreshes memory (slowly). > > There were 4 interrupt lines which gave only 4 levels of interrupt. > Then interrupts were further arbitrated by the position of the > interrupting

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Jon Elson
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 04 January 2009, Jon Elson wrote: > >> Gene Heskett wrote: >> >>> On Sunday 04 January 2009, Peter C. Wallace wrote: >>> On the other hand you can do a lot with a embedded 32 bit processor in a FPGA (the ZPU for example uses about 20% of a 40

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Jon Elson
Mark Wendt (Contractor) wrote: > Jon, > > You sure you didn't bring home a Vax workstation? I had a > bunch of those, and they were built in the pizza box config that the > early desktops were like. The Micro-Vax was still a server, though > it was a bit smaller than the 6000 series..

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Jon Elson wrote: > Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 11:57:53 -0600 > From: Jon Elson > Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11 > > Gene Heskett

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Dave Engvall
since I didn't find Jon's post on the interrupt process. Some reading of pdp wiki, etc refreshes memory (slowly). There were 4 interrupt lines which gave only 4 levels of interrupt. Then interrupts were further arbitrated by the position of the interrupting board on the bus. IIRC : CPU slo

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 04 January 2009, Jon Elson wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Sunday 04 January 2009, Peter C. Wallace wrote: >>> On the other hand you can do a lot with a embedded 32 bit processor in a >>> FPGA (the ZPU for example uses about 20% of a 400K SP3, runs at ~ 100 >>> MHz, is BSD licensed and

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Jon Elson
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 04 January 2009, Peter C. Wallace wrote: > > >> On the other hand you can do a lot with a embedded 32 bit processor in a >> FPGA (the ZPU for example uses about 20% of a 400K SP3, runs at ~ 100 MHz, >> is BSD licensed and has a GCC toolchain) >> > > Which

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Jon Elson
Matt Shaver wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 21:38 -0800, Rafael Skodlar wrote: > >> No modern PC with water cooling, tons of LEDs, or shiny fans look as >> good as PDP-8 or PDP-11/44 front panels. You could tell what system was >> doing just by looking at LEDs. >> > > I know what you mean, I

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 04 January 2009, Peter C. Wallace wrote: [...] >Of course the FPAG woudl have hardware step generation as well, but actually > a 100 MHz processor with decent I/O even without hardware step generation > will make steps just fine (1 MHz interrupt rates are no problem at all) > >You are com

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Mark Wendt (Contractor)
At 08:19 PM 1/3/2009, you wrote: >Ok, I cant let this one go without a comment. I joined DEC as a sales >engineer in the Ann Arbor Michigan office in Feb 1969. That was still >PDP8 days, the 11 didnt come until 1970. We had a series of application >systems we sold on PDP8's, and as I recall one of

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Mark Wendt (Contractor)
At 06:52 PM 1/3/2009, you wrote: >Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > > Lester Caine wrote: > > > >> All this nostalgia set me thinking I had a silly text graphic based > >> Dungeon and Dragon game on the VAX. It used to while away the lunch hour > >> ;) anybody know if it's still available. I can't

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Mark Wendt (Contractor)
At 01:40 PM 1/3/2009, you wrote: >Stuart Stevenson wrote: > > I ran a long process and post on MicroVAX. The geometry was very > > complex. The hard drive was a large 51mb. I think it had 8meg memory. > > I broke my file into about 50 sections. I had to write a script to > > process the file, colle

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-04 Thread Lester Caine
Dave Engvall wrote: > On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > >> Lester Caine wrote: >> >>> All this nostalgia set me thinking I had a silly text graphic >>> based >>> Dungeon and Dragon game on the VAX. It used to while away the >>> lunch hour >>> ;) anybody know if it

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Matt Shaver
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 21:38 -0800, Rafael Skodlar wrote: > No modern PC with water cooling, tons of LEDs, or shiny fans look as > good as PDP-8 or PDP-11/44 front panels. You could tell what system was > doing just by looking at LEDs. I know what you mean, I started my computer career in 1981 work

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Jon Elson
Dave Engvall wrote: > It is amazing how many DEC users, etc come crawling out of the woodwork. > All of them with great stories about how things used to be. > > With all this architectural experience there ought to be some > strongly held opinions on a processor chip that would do a > good job on

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Jon Elson
Ron Ginger wrote: > Ok, I cant let this one go without a comment. I joined DEC as a sales > engineer in the Ann Arbor Michigan office in Feb 1969. That was still > PDP8 days, the 11 didnt come until 1970. We had a series of application > systems we sold on PDP8's, and as I recall one of them was

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Peter C. Wallace
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Gene Heskett wrote: > Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 01:16:18 -0500 > From: Gene Heskett > Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > > To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11 > > On Su

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Jon Elson
Dave Engvall wrote: > > Anyone really remember how many interrupts an 11 really had. I'm > thinking 256 but haven't found the book to confirm that. > I think it was actually unlimited, up to filling the entire address space. Now, off the shelf boards didn't support that, and some of the e

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Stephen Wille Padnos
Gene Heskett wrote: >[snip] > >>On the other hand you can do a lot with a embedded 32 bit processor in a >>FPGA (the ZPU for example uses about 20% of a 400K SP3, runs at ~ 100 MHz, >>is BSD licensed and has a GCC toolchain) >> >> > >Which again, sounds like a plus till you said 100mhz. That

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 04 January 2009, Peter C. Wallace wrote: >uOn Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Gene Heskett wrote: > >SNIP___ > >> As a matter of fact, yes. The quad core amd phenoms, (I have a slow one >> in this box) with some additional controls in the kernel to release one >> core just for the realtime

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Rafael Skodlar
Dave Engvall wrote: > It is amazing how many DEC users, etc come crawling out of the woodwork. > All of them with great stories about how things used to be. > Love DEC stories. As field service technician I learned how to repair PDP-8 mostly by fire, i.e. in the field. Had some training for PDP-1

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Peter C. Wallace
uOn Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Gene Heskett wrote: SNIP___ >> > As a matter of fact, yes. The quad core amd phenoms, (I have a slow one in > this box) with some additional controls in the kernel to release one core > just for the realtime stuff, and then hand that core to rtai, seems like it >

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Dave Engvall wrote: >It is amazing how many DEC users, etc come crawling out of the woodwork. >All of them with great stories about how things used to be. > >With all this architectural experience there ought to be some >strongly held opinions on a processor chip that w

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Stephen Wille Padnos
Dave Engvall wrote: >It is amazing how many DEC users, etc come crawling out of the woodwork. >All of them with great stories about how things used to be. > >With all this architectural experience there ought to be some >strongly held opinions on a processor chip that would do a >good job on rea

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread tomp
Dave Engvall wrote: > It is amazing how many DEC users, etc come crawling out of the woodwork. > All of them with great stories about how things used to be. > > With all this architectural experience there ought to be some > strongly held opinions on a processor chip that would do a > good job o

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread tomp
Dave I agree Dave Engvall wrote: > It is amazing how many DEC users, etc come crawling out of the woodwork. > All of them with great stories about how things used to be. > > With all this architectural experience there ought to be some > strongly held opinions on a processor chip that would do a

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread tomp
Ken Kenneth Lerman wrote: > > tomp wrote: > ... >> Collosal Cave >> "you are in a twisty little maze of passages" :) mine didnt say that it went you are in a twisty little maze of passages then you are in a maze of twisty little passages then you are in a twisty passage of little mazes then you w

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Engvall
It is amazing how many DEC users, etc come crawling out of the woodwork. All of them with great stories about how things used to be. With all this architectural experience there ought to be some strongly held opinions on a processor chip that would do a good job on real-time applications such as

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Ron Ginger
Ok, I cant let this one go without a comment. I joined DEC as a sales engineer in the Ann Arbor Michigan office in Feb 1969. That was still PDP8 days, the 11 didnt come until 1970. We had a series of application systems we sold on PDP8's, and as I recall one of them was for generating NC code o

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Kent A. Reed wrote: >Gentle persons: > >I love these stories! > >I'm sorry, Gene, that you had such a bad experience. I can only protest >that a PDP11/23 wasn't a *real* PDP11. It came out nearly a decade after >the 11/20, had an LSI-based CPU instead of a boatload of M

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Kenneth Lerman
Kenneth Lerman wrote: > > tomp wrote: > ... >> Collosal Cave >> "you are in a twisty little maze of passages" :) > "all alike" or "all different"? Oops. I should have remembered that they were all different. :-) >> TomP >> >> -

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Kenneth Lerman
tomp wrote: ... > Collosal Cave > "you are in a twisty little maze of passages" :) "all alike" or "all different"? > TomP > > -- > ___ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@list

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread tomp
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > Lester Caine wrote: > >> All this nostalgia set me thinking I had a silly text graphic based >> Dungeon and Dragon game on the VAX. It used to while away the lunch hour >> ;) anybody know if it's still available. I can't even remember the name >> now :( >> >

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Engvall
On Jan 3, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote: > Gentle persons: > > I love these stories! > > I'm sorry, Gene, that you had such a bad experience. I can only > protest > that a PDP11/23 wasn't a *real* PDP11. It came out nearly a decade > after > the 11/20, had an LSI-based CPU instead of a

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Kent A. Reed
Gentle persons: I love these stories! I'm sorry, Gene, that you had such a bad experience. I can only protest that a PDP11/23 wasn't a *real* PDP11. It came out nearly a decade after the 11/20, had an LSI-based CPU instead of a boatload of M-series logic, used the Q-bus instead of the Unibus,

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Engvall
On Jan 3, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > Lester Caine wrote: > >> All this nostalgia set me thinking I had a silly text graphic >> based >> Dungeon and Dragon game on the VAX. It used to while away the >> lunch hour >> ;) anybody know if it's still available. I can't ev

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Stephen Wille Padnos
Lester Caine wrote: >All this nostalgia set me thinking I had a silly text graphic based >Dungeon and Dragon game on the VAX. It used to while away the lunch hour >;) anybody know if it's still available. I can't even remember the name >now :( > > Either Zork, Hack, or Moria probably. -

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Jon Elson
Kirk Wallace wrote: > I killed a VAX by spilling coffee in a power strip. Then later, killed > it again, by trying to move a running terminal with my "clever" custom > power cable, which connected the "immortal power" L1 and L2. > Fortunately, the VAX rebooted both times, but the status changes wer

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Jon Elson
Stuart Stevenson wrote: > I ran a long process and post on MicroVAX. The geometry was very > complex. The hard drive was a large 51mb. I think it had 8meg memory. > I broke my file into about 50 sections. I had to write a script to > process the file, collect the log, erase the .pr file, post the

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Mark Wendt (Contractor)
At 12:01 PM 1/3/2009, you wrote: >On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 07:15 -0500, Mark Wendt (Contractor) wrote: > > > Never enuff war stories... ;-) Didn't happen to me, but it did > > happen while I was a VMS sysadmin and we had tons of VAX heavy metal > > running in the enviro rooms: > > > > http://www.net

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Kirk Wallace
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 07:15 -0500, Mark Wendt (Contractor) wrote: > Never enuff war stories... ;-) Didn't happen to me, but it did > happen while I was a VMS sysadmin and we had tons of VAX heavy metal > running in the enviro rooms: > > http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/89q1/vax.253.html I

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Mark Wendt (Contractor) wrote: >At 12:02 AM 1/3/2009, you wrote: >>Another war story was the time our VAX 11/780 was going to be used for a >>huge finite element analysis run on a building's structure over the >>weekend. It had all of 512 KB of memory! Well, right abo

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Lester Caine
Lester Caine wrote: > Kent A. Reed wrote: >> Stuart and Jon: >> >> You got me with your talk of PDP11 memory tests and "insanely complex >> systems with PDP-11s with hundreds of ISR addresses"...I was immediately >> transported back to the 1970s. I still have the tactile memory of keying >> in t

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Mark Wendt (Contractor)
At 12:02 AM 1/3/2009, you wrote: >Another war story was the time our VAX 11/780 was going to be used for a >huge finite element analysis run on a building's structure over the >weekend. It had all of 512 KB of memory! Well, right about 4:30 PM >Friday afternoon, it crashes! After some diagnosin

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-03 Thread Lester Caine
Kent A. Reed wrote: > Stuart and Jon: > > You got me with your talk of PDP11 memory tests and "insanely complex > systems with PDP-11s with hundreds of ISR addresses"...I was immediately > transported back to the 1970s. I still have the tactile memory of keying > in the bootstrap loader from th

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-02 Thread Greg Michalski
ni-geek. Ah to reminisce... Greg www.distinctperspectives.com -Original Message- From: Stuart Stevenson [mailto:stus...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 1:01 AM To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) Subject: Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11 I ran a long process and post on MicroVAX. The

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-02 Thread Stuart Stevenson
I ran a long process and post on MicroVAX. The geometry was very complex. The hard drive was a large 51mb. I think it had 8meg memory. I broke my file into about 50 sections. I had to write a script to process the file, collect the log, erase the .pr file, post the file, erase the .cl and .pr1 fil

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-02 Thread Jon Elson
Kent A. Reed wrote: > Stuart and Jon: > > You got me with your talk of PDP11 memory tests and "insanely complex > systems with PDP-11s with hundreds of ISR addresses"...I was immediately > transported back to the 1970s. I still have the tactile memory of keying > in the bootstrap loader from the

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-02 Thread Dave Engvall
On Jan 2, 2009, at 12:51 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kent A. Reed wrote: >> Stuart and Jon: >> >> You got me with your talk of PDP11 memory tests and "insanely complex >> systems with PDP-11s with hundreds of ISR addresses"...I was >> immediately >> transported back to

Re: [Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 January 2009, Kent A. Reed wrote: >Stuart and Jon: > >You got me with your talk of PDP11 memory tests and "insanely complex >systems with PDP-11s with hundreds of ISR addresses"...I was immediately >transported back to the 1970s. I still have the tactile memory of keying >in the bootst

[Emc-users] OT: PDP11

2009-01-01 Thread Kent A. Reed
Stuart and Jon: You got me with your talk of PDP11 memory tests and "insanely complex systems with PDP-11s with hundreds of ISR addresses"...I was immediately transported back to the 1970s. I still have the tactile memory of keying in the bootstrap loader from the front panel, over and over and