Michael Jennings wrote:
>On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 20:17:34 (-0500),
>Laurence J. Lane wrote:
>
>
>
>>A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and
>>backported quite easily.
>>
>>Release 0.9.3 when you get a chance.
>>
>>Thanks. Have a nice day.
>>
>>
>
>That should ha
At 03:24 PM 11/25/2003, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 November 2003, at 14:09:30 (-0600),
Brian Mattern wrote:
> I do. atmos does. and benr.
> anyone else?
I recommend research into the meaning of the X-Troll: header.
Shouldn't you listen to your own X-Disclaimer ??
X-Disclaimer: I do not
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 05:52, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My favorite theme for a long time has been "Hand of God 2"
> > (http://themes.freshmeat.net/projects/handofgod2/?topic_id=60).
>
> There's a
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 15:56, Jason Van Cleve wrote:
> Thus spoke Alan Schmitt, on Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:26:33 -0500:
>
> > In e16, does focusing on a window using alt-tab modify the order of
> > windows in the alt-tab list ? I think I remember that in Windows it
> > brings the focused window to the
At 03:56 PM 11/13/2003, Jason Van Cleve wrote:
What I want is for the windows to remain stacked as they are, until I
finally select one in the alt-tab menu and release the alt key.
You want it to behave like MS Windows. :-) With the multitude of focus,
window raise, and so on settings, it's surel
At 12:08 AM 11/12/2003, The Rasterman wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:45:49 -0500 Hall Stevenson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:04, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > 3. convert images that are not "transparent) (ie square) into .jpg and
> > change do
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 19:04, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> 3. convert images that are not "transparent) (ie square) into .jpg and change
> docs to point to these
I just converted all the PNGs from the E-dox directory into JPG and GIF
format. GIF is no longer "evil", right ?? The Unisys patent ran out
At 03:17 PM 11/11/2003, Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
Which brings me to what I've been thinking all along: Some of these things
could be pulled out into separate packages. That way, those who want these
extra features can install them, and you get a lean package. This would be
useful for sounds and dox,
At 05:54 AM 11/11/2003, Ben Rockwood wrote:
The other killer is dox, the pretty spiffy oh so awsome help system
that most people look at once and then never again. This is
arguable, but I'd imagine that being as DR16 is pretty well
understood, we won't get many first time users, and the fact that
At 01:48 PM 11/11/2003, John Miskinis wrote:
Hi,
What does converting them to JPG do to the size ?? I've taken images
It really depends on the image. A lot of my artwork is ray-traced, and
contains very smooth color transitions. Converting such an image will
produce severe "banding", and the smo
At 09:58 AM 11/11/2003, David Tulloh wrote:
With some hacking in gimp I managed to cut the
E_backgrounds_settings.png file from 256K to 147K with no visible
deterioration from the process (that wouldn't be fixed with some care).
What does converting them to JPG do to the size ?? I've taken images i
At 09:28 AM 11/11/2003, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do many people use sound events ? Personally, I find them annoying,
> but that's just me.
I think they're very much like real alpha that way -- good fun for
about half
At 05:54 AM 11/11/2003, Ben Rockwood wrote:
Since someone suggested a possible change for the next DR16 release would
be to shrink the package size I poked around. BrusedMetal is big, 3.7M
big.
The current package contains 4 themes, BrushedMetal (3.7M), ShinyMetal
(1.2M), BlueSteel (650K), and Gan
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:56, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > Maybe including more themes isn't a great idea, but how 'bout an
> > integrated method of downloading more. Many apps do this nowadays.
>
> definitely on the plans for e17/18 etc.
e18 ?? Just get e17 released, will ya' ?? :-)
Hall
-
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 20:27, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> New default themes would probly be R-9X, 23oz of Glass, and Axios. We can
> either leave the old themes in for historical purposes or drop them for
> all new themes, in which case I'd probly add Cored to the list of new
> ones.
My favorite theme
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 16:24, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 10 November 2003, at 22:04:57 (+0100),
> Kim Woelders wrote:
>
> > I have E running with imlib2 (configure --with-imlib2) as well as
> > imlib1. The port is done mostly by changing the code to the imlib2
> > API and using preprocess
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 16:21, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> * Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 21:23, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> > > On a more generic question, I was thinking of adding an option to have
> > > (real) desktops wrap (like there is an
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 21:23, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> On a more generic question, I was thinking of adding an option to have
> (real) desktops wrap (like there is an option for virtual desktops). Are
> there any plans to continue to add small features to e16 (in other words
> would you accept patches)
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 21:52:37 EST, Alan Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Thanks, but I'm afraid that would not work. The typical usage I have in
> mind is: I open an Eterm (which I configured to be half a screen wide),
> which gets on the left. Then I open another one, and I'd like it to be
>
At 11:39 AM 11/3/2003, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> It sounds to me like you're saying Eterm isn't a "serious" terminal
> and isn't suitable for "serious" usage. I think I should be
> offended. ;-P
I've found it capable and stable in prolonged serious use.
I also found it pretty, decent t
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:19, Beny Spensieri Jr wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 23:43, Robert G. Werner wrote:
> > Did you check to see if there was a command called imlib-config on
> > your system?
>
> Yes it is located in /opt/gnome/bin/imlib_config
Okay then, is /opt/gnome/bin in your $PATH ??
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 11:37, Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:14:15PM -0500, Beny Spensieri Jr wrote:
>
> > However I do seem to meet the imlib requirements:
> >
> > imlib-config-1.9.14-1.ximian.2
>
> That probably contains a binary, imlib_config. Please note the
> u
At 04:29 PM 9/29/2003, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 04:19:29PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> By the way, when is E 0.17 going to be released ?? :-)
Nice one, that's two more weeks delay. :-(
Haha !! I know the "rule" on asking too !! :-) What's
At 07:01 AM 9/29/2003, The Rasterman wrote:
i dont think its really worth the time to spend on this small thing :( E
0.17 -
though long in the coming, has all the design fixes we need that i know are
needed in the 0.16.x codebase - this kind of thing just wont occure in future
I seem to recall sim
* Kim Woelders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030402 18:29]:
> What can I say...
How come no one ran into the "bugs" before ?? :)
Hall
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No ot
* Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030322 03:34]:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:14:28 -0700 Bob Arendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > Are any major Linux distro's including imlib2 as part of their
> > distributions? I rather like being able to build e16 without
> > having to build a lot of t
At 10:14 AM 3/21/2003 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote:
James Moss wrote:
On the subject of features/fixes going in to e16, don't suppose anyone
has thought about moving e16 to imlib2? I know it's in the TODO for
e16... any thoughts? I'd be interested in helping out with this.
-James
Are any major Lin
At 10:57 AM 3/21/2003 -0500, James Moss wrote:
Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 15:26:53 -0800 "Robert G. Werner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:40:54 -0800 "Robert G. Werner"
> > > <[EMAIL
* Michael Jennings ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030319 18:15]:
> On Wednesday, 19 March 2003, at 17:52:00 (+0100),
> Kim Woelders wrote:
>
> Is there a problem with the 0.16.5 tarball? If so, I'd like to get
> that corrected. If it's related to newer auto* tools, though, I won't
> bother.
>
> > The pat
At 09:07 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm still, and have been for a long time, looking for a good file
> manager. My definition of "good" being primarily a user-friendly
> one.
I'd be most in
At 01:31 PM 3/17/2003 -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen evidence mentioned before and that it's related to
> Enlightenment somehow. What's the official deal
At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen evidence mentioned before and that it's related to
> Enlightenment somehow. What's the official deal with that ?? As I
> recall, evidence's websi
At 10:21 AM 3/17/2003 +0100, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
GnuMdk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was an E16 fan but since E17 is in developpement, I'm waiting for
> it. Today, i use waimea. But i so suprised to see that E17 always
> use gtk+-1.2 instead of gtk+-2.2. Why don'y you make a port, E1
* Carsten Haitzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030313 18:57]:
>
> things are coming together. these are building blocks that will make
> building e
So, when will e17 be released ?? :)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
At 07:52 PM 3/13/2003 +0100, GnuMdk wrote:
I was an E16 fan but since E17 is in developpement, I'm waiting for it.
Today, i use waimea. But i so suprised to see that E17 always use gtk+-1.2
instead of gtk+-2.2. Why don'y you make a port, E17 is always(a lot on my
computer) unstable and I think i
At 01:56 PM 3/13/2003 +0100, Stefan Held wrote:
Am Don, 2003-03-13 um 11.28 schrieb Richard Martin:
> Personally I would never have a flash backdrop (actually my desktops
> are so cluttered I never even see my backdrops), but I can imagine
> people wanting it.
>
So do i, but do you agree that peopl
At 06:36 PM 3/12/2003 +0100, Stefan Held wrote:
Am Die, 2003-03-11 um 10.17 schrieb Richard Martin:
> Sorry to kick up this thread again, but...
>
> Why not make the background an html browser which supports plug-ins.
> That way backgrounds could be written in plain html, html with
> javascript or
37 matches
Mail list logo
