Hi,
== efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_evas_extn.c ==
OpenBSD doesn't have shm_open(), just shmget(). As ecore_evas_extn.c
doesn't seem to be used, I commented all the file and it works, but
it would be better if someone adds #elif HAVE_SHMGET or replaces
shm_open() by shmget(), whi
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
> Hi,
> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_evas_extn.c ==
> OpenBSD doesn't have shm_open(), just shmget(). As ecore_evas_extn.c
> doesn't seem to be used, I commented all the file and it works, but
> it would be better if so
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
>
>> Hi,
>> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_evas_extn.c ==
>> OpenBSD doesn't have shm_open(), just shmget(). As ecore_evas_extn.c
>> doesn't seem to be used, I c
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:11:31 +0100 Vincent Torri said:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_evas_extn.c ==
> >> OpenBSD doesn't have shm_open
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
>
>> Hi,
>> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_evas_extn.c ==
>> OpenBSD doesn't have shm_open(), just shmget(). As ecore_evas_extn.c
>> doesn't seem to be used, I c
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_evas_extn.c ==
> >> OpenBSD doesn't have shm_open(), just shmg
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Adrien Nader wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 20:37:17 +0100 Vincent Torri said:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer/ecore_evas_extn.c ==
> >> OpenBSD doesn't have shm_open
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:15:58 +0100 Adrien Nader said:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:54:24 +0100 Maxime Villard said:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >> == efl/src/modules/ecore_evas/engines/buffer
Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
> the reasons are many but here are some:
>
> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they support the os they
> work
> on.
> 2. frankly linux has much more momentum than the bsd's (excluding osx as you
> say) and that lead
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
>> the reasons are many but here are some:
>>
>> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they support the os they
>> work
>> on.
>> 2. frankly linux has much more mom
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it
> cannot block development because features that is in the standard for
> 12 years without being implemented.
First of all, shm_open is an optional part of P
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it
> > cannot block development because features that is in the standard for
> > 12 years withou
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:57:36PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it
> > > can
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it
>> > cannot block de
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
>> the reasons are many but here are some:
>>
>> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they support the os they
>> work
>> on.
>> 2. frankly linux has much more mom
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:43:36 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger
said:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it
> > cannot block development because features that is in the standard for
> > 12 years witho
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri said:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
> >> the reasons are many but here are some:
> >>
> >> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they suppor
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:43:36 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger
>
> said:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it
>> > cannot block devel
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard
> wrote:
> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
> >> the reasons are many but here are some:
> >>
> >> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they sup
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
>> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
>> >> the reasons are many but here are some:
>>
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:14:10 +0100 Vincent Torri said:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> >> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:09:31 +0100 Vincent Torri said:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:43:36 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger
> > said:
> >
> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >> > Jokes aside, we appr
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:12:23 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard
> > wrote:
> > > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
> > >> the reasons are many but here are some
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:12:23 +1000 David Seikel said:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard
>> > wrote:
>> > > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:12:23 +1000 David Seikel said:
>>
>>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villa
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:24:46AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> a file on disk is specified to survive reboots.. UNLESS it is specifically in
> part of the fs that is discarded on reboot. vast difference between them.
Well, most systems clean up /tmp on boot, so they discard the content as
wel
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:39:15 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger
said:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:24:46AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > a file on disk is specified to survive reboots.. UNLESS it is specifically
> > in part of the fs that is discarded on reboot. vast difference between them.
>
> Well
Le 18/12/2012 00:15, Vincent Torri a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
>> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
>>> >> the reasons are many but here are some:
>>> >>
>>> >> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they support the
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 18/12/2012 00:15, Vincent Torri a écrit :
>> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
>>> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
>> the reasons are many but here are some:
>>
>> 1.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 18/12/2012 00:15, Vincent Torri a écrit :
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> >> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit :
> >>> >> the reasons are many but here are some:
> >>> >>
> >>>
Le 18/12/2012 17:21, Vincent Torri a écrit :
>> As far as I'm concerned, I already sent a lot of patches to support
>> > BSD's.
>> >
>> > I'm busy the week, but free the week-end. The w-e, I send patches and
>> > I have to wait, wait, wait, ... and to resend a mail two weeks later
>> > only to know
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 18/12/2012 17:21, Vincent Torri a écrit :
>>> As far as I'm concerned, I already sent a lot of patches to support
>>> > BSD's.
>>> >
>>> > I'm busy the week, but free the week-end. The w-e, I send patches and
>>> > I have to wait, wait, w
Le 18/12/2012 17:51, Vincent Torri a écrit :
>> Yes I know, and the last time I tried to compile branches/ I got a
>> > mega-bug with ecore. No error message, just garbage characters.
> during compilation ?
>
> Vincent
yes, i'll retry soon
34 matches
Mail list logo
