I have successfully cross compiled the EtherCAT master for PowerPC, it does
seem to work and can see devices on the wire. I am using a RTL8101E PCI
Express adapter (r8169)..
r...@10.34.9.210:/opt/ppmac# ethercat slaves
0 0:0 INIT E EL9800 (V4.08) (SPI, ET1100)
r...@10.34.9.210:/opt/ppmac#
Are there any examples of communicating to a drive using either the CAN Ds402
or SoE out there?
**
Outbound scan for Spam or Virus by Barracuda at Delta Tau
**
I recently added a couple more slaves now I am getting errors for subindex.
I am using the latest code from August on a PowerPC. Before I added slaves
4 and 5
there were no error messages. Here are the messages I get. Followed by the
xml output
EtherCAT: Link state changed to UP.
EtherCAT:
I am trying to read the inputs on an ABB CI512 slave. The outputs seem
to work just fine however I get nothing from the inputs. I can read my
beckhoff inputs and copley amplifiers just fine. The structures I use
come from ethercat cstruct. Any ideas? Below is the devices xml info.
/* Slave 0,
I am attempting to use a Yaskawa (SGDV-R90FE1A) Sigma-5 amplifier motor
combination. It appears as if there is no EEPROM which seems strange to
me. I generated a binary file and attempted to write it into the EEPROM
with the ethercat sii_write -p 8 -f Yaskawa.bin command but afterwards
there stil
Just compile the examples after modifying them for your Ethercat
hardware and they should run right away if you have xenomai installed.
After you are comfortable that they operate correctly, insert the
ethercat functionality from the example into your realtime xenomai app.
For,
example my system i
down. Clearing slave
list.
EtherCAT: 0 slave(s) responding.
r...@10.34.9.212:/opt/ppmac#
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 10:56 -0700, Henry Bausley wrote:
> I am attempting to use a Yaskawa (SGDV-R90FE1A) Sigma-5 amplifier motor
> combination. It appears as if there is no EEPROM which seems strange
ek Lee
Motion Product Engineer
Yaskawa America Inc.
2121 Norman Dr. S.
Waukegan, IL 60031
Phone: 847-887-7235
Fax: 847-887-7280
- Forwarded by Derek Lee/Yaskawa/YEA on 07/07/2010 01:21 PM -
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:16 +0200, Florian Pose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at
completed in 18 ms.
EtherCAT DEBUG 0: Writing system time offsets...
EtherCAT DEBUG 0: No app_time received up to now.
EtherCAT DEBUG 0-0: Ready for requests.
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 13:55 +0200, Florian Pose wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 05:25:55PM -0700, Henry Baus
10
EtherCAT DEBUG: 07 0A 00 00 30 01 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
EtherCAT DEBUG: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
EtherCAT DEBUG: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 15:10 -0700, Henry Bausley wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. I was traveling and did not have
1 60 72 60 74 60 76 60 77 60
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 17:06 +0200, Florian Pose wrote:
> Hello Henry,
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 02:52:23PM -0700, Henry Bausley wrote:
> > Do the details from setting debug to 2 help anyone see why a Yaskawa
> > Sigma 5 Drive comes up with a
Phone: 847-887-7235
Fax: 847-887-7280
Henry Bausley
09/29/2010 04:06 PM
To
derek_...@yaskawa.com
cc
Subject
Re: Fw: Ethercat
Module
Thank you for sending another drive it arrived at my desk this morning.
I do have a question for the develope
c.
> if it syncs it goes to OP.
>
> Greatings
>
> Andreas
>
>
> Henry Bausley schrieb:
> >
> > When attempting to use the latest Yaskawa drive I cannot get PDO's to
> > update with valid data I just get 0s as the slave stays in preop
> > after callin
I am trying to use an Emerson Control Techniques Digitax ST Servo Drive
via their SM-EtherCAT module but no PDO information is ever exchanged.
The Working Counter and Working State are always 0. I verified all the
PDO mappings and Sync Manager configurations. The Drive goes to OP mode
but no da
ocess(...);
> ...
> ecrt_domain_queue (...);
> for BOTH domains CYCLIC in your RT-task?
>
>
> See also
> http://www.mail-archive.com/etherlab-users@etherlab.org/msg00496.html
>
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: etherlab-users-
drive I tested seems not to have this restriction.
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 08:31 -0700, Henry Bausley wrote:
>
>
> ecrt_domain_process and ecrt_domain_queue are called for both the
> input and output domain.
> The code is below and the same code works with a different drive! I
It is the order of ecrt_domain_reg_pdo_entry_list that makes it work.
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 16:25 +0200, Florian Pose wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it would be interesting to know if this order ...
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:07:09PM -0700, Henry Bausley wrote:
> > ecrt_doma
Check if your device has notLRW set.
If so you are going to need to have a separate domain for input and
output.
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 10:39 +0100, Wilfried Holzke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I trying to transfer process data to and from a CIFX50RE pci card from
> Hilscher. With Twincat software it wo
This drive initially drove me crazy too.
1.) You should obtain Firmware Version 3.01 from Yaskawa where they
appear to have improved the SII EEPROM interface. If you have anything
earlier you may be wasting your time. I got nowhere until I received a
drive with this firmware from my Yaskawa USA
Yes use 2 arrays and call ecrt_domain_reg_pdo_entry_list twice. The
first call of ecrt_domain_reg_pdo_entry_list must be for the output
domain. If you call ecrt_domain_reg_pdo_entry_list with the input
domain registers first it won't work.
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:34 +0900, takeshi ikeya wrote:
Most of my HUB's would did not work with ethercat. One that did was the
Netgear FS605 v3, I have been told the FS608 v3 also works. I use a
different PC for capturing over wireshark myself.
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 16:47 +0100, Thomas Paoloni wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my first post here, I'm
I did not have any success until Yaskawa gave me a drive with firmware
3.01, older firmware did not work for me!
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 21:17 +1300, Ravi Chemudugunta wrote:
> I am in the process of setting up and playing with the Yaskawa servo
> drive (sigma five), I plugged it into the master, go
Just map everything yourself and it should show up after doing a
ethercat pdos. I have not actually used the drive this way. Good Luck.
/* Master 0, Slave 11
* Vendor ID: 0x0539
* Product code:0x0221
* Revision number: 0x00030001
*/
ec_pdo_entry_info_t slave_11_pdo_entries
We have used this drive in velocity and position mode using the fixed
PDO's see my config below. Have you tried contacting Kollmorgen and do
you have the latest firmware?
/* Master 0, Slave 0, "AKD"
* Vendor ID: 0x006a
* Product code:0x00414b44
* Revision number: 0x0002
*/
The short answer to your question is yes. You should look at your PC
version and familiarize with the installation.
For example
/lib/modules/2.6.xx.x
The tool ethercat goes in /usr/bin
The configuration usually goes to /opt/etherlab
Once you study the PC installation it will be no big
Did you try changing the interpolation time period, index 0x60C2 sub
indexes 1 and 2 to match your cycle time?
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 20:03 +1300, Graeme Foot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been playing with various options but I'm still getting a drift on my
> slave relative to the master.
>
>
> What
a clock
that can have see ~20usec of worse case jitter. Omron in Japan
currently has the drive what they report is as follows.
Forwarded Message
From: satoshi.kuram...@omron.com
To: Henry Bausley
Subject: Re: Fw: ECAT testing between PMAC and G5
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:48:40
ur drift is not too large and the master time
> you are sending to the ref slave is the current clock time (rather than
> just += 100).
>
> Note: I call the dc sync methods just before calling
> ecrt_rtdm_master_send to ensure there is minimal variable between the
> master time and
Graeme,
I have always called ecrt_master_activate in my xenomai kernel driver.
That same xenomai kernel driver has its cyclic loop running all the time
but waits for a flag indicating whether to start ethercat activity.
I trigger the kernel driver call to ecrt_master_activate with a user
spac
has
> reached OP mode).
>
> I've also replied to Florian with a bit more info.
>
> Graeme.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Henry Bausley [mailto:hbaus...@deltatau.com]
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 08:58
> To: Graeme Foot
> Cc: etherlab-users@ether
un?
>
> Graeme.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Henry Bausley [mailto:hbaus...@deltatau.com]
> Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 11:05
> To: Graeme Foot
> Cc: etherlab-users@etherlab.org
> Subject: RE: [etherlab-users] Distributed Clock with Yaskawa SGDV driv
I am working with Copley attempting to use Cyclic Synchronous Torque
Mode at 250usec. We have setup up the distributed clocks w/ Sync0_Cycle
as 25 and assign activate at 0x330.
What is being seen on the scope is the time at which an EtherCAT frame
arrives eventually drifts into when the Sync0
e stable.
>
>
> I don't know if this will make any difference but try reversing
> ecrt_master_sync_reference_clock and ecrt_master_sync_slave_clocks.
> This may (or may not) let the reference slave propagate a more stable
> time to the rest of the slaves before receiving the up
ld = GetNsecHWClock()
> Otherwise you are introducing an extra drift due to the (small) time
> difference between the two GetNsecHWClock() calls.
>
>
> Graeme.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Henry Bausley [mailto:hbaus...@deltatau.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 28
Raz,
Did you use Graeme Foot's DC patch?
http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/2012/001642.html
I found that without using the slave's clock as a reference there was
always drift even though I have a system with low jitter and my cycles
are performed in kernel mode. I st
threads
> for transmission. once you use threads, you are subordinates your
> task the os heuristics more than in the case of hardware interrupt.
>
>
> From: Henry Bausley [hbaus...@deltatau.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:16 PM
>
Perhaps the slave doesn't work with LRW. Issue ethercat slave -p0 -v
and see if Enable notLRW: yes. If this is the case try using seperate
domains for the output and input so that LRD and LWR are used instead.
ie.
domainOutput = ecrt_master_create_domain(master);
domainInput = ecr
Other than not using separate domains and for output/input as well as
not registering the output domain first the other cause of this I have
seen is having EC_WD_DISABLE set.
Try using EC_WD_DEFAULT.
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 09:09 +, Laurent B. wrote:
> The Enable NotLRW flag is no, i have tr
Its been a few years but I recall only doing a complete access for index
0x8000 and it started working.
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 17:00 +0200, Felix Barth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently trying to connect a Siemens S7 SPS to a Beckhoff
> 6731-0010 via ProfiBus. This setup works fine while usi
Are you using the latest version of the stack? I believe this was
related to writing a 1 to address 0x500 in
ec_fsm_slave_config_state_boot_preop and was fixed.
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 13:30 +0200, Carlos Jiménez Leal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to run the Beckhoff EL7201 drive with Etherlab
Are you using the dc_clock_adjust to modify your sleep time? ie.
something like
clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_MONOTONIC,TIMER_ABSTIME,&inst->wakeupTime,NULL);
TIMESPEC_ADD_NS(inst->wakeupTime,100 + dc_clock_adjust);
Does your inst->cycleNs include the clock adjustement?
I have found th
lem with calling those functions
> > from user space? Could it be a problem with the e1000e driver? I’m not
> > exactly sure where to go from here except to try moving the whole program
> > into the kernel, but, at this point, I’m not sure that will solve the issue.
>
Try this
http://synapticon.github.io/siitool/
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 12:59 +0200, Christoph Schroeder wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> we need to generate a binary file for the SII from an existing ESI xml
> file. I read that TwinCAT is capable of doing this, but we would prefer
> to use free software under
We have a etherlab 1.5.2 kernel mode application running in xenomai
2.4.6 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 Desktop that will get on rare occasions a large
number of datagrams UNMATCHED. It occurs at random times and relatively
rarely but when it occurs it can result in disaster as we are running a
large numbe
le/diagnostics-with-ethercat-part-4
> >
> > I think you can set the above registers to zero after the fieldbus is up
> > and running, then you can check them if a problem occurs.
> >
> >
> > Haven't actually done it yet myself, so would be interested to see if it
running, then you can check them if a problem occurs.
> >
> >
> > Haven't actually done it yet myself, so would be interested to see if it
> > helps you.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Graeme.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Or
, Henry Bausley wrote:
> FYI,
>
>Just changing the host ethernet port seems to have alleviated our
> issues with UNMATCHED datagrams. We saw something virtually identical
> to Ralph.
>
> [451886.660655] EtherCAT 0: Domain 0: Working counter changed to 0/13.
> [451886.66
I had this type of problem and in my case it turned out the NIC adapter
was buggy and switching to a new NIC resolved the issue.
https://www.mail-archive.com/etherlab-users@etherlab.org/msg02722.html
The way we found the problem was
1.) Log the time when ecrt_master_recieve and ecrt_master_se
Make sure you have --enable-sii-assign when you run ./configure to setup
the stack before compilation
On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 14:19 +0200, Philippe Leuba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to use a Beckhoff EL7211-0010 module but encounter the following error:
>
> EtherCAT ERROR 0-3: Failed to set PREOP state
1. Get a copy of Omron’s Sysmac Studio setup software.
2. Connect your PC to the NX Coupler via the USB cable.
3. Create a New Sysmac Studio Project.
4. Within your Sysmac Studio Project configure the “virtual” NX
Coupler with the slices (“boards”) in exactly the same orde
50 matches
Mail list logo
