esis lxxxii). Thus the monad is not really
a monarch, but a subject of God's Kingdom, which is the universe, "the true
city of God".
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/26/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert Einstein
--
You received this messag
divinity in that it alone can
perceive (and perceive the universe of monads) and
perform actions among them. Thus each monad in effect
can perceive the universxe indirecty and is continuously aware
of all of the actions and states of the universe. - Roger Clough
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/26
admission
that creatiion requires a Creator.
r. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/23/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert Einstein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubs
f the other monads
in the universe imperfectly -- to various degrees of clarity
and distortedness.
The physical world itself is perceived by each monad
in the usual way, through the senses of the homunculus in each
monad.
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/22/2013
"Coincidences are Go
minated by the
most powerful meanings, whatever that mean sin a Darwinian sense.
Meanings arwe in some ways similar to relational quauntum histories,
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/21/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert Einstein
--
You received this
Think of the brain as one airport among many, the mind(s) as national air
traffic.
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/19/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert Einstein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
&
Hi
My Genealogy (down from John and Jane Clough, who came to Plymouth Bay Colony
in 1635) is Now Online at
http://www.academia.edu/3044786/My_Genealogy_--_Roger_Bristol_Clough
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/18/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert
Since mind is an MQS or Multiple Quantum Superposition, it can
process information at the rate of a quantum computer.
- Roger Clough
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/18/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert Einstein
--
You received this message
Hi michael haaheim
Since mind is a MQS or Multiple Quantum Superposition, it can
process information at the rate of a quantum computer.
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/18/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert Einstein
- Receiving the fo
Hi
My Genealogy (down from John and Jane Clough, who came to Plymouth Bay Colony
in 1635) is Now Online at
http://www.academia.edu/3044786/My_Genealogy_--_Roger_Bristol_Clough
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/18/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
-
e are
perceiving. So consciousness consists of
a pair-- a subject plus an object. Neither one is
fundamentally a piece of matte, because
fundamentally everythuing according to QM is
just a quantum field.
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/17/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonym
with a current event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3he4YHDjizo
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/16/2013
"Coincidences are God's way of remaining anonymous."
- Albert Einstein
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" g
the dominant monad of the mind, but from the point of view of a
each monad.
Leibniz uses the phrase "reflected by each monad". Hence the idea of holography
comes to mind.
For a more complete descri;ption see
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.
research in the late twentieth century
suggested that the structure of memory in the human mind is holo-graphic. Thus,
for instance, a patient suffering an injury affecting 90% of the
brain experiences only a 10% memory loss. "
Dr. Roger Clough NIST (ret.) 3/6/2013
"Coinciden
Hi
Here is a fairly brief, clear, account of Leibniz's phil of mind written by
himself.
Probably best to print it, but Adobe won't read it, so you\
can use the print icron to the upper right hand corner of the page.
Landscape orientation works best.
http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/leibpri
The roles of efficient causation and final causation in the double aspect
theory of mind
The double aspect theory of mind considers the brain and its actions according
to two aspects, the brain and the mind. There is no assignment of causation,
there is only correlation.
Leibniz's metaphysics, o
The argument below, based on the metaphysics of Leibniz, suggests that
a) Mental acts such as thinking are primarily driven by final causes, while
b) The actions of physical bodies are primarily driven by efficient causation.
[The current heated debate as to whether evolution is purposeful o
f physical bodies.
These include
force
mass
temperature
momentum
Kant pointed out, in addition, that space and time
are only mental intuitions. So I might add
distance
time
to the above list. If not phenomenol, time and distance
are known to be relative quantities since Einstein.
- Roger Clou
- Have received the following content -
Sender: Robert Karl Stonjek
Receiver: Psychiatry-Research,Cognitive NeuroScience,Mind and Brain
Time: 2013-03-01, 00:21:49
Subject: [Mind and Brain] News: Brain-to-brain interface allows transmission
oftactile and motor information between rats
Hi - Roger Clough
Peception -which involves the final, recognition step of epistemology- is
impossible without the
Perceiver, which might be thought of as the end entity that stops the infinite
regress implied by the
necessity of a homunculus within a homunculus within a homunculus...etc
A note for materialists.
That which perceives cannot be perceived.
It is, sotospeak, hidden in plain sight.
It is what is reading and interpreting this email.
The searcher cannot find himself, for he is doing the searching.
The tao which is spoken is not the tao.
--
You received this message
For what it's worth, here are two places on the internet to publish
your papers for free. Then they will appear to others on a Google
search.
You don't even need to do that. You can just post
your resume or bibliography on any yahoogroup
googlegroup posting. If you Google up anything
about Le
A note for materialists.
That which perceives cannot be perceived.
It is, sotospeak, hidden in plain sight.
It is what is reading and interpreting this email.
The searcher cannot find himself, for he is doing the searching.
The tao which is spoken is not the tao.
--
You received this message
A note for materialists.
That which perceives cannot be perceived.
It is, sotospeak, hidden in plain sight.
It is what is reading and interpreting this email.
The searcher cannot find himself, for he is doing the searching.
The tao which is spoken is not the tao.
--
You received this message be
Definitions
consciousness or mind or mental or thinking = any intentional act by the brain
Perception is also an intentional act which might be called "thinking about
sensory information"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To
e = innate knowledge (platonic, necessary truths) + stored knowledge
stored knowledge = knowledge as descriptions (ideas) + empirical knowledge
empirical knowledge = knowledge obtained through the senses (faded impressions
as in Hume)
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
2/22/2013
"Fo
Hi everything-list
The way I see it, as an Idealist, is that the universe is composed
only of numbers, possibly based on the two idempotent numbers, 0 and 1
(yin and yang). I suppose I could call 0 an uncreated number, since it
consists of nothing, and 1 something created, and these two
then com
according to the PEH.
Morphism. A potential transformation.
-
The concepts discussed here are modified forms of those found in
http://www.uky.edu/~look/8899403.pdf ,
which is a treatise on the meanings of "domination" and "subordination" in
Leibn
http://www.scaruffi.com/phi/quine.html
Synopsis:
Purely analythic truths do not exist: all truth depends on both language and
facts
Even Logic and Mathematics are, ultimately, empirical
A statement alone cannot be verified: only the totality of statements (science
in its totality) can be veri
-list
Time: 2013-02-05, 11:18:49
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
On 05 Feb 2013, at 16:44, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
If comp is assumed, then we need not worry about consequences of emulation,
it's a given that it works.
Then what is the purpose of this discus
Perhaps I have misinterpreted what I hear on the news,
maybe I'm just paranoid, but...
The president has said that the internet is a RIGHT,
so everyone must have it, which means to
him of course that the govt must supply the country with
wi-fi. I suspect that that will put internet suppliers
out
Hi socra...@bezeqint.net
To say that nature is absurd is to say that our current
understanding of nature --materialism-- is wrong.
- Receiving the following content -
From: socra...@bezeqint.net
Receiver: Everything List
Time: 2013-02-05, 06:43:51
Subject: Science is a religion by its
Hi Stephen P. King
Anything that has a purpose is teleological.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-05, 07:53:22
Subject: Re: Lee Smolin and Darwin's Uncommon Success
Hi,
ISTM that purpose is a 1p, so to ask the
Hi Kim Jones
Life seems to be the only thing in the universe that has purpose--
which is, or course, to create more life.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Kim Jones
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-05, 02:59:01
Subject: Re: Lee Smolin and Darwin's Uncommon Success
S
Hi Kim Jones
I thought that black holes destroy rather than create.
That only life can create.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Kim Jones
Receiver: Everything List
Time: 2013-02-05, 02:16:59
Subject: Lee Smolin and Darwin's Uncommon Success
http://io9.com/5981472/what-i
32:01
Subject: Re: context, comp, and multiverses
Hi Roger,
On 04 Feb 2013, at 16:43, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Brunio,
I agree with Craig. And I've never understood how there can be any consequence
of an emulation,
or how it can be proven or not that comp works, since no comparison can be made.
pical combination
On 2/4/2013 7:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 Feb 2013, at 12:30, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi John Mikes
?
It says
?
"The Fabric of Eternity is the author's personal view of the Universe that
allows for science and theology to explore the wonders of creation in p
Hi Telmo Menezes
Garbage in, garbage out.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 17:19:36
Subject: Re: Again, why the triad is necessary--> 1p, 2p,and 3p as types of
knowledge
Hi Roger,
1p/3p is a label for a v
ote:
On Monday, February 4, 2013 9:59:09 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 12:11:17 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Feb 2013, at 16:42, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
?
I would think that eac
Hi Jason Resch
"God" is a word, and the meanings of words are established by use.
So the word "God" can mean whatever you intend it to mean.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Jason Resch
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 22:12:54
Subject: Re: HOW YOU CAN BECOME A LI
Hi Bruno Marchal
Indeed, Plato, just as Leibniz did, considered
the idea of matter more real than matter itself.\
Both considered matter, however, somewhat differently.
While Plato called it an illusion, Leibniz and Kant called
it (as perceived) phenomenological, presumably because an
illusio
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 11:43:07
Subject: Re: multiverses and quantum computers
On 01 Feb 2013, at 19:26, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I can't see that superposition of states is any more magical
in one universe than, say, multiple roots to an equation, or imaginary
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Your concept is incomplete, because geometry is what Plato called forms,
which he gave the Greek name of ideas. So you have a thought without a thinker.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-04, 15
done.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 11:35:50
Subject: Re: Why Peirce's triad is more complete than 1p->3p
On 01 Feb 2013, at 18:44, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Good. And I should have said, rather than "I
g Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 6:05:53 AM UTC-5, telmo_menezes wrote:
Hi Roger,
I don't really understand how people can object to the idea of
physical/mechanical intelligence now that we live in a world where we're
surrounded by it. Google searches, computers
Hi socra...@bezeqint.net
That mind creates the brain is Platonism, control from above,
downward causation. Materialism or Aristotelianism is control from below,
"upward causation", which is completely unnatural and problematic,
and why it has to invoke the magic of "emergentism"
in its struggle u
bject: Re: Plotinus vs Aquinas
On 03 Feb 2013, at 12:18, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
How can numbers understandi anything ?
Do they have a mind ?
They have a mind relatively to the universal numbers which implement them, like
a computer has a mind relatively to a possible univ
ntent -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 09:37:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
b 2013, at 16:42, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
?
I would think that each universe provides its own distinctive
context to any?alculation, including comp.
Comp is the assumption that we are Turing emulable.
That notion is made very solid by Church's thesis.
I don't think tha
at we see, with his causalities, his time,
his 3d space, his macroscopical laws, is a product of the mind when he
contemplate the mathematical structure from inside.
2013/2/3 Roger Clough
Hi Alberto G. Corona
My understanding is that the block universe is the physical universe,
so it doe
-02-03, 07:19:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Roger,
I think the block universe (not quite accurate terminology)
is actually the 4-dimensional quantum mind and in it is written all
possible futures and pasts based on comp and quantum mechanics
as well as info on what
Hi John Mikes
It says
"The Fabric of Eternity is the author's personal view of the Universe that
allows for science and theology to explore the wonders of creation in peaceful
unison.'
IMHO that is completely misguided, because the worlds they understand are
separate magisteria, to use
Step
ne it).
2013/2/2 Roger Clough
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
I do think that a
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 08:59:44
Subject: Re: Re: How can intelligence be physical ?
Hi Roger,
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Agreed, computers can be, or at least seem to be,
intelligent, but they are slaves to mathematical codes,
llowing content -
From: socra...@bezeqint.net
Receiver: Everything List
Time: 2013-02-02, 08:52:43
Subject: Re: How can intelligence be physical ?
On Feb 2, 10:02?m, "Roger Clough" wrote:
> Hi socra...@bezeqint.net and Craig, and all,
>
> How can intelligence ?e phys
(the president) to provide a legislative
vision and to sign or not sign a bill.
Leibniz's system seems to act "as if" each monad is free to do as it wishes,
but that is only apparent. Above or among the monads must be
just one supreme monad that does all of the actual perceiving and
Time: 2013-02-02, 06:05:53
Subject: Re: How can intelligence be physical ?
Hi Roger,
I don't really understand how people can object to the idea of
physical/mechanical intelligence now that we live in a world where we're
surrounded by it. Google searches, computers that can beat the
communicate and agree, on these
laws and these experiences.
2013/1/31 Roger Clough
Hi Bruno Marchal
The block universe is the physical universe. So we are not part of it,
for it does not allow subjectivity, which is nonphysical. Or
mathematics or comp, which are also nonphysical
Hi socra...@bezeqint.net and Craig, and all,
How can intelligence be physical ? How can meaning be physical ?
How can thinking be physical ? How can knowing be physical ?
How can life or consciousness or free will be physical ?
IMHO You need to consider what is really going on:
http://plato.sta
Hi meekerdb
God is not in spacetime, which is extended, so he doesn't physically exist.
He is intelligence, etc., which is not extended, exists beyond spacetime,
and is nonphysical. You don't have to think of God as a person, or
believe in any "fairy tales" (whatever they are, I don't know) unle
Hi Russell Standish
Fine.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-01, 16:54:48
Subject: Re: Re: [Metadiscussion] Off topic posting on the everything-list
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:30:39AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
>
Hi Russell Standish
Sorry, I don't have a copy of your book.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-01, 16:52:09
Subject: Re: Mathematical Multiverse
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:32:27AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
nd and Brain] The El Nino, not auto fumes, is the main driver
of global temperatures.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Clough
To: everything-list ; - mindbr...@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Will.Steffen ; Nico.Grasselt ; gerstengarbe
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:42 PM
Subject: [Mi
Hi Roger Clough
F = U - TS points out a curious relationship between
information, which is nonphysical, mental and part of mind, hence S,
and energy U or F , which is physical so part of the brain.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Roger Clough
Receiver: - mindbr
Hi Richard Ruquist
Perhaps you can just define or describe compactification in general terms.
Is it compactification of dimensions ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-01, 13:30:36
Subject: Re: Is God created ?
On Fri,
nezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-01, 03:46:32
Subject: Re: multiverses and quantum computers
Hi Bruno,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Perhaps you're right, but to my limited kno
no Marchal wrote:
On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Perhaps you're right, but to my limited knowledge,
a quantum has infinite paths available between
points A and B without invoking another universe.
Once we are able to use (classical) information obtain
t: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On 31 Jan 2013, at 09:38, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
The block universe is the physical universe. So we are not part of it,
for it does not allow subjectivity, which is nonphysical. Or
mathematics or comp, which are also nonphysical.
But you
an aether ?
On 30 Jan 2013, at 11:55, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
Theology is an objective, derivative. human pursuit based on reason,
and reason, acccording to my Lutheran beliefs,
being objective (3p), cannot be free of error.
OK.
Only the consciousness root of our subjectivity
Hi Bruno Marchal
There are no reasons to believe in God
any more than there were reasons,
as an infant, to trust your mother.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-01, 10:12:53
Subject: Re: HOW YOU CAN BECOME A LIBERAL THEOLOGIA
Hi socra...@bezeqint.net
Feynman was wrong. Life isn't physics,
it's intelligence or consciousness, free will.
- Receiving the following content -
From: socra...@bezeqint.net
Receiver: Everything List
Time: 2013-01-30, 22:06:54
Subject: Re: Science is a religion by itself.
Quantu
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Faith (trust) is a gift from God, you can't do anything about it except
to accept or reject the gift. As a child, you didn't have to decide whether
to trust your mother, you just did. And for no reason.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Platonist Gu
eated ?
That just semantics. In my metaphysical string cosmology god is
created by the compactification of space dimensions.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Hi Kim
>
> God is not himself created since the creator of all cannot create himself
> and still
e per entity is unjustified.
On 1/31/2013 8:09 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
IMHO more than one universe is unjustified.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 12:10:08
Subject: Re: About the Infinite Repet
whose canonical description can be associated with some kind of
fixed point theorem.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
IMHO more than one universe per entity is unjustified.
On 1/31/2013 8:09 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
IMHO more than one univer
than one universe per entity is unjustified.
On 1/31/2013 8:09 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
IMHO more than one universe is unjustified.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 12:10:08
Subject: Re: About the
e, my cosmology turns out to be a
giant cosmic octopus, knowing all and doing all.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-31, 13:09:07
Subject: Re: The least and best means of controlling gun violence
Hi Roger,
We ca
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Nothing human is off-topic to me.
Which suggests that materialism and brain science are off-topic.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-31, 11:29:36
Subject: Re: [Metadiscussion] Off topic p
-0500, Roger Clough wrote:
> Hi Russell Standish
>
> I have no problem with the idea that the universe is sort of ultimately
> mathematical, except that equations by themselves can't
> do anything except just be there. So nothing can happen.
> All you have is an a priori.
This
-list
Time: 2013-01-31, 10:15:20
Subject: Re: multiverses and quantum computers
On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:15, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Perhaps you're right, but to my limited knowledge,
a quantum has infinite paths available between
points A and B without invoking another universe.
1, 08:13:30
Subject: Re: Re: About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space
Hi Roger,
In the one universe model, where does the extra computational power of quantum
computers come from?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
IMHO more than one univer
Hi Russell Standish
I have no problem with the idea that the universe is sort of ultimately
mathematical, except that equations by themselves can't
do anything except just be there. So nothing can happen.
All you have is an a priori.
The other problem I have is that such a universe as you propo
Hi John Mikes
It didn't feel good.
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Mikes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 17:45:12
Subject: Re: Re: Re: The "fairness" argument and women in the infantry
Roger: it is obvious that you have not understa
Hi Telmo Menezes
IMHO more than one universe is unjustified.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 12:10:08
Subject: Re: About the Infinite Repetition of Histories in Space
Hi Roger,
I find it harder to believe in
Hi Stephen P. King
IMHO morals imply that you have somebody looking over your shoulder.
So they are collective.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 13:44:45
Subject: Re: The least and best means of controlling gun viol
Hi Terren Suydam
Faith is a gift we are unworthy of.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Terren Suydam
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 14:21:17
Subject: Re: Re: Hateful
Hi Roger,
What else is it?
If you say it is the arbiter of morality, then that too can
Hi Kim
God is not himself created since the creator of all cannot create himself and
still remain a creator.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 13:19:48
Subject: Re: Hateful
On 30 Jan 2013, at 06:06, Kim Jones wrote:
>
Creationism is the religious belief that life, the Earth, and the universe are
the creation of a supernatural being.
Metaphysical naturalism is the religious belief that life, the Earth, and the
universe are NOT the creation of a supernatural being.
--
You received this message because you are
Hi Bruno Marchal
The block universe is the physical universe. So we are not part of it,
for it does not allow subjectivity, which is nonphysical. Or
mathematics or comp, which are also nonphysical.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time
How can we reestablish moral values in our homes, our schools, and in the media
?
How about starting with the Golden Rule (Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you)?
To tell you the truth, that covers about everything.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
What is the least powerful means of controlling gun violence ?
By legal means, as if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
What is the most powerful means ?
By restablishing moral values in our homes, in our schools and in the media.
--
You received this message because you are subscr
Hi Terren Suydam
Considering religion as a stabilizing social phenomenon is true,
but that's not all it is.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Terren Suydam
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 10:22:37
Subject: Re: Hateful
Personally, my take on religion is that it h
If you want to throw darts, consider Richard Rorty.
Rorty, now retired, is a pragmatist who broke with rationality in
his "The Mirror of Nature" and who was once a Big Bad darling of
mine when I was an agnostic leftist, once recomnmended that
science be read as literature.
--
You received this
Hi Stephen P. King
Even Wittgenstein, who invented logical positivism,
soon abandoned it and spent the rest of his life
showing why it doesn't work.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 00:32:44
Subject: No Wonder philo
Hi socra...@bezeqint.net
God is life, consciousness and intelligence, not
a triangle with three sides.
- Receiving the following content -
From: socra...@bezeqint.net
Receiver: Everything List
Time: 2013-01-29, 02:33:15
Subject: Re: Science is a religion by itself.
.Everybody creat
Hi Richard Ruquist
Consciousness is not a force that might do things.
It is what allows us to perceive and know things.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-29, 20:39:40
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On
Hi Stephen P. King
Cool.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-29, 16:57:18
Subject: A real Cyborg
http://vimeo.com/51920182
Comments?
--
Onward!
Stephen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Hi Stephen P. King
Here is where neuroscience can learn something from taoism.
1p is like the tao in that it isn't even indeterminant.
Indeterminacy is an objective property, meaning to others,
but 1p is subjective, it is like the tao, an opening, like an input port.
A receptacle.
We person
Hi Stephen P. King
The subjective universe is like the tao.
Whatever is said about the tao is not the tao.
So not to worry.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-29, 15:44:06
Subject: Re: Science is a religion by itself.
O
IMHO the Block Universe problem is pointless,
since it only discusses the objective, physical universe.
But the discusser belongs to the subjective nonphysical universe.
The discusser, at base 1p, is subjective, hence nonphysical.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stathis
301 - 400 of 2234 matches
Mail list logo
