Upgrading Exchange 5.5 from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 Platfo rm.

I have one question about upgrading Exchange 5.5 (SP 4) on a Windows NT 4.0 (SP 6a) platform to Windows 2000. Is it possible to run Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 without preparing the Forest and the Domain and without applying the ADC? Will Exchange 5.5 run normal as if it was running on the NT 4.0

RE: www.slipstick.com/

She's one of those ever popular social butterflies. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Reduce your stress; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: www.slipstick.com/

Not a bad word from me about Sue :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ She's one of those ever popular social butterflies. Joh

RE: Upgrading Exchange 5.5 from Windows NT 4.0 to Windows 2000 Platfo rm.

1. Yes. ADC and forestprep/domainprep are only for e2k. 2. That won't work. 5.5 on a GC cannot upgrade to e2k. See Q275127 for information. -aseigler -Original Message- From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions S

RE: www.slipstick.com/

nor me... although.. there was that "thing".. I added her to my MEC buddy-list. When I noticed her on the LAN, she refused my request to stand up so I could rush her. That brush-off hurt me. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 20

RE: www.slipstick.com/

FYIO: Exchange 2000 Instant Messaging has up to 20 minutes latency until your status will be updated on the server. > -Original Message- > From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ >

RE: www.slipstick.com/

Yup. Noticed that the first day... -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ FYIO: Exchange 2000 Instant Messaging has up to 20 minutes latency until your status

Haiku Friday

My resume sits. Bad time to ache for new job. We're in recession. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailt

RE: Haiku Friday

No jobs in Cali Recession has been all year No work for the best -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday My resume sits. Bad time to ache for new jo

RE: www.slipstick.com/

I stood up for you, Tim! -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggercam: - "Love is like a little old woman and a little old ma

RE: Haiku Friday

Why I hate my job Vaio, ME, CDRom Why you no answer... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 November 2001 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday No jobs in Cali Recession has been all year No work for the best -Original Me

FW: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade

We're about to upgrade our Exchange box from 5.5 SP2 to SP4 and I wanted to confirm with the group that there are no issues. I've checked the archives and found no unusual stories. I've also upgraded on a test server (several times) with no problems, however, being the causious one that I am, an

Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

I am running Exchange 2000 and when ever I am in system manager and I expand the public folders I get an error. The error is 80004005. I ran system manager on a remote machine and I got a different error. Something like 800400e46. Also when I am in OWA and I open the folders shortcut I get

RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

Classic Error Message: Q279863 or http://www.wsd2d.com/wsD2D/Tips/Server/{3915A76C-A655-45C6-B604-77D9A20C923B }.eml -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error When Expanding Public Fo

RE: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade

Backups and the Performance Opt are your friends... There are some Post SP4 issues: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q282/5/33.ASP and http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q283/2/38.ASP and maybe even some more! -Original Message- From: Germain, Bob [mail

Internet Explorer

Is anyone running IE 5.5SP2 or IE6 on your MSX 5.5 servers? Any problems? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:

RE: Internet Explorer

What happened when you tested it in your lab? -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Explorer Is anyone running IE 5.5SP2 or IE6 on your MSX 5.5 servers? Any problems?

RE: Internet Explorer

Come up to the lab and see what's on the slab. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer What happened when you tested it in your lab? -Original Message- F

RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

I have tried all the steps except the dll replacement. None of them worked. Will replacing the dll cause any other problems? I have always been nervous about replacing newer dlls with older ones. I have always been of the mind that there is a reason for the newer dll. Thanks, Mike

RE: Internet Explorer

Fish Tacos? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer Come up to the lab and see what's on the slab. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: Internet Explorer

Ahhh, I see you quivering in antici pa tion -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer Fish Tacos? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: Internet Explorer

I have yet to try it in lab. Right now, I'm just putting together a feasibility report for our security folks. I thought I'd see how many people have successfully done this to see if it's worth the trouble. If we decide to upgrade IE, I will test, test, and test some more. but as Admiral Lord Fis

RE: Internet Explorer

Just curious, why the need to upgrade? -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer I have yet to try it in lab. Right now, I'm just putting together a feasibility repor

RE: Internet Explorer

SAY IT! > -Original Message- > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:45 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Internet Explorer > > > Ahhh, I see you quivering in antici pa tion > > > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hampsh

RE: Internet Explorer

Our security folks are mandating that any system (desktops and servers) with IE be at least 5.5SP2. This came about from the Nimda virus since we are positive we got infected here via someone's web browser. Also, we would like to upgrade our EMC powerpath software (our MSX mailbox servers are on

RE: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade

SP4 introduced some CDO problems as well so look out for the CDO fixes. We think it's caused calendar corruption here after using OWA to edit calendar appointments. rgrds Mark Harford | Exchange 2000 Project BBC Technology | DSD T: +44(0)20 7765 0668 M: +44(0)7801 912974 http://www.bbctechnol

RE: Internet Explorer

Do you go browsing from the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer Our security folks are mandating that any system (d

RE: Internet Explorer

I browse the server to windowsupdate.com to download critical updates with no probs. We are running IE5.5sp2 on Ex5.5 sp4. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EM

RE: Internet Explorer

As I stated in my post, no. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer Do you go browsing from the Exchange server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Haiku Friday

Jobs suck anyway I hate mine the most of all Homeless ain't so bad - Original Message - From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:58 AM Subject: RE: Haiku Friday > No jobs in Cali > Recession has been

RE: Internet Explorer

You install updates right to the production server from windowsupdate ? -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer I browse the server to windowsupdate.com to downloa

RE: Internet Explorer

Yes. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 November 2001 16:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Explorer You install updates

RE: Internet Explorer

Saves poking around network drives trying to remember where you left it! Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From

FW: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade

It is. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade SP4 introduced some CDO problems as well so look out for the CDO fixes. We think

RE: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade

ah yes.. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q289/6/06.ASP -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade It is. Michael Semiglia ---

RE: Haiku Friday

I work, they pay me It's all good for now, I guess Need to move on soon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Cooper Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Haiku Friday Jobs suck anyway I hate mine

Computer Associates

CA contacted me, concerned about posts I've made regarding their products. In the past it has not been their policy to participate in these forums because vendors aren't always treated very well. They are reconsidering this policy. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+, ExchangeMVP Here is the list of

RE: Computer Associates -ummm

now they want to listen? wow well too late for me. dumped years ago. BE works all the time and there's support! bill OK.. a poet i'm not. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Computer Associates

ahahaa... :) You can add this to you list. An exact quote from a friend of mine about a month ago... "InnoculateIt is to Trend Viruswall what a Pinto is to a Dodge Viper. Sure, it has four wheels. So does my wife's dildo. It doesn't mean that I admit to working with or using either." Denis Den

RE: Computer Associates

Heck, perhaps they could contact me about the OPEN case I've had with them for I think going on 6 months now. I just quit wondering when/if they would ever get back to me. If my boss wasn't hell bent on using their products, I would have tossed it out the door, but some things I don't have contr

RE: another OWA question....

A.very wise oh exchange master! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: another OWA question Epoch? C

RE: Computer Associates

Three years ago when I started my current job the company used nothing but CA products, Innoculan, Arcserve etc... Everyone was complaining that they sould not get anything to work. I had not really ran into to anything that I was not able to get to work so I thought that this presented a tremendo

RE: Computer Associates

Well that about makes up my mind, I know what products I will Never use. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Computer Associates Three years ago when I started my current job the

RE: Computer Associates

if you go to the offices of my previous employer, go up the stairs to the server room, you will see a hole in the door. this hole was made with a fist, the fist of the managing director. the fist was used when this particular managing director discovered that his exchange mailbox, containing a

RE: Computer Associates

Of course if their one tech support person participates in this forum, there will be no one to answer the phone! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Computer Associates CA c

RE: Computer Associates

I disagree with the majority. I have had great results with CA products, especially Arcserve Exchange Agent. Tech Support has been a blessing in disguise. They have walked me through any problems that I have had. I would rate them among the best I've worked with. One more thing, I am a big fa

RE: Computer Associates

YEAH!! -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Computer Associates if you go to the offices of my previous employer, go up the stairs to the server room, you will

Re: Computer Associates

TMI TMI -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Denis Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, Nov

RE: Computer Associates

God this thread is hilarious -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Computer Associates YEAH!! -Original Message- From: Atkinson, D

RE: Computer Associates

At the risk of being jumped on, I will make the following comments. I used ArcServe for years with NOVELL and CCMail and it worked great then. We never lost a file or mailbox that we couldn't get restored. The Technical Support was always good and helpful. It has been a few years now since I had

RE: Computer Associates

> CA contacted me, concerned about posts I've made regarding > their products. In the past it has not been their policy to > participate in these forums because vendors aren't always > treated very well. They are reconsidering this policy. Trend and Sybari are treated very well here because

RE: Computer Associates

I bet you can hold CA liable for fixing the door! Bob -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Computer Associates God this thread is hilarious -Original Message- From: [

RE: Computer Associates

It was Cheyenne back then and it did work well. Hasn't worked well since CA took it over. Typical for any product CA has bought... -Original Message- From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Computer

View all Private Meetings of other users...

Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6a Outlook 2000 When reviewer permissions are set on a calendar, you can't open a private appointment directly but you can view appointments marked private by navigating up or down using the arrows for previous/next meetings. Is this a feature? Example: User A uses 'F

Unusual error in Exchange

Hi all I recently upgraded my PDC to a Windows 2000 DC (W2K, SP2, Ex 5.5, SP4). There is a BDC in the same domain running NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5 (NT 4.0, SP6a, Ex 5.5, Sp4). If I go to the W2K\Ex 5.5 machine to use Exchange Administrator, I can see everyone from both machines. If I click on th

RE: Computer Associates

Answer the phone? Why would they do that? Try e-mailing them via their website like I did 2 weeks ago... NO RESPONSE! Too bad someone else made the decision to buy InoculateIT here. I'd love to change, their Exchange option is a joke, nothing but problems with it.. stops allowing me to log int

RE: View all Private Meetings of other users...

Hum... Just tested that same setup here, and I get "Can't open previous item." I also tested it going the other way. "Can't open next item." Must be something about your setup that is not right some where. Exchange 5.5 Sp4 W2K Sp2 Outlook 2000. -Original Message- From: Black, Natha

RE: Computer Associates

I actually know a very smart guy who is somehow a support engineer for CA. He's quite open about not knowing a single freaking thing about 95% of the products he supports. He knows a lot about the one piece of software (CA acquired it from his original employer) for which he was originally traine

OT: Email Address Collection

I got this email today. It looks like a email address scavenging service where they finger/brute force the mail server getting to see if they get responses to requests for email addresses. Has anyone heard of this before? I would assume this is something that administrators would frown on grea

Losing Permission to your own Exchange Mailbox

Some Windows 95B clients running Outlook 2000 connecting to our Exchange 2000 server apparently lose permissions to their own Exchange mailbox after viewing another user's shared mailbox (Calendar, Contacts, etc.). When the user right-clicks on their Mailbox in the Folder View and selects Properti

RE: Exchange and Proxies and ISP's

Thanks Ed, Of course now I have other questions You think it helps to point the MX record at the ISP's machine and then to our proxy or directly at our proxy and let it translate to the Exchange Server. Or does it really not matter as long as the mail is being delivered. Secondly...Is it a

RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

Does the account you are logged on with have a mailbox itself? This is necessary to administer PFs. mark -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 November 2001 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Mana

RE: Computer Associates

Pass the Windex please, I now have to clean soda and snot of my monitor from laughing. >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:53 AM >>>To: Exchange Discussions >>>Subject: RE: Computer Associates >>> >>> >>>ahahaa

RE: Computer Associates

Sorry, it's not recommend to use Windex on a computer monitor. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Computer

Re: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

Just rename the org. too *.org or something. You can always go back. - Original Message - From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:38 AM Subject: RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager >

RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

I am using my username and pass to log onto the machine and I have an account on the exchange server. I dont have to myself in any "Exchange Admin" group or anything do I, even tho I think I did. Also, what would cause that error in OWA when I view my folders? I cant find that number anywhe

RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

Rename the org? Where do I do this at? I am a bit of a newbie as this is my first Exchange box I have setup. How would this resolve the problem? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discus

OWA Email Format

How do I change the format of the email that is sent out using OWA? I have exchange set to only send email in plain text, but when using OWA they are not plain text. Thanks, Mike â²Úh²Ø§€P†Ûiÿü0ÂÌ"Ç(›úÞ²‹«qïÞÅÈ_j¨m˜ ܆+Þ²m§ÿðÃ0Êy¢oìŠ×¬yªÜ‡ûj·!jÊS¢éì¹»®&ޙ¨¥¶‰^j÷žÅÈZž¥²Ì2žG(˜L\…

RE: Computer Associates

I'm famous...I'm quoted at least 5 times in this message. This week alone is enough to stop using arcserve. Sunday - server 1-2 backup server 3 fails Mon. -server 1-2 backup, server 3 fails again, different errors though tues - server 2-3 backup 1 fails Wednesday - server 1-3 backup 2 fails Thu

RE: www.slipstick.com/

i wouldn't have stood up, either. i don't do command performances for total strangers. and i'm a spooky chick. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ nor me... al

RE: www.slipstick.com/

Can you stand up now Kim? I'm waving my hands!!! Look!! Can you see me? -Original Message- From: Kim Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/ i wouldn't have stood up, either. i don't do comman

RE: www.slipstick.com/

I bet you aren't as spookie as me. What's spookier than a short, round, white dude with jet black hair, a beanie and a a Slackware Linux CD ? :) Denis Denis A. Baldwin Network Administrator, CAE. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: OWA Email Format

Dude change your font, it seems to be messing up my mailbox rules! -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Email Format How do I change the format of the email that is sent out usin

RE: www.slipstick.com/

..yes you DID, shelly. ..grrowwwll... Hey! Is that Gary from Thrirysomething with you? Gary can I have yer autogr.. husband?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: www.slipsti

RE: OWA Email Format

I'm having major deja-vu with this -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Carlson Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Email Format How do I change the format of the email that is sent out using

Re: OWA Email Format

What version? of OWA - Original Message - From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:33 PM Subject: OWA Email Format > How do I change the format of the email that is sent out using OWA? I > have exchange set

Re: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

rename the original dll file name to *.something - Original Message - From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:31 PM Subject: RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager > Rename the org? Wher

Migrating Netscape Mail to Exchange

Hi all, We are in the process of planning the migration to Exchange 5.5 from Netscape Mail 4.7. I'm wondering what processes there might be to getting their old mail onto the Exchange server, besides getting it into Outlook Express and then importing that into Outlook 2002. We know we can add the

RE: OWA Email Format

Exchange 2k. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: OWA Email Format What version? of OWA - Original Messa

Log files in c:\exchsrvr\mdbdata

I am running ES5.5 SP4 on NT4.0 SP6. As a result of some problems we had been having over the last week or so I had increased the ES logging levels. The problems have now been resolved and I have reverted to standard logging levels, but I still appear to be getting log files created every minute

RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

OK. That makes more sense. I thought you meant rename my organization in Exchange. I was all worried. I have thought of that, just havent gotten there yet. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 1:00 PM To: E

RE: View all Private Meetings of other users...

Anybody try it on an NT 4.0 server? Not much to mess with setting reviewer permissions... > -Original Message- > From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: View all Private Meetings of other users

Re: Log files in c:\exchsrvr\mdbdata

Look at all the logging levels. Sounds like you missed one. - Original Message - From: "David Lefebvre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:04 AM Subject: Log files in c:\exchsrvr\mdbdata > > I am running ES5.5 SP4 on NT4.

Re: Migrating Netscape Mail to Exchange

- Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony G AG:EX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:07 PM Subject: Migrating Netscape Mail to Exchange > Hi all, > > We are in the process of planning the migration to Exchange 5.5 from > N

Re: Migrating Netscape Mail to Exchange

Where does their mail reside. On the server or on their desktops e.i. pst's? - Original Message - From: "Woods, Tony G AG:EX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:07 PM Subject: Migrating Netscape Mail to Exchange > Hi all,

RE: Computer Associates

They probably wonder why "vendors aren't always treated well"! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Se

RE: Computer Associates

"Better software by design." They neglect to add, "But fvcked up by acquisition." Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Computer Associates It was Cheye

RE: Exchange and Proxies and ISP's

One advantage of putting an SMTP server at your ISP's site might be that it would queue the mail should your link be down. It shouldn't really matter, though, because sending hosts will retry for a while themselves if they can't contact your SMTP server. If you use the IIS SMTP Service on a Prox

RE: Internet Explorer

It seems we're his lab. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 7:32 AM To: E

RE: Migrating Netscape Mail to Exchange

Both on their machines and on the server. It's a real mixed bag here. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Migrating Netscape Mail to Exchange Where does their mail reside. On the

RE: Exchange and Proxies and ISP's

Ed Thanks Dave -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Proxies and ISP's One advantage of putting an SMTP server at your ISP's site might be that it would queue the mail

RE: www.slipstick.com/

LOL! ps. only one L -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggercam: - I'm not offended by all the dumb blonde jokes because

FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and acti on taken.

LOL!!! Must be because of the "dumb blonde" in my sig!!! LOL!!! -Michèle Immigration site: Our new 2001 Miata: Tiggercam: - "You can le

POP3/IMAP

Can I turn off POP3 and IMAP services? These are not used so I figured I could free some resources. Thanks, Mike .+-¦‹-Šx
m¶ŸÿÃ,Â)Ür‰¿­ë(º·ýì\…öª†Ù€­Èb½ë!¶Úÿ0³ §‘Ê&þÈ­zǚ­È±æ«r¬¥:.žË›±Êâm隊[h•æ¯yì\…©àz[,Ã)är‰„ÅÈZž‹ŠËZvh§–+-iÙ¢žÌ2žG(

RE: POP3/IMAP

Yes, you may... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3/IMAP Can I turn off POP3 and IMAP services? These are not used so I figured I could free some resources. Thanks, Mike .+--x

RE: POP3/IMAP

That would be prudent. William -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3/IMAP Can I turn off POP3 and IMAP services? These are not used so I figured I could free some resources. Tha

Re: POP3/IMAP

Yes they can be turned off I suggest disabling the protocols :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Mike Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exc

Can not download entire GAL

Have a single organization with 3 sites - 3 domains, 4 servers. Everything is 5.5 sp3 or sp4 on NT 4.0 SP6, Outlook 2K clients. I have a user that logs into one of the domains both locally and from another site across the WAN. Regardless of how or where he is connected he can only download the

RE: POP3/IMAP

OK, I need to remember to fully pose my entire questions and not rely on assumptions. I can turn of POP3 and IMAP. Great. Now, HOW do I turn these off? My newbieness is shining through at the moment. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip

Mapi Clinet for win2000

Hello. I think it would be relevant to post my tests with Q254458: It doesn't support y2k. It required restart to start working. It supports only PST,MS mail and PAB. And of course, it isn't supported by MS. Thanks. _ List postin

  1   2   >