Re: Re:mailbox size limits

RFC-821/2821 Something you'll pick up as you read the above: during a conversation all error messages come from the server, not the client (client is the machine that opened the connection). Your SMTP daemon may insert it's own name when reporting back, but the error message is always from the ot

Agent Tab missing onf PF

Any idea why the "Agent" tab could suddenly be somewhat missing from the properties of newly created PF ? Exactly, talking about a bunch of subfolders of a particular folder, - The service account and two admin accounts (one with service account permissions, the other one is a View only admin on

OWA Access

Hi, Anyone know of a way to globally disable OWA access for Ex2K users. Deleting the user is not really an option :) I don't relish the prospect of going into Protocol Settings on every mailbox and disabling the HTTP right for every user. Is there a quicker way ? Regards Mylo __

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

OK, Steve you deserve the geek of the week for the "Stop Yelling" comment. Come on dude. I expect a bit more from this list than to stoop that low. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

A new version of NAV-GW, or a new definition file? Using NAV-GW 2.5.1.18 here. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:31 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: WORM_KLEZ.G Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If you'

RE: performance monitoring

Is that 1027 reported in the 5.5 tracking log, or E2k log? I can't find it in my 5.5 logs and Q173364 doesn't mention it. Hunter -Original Message- From: IRELAND,MIKE (HP-Corvallis,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: R

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

If I am reading this article correctly, then it will have a random extension if it is a earlier variation of KLEZ. This particular version has either .exe or a double extension. Please correct me if I'm wrong. http://www.viruslist.com/eng/viruslist.html?id=4292 Jessica -Original Message

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

A new version of the GW; you might be alright, but I'm at .13, and the tech is e-mailing me link to the updated version. What's really funny is I just got new CD's the other day and they have the same version. Have you been stopping it? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Of course you do! -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G If you're using NAV for Gateways to do the blocking, it doesn't recognize the attachments; they have a new ver

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Besides, it wasn't his fault. It's part of the payload of the virus. It sets caps lock on and then disables the caps and shift keys on the keyboard. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Of course THEY do ;-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Of course you do! -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

I believe I went from .13 to .18 with an earlier virus that rolled its own non-RFC smtp engine, and was slipping attachments through. I haven't seen the virus yet. Let me know the minor version number when you d/l it - I check with them every month or so because I have a standing issue with the

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Tom, The new version is 2.5.2.9 (for NT) -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G A new version of the GW; you might be alright, but I'm at .13, and the tech is e-mail

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Just thought I'd pass on some info to him that wasn't already in the FAQ. Duly noted. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Besides, it wasn't his fault. It's part o

RE: performance monitoring

It is reported in the E2K logs. See Q246959 for E2K tracking log event descriptions. -Mike -Original Message- From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: performance monitoring Is that 1027 reported in

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

I've seen some klez-g messages with bat and scr attachments. Of course there may be disagreement on exactly what constitutes the G variant. -Peter -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subjec

RE: OWA Access

have you looked at disabling/locking/changing the virtual directory via IIS? I haven't tried it myself, but I'm guessing that if you went into a lab environment and tweaked the default website\exchange folder, you could universally disable OWA without needing to manage individual users. -Ori

RE: OWA Access

Can't you just go in to the ESM, and under the servers/protocols/http/ and disable the Exchange Virtual Server? Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:51 AM Posted To: DiscussionGroup C

RE: Information store comes up with dr watson if mail address is wrong

http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch55/SP/4/NT45/EN-US/SP4_550I.E XE -Original Message- From: sabby kassim-momodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:33 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Information store comes up with dr watson if ma

RE: performance monitoring

thanks for the headstart! best, heather -Original Message- From: IRELAND,MIKE (HP-Corvallis,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: performance monitoring Heather, All of this data (and more) is stored in the track

RE: OWA 2000 issues

SP3 is due out in about a month -Original Message- From: Romeo, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:43 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: OWA 2000 issues Subject: OWA 2000 issues I know that this may have been covered before but I w

RE: MSX5.5 and dir.edb

AuthRest will let you set a "master directory"... Good luck However, by the time you get this, old stuff will have probably started getting corrected by the highest USN -Original Message- From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:21 AM Posted T

RE: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E 2K)

The code to handle the Dynamic Distribution Lists that you want was actually partially implemented in E2k. RTM and SP1 E2k could handle DDLs, although there isn't a GUI to do it. SP2 broke the partial implementation, however, SP3 will fully implement the code to handle DDLs. (DDLs are Distribut

RE: Exch2k IIS

How can mail continue to work and not be able to send? Do you mean that mail can be accessed but you have no internal or external mail flow? Or do you mean that internal mail works but you do not have outbound external mail? And you seem to indicate that you can still receive mail? -Original

RE: Sharing a custom folder under mailbox

Set up a rule to forward the data to a public folder Give them access to the public folder -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:22 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Sharing a custom folder under mail

RE: Pulling a email out of the DB?

You can train a monkey to use ExMerge in less than 5 minutes. The document that comes with it is very detailed and thorough. Although the doc contains much information that 95% of ExMerge users will never use, you can easily just look for the pictures in the document and read those 10 or so page

Delivery restrictions - use an external address?

Hi there - is there a way to use an email address that is not in the GAL as an option in the "delivery restrictions" tab in the mailbox properties? D _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: OWA "Unknown Error"

Title: Message The -2147467259 (aka 80004005) is a MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED which, in E2k, often translate to an access denied.  I saw a similiar issue before, but it was a FE/BE configuration and the problem was one of the hotfixes installed on one of the servers.  Unfortunately, I can't recall r

RE: Exch2k IIS

What I mean is that you can access mail since the stores are still mounted. You can't however send or receive. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch2k IIS How can mail conti

Migrating

I have one NT4 domain with 100 users. I am using Exchage 5.5 SP4 I want to move to Windows 2000. Can anyone suggest the best methode for going to Exchange 2000. I am pretty sure from doing some reasearch that it would be to setup a seperate Exchange 2000 server and migrate mailboxes to this new s

RE: NewsGroups / Bulletin Boards

Public folder, SharePoint Portal server, or just go with SharePoint Team Services to do it since you probably won't need enough to justify a full blown SPP server -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:44 AM Posted To:

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

how do you stop it from opening windows media player even if i am blocking scr exe pif bat vbs js and com. I am using scanmail for exchange verson 3.52 -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subje

Re: Migrating

hire a consultant after you look at FAQ's below - Original Message - From: "Trecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:09 PM Subject: Migrating > I have one NT4 domain with 100 users. I am using Exchage 5.5 SP4 > I want t

RE: performance monitoring

Are the clients also throwing an event 4 on the same message IDs that are reporting the 1027s? Hunter -Original Message- From: IRELAND,MIKE (HP-Corvallis,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: performance monitoring

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

I'm afraid you've gone and mystified me. If you're blocking all those filetypes, how can Klez get through to open Windows Media Player? -Peter -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

I've seen that happen here too. We block the files and antigen catches it but the media player/real player does start. Nothing bad happens after that which is a good thing. Sandhya -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:40 PM

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

I dont know if I anyone is infected or not we just keep receiving a ton of emails with viruses in them. -Original Message- From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I've seen that happen here

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Dont you get paid to find out if anyone is infected or not? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G I dont know if I anyone is infected or not we just keep receiving a

RE: performance monitoring

A 4 event would occur in the Exchange 5.5 logs only if the message originator was on Exchange 5.5. The issue I am dealing with is programmatically identifying which 1027 events are actual message submissions and which are MTA routing of mail from the 5.5 environment. In a pure 5.5 environment, w

Re: Information store comes up with dr watson if mail address is wrong

"I want to know how to install SP4."?? Oh, man. If there are any hiring managers reading, I'm available and I don't ask questions like this. - Original Message - From: "Stephen Mynhier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 1

RE: Migrating

You can find every bit of information you need at www.microsoft.com/exchange. Do yourself a favor and try things out in your test lab first. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subje

RE: Delivery restrictions - use an external address?

Yes and No. No you can't use something that's not in the GAL. Yes, you can use an Internet address in there, but you need to create a Custom Recipient for that Internet address. At that point that foreign entry would be in your GAL, so you would be able to use in the delivery restrictions. Wha

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Why you no answer my question?? Quack! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Dont you get paid to find out if anyone is infected or not? -Original Message- From

Moving NT4.0 Dns to Win2k Server before upgrading to Win2k....

In doing my research on how to do this I've come across two methods of doing this and having tested one method I was wondering if there are other methods? The method I tested was a combination of Mark Minasi Dns Disaster Recovery that he published in the Windows NT Magazine Dated November 2000 and

Exchange 5.0 issue

Yes, I have a GOOD one. It turns out that a new scientist that has started at my company brought his old contacts over as an .edb file instead of the usual .ost/pst file. (He had his own server that was his to play with, etc.) The issue that I am having is how to recover his contact information f

Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

Where do I go to setup the internet connection (ie. like in Ex5.5) in Exchange 2000? Realize there not the same, but, using Ex.5.5 as an example.. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

Does no-one read books these days? I tell you - it's all Microsoft's fault. They make their stuff so easy to install that the moment an option does not JUMP at them - they're lost. I am half expecting the next question to be "I installed E2K - but that little cool 'clip guy' does not show up

RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

YES, RTM is not the option. BMA is the correct option for your reply. -Original Message- From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K Does no-one rea

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Ah, so the virus file is gone but the incorrect MIME header exploit remains. I haven't seen that here, but I can see how it would occur. In our setup the only place Antigen does file filtering is in the realtime scan, not in the internet scan. That way, the only thing going on in the Internet s

RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

hey when I "Installed my TS W2k" and loaded "MS Office 2K" using the tsm Where is the clip guy? he's not there and its tell me about not being available ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Dis

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

Thats the virus softwares job we pay him good money to do this. He told me that no one is infected. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: WORM_KLEZ.G Why you no answer my quest

Re: Exchange 5.0 issue

An EDB file? You'd have to do a full disaster recovery on it on a clean server matching the original org/site names and server name. If he was running his own server let him deal with it and deliver a PST to you. - Original Message - From: "Mark Chandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchang

RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

First of a two-part q-article. I believe it's also in the Exchange 2000 FAQ, which you can find at the bottom of this (and every) post. I suggest printing the PDF version of it. -tom -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17,

RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

Oops, forgot the link, didn't I? Just as well, since by now you'll have found it in the FAQ. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q266686 -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:30 PM Posted To: MSExchange

Re: Exchange 5.0 issue

That's the problem. His old server is no longer there... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: Exchange 5.0 issue

I was going to say that. Obviously Mr. Scientist didn't have clue... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.0 issue If he was running his own server let him deal with

RE: Setting up your internet connect for outgoing mail E2K

It is all set up once it is installed. DNS must be setup with Host and MX records for inbound mail to work, but outbound mail will work without doing anything else. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EM

RE: Pulling a email out of the DB?

Ok, I'll remember that for future 1d10t errors. Thanks. e- -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? You can train a monkey to use Ex

RAID 5 setup

Hey, I'm setting up RAID 5 on an upgraded Exchange 5.5 server, my question is this do I install Exchange before I setup RAID 5 or do I do it after the install, also I will be migrating data, do I need to do the migration before RAID 5 setup or after, may be a newbie question to some but I appreci

RE: RAID 5 setup

1. Hardware setup (this includes RAID) 2. Install OS (in this case, let's assume Windows NT or Windows 2000 Server) 3. Install Application (in this case, let's assume Exchange 5.5) I think I'm not understanding your question. How would you install either your OS or your Exchange Server softw

RE: RAID 5 setup

I always thought you had to have the raid five set up before you install the operating system. Not sure however so don't listen to me. -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RAID 5 setup Hey

RE: RAID 5 setup

I wonder if he means it's going to be a software raid? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brett Wesoloski Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RAID 5 setup I always thought you had to have th

RE: RAID 5 setup

You can set up RAID in software after NT has been setup. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail discla

RE: RAID 5 setup

Yeah. So in that case install NT, set up your RAID, then install Exchange. Been a long time since I've done 5.5, doesn't it ask you during install where you want your databases & logs? Easiest to have the RAID set up first. -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: RAID 5 setup

How do you guy's feel about software NT software RAID? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaim

RE: RAID 5 setup

We use it on our most important clusters. -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RAID 5 setup How do you guy's feel about software NT software RAID? Mario Fernandez Network Adm

RE: Public Folders

Actually, they wrote a lot of this stuff: http://www3.ca.com/Solutions/ProductsAZ.asp They also ammended a lot of code purchased from other software producers. Lest we forget: www.clarksupport.com/whynotca.htm William -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: RAID 5 setup

I prefer hardware RAID, but software RAID gets the job done if that's all you've got. Depending upon the server and the application you may or may not notice any tangible performance hit from it. We have a document server with software RAID1 - it does fine because it's just a dedicated file serv

RE: RAID 5 setup

Sucks...It's worth it to buy the hardware -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RAID 5 setup How do you guy's feel about software NT soft

Re: Exchange 5.0 issue

Then he'll need a machine running at least NT4 and Exchange installed on it with the same SP. The rest is outlined in the DR paper. - Original Message - From: "Mark Chandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:37 PM Subject

RE: RAID 5 setup

Touché (hope I've spelt that right !). All my servers are built on a RAID1 (mirrored pair) for the OS and APPs with a RAID5 setup of at least three disks for the data ... ideal if money isn't a problem ! Tim :-Original Message- :From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] :Sen

RE: Deleting mailboxes in Exchange 2000

IF it doesn't have the red x, than right click the mailbox and run the cleanup agent. If the mailbox in question is no longer attached to a user than the red x will appear, then you can purge it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobso

RE: RAID 5 setup

Sounds like Hardware RAID 5 is the way to go for Exchange then, that's what I will use. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubs

RE: RAID 5 setup

Without a doubt! http://www.boostsystems.com/files/HW_SW%20RAID.PDF http://www.zzyzx.com/products/whitepapers/pdf/hard_vs_soft_raid.pdf http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xb4e235067c18d6118ff40090279 cd0f9,00.html -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: RAID 5 setup

If money is an issue, buy a server with an integrated RAID controller. Performance may not be the same as a RAID controller with huge cache, but you still get the advantage of hot swap, and no OS overhead. -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April

RE: RAID 5 setup

Hey thanks for the links, do you have any info on setup for the two harware and software RAID 5 that you could give me? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com

RE: RAID 5 setup

Peanut or Caramel? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 6:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RAID 5 setup We use it on our most important clusters. -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAI

RE: RAID 5 setup

Ha! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: WORM_KLEZ.G

You refer to your virus software as "him" and you think that "he" talks to you? Now take your Magic 8-Ball and shake it up again and let's see what is tells us. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:01 PM Posted To: Exc

RE: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E 2K)

That is good information and something I did not know about before - but I am looking to actually populate DL's with recipients based upon a LDAP query instead of having a user send an LDAP query to send to. Here is what I found: Dynamic Distribution List - A collection

RE: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E 2K)

You create the LDAP query for the DDL -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: RBDL/Auto DL population based upon directory properties (in E 2K) Subject: RE: RBDL/Auto

RE: Exchange 5.0 issue

Restore the server, replace the PRIV, issue a new GUID, then do an IS/DS consistancy adjustment to build the directory up so you can get to the mailbox. Log on and your done. -Original Message- From: Mark Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 3:37 PM To: Exc

Can Exchange do this?

Can you configure an internet connector and a routing group connector to to route messages to the internet and to other routing groups if either of the other links fail? I have listed in more detail the three situations we want to cover. I would really appreciate any help or reference (Technet

Which server in E2k typically performs this role?

Which server in E2k is listed as being responsible for the Default Offline Address list? Is it a specific FSMO server at the root of the domain? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archi

mail stuck in a strange way

Brothers and sisters, 2 notebook users (VIP) have the next problem: When they work offline and send a message, the message goes to outbox.When they are online and sychronised it,the message wordt delivered but still exist in outbox.( Not italic letter type)There is also a copy in sent items.

RE: mail stuck in a strange way

This is not a good answer, but you really should consider Outlook2000. William -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mail stuck in a strange way Brothers and sisters, 2 notebook user

xcng routing in detail

Hi, at present I have the following network layout: Internet - gateway - mailserver1 - frame relay - distant mailserver2 All inbound emails go through the gateway to mailserver1, which sends them over to mailserver2 (connected via IMS). Outbound emails are being send directly by mailserver2. now t