I have users that look at 2 mailboxes. They have ol set up to display a
message when new mail arrives however, this does not work on the secondary
mailbox ??? I guess this is the way it is supposed to work but does anyone
know how to make it work on both NT4 Sp6a, Ex 5.5 SP4, OL97
Coolchai
Ouch.. what a mess..
Check through your event logs... the symptoms you are describing suggest an underlying
problem, e.g. DNS... the enviable situation you're in, I suspect, is a byproduct of
that (machine account/kerberos/security problems etc), together with some new ones you
may have introd
I am in Amsterdam Holland
Maarten
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
I think Italy...
England messed up their chances over the weekend...
Stu
ExPat Brit
-Or
Stuur drop asb!...:-)
Sander - Kaapstad
-Original Message-
From: Willigen, Maarten van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 12:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
I am in Amsterdam Holland
Maarten
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:
...but for some reason the controllers and external arrays seem to work
much better when used with servers other than those manufactured by IBM.
As long as you don't use RAID configurations with an "e" after the
number, that is.
All the best,
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Peo
I've seen this problem occur if users reply to mail addresses that are no longer valid
AD objects...
For example
User: JSmith has Delivery Options enabled to point to a AD Contact for his
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox.
Let's say JSmith changes his mail to yahoo.com and the original Windows Contact
It's a sick situation to be in, but it can be done. We've successfully
restored E2K using Arcserve 2000 in a cluster environment using the
agent. The agent is installed on exchange and arcserve is on a separate
domain controller.
Tara Stephens
Messaging Administrator
Carters
770.233.2392
[EMA
Monday and Tuesday were holidays for us over here in the UK to celebrate the
Queen's Golden Jubilee
I was helping to build and light a beacon near our village on top of the
local hill which is also the site of an old Roman (& pre-Roman) Hillfort
chosen for it's good views across Somerset (South-W
www.exchangeadmin.com : subscribe today.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Distribution List
>
>
> Hi people,
>
> I have just created a Contact Folder inside a Public Folder
>
Sure. What's your budget?
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:57 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Outlook 97 Notification
>
>
> I have users that look at 2 mailboxes. They have ol set up to
> display a message w
Umm this could get to be problematic...but
Have the second e-mail a notification to the first
bill
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 97 Notification
I have users that look at 2
Boy this list is educational.
Now I know that "authorise" is a British variant of AUTHORIZE.
Very cool.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Sure. What's yo
Budget ??? Cant it be done for free ?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 June 2002 14:34
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
>
> Sure. What's your budget?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Darren A
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Out CEO wants us to add some HTML to the top of all outbound messages. It is
a graphic with a hotlink to our website. 10K total size.
Can I configure this from the server?
Thanks!
_
List posting FAQ: http:/
Egad. Why?
- Original Message -
From: "Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:01 AM
Subject: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Out CEO wants us to add some HTML to the top of all outbound mess
Authorise..also is use in Ireland as an effective way of communicating the concept
of authorisation.as in we are all authorised to go out to the pub tonight and get
flootered to celebrate not being trashed by Germany :)
E.
-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAI
as if we need authorisation for that
:)
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 15:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Authorise..also is use in Ireland as an effective way of communicating
the concept of
Never tried it but if you put the link in a disclaimer it might work. Other
than that it sounds like some rewriting of code or a 3rd party add-on.
- Original Message -
From: "Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:01 AM
S
Phil, I would urge your CEO to think twice about this. There are a few
reasons.
A) Many folks don't want HTML email.
B) A 10K graphic just eats up space, makes downloading of email slow, and
generally is useless to anyone but the sender. It's a cute trick, but that's
it. It adds NOTHING of value.
Are there free ways to workaround the problem as described? Sure. However to
solve the problem as described, requires either developer hours (in house or
other) or the purchase of a 3rd party product.
I don't bother with kludge workarounds when a proper solution exists, hence
the question as to y
Surely 'authorize' is the variant and the true English spelling is
'authorise'
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Boy this list is educational.
Now
Come to think of it. 10K add-on per message. Boy that could get ugly.
- Original Message -
From: "missy koslosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?
> Egad.
Cool! So all your posts to the list will now be bounced. I guess when we
stop hearing from you, we'll know you figured it out.
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:01 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Adding some HTML to a
Is it pronounced the same? like tomato, process, schedule etc.
- Original Message -
From: "Ward, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:19 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
> Surely 'authorize' is the variant an
we appear to be moving away from the original question here !
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 June 2002 03:23
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Outlook 97 Notification
>
> Is it pronounced the same? like tomato, process, schedul
Darren,
We have a couple of users that are using MAPInotify: Shadow of Power!
Amazingly enough, I found it at www.slipstick.com.
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 97 Not
Slipstick has answers to Outlook questions? Get outta town! Somebody oughta
to add that place to the FAQ.
> -Original Message-
> Amazingly enough, I found it at www.slipstick.com.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.c
Maybe... CDOLIVE.COM too
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Slipstick has answers to Outlook questions? Get outta town! Somebody oughta
to add that place
Not according to Webster Dictionary
"One entry found for authorise.
British variant of AUTHORIZE"
As opposed to "authorize" - which does not refer to "authorise" at all.
Must be some sort of British slang or something :=)
Jerzy
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL P
We use Optus's Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector with Exchange 2000. We had
previously used the same company's fax connector with Exchange 5.5 with great success.
After we upgraded to Exchange 2000, we installed the new Facsys software and sent some
test e-mails to fax numbers and it work
Who knew?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Slipstick has answers to Outlook questions? Get outta town! Somebody oughta
to add that place to the FAQ.
> -
Not to mention that some of the net nazi black hole lists will add your
domain because they hate HTML so much.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Adding some HTML to all outbo
I wonder what the 'Oxford English Dictionary' might say...
-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Not according to Webster Dictionary
"One entry found for
Is the mail flowing between the two sites OK. What did Optus say?
- Original Message -
From: "Arch Willingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:39 AM
Subject: Facsys 2000 Fax/Exchange 2000 connector has died with weird
m
And we know Webster is an authority on the use of English :-P
-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 16:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Not according to Webster Dictionary
"One entry found for authorise.
We had one here at Brooklands, Weybridge UK
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Monday and Tuesday were holidays for us over here in the UK to celebrate the
Queen
Yeah, but here's the kicker, you would have to get people to actually READ
the FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Slipstick has answers to Outlook
Because here was no standardized spelling until after the settlement of
the Americas, and because standardization developed separately, neither
side of the pond can claim their spelling is "correct" or the other
side's is wrong. It's just different.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consu
Was watching on TV both the pop concert and carnival on Tuesday, wish I had
been one of the million in London, would have been one huge atmosphere.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 15:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is
> Out CEO wants us to add some HTML to the top of all outbound
> messages. It is a graphic with a hotlink to our website. 10K
> total size.
How about telling them that the in-flight magazine was wrong, and it
can't be done cheaply? It may be the future, but the future will upset
a lot of peopl
That should be, "Because there...", if anyone cares.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:57 AM
To: 'Exchange D
Of course Ed.. this is a caring forum :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 17:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
That should be, "Because there...", if anyone cares.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech
Thank you for the detailed reply. As far as I can see there are some good hints in it.
I will go through it tonight and post my experiences later.
Regards
Elmer
> -Original Message-
> From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:29 AM
> To: Exchan
Andy sez...
>I remember seeing evidence somewhere that people are more likely to
>click on a link positioned at the bottom of a mail, because that is
>where they end up after they've read it. Even a CEO should understand
>that logic?
Maybe a faq link should be put at the bottom of all list p
Yeah...the mail is flowing fine between sites. You can't really ask Optus
anymore...you have to buy a support incident from their tech support provider. It
seemed like it was something I did and not them due to the weird routing message.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMA
I would hope they are - that's a major limitation if they aren't
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Narkinsky, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Mon
You're new here, aren't you?
Slipstick is a good answer. Aternatively, if you felt like it you could whip
up a POP3 notifier, even something like xfaces to scan the second box.
I thought I remembered a Java implementation:
http://gate.cruzio.com/~jthomas/mailfaces/
--
be - MOS
Competitive fu
This is from www.Eventid.net
We have seen this message when an Exchange custom recipient is deleted and
someone tries to send an email to that account BEFORE the global address
list is recreated. However there are other potential reasons for this
message to occur. See the articles below for more
Arcserve has issues? Imagine that!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of kanee
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:46 PM
To: Excha
I was told that there might be a way to keep the CTRL-ALT-DEL and/or
task manager from canceling an .exe or .bat file.
Does anyone know where I can find a way to do this with Windows 2000
server/workstation and Windows XP.
Thanks,
Chuck
__
Yes we can claim your spelling is wrong. It's our language and you lot don't
talk it right or spell proper.
Come on, you even think we're playing the 'soccer' world cup right now.
dan.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:57
I had a problem similar to this. Use something like ASDI and look at the
users Target Address attribute. It might have something in it. Not sure
how it gets there, but that is what happened to me. Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: W
From TechNet "disable Task Manager" search
- To disable the TASK MANAGER button, create the following value in the
registry:
NOTE: The System key may need to be created.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion
\Policies\System\
DisableTask
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes;
> Maybe a faq link should be put at the bottom of all list
> posts instead of...Huh?...what's that?...Oh, I see... Never
> mind then...
... Aha! but then it has to slip in between the most recent post and all
the other long posts alluding to, but not actually saying,
Fortres 101 Version 4.1
http://www.fortres.com/
Mike
--- Charles Carerros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was told that there might be a way to keep the CTRL-ALT-DEL and/or
> task manager from canceling an .exe or .bat file.
>
> Does anyone know where I can find a way to do this with Windows 2
I'd bet the same people who say not to do exactly what you are doing are
VERY comfortable with esetuil and isinteg.
That's precisely why they say *not* to do it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta,
He's just jealous.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Yes we can claim your spelling is wrong. It's our language and you lot don't
talk it right or s
Translation for the reading impared:
"Don't listen to me"
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
> -Original Message-
> From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, Jun
I love soccer. Especially when it's 0-0 in double overtime
- Original Message -
From: "Atkinson, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification
>
> Yes we can claim your spelling is w
Can anyone shead some light on how I might Import and export directly to a
users contacts? not via OL... Independent of the client being open.
Would like to be able to "dynamically" update/extract info in users
contacts...
Other than extract to PST, wipe, import
My guess is this is a heavy duty
We have a block of 20 remote users (all of whom are in one classroom), all
of whom are connecting through a LinkSys router to the Internet. Each
machine has an individual VPN tunnel to the corporate intranet, which has
an Exchange server. All other users of the Exchange server are perfectly
fine -
Actually, it's 'extra time', and football.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 05:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook 97 Notification
I love soccer. Especially when it's 0-0 in double overtime
- Original Message -
Fr
Very well done!
Paul
:)
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes;
> Maybe a faq link should be put at the bottom o
Can a kind soul point me to a place where I can get scancal.exe without the
help of PSS? Thanks.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended
for a specific individual a
Sure, I'll send it right over. If your AV software catches it as
BackOrifice, that's an error, ignore it and carry on about your business.
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subj
I think I might just start blocking messages with moronic disclaimers before
they even get to my system. I feel dumber just for having read the
disclaimer below.
> This message (including any attachments) contains
> confidential information intended for a specific individual
> and purpose, and
Unfortunately you can only get that from PSS and only if you're experiencing
a specific problem. AFAIK, that utility was not written as a
general-purpose tool but more for detecting a specific problem [1].
Serdar Soysal
[1] Don't ask me what that specific problem is. I don't know.
-Origi
I'm interested in hearing some sound arguments on why offline maintenance
should *not* be performed ... I've heard/read quite a few people cringing
about it, but can never back it up. I've been doing it for years without a
hitch; I think as long as the proper precautions are taken and proper
tren
Do think this was my design? Our lawyers think we need this. Like it
actually performs some kind of function.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: stupid disclaimers
I think I might
I'm taking action on your message. I'm taking action on it right now. Nyah
nyah nyah nyah nyah.
Tell your lawyers to get their $49.95 back from "J.D.'s 'R' Us."
--
be - MOS
Noone ever built a statue to a critic.
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
soccer.hmmm. is that the game where after 30 minutes only the
Goalies and Commentators have any energy left?
No wonder fans get so frustrated.
Jerzy
This message (including any attachments) does not contain any confidential
information or serves any purpose.
You are not the intended re
The real question, to my mind, is "why bother". There is no need to run
these utilities, and hasn't been since the introduction of online
maintenance, which gathers all of the white space in the database and
essentially moves that white space into the back of the database where
it can be overwrit
Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute "action"?
> -Original Message-
> From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
>
>
> I'm taking action on your message.
The printing does
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute "action"?
> -Original Message-
if it's a litmus test
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute "action"?
> -Original Message-
It performs a function... It states I'll be breaking the law if I act on
messages you send to the list. In fact I'm apparently breaking the law now
by clarifying why I'll no longer be acting on messages you send to the list.
So, sorry you'll no longer be the direct beneficiary of any my witty
dis
> Enterprise Domain Controllers (built-in group) should have
Is this something I schould worry about? The group does not exist in our domain. We do
have the domain controller group, but not Enterprise Domain Controller...
regards
Elmer
> -Original Message-
> From: Myles, Damian [mail
Alright, alright. There. Fortunately Mailsweeper allows you to bypass by
adding personalmail in the body somewhere. Are you happy?
Michael Woodruff
System Administrator
inChord Communications Inc.
A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility
614.543.6405
[EMA
That was a good one!!! I laughed for 5 minutes after reading that
one!!! :) I needed that today, thanks.
-Ryan
Does printing the message out and pissing on the paper constitute
"action"?
> -Original Message-
> From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2
Can't seem to get into the archives right now...
How do I go about restricting outbound email from a user to only particular
internal recipients?
I see how to stop the receipt of messages unless from specifics, but not how
to restrict outbound.
Thanks
__
The reasons why I don't do it are:
1. It's unnecessary.
2. I have a life.
3. Unnecessary downtime is frowned upon in a 24x7 shop.
4. I don't need to justify my existence by doing useless administrative
work.
It's like disassembling your car's axles and clean your shocks every weekend
as "schedul
create custom recipient and set restrictions on it
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4
Can't seem to get into the archives right now...
How do I go about r
I don't believe that achieves what I am after. I want to set up an internal
user to only be able to send email to a single internal distribution list.
-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subje
first there was a "restricting outbound email from a user"
now there is "an internal user" to "send email to a single internal
distribution list"
Make up your mind and re-state the question please.
Jerzy
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Anyone know a way to disable users from dragging & dropping items to a
public folder - I want them to be able to post to the folder, but not be
able to drag/drop items in it. Thanks!
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/r
I used Exclaimer and configured it to exclude mail to this list from
getting
our disclaimer.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:23 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: stupid disclaimers
>
>
> I think I might ju
lol. Whatever for?
> -Original Message-
> From: TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Public Folder - drag/drop
>
>
> Anyone know a way to disable users from dragging & dropping
> items to a public folder - I want
So you want them to be able to create new items in that folder but not be
able to create new items in it. I can see the challenge.
The only thing I can think of is to use a custom post form for that pf,
publish it in that pf and then restrict the pf to accept only that specific
form.
Serdar
It's the same question just clarified further...
To restate "I want to set up an internal user to only be able to send email
to a single internal distribution list."
-Original Message-
From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange
Seeing as the problem you're experiencing is most likely the direct result
of one of your offline database management practices, you might want to
change your thinking on it.
The only time I've ever seen a good reason to do them is following a large
scale change on a server - like migrating 30GB
In Exchange 5.5, when a SMTP message bound for a remote host gets queued
because the remote host is temporally down, the message would sit in the
IMC outbound queue as a file on disk usually in the exchsrvr\imcdata\out
directory.
This does not seem to be the case for Exchange 2000. Does anyone kno
Mongo like posting in drag.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder - drag/drop
Anyone know a way to disable users from dragging & dropping items to a
public folder - I
All,
Is there anyway to remove the Delegation wizard that comes along with
the install of Exchange 2000? Currently we have admins that think that
it's fun to add themselves as Full Admins on our site. Can I take care
of this somehow? And what privileges do you need to add yourself? I
can't th
"...unless your lawyers want to send me a singed and notarized waiver..."
So that means you want his lawyers to very briefly hold the waiver over an
open flame? Would you like that singed in the middle or around the edges?
;o)
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:
Just lightly toasted please. I hate it when the burn it. :)
"...unless your lawyers want to send me a singed and notarized
waiver..."
So that means you want his lawyers to very briefly hold the waiver over
an
open flame? Would you like that singed in the middle or around the
edges?
;o)
J
Delivery Restrictions...Reject messages from
You'd have to do this to every recipient, mailbox, or list that you don't
want this user to send to. Should be able to do this with a Directory
export/import using the Header tool.
-Original Message-
From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Outlook 98. exchange 5.5 sp4
User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake. The Recall
Message action feature did not work very well on this.
This was very sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before
too many people read it. What can I do?
Thanks in advance.
Title: RE: Adding some HTML to all outbound messages?
If you must do it I know that the 4.3 Version of MailSweeper for SMTP will allow you to do this.
Although I for one would talk him out of it. Bandwidth issues alone could probably do it. Go for the link at the bottom of the message, eas
That's quite a leap, to say that offline maintenance is causing 2 or 3
mailboxes out of 1200 to be unable to respond to specific meeting requests,
even though it's been running for years without a single problem. Might
want to reconsider your logic on that one -- there's not a shred of evidence
t
Spank user.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A mistake was made...
Outlook 98. exchange 5.5 sp4
User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake. The Recall
Messag
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
