Can anyone tell me or provide a ref to the differences between Exchange 2000
Developer Edition and Exchange 2000 standard edition?
I've searched the entire MS site, including KB, TechNet, and MSDN, and
cannot find any info on this.
TIA.
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
I am restoring the Information Store to a recovery server that was backed up
with NT Backup. I have been restoring for about 4 hours now and I am
beginning to wonder if I am just spinning my wheels. Does anyone know if a
restore throws the data right back to d:\exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub.edb | priv.edb
Hi Everyone,
I have a problem with a user (using Outlook 2000) who can't open
attachments.
When she opens new e-mails there is no attachment icon displayed even though
the message contains an attachment. She can open e-mail that was sent to her
yesterday but not today's. This isn't an Outlook
But only to the extent that the company's document retention policy
allows.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:11 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: PST as an archive?
Subject: RE: PST as an archive?
PSTs are
And then when the users come yelling, just point the finger to the
direction where blame goes. It's rather amazing how people won't go
complaining to a CEO or other decision maker level person.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, July 08,
Ed's discussion in the FAQ is excellent. I would add one item to the two
"goods."
If you are providing Exchange Server services to non-employees, they may be
receiving some mail which is not the property of the enterprise. This could
also be true for employees, but you need to clarify exactly w
I did that, also with the resetfolders switch.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar issue
Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Try running outlook /cleanfreebusy.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pillai, Raj
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:46 PM
To:
You need to start with the Exchange install cd and then apply SP4 as far as
I know (I had to do that but we were only on SP3 at that point). I thought
there was something in the FAQ about this too? In one of the appendices
maybe? Yup, here it is:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxg.htm
Exchange 5.0 Standard Edition had a limitation whereby you could not
join it to other servers in a site, i.e., it had to be the only server
in a site. To remedy this, you either installed the Connector or
upgraded to Enterprise Edition. You should contact your friendly local
Microsoft representa
Hello All-
I periodically (currently) have users with W2k Pro SP2 + HF O2k SR2* Dell
GX240 1.8G 256RAM that have a locking problems when they logon to their
email. I have eliminated network problems, the server seems intact (W2k
Server SP2 + all hotfixes per HFNETCHK).
What happens is they open
Thanks for the info. I'll have a go at installing OWA on the web server I
think. I see IIS as a necessary evil. We're basically a Microsoft
environment here so since I have to use IIS for the web server I may as well
install OWA on it as well. Do I just install the OWA component from SP4? Any
oth
1. What about using the iis lockdown tool and url scan? Check technet for
how to get this to work nicely w/ owa.
2. yeah, but you'll still need to allow an rpc/mapi session between owa and
the mailbox server(s), so you'll need to have the dmz configured for the
necessary ports. So the idea here
1) I think you can't really make anything bulletproof but Microsoft has a
security tool that sets perms for an IIS server running OWA to minimize
risk. Search for the "IIS security tool" or something like that.
2) Yes you can run OWA on a different server. I do that. I have a cheapo
ex-desktop th
Thanks for the pointer Ed, everything looks OK there, however the time zone
in Calendar options is off by an hour( it is spooky), The exchange server,
XP client are all on CST with daylight savings enabled, the time on the
"time zone" in calendar options is set to the same (CST with daylight
enabl
During the learning curve on Exch2K, I started multiple instances of Mailbox Manager,
all of which run consecutively every week. The first does its task but the others run
anyway. It's not a serious issue, but I can't find anything in Technet or the
archives which would indicate where I could
I'm running 5.0 std on an NT server that's about maxed out. I've got
another server available to upgrade to 5.5, however, when I try to install
the server software and connect to the existing server (VS1) I get the
following error message:
"VS1 is licensed for stand alone use only. Install Micros
Good day All,
Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP;mixed mode.
Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information
could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be
scheduled with the user though.
Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem ?
TIA
Ra
Hi Everyone,
Lately I've been noticing a number of attempts to hack one of our Exchange
Servers. Our network is behind a Pix firewall and I've closed all
unnecessary ports and have it fairly tightly locked down. However I have
Port 80, 25 and 110 open for Exchange. My main concern is IIS. I am
c
Hi all, added a new user today and discovered that after 2 hours, the email address
had not been automatically entered into the (mailbox enabled) account. I believe this
has something to do with the RUS, correct? Found one reference to it in the KB -
Q317654. It says this may happen without
same issue but the PSS person I am talking to seems to have limited
knowledge of this tool . . . .
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:59 PM
Subject: RE: MFC Mapi
> If you called PSS t
Just added that Ed, and the same error is appearing.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
It is possible that your best option is to do as I suggest and give them
the options well in advance of a crisis and then let the crisis happen.
You can even warn them along the way if you want.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bri
I am finally getting management to make some decisions. But they have a
habit of putting things off until we are in a crisis situation. I hate to
have to wait until all hell breaks loose and then both management AND the
users are throwing a fit.
Jim
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Cro
You could write an application. There's nothing standard in Exchange or
Outlook that does that.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On B
In Outlook there's a setting that specifies how many months of free/busy
data to publish.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf O
Like the other Ed is telling you, it shouldn't be your job to make their
business decisions. You explain the ramifications of having no quotas
currently, what it will mean in the future, and the costs to change
things. That is, you present options to management.
You should be positioning your j
Try adding it to LMHOSTS. If that fixes the problem, then you know that
you should fix or install WINS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks for the reply...
Ron
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 with OWA
They can certainly coexist. But as you mentioned, the FrontEnd server
with Exchange2000
If you called PSS to get the util you should be able to call back and
reference the same call to get help.. Or is this another issue?
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have any experience with a tool from MS PSS called MFCMAPI? I am
trying to restore a deleted PF tree.
I do not get an error but no "success" message either . . . anyone ever use?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swin
They can certainly coexist. But as you mentioned, the FrontEnd server
with Exchange2000 will only be able to access the Exchange2000
mailboxes. The 5.5 OWA is like a MAPI client. MAPI-by-proxy if you
will. They can coexist fine.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mai
An RPC Communications error occured. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality
Table Index; 49. Windows 2000 MTA error code:1753 Comms Error Code. Bind
Error 0. Remote Server Name
This error is appearing on a new exchange 2000 server. It has the ADC
connector installed as well as a SMTP connector. T
Currently running E2K/Ex.5.5 in mixed mode. Want to install a front-end
server (e2k) to go along with the OWA for ex5.5
mailboxes. That way I can test e2k OWA before removing my last ex5.5
server. OWA for 5.5 can access both 5.5 & e2k
mailboxes. E2k OWA can only access E2k mailboxes. Can the
Just block *.* and you shouldn't have any problems. Who needs attachments anyways :)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Not to blow my own horn...
http://www.swinc.c
Yes I've worked in small companies. And I've sold to small companies. I
dare say that I understand the dynamics fairly well. Disk space, tape
space, and backup time are all simple issues, present them to the purse
strings and let them make the decision.
1GB of saved email? You aren't even in th
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:27 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Unlimited Quotas
Subject: RE: Unlimited Quotas
> And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to
> support. Has management
That's absolutely correct. If business is presented with the situation,
then they get to make the decision. If they don't think that it's worth
the cost, then that, as many other things just don't get done.
-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: M
A resource calendar was created and permission was assigned to a group.
But it didn't propagate correctly as a result of deleting the
Distribution List and creating a new Security Group with the same name
or shortly after.
I deleted that group over the weekend, waited about 20 minutes and then
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 July 2002 16:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
course there is - lucky guy
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 July 2002 16:19
T
What I've seen is they are not using the helo/ehelo part of
sendmail.this is what im getting in my sendmail
logs"authentication-warning: [203.42.219.114] didn't use helo protocol"
john
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7
course there is - lucky guy
-Original Message-
From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 July 2002 16:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
There's no answer to that.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 July
Nuke 'em from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
--
be - MOS
If God didn't mean for us to juggle, tennis balls wouldn't come three to a
can.
> -Original Message-
> From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:26 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subj
I was wrong.
There *was* an answer to that
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 July 2002 16:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
If I could do that, I'd never leave the house.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I try to blow my horn once if not twice a day. It makes you feel good.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
If I could do that, I'd never leave the house.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Not to blow my own horn...
http://www.swinc.com/resour
Metallica!!
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Ditto. Who cares if a user wants to get an AVI file from home. I say kill
em all.
> --
> From: Kevin Miller
Ditto. Who cares if a user wants to get an AVI file from home. I say kill
em all.
> --
> From: Kevin Miller
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2002 10:06
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: New Virus?
>
> I love not caring what comes out.
There's no answer to that.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 July 2002 16:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Not to blow my own horn...
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm
OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own h
So we just have to send your users nasties in zip files?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 July 2002 16:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
I block everything but zip, pictures, and office docs.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UC
That's what I always say.[1]
Having said that, we did have an instance of
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which, rather than sending itself to the address indicated by our MX records
(which all point at Messagelabs), came straight to our gateway (which has no
public DNS records pointing to it). It was cau
The genome thingie?? Hahahaha.. They are running mixed mode 5.5 and 2k..
They have a cluster fusk for email
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
And I use Martin's list to block...blow Martin Blow...It's a good horn
to blow
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
Internet/WAN Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:13 AM
To
Not to blow my own horn...
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm
OK, I admit it, I am blowing my own horn.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Man, you're s
Yes, I do. I was just joking with Kevin. But I guess he didn't see
that.
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, Ju
You don't? And you guys have the genome thingy? You're scaring me...
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:08 AM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: New Virus?
> Subject: RE: New Virus?
>
>
> Man
I block everything but zip, pictures, and office docs.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L.
Sent: Monday, July 08
Mmmm hm
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://
Man, you're serious? You block those extensions? Man you're good
dewd!!
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support & Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, Ju
I love not caring what comes out. Just knowing that I am covered.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Mon
Sybari has it covered also.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Trend has it covered
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL
Trend has it covered
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus?
Hi,
Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that
is the report I have received.
We've gotten a couple of these as well... Looks like it comes from another
user at your own org... Pretty neat trick, confused a couple people here,
but it's just another underhanded spammer... Grab the originating IP
address off the header and head to www.dnsstuff.com and pop it into their
sp
Hi there
If the Front End server is in same site, make sure that it is in the same
subnet. If it FE server is not in the same subnet, then you need to
specify the subnet in sites and services.
HTH
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon
Hi,
Rightfully so. I wanted to verify if others can deem it 'wild' since that
is the report I have received.
Erik L. Vesneski
www.epicentric.com
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: N
Nope. I block both those extensions.
--Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Vesneski
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:49 AM
To: E
Hi,
There is a new virus supposedly in the wild:
Attachment:
LILAC-WHAT-A-WONDERFULNAME.avi.exe
Anyone seen it yet?
Thanks,
Erik L. Vesneski
www.epicentric.com
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.ht
Probably a sleazy spammer (sorry, that's redundant). It's quite common to
forge the from address.
If your antivirus isn't going off you can know for sure.
--
be - MOS
You can't have everything. Where would you put it? -- Steven Wright
> -Original Message-
> From: Orin Rehorst [mai
Good day All,
Exchange 2000 SP2/OLXP;
Cannot see another user's calendar(no information/no free/busy information
could be retrieved), looks like a permissions issue.A meeting can be
scheduled with the user though.
Any ideas on where to start looking to correct this problem.
TIA
Raj
**
Interesting
I've been seeing the same thing.
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: KLEZ or Sleaze
Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject i
This probably sounds a daft question, but its part of a much larger
problem that I'd confuse myself attempting to explain!
The Notes connector in e2k creates a mailbox used to deliver mail to
before being processed by the connector. Mail is sent to the connector
mailbox using SMTP. Could anyone te
Getting KLEZ-like emails. The From is spoofed employee address. Subject is
"Mortgage Rates Have Never Been Lower." Email body is legitimate-looking ad.
Is this KLEZ or an incredibly underhanded advertiser?
TIA,
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, at 10:47pm, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
> And as to disk drives, I can speak pretty knowledgeably in this situation,
> there is virtually no storage limitations within Exchange that impacts the
> per user storage.
Yah, and what about when you run out of physical disk space, or tape
I've never seen a white paper that says either. For ease of disaster
recovery, I'd leave them separate if you have the hardware. You'll want
to fix your problem, rather than sweeping it under a rug. In ESM, in
the properties pages of your server, Directory Access tab, are all the
servers correc
Here: Exchange / Outlook 2K
Problem: I have a 'Public' Company calendar. Everyone can see it. I want it to
update everyone's private calendar, but not vice versa.
Can anyone help me get this done?
Please...
TIA
--
> Reed L. O'Brien
> VisionOnline, Inc.
> 10511 Braddock Road, Suite 200
> Fair
All,
I have read and heard some conflicting information (surprise). We are
having a problem with our Exchange servers contacting our DCs. All of
the servers are on the same LAN connected using 3com switches, we are
using VLANs, but again all servers are on the same VLAN. We get
numerous mess
With the "dumpster", recovery isn't usually a big deal, until users call after a file
has been deleted for "weeks" (and it has passed out of the dumpster).In my
organization the expectation was that it was "on tape". I don't have the
person-hours, disk space or spare servers to do that kin
> And the whole idea is that as a support shop, your job is to
> support. Has management told you to put limits? When the
> email or file system was presented to them, did you say that
> there were going to be limits.
No. But I had no idea things would get the way they have. I do have mailbo
We have been trying to figure out how to get the GWISE connector to work
with exchange. We understand that it is IPX based but we tried to by-pass
it by installing the Netware client onto Exchange so it logs into both the
NT and Novell domains. Anyway the docs that come with the connector are
pr
Is that happen the same way on different clients (computers) or only on one?
I've seen that before, it was solved by our help desk by re installing the
common ghost version
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exc
80 matches
Mail list logo
