Ray,
Are you trying to destroy the world :-), now Repeat after me 'you do not say
the Cth word' ANYTIME, (calling his name is just like that is asking for
trouble), and I just like to say, I like the way everyone avoided the middle
name as if it didn't exist ;-).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are
NT4 Sp6a , Ex 5.5 OL97
Scenario - When a user saves a message from OL it defaults to their home
drive ...
How / where can this be changed to default somewhere else (shared network
drive) .. I have looked everywhere but found nowt.
TIA
Darren Ash
IT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR
Coolchain Ltd
http://www.swinc.com/resource/outlookdefpath.htm
(Outlook97? EW!)
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darren Ash
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: File Locations
NT4 Sp6a , Ex 5.5 OL97
Running Exchange in mixed mode, with final exchange 5.5 server ready to be
removed. I have changed the site addressing to my new ex2000 server and
recalculated routing, but, noticed that email is still going out
via the IMS on the Ex5.5 server. Inbound mail comes in OK, just outgoing
email
Ouch, I've jest been classified as a desperate newbie. Have you been talking
to my guitar instructor or something?
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
I thought you played the flute?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Ouch, I've jest been classified as a desperate newbie. Have you been talking
to my
SORRY I meant James. Please forgive me Chris :-
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 15:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Ouch, I've jest been classified as a desperate newbie. Have you been talking
to my
Craig/David,
I think that you may be confusing the Lotus Communications Server (LCS)
with the Lotus Messaging Switch (LMS).
The LCS was announced at cc:Mail Interchange '93, and was supposed to be
the product that served as the Enterprise Messaging Backbone that would
link X.400, SMTP/MIME,
I thought I spelled fresh meat whenever you responded to anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Ouch, I've jest been classified as a desperate newbie.
Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the selected
mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool out there that
will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked hard and couldn't
find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document.
A much improved OWA, for one - a steadily decreasing lack of support for
another. Especially if you're starting from scratch, I recommend
Exch2K. AD will not hurt you, and you need not switch to native mode,
ever, unless you wish.
David
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fors, II
Did you change the cost on the 5.5 one? If they're all cost 1, then
mail will continue to follow the route it knows.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:38 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Just wondering. Why would you want to do this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of EXTERN Hlabse
Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST
Yes I would agree.
One small quibble, which actually tends to confirm your observation. As it
became clear that the original LMS was not going to be built, other folks at
Lotus started rapidly changing the story. Within about a 12 moth period
just before the sale to IBM, LMS went from a
Nahh, I am busy reading the temp files on my Imail servers. Imail leaves behind lots
of fun stuff to read and look at.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messages sent
File and Print sharing opens you up.
How about if you get a second NIC with an internal IP address and bind File and Print
sharing only to that NIC?
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi all.
I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors
in our shared Exchange environment.
Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many
messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message?
Our
If you have a decent box, you can start off with AD domain controller and X2K server
on the same box. Then if performance starts degrading you can add another W2K server
to be the domain controller.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
well Exchange 5.5 needs Windows NT domain. So you still may need an additional server
to be the domain controller.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide;
Slight Welsh accent?
Les? Is that you?
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 02:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
You can always initiate a self-punishment session at any time.
And, yes, it's
Nope. Your women.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Ouch, I've jest been classified as a desperate newbie. Have you been talking
to my guitar instructor or
You need to evaluate the size limit based on your business needs.
If all you need to do is send Word docs, etc, 10 MB is probably fine. If you
are working with graphics folks, etc, 10 MB wont be enough.
If this customer has a legitimate business need, you probably need to bump
the size.
On behalf of everyone that hates waiting for large attachments, please
just grab a baseball bat and hit him over the head for us
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange
Sorry for having it reposted. Spent the last 3 hours getting it automated
and getting the tapes ready. The only thing we could not get to work was
the Eject process. This is a LTO drive and when we tried the RSM.EXE eject
PF BACKUP - 1 /astart we get the following error.
Changer has not IE
OS: Win2K, SP2, IIS Roll-up, (+most Critical Windows Update published hotfixes)
E2K: Native, SP3, Trend 6.0 Scanmail
Single Native Domain, Single Exchange Server, 1 SG, 4 Mailbox DBs, 1 PF DB
Hello,
Not sure if this is a new bug introduced with E2K SP3, or just my bad luck with E2K.
Some
We use a 2MB limit as a general rule - with plenty of exceptions, of course.
Steve C.
- Original Message -
From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 4:17 PM
Subject: need ammo
Hi all.
I have this customer
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestIndexing.asp
I did not see the option to add PDF in this document, perhaps some
whitepaper from Adobe.
Did not sound terribly hard to implement, I would be most interested in what
the performance hits would be as you get into larger
I dunno, I am just speaking out loud (maybe I should say typing out loud),
but why oh why would you want to do this?
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:43 AM
To: Exchange
I can tell you from first hand experience, like many others I'm sure, this
is not true.
Automating it, as Pete has found, is a whole new can of worms. Change your
reading material to find out what the RSM is and how it works with regard to
the 2k version of backup. My take is the RSM is
Did you hear Sheep in the Back ground?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hanna, Keith
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
I've never seen a large message crash servers, but I have seen them
bring everything to a halt, all queued up til the message was sent.
What's reasonable really depends on your needs. I think 10MB is very
reasonable. There are better mechanisms for file transfer than SMTP, I
think. FTP
Assuming you're still using Windows.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
Well if you get stranded for four years
Cool beans. That message took 8.5 hours!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Desperate Newbie
Nope. Your women.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Wow, both you and Leo casting aspersions on my sexuality. If this weren't
the mSexChange mailing list, some might consider that to be a bit off topic.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange
Maybe you'd get less spam if you didn't keep trying to unsubscribe.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Thanks Andrey. I found it. I could I have missed it. Anyhow it looks like I
will have experiment with that setting. I am guessing I may have to do this
in two runs. One to get the user names that contain the subject matter and
then run it again with the all mailboxes being put into one PST once
We have a 15 MB limit to keep the users happy, then block all AVI, MP* files
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: need ammo
We use a 2MB limit as a general rule - with
The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet
inbound/Outbound messages.
In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean
highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or
inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large
What caused the mail loop?
-Original Message-
From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 8:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet
inbound/Outbound messages.
In my
Okay, I am getting knee deep into a conversion from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange
2000. Now we have an NT 4 Domain with two Exchange 5.5 Servers. We are
creating a 2000 Domain that is going to house our new Exchange 2000 Servers.
Now we are going to migrate with a test group to make sure everything
And the first name rhymes with crate.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aaron Brasslett
Sent:
I think he means NT 5.0.
Ed Crowley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
Whatever you're reading, you should be
Actually, he's right. You have to install the Exchange System Tools to
make the version that ships with Windows 2000 Exchange-aware.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
You should send that one to Boys' Life.
Edgar J. Crowley Jr.
Technical Consultant
Windows Messaging Platforms Practice
hp Services
*510-612-3365
*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent:
A message from cheerios.com.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: need ammo
What caused the mail loop?
-Original Message-
From: Darryl
We're related, yes.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hanna, Keith
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 5:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: To Great Cthulhu Jones
Slight Welsh accent?
Les? Is that you?
-Original
Hear about the sequel where he goes back for Wilson?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 4:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
Well if you get stranded
Good news is, if you get a PST over 2GB in size, you only have to truncate
the file size to read what's in it!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
One other guy on this list saw that and there's very little information on
that error message. Do you have any other error messages in conjunction with
those?
No matter what, call Microsoft. This may be an emerging issue with that SP.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not a problem. We figured most of the monthly runs will be under that. In
fact will make them under 650 so they will fit on a CD. Still can't believe
I missed it in the manual. My only other possible problem is the older
version doesn't have that feature. If not will have to load up 2000
Well... for the LEAST amount of network traffic, do not have either system
on the same network. Create an X.400 connector between the two, but use a
postal address at either end of the connector. Then, for every message to
the other server, have the sender print it out, submit it to the postal
Ho ho ho. PST on a CD.
Good luck reading *that*!
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Not a
Just for mailing to lawyers then they will copy to hard drive. Yes I know
about it is written to open.
- Original Message -
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes
Does anyone here have any experience with NEMX PowerTools for Exchange,
specifically the modules for spam blocking and content management and
filtering? I'm considering this primarily for the ability to query the MAPS
database and block the spam before it gets in the door. Is this a good idea?
Well for one, who is going to accept 15MB on the incoming side? I
definitely wouldn't. Without attachments 15MB is a hell of a lot of
typing ..:-)
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
55 matches
Mail list logo
