Does anybody else receive this message when posting to the list ?
-Original Message-
From: CPOCWCP DEU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 14:13
To: MATTSON, Winston
Subject: DEU Resume Received
Your resume for the DEU announcement number you indicated in the subjec
Yes I agree this would be a good idea, if you find out how to do it
please let me know.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 8:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
I am r
I've just started looking at it. It's an IMAP client for mail and uses
LDAP to connected to AD. There seems to be no sharing though it can
check to see if a person is available for a meeting.
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 20
I believe you can Demo both Trend Products and Antigen..by going to their
respective web sites..etc
Me Id get something on that box fast...that's just me...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
S
Yes, I think you have figured it out. Every time I make a post to this list
I get another email from the Army.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume
I think that mayb
There is no white list, only a black list.
-Original Message-
From: Cary, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SAV for SMTP Gateways - blocking extensions within ZIP??
Can you configure this (Symantec Antivirus f
That's what I thought after thinking about it on the way home. Thnaks for
confirmation.
From: Roger Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: OWA content and anti-virus
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:
Its just another layer of protection - the more the merrier.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday
That I know and agree but what HTTP traffic could be vurnerable if all email
traffic eventually passes through the SMTP servers which are being monitored
there?
From: Roger Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PRO
Errr no, the long answer would trigger content filters around the world...
:P
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering pif and scr
Isn't the long answer also NO?
-Peter
You're missing something.
Client to OWA is HTTP, not SMTP. So if you can scan the HTTP traffic, you're
getting an extra layer of protection.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original
If you happen to be using NAV for Exchange - then you may do so by using
a registry tweak. Info on Symantec's site somewhere.
David
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering pif and s
Interscan but when using OWA there shouldn't be another virus/spam filter in
place as the SMTP servers where Tren is set up will catch inbound outbound
of the OWA user unless I am missing something.
From: Roger Seielstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Which Trend product do you run? InterScan VirusWall can do HTTP scanning as
well.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to this list, and has an autoreply
rule. It's probably not sobig related at all.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resu
And why in heaven's name would you want to do that? There are several
viruses that send the payload contained inside a .zip file, the worst of
which is the one that a lot of people on this list just got through patching
systems for:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL P
Can you configure this (Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways) to only allow
specific extensions? Basically block all by default except for the
extensions you put on a white list?
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 PM
To: E
I just gone one too. And the headers look legit:
Received: from ops.xetron.com ([192.168.1.121]) by s3cin.xetron.com with
SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59)
id RHLTYYTF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:08:21 -0400
Received: from fw.xetron.com ([192.168.1.1])
by ops.x
I am running Symantec Antivirus for SMTP gateways version 3.1.0.29. This
has an option to block attachments by extension, but this blocks files even
when they are in ZIP files. The Symantec (Norton) antivirus that runs on
our exchange server (5.5) has a registry setting to control whether or not
Just remembered on the ride home. All traffic on 2000 to the outside is SMTP
OWA is just an interface. Sorry but wonder is there still is something I am
missing
From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Throw Linux on an old workstation outside your firewall and have it filter
on Blackstone's List of Danger, before it hits your Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering
The long answer is HELL NO... wow some people never learn j/k :)
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering pif and scr
Isn't the long answer also NO?
-Peter
-Original Mess
Isn't the long answer also NO?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 14:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Filtering pif and scr
Short answer is, NO. Most Exchange based AV programs have this. Trend and
Sybari are the
Short answer is, NO. Most Exchange based AV programs have this. Trend and
Sybari are the top contenders in my book...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Filtering pif and scr
Exchange
I got the same thing!! Thought it might be the new email virus, but it had
no attachment.
Just got another as I write this!!!
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: DEU Resume
Anyone h
Trend also has a gateway scanning product that will scan all HTTP, FTP, and
SMTP traffic... But really, as long as you are scanning your IS and
blocking attachments using an example such as "Martin Blackstone's List of
Danger" you should be fine.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mai
Exchange 5.5
NT4
We are getting a lots of attachment with pif and scr today. We do not any
third party filtering software install yet. Can I filter this extension with
Exchange?
Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
System Administrator/DBA
Senior Aerospace Jet Products
www.jetproducts.com
__
I'm so glad to hear that. I was beginning to think my boss was hinting
at me for a career change. :-)
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:29 PM
Pos
We currently use Trend here for anti-virus and spam filtering on a pair of
separate relay servers, inbound and outbound with failover. We are in the
process of opening OWA to the outside world using a small array of ISA
servers doing SSL and Secure ID. I feel that we will also have to run some
I've been searching and finding nothing that details how to go about
this...only that e2k3 supports it.
I have a wireless lan here. I have a pocketPC running PPC2003 with
wireless. E2k3 Enterprise available across the wireless lan.
E2k3 has activesynch support which is supposed to allow me to
when in dough ghost a known good, over right known bad?
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 4:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
tried that...still did not fix it for us..made it wo
tried that...still did not fix it for us..made it worse for the particular
client
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
We recently
We recently had a problem as well. The resolution was do de-install tcpip
and re-install on the workstation having the issue. Have no idea why that
would fix it, but it worked in our cases.
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003
I've had the same problem with a couple of my workstations herecan do
nslookup to exchange server, ping, map a drive, via unc, changed rpc binding
order on the workstation, can have the user move to another machine in same
office works fine, move to another xp machine works fineetc,
etc...u
I can't believe how many places increase the SPAM 3 folder with useless
alerts. Worst, having to tell a postmaster how to correctly read a delivery
report...
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 13:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Su
My "anti-spam" filter is catching these with regular expressions if you want i can
post the expressions.
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume
Looks like the SoBig.F virus.
I got the same DEU Resume message, and assumed it was a sobig byproduct.
On a slightly different topic, I sure wish AOL would stop sending out replies to the
Sobigs they block.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:29
T
Ok when I used to run GS45 on my exch55..
1.) It scanned everything in the system...I believe it was at the IS type
level...SO it scanned every internal message sent and every incoming and out
going from Exchange...
SO If I had aliases..which I had a couple..it scanned for me
It might/sho
I made no promises as to how well it works on the store..
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
scans = trashes
- Original Message -
From: "Je
scans = trashes
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy I. Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP
traffic
Looks like the SoBig.F virus. So far we have got 300 and counting of this thing.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DEU Resume
I'm seeing that from the Four Season's Hotel - not
I'm seeing that from the Four Season's Hotel - not sure if it is a virus or
not - might be coming in as part of the current SoBig.E variant.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original M
I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP
traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
I know this is not a 100% exchange quest
Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you
never sent to them?
About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply
from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and
the DD-214.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
A
I know this is not a 100% exchange question. We are
running 5.5 and Groupshield. If someone sends an email
to an alias on the system, would Groupshield stop it?
We have a user that claims that he is getting email at
his "real address" that is infected with viruses. This
email gets "bounced" off the
IronMail.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:33 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: MailMarshal
Subject: MailMarshal
Has anyone been ab
Corrected issue at hand, thanks for your help
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA Connection Problems
This kind of thing happens when you start tweaking things without thinking
the
I'll bet at least some of those workstations, the ones that can't connect at all, are
trying to contact the Exchange server via an ISP which is now blocking RPC traffic,
thanks to msblaster.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19
Thanks for the advise
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA Connection Problems
This kind of thing happens when you start tweaking things without thinking
them through. Exchange won
And one helluva bill... :P
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Let me see, Ed, Chris and myself...beer? Hmmm...that's a distinctive
po
Let me see, Ed, Chris and myself...beer? Hmmm...that's a distinctive
possibility.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
Fr
Sure Ed, if you come to Kansas City, I'll buy you lunch and dinner! :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowl
Is there going to be beer involved? That would make it doubly fun.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
If you're paying, I'll come mock
If you're paying, I'll come mock you too.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:59 AM
To:
Call me next time you are in town, and I'll go with you so you can mock
me all during lunch :)
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Mes
Makes a note to stop by and mock Bob on my way to Gates next time I am
in town.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:50 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Subject: RE: Services No
Irregardless Chris, anyways you look at it, the whole thing was a mess!
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Chris S
Use the terms "anyways" or "irregardless" in my presence and I'll
correct you once. Do it again and I'll just mock you.
And no, outside of a boxing ring, I haven't been punched in 15 years.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 1
Well, the RUS wouldn't have anything to do with it.
Perhaps this might help:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;[ln];327378
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
This kind of thing happens when you start tweaking things without thinking
them through. Exchange won't run with local accounts, even if it looks like
it's running. At this point, I can only advise you to call PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world fr
What machine name is in the "Requesting" dialog box. That might tell you
something as well.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sha
Could have been a corrupt message in the conversion process which caused
the service to enter a bad state. Although if they are currently in the
MTA and not the IMS queue that precedes the conversion process hmm,
I imagine distribution list expansion was not working either (though you
may not h
Well, you really should have found that out before posting your question,
no?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg S
Sent: Monda
Do it this way:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxa.htm
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
You will find that usually the flaming is directed toward those who
repeatedly ask stupid (i.e., easily researched) questions even though they
have been warned, and those who become argumentative or abusive themselves,
even when they are wrong.
I believe that flamee in the most recent long thread
Thanks Joe, I appreciate the update. I don't doubt that this is the best
place for good technical info, that's why I came here.
Honest answer is that my solution most likely lies somewhere in the Office
resource kit. Chris turned me on to some possible solutions which I will
look into. I imagin
Yes.
No.
Never.
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Ok so you correct spoken grammatical errors in regular day to day
situat
Ok so you correct spoken grammatical errors in regular day to day
situations, and enjoy it.
Is this with strangers?
Are you often punched?
> -Original Message-
> From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 August 2003 14:23
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Servic
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 August 2003 14:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Storage limts not working
Exchange 2k sp3. A user went over our storage limits and cant send. I
changed her account so she doesn't have any limits until sh
I can do that.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:56 AM
Subject: RE: outbound [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris,
Can you get to port 25 on the external smtp box from you
Does anyone know why that the PDA(Compaq ActiveSync 3.5) won't sync with OL2K after
the migration from Ex55 to E2k?
Note: The user stills logon to the NT domain and accessing Ex2k mailbox from AD (We
have a full trust)
TIA!!!
_
L
Update:
I rebooted my IMC server and it now has 5000 emails sitting there in the MTA
queue to the Internet Mail Server (same server) . . . they seem to be going
down slowly since the reboot . . .
All services were running prior . . .
Has anyone seen this before?
Chris
- Original Message --
Chris,
Can you get to port 25 on the external smtp box from your IMC server? I am
wondering if a firewall rule has been changed perhaps.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2003 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: outbound [EMAIL PROTECT
We are seeing a lot of this virus this morning.
Luckily, I block PIF and SCR extensions...
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another Medium Risk Virus on the rise (Worm_
any ideas on where to look?
we forward to our ISP's outgoing smtp . . .
we get incoming ok
since yesterday afternoon no outgoing emails make it to their destination
I can ping smtp forwarder from my IMC server
nothing in any IMC queues
nothing in any MTA queues on ANY server in our site
Checki
We are running exchange 5.5 on a nt 4.0 environment and we have 6 domains
most of the service accounts logon using a account on one specific domain.
we have 3 servers and each on residing in different domains. The trust
between the domain with the logon account and one of the servers have
become fl
Hey you had stops in OWA 2000 as well. That's normal.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 2002 OWA to 2003 OWA
I've upgraded my 2002 front-end server to 2003.
In my IIS configurati
I've upgraded my 2002 front-end server to 2003.
In my IIS configuration, I'm seeing stops for Exchange and Exchweb pointing
to \\.\BackOfficeStorage, which no longer exists.
Since IFS is not enabled in Exchange 2003 and I really have no need to
reference the M:\drive, is there some place that I c
It may be unrelated, but always helps: make sure your DNS is working
correctly and those windows 2000 clients can resolve the name of the
exchange server (NSLOOKUP exchsvrname)
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Tuesday, August 19,
Symantec has updated as well - dated 8/19/03 rev3 - available for
download, and liveupdate has them as well.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Another Medium Risk Virus on the r
I do.
It is rather annoying to hear people speaking incorrectly.
Please drive through.
-Original Message-
From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Do you
Did you try accessing the 3 different user from a computer that does not
have this issue?
From: Shawn Connelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange (5.5) server not available
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 200
This is very strange and I'm at a complete loss as to what the problem is.
As of yesterday, 3 out of 53 computers all connected the same or similar way
with the same OS and Outlook client... are encountering one or more of the
following problems:
Server: Exchange Server 5.5 with latest patches
Wor
Trend Pattern 618 is now available for this.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Another Medium Risk Virus on the rise (Worm_Sobig.f)
http://tinyurl.com/kgz2
_
http://tinyurl.com/kgz2
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Dan,
You've got to remember that this list's main contributors are a set of veterans who
are extremely knowledgeable and have been around for a long time... Flaming has never
gone out of fashion here... Eventually you'll come to find that this list is probably
the best, most technically knowl
I'll take you up on that!
I have to admit, I'm kind of surprised and disappointed about one of the
other threads going on right now it's getting kind of personal.
Obviously, this is not monitored, and if people want to resort to public
flaming on a technical platform, well, I guess that is th
And you took it well. That alone earns you a beer at the next MecEd.
Roger's treat.
- Original Message -
From: "Locey, Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: OK, abuse well deserved
>
> My bad, I'll be m
Do you enjoy correcting people's grammar when you're not on the internet?
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 August 2003 19:25
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
>
>
> That would be "you're"
89 matches
Mail list logo