It depends on db size. It will take quite a while. Are you running
2.0?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd, Nathan
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Powercontrols
Ontracks support is
I have a client who is migrating away from an ISP hosted POP mail account
to a newly created exch 2003 box and we're experiencing 5.5.0 smtp;550
Dynamic IPs/open relays blocked. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED], 5.5.0
smtp;550-68.37.144.103 blocked by blacklist.mail.ops.asp.att.net. and to aol Could
Are you using some kind of dynamic DNS?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 5:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Internet Mail Issues
I have a client who is migrating away from an ISP
If you are doing your SMTP, you must have a MX record of some sort located
on a DNS server somewhere. Are you hosting your own DNS or is your ISP
hosting DNS zones for your subnet?
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax:
Yes and No. You can mail-enable Public Folders (as you could do with
Exchange 5.5 and 2000), which will satisfy the first part, and grant
Send As rights to individuals, however, keeping track of the Sent Items
will be much more difficult. Public Folders do not have a Sent Items
folder. Instead,
Shirley Comcast will allow you to relay your outbound mail through their
MXed, reverse-DNSed mailhost, right? If so, just point your Exchange
server to relay all outbound mail through them.
If not, ditch Comcast. They're not a business-class ISP in my opinion,
at least.
--
be - MOS
Replace
I am running version 2.0. Server is 2000 SP4 and the backup device is an
LT02. Typically the catalog process, on backup exec using an LT01 is a
couple of minutes for a 100GB. I have been running Powercontrols for 15
hours and it has managed to catalog 122GB.
We were hoping this would reduce
I am setting up a plan to restructure our exchange DB config. Currently
we have 3 DBs. 1 with a mix of companies that is very large (65GB).
The others are 4 to 5GB a piece and are one Exec DB and one company DB.
I started to go the departmental route to separate DBs, but then that
idea was soon
I would first make sure that I am comfortable with backup/restore speeds
and base the DB size on that.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2k3 store configs
I am
That's what my 20GB was set for. I was just wondering as far as how you
split up your DBs if you do at all. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
At the current place, we have a separate DB for execs. It was not my
idea. I am not sure if I would do it this way - put all execs in one
basket... that's an easy way to piss off all the execs at once if
something happens.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL
That is a good question We are a Law Firm and we have several
attorneys that refuse to give up the Exchange 5.5 OWA - they state
Exchange 2000 OWA is too slow and unusable... So, we wanted to offer up
both for a period of time - to slowly wean them away from 5.5, while
still switching to
Thanks for the reply... I actually confirmed just that last night in the
lab. I brought up a separate native mode environment with an OWA 5.5
server.. New users were not able to access their mailboxes, while users
created before the switch continued to work
Thanks again
-Original
Thank you for your response!
When the Public Folder was setup and email enabled we were able to receive
mail to the public folder, but external mail (outside our domain) is
coming into the Public Folder as a post (not a email message). We are
then unable to reply to the message since there is no
AM I missing something here. Are you saying you want to limit your DB's to a
certain size. Maybe I am crazy but you can only limit indvidual mailboxes
sizes via property settings or policies, right?
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Not a hard limit, I just want to cut off creating users on that store
when I reach that limit to keep the DB size down.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Ok the last place I was at they created multiple DB's based on sizes ranging
from 100MB to 500MB for the mailbox limits which were set by policies. If
your really worried about DB's getting too big maybe a archiving solution
would be a worth look at.
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My general design plan (which may not be applicable here) is to worry
more about the storage group level. I'd design a SG with 4 private
information stores and create those databases at the outset. Then
through day to day operations, I distribute users over those storage
groups. I'd rather have 4
Agreed on that. When I give customers the overall choices, i.e. spread
users randomly across databases and reduce risks to common groups of
users if a database fails, or group certain types of users together on
the same database based on the need to collaborate and therefore improve
SIS, they
Who is Shirley Comcast?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of East, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 6:52 AM
To: Exchange
OWA 200x dumbs down based on the version of the browser. However, it
doesn't look like OWA 5.5.
Maybe this is the excuse you need to upgrade to Exchange 2003. OWA 2003
rocks!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
Yep, my experience as well. The other advantage to creating the SGs and
databases in advance is that you can make sure they conform to your
naming scheme and set up a full set of monitors to make sure everything
runs smoothly from the outset.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson
Stop calling me Shirley!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
Who is Shirley Comcast?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
We have a few companies that we would like to have all there email users
as
contacts in our GAL. Is there a way to export / import their GAL into
ours? Or if
they could be linked somehow over the internet? Also if they add /
delete /
change users how would that work?
We have Exchange 2000 others
It's an ISPand stop calling me Shirley.
(Sorry, couldn't resist the Airplane reference)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
Who is Shirley
Shirley you can't be serious?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Posted At: 07 January 2004 16:54
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Internet Mail Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
Who is Shirley
Think back to Airplane the movie. Shirley == Surely
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004
That's normal behavior. It has to do with e-mails from the Internet
being posted as IPM.Post instead of IPM.Note. It should not affect
functionality - you should still be able to reply to them. The buttons
may look different, but the functionality is still there. I have this
list being
Most of the large companies I've consulted with just keep the DB to a
certain size (20GB sounds good) and don't worry about who's on what DBs
it's too much a pain in the butt to be shuffling people around.
Although I have seen them try to keep important people on different
servers / DBs to keep
Yes, sorry. We are running Blackberry Server v3.6 on all three servers.
We are on the latest service pack.
We have done the massaging both in that manner and also via the
exchange database level tool, but still have the same issues over time.
Thanks!
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From:
Never mind my last post about being able to reply. I see what you are
saying now. The links I posted detail workarounds. The first link also
is for a hotfix that should correct this problem.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From:
LDAP is the only clean way I can think of doing it. But that could create
some potential vulnerabilities for the unwary.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From:
I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.
http://sounds.wavcentral.com/movies/airplane/shirley.mp3
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
Shirley you can't be
Answered in the other forum in which you posted this (under a different
subject).
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlovits,
Just out of curiosity, are the Blackberry people with the problem using wireless
Calendar syncing, or doing it via the old Intellisync?
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Hi John:
If you develop a custom application via LDAP or use Directory
Transformation Manager (DTM) from Imanami and be done in 45 minutes.
DTM lets will check for duplicates, automatically create contacts in
your GAL, and sets a schedule to keep your changes synchronized.
Check it out at
Wireless calendar synching.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Calendar Lockups / Blackberry Server
Just out of curiosity, are the Blackberry people with the problem using
I tried doing that too at my previous place, thinking that when someone
wants a larger mailbox we could upgrade that person by moving his/her
mailbox to the store with higher mbx size limits. But then, moving 100MB
mailbox is going to take some time. Either the user is going to lose
20-30 minutes
It does not look exactly like 5.5 OWA but retains the same feel and
probably loads faster.
Another way to dumb down 2000 OWA is segmentation. You basically go to
ADSI Edit, go to the user's properties, and find the certain field
(can't remember its name off the top of my head), and set its value
There is a hotfix for that.
Search MS support site for IPM.Post
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: CC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are they NDRs going to places like Yahoo? Someone could be using you to
generate a reverse relay. Basically they deliberately stuff the
messages with From addresses of the actual victims and send those
messages to the bogus addresses at your domain. This generates the NDRs
that then bounce back to
Or vice versa - someone used us (bordersgroupinc.com) as a bogus return
address (@, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) to spam another company (again, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
so
we got lots of NDRs from this other company. (~40,000/hour)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Is it possible to create a rule that will put a copy of the email into the folder on
send? I just took a quick look through the rule options and nothing jumped out at me,
but that doesn't mean anything
Erick
PS Is it possible to apply rules to all accounts administratively?
-Original
With the help of Compaq we were able to determine that we should be able to
write 2:1 compression using the existing hardware at 1GB every 10 seconds.
Powercontrols catalogs at 1 GB every 1 hour.
What do other people get for a 1GB catalog?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael
Hahaha... should we all get together and sing Kumbaya now?
We are hosting our DNS and there is an MX record for the server, however
we cannot do reverse DNS because comcast won't let us. While I agree
comcast is not a 'business ISP', for nice little startups and two person
home offices (my main
I'm working on getting my users to start using the calendar in Outlook, and in public
folders. However, I haven't used the calendar a whole lot. Does anyone know of good
tutorials/FAQs for the calendar, written for end users?
BTW, we're on Outlook 2000, but will soon be moving to Outlook 2003.
Does anyone know of a way to determine when the last time a user(s)
accessed their mailbox. The last logoff time from the Exchange admin
program will not be sufficient for me. I would like to know when the last
message was read and or sent from each mailbox or both. Or at least
something to that
For some reason the 'tasks' folder is being renamed (tasks1, tasks2...all
the way up to as high as 70) and the only common denominator is these are
resources (rooms etc..) which use the 'enhanced' Autoaccept script (from V4
from ExchangeCode). Haven't seen this before (I suppose a clean freebusy
I have an Exchange organization in Mixed Mode (2000/5.5). I installed
Exchange 2000 in an existing site and moved mailboxes to the new
server. The previous server was in another domain, which we now want to
bring down. The service account listed for the site is an account in
the old domain.
Hi,
I found a thread, titled as above, via a google, I'm just curious what
the resolution was (if any)
I have recently install Exchange 2003 and today, I found a bunch of
messages waiting for submission.
The SMTP service would not stop.
I followed the threads procedure.
Disable SMTP service
Here's a new one on me... Earthlink replied that because the ip block the
MX record points to is persistent not static they block the address.
The reason that your mail bounced back is because it attempted to pass
directly from an IP address range believed to be dynamically assigned
(such as
Okay, what is the difference between a IPM post and a IPM note?
I now understand what I need to do to make this work properly, but I am
not sure I understand the difference between a IPM post and a not.
_
List posting FAQ:
52 matches
Mail list logo
