Simple answer: Go the Microsoft.com/exchange and look around a bit. It's there.
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange2003 features versus OS matrix.
Hi all,
Other folks on this list can correct me on this. . .but isn't it rather slimey to
send as somebody else's domain?
Or are you perhaps talking about sending as a domain that you folks own, but don't
normally use for email?
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Michel Fayad [mailto:[EMAIL
Set up a mailbox for the resource (location), use Outlook to set it to auto-accept
meeting requests.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar
NT4sp6
Exchange 5.5 sp3
Can this
: How to send on behalf for an external Domain?
Pop3 will let you send as whoever you'd like to be. (Depending on the server
configuration of course)
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
And how does little old Clark County have the money to send their sysadmin to two
conferences in one year?
Sheesh!!
Darcy Adams
Sr. Exchange Administrator
Getty Images
Tel 206-925-6617
Cell 206-255-0169
http://www.gettyimages.com
Where do you want to ride today?
http
FYI for anyone who hasn't already seen this:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Barnard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:29 PM
To: Darcy Adams
Cc: Laurel Banister (COSSETTE)
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 release
Hey Darcy - I'm guessing you've already seen this by now
in which an OOO loop alone could be created, all
of them involved poorly written software and the potential of them actually
happening is extremely low.
On 3/5/03 13:14, Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels
couldn't comprehend
There's a full step-by-step in the FAQ. Works like a charm. Even though it shows for
NT to NT, it also works for NT4 to 2K
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to move exchange 5.5 to
I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't
comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a delegate than
have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO.
Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of
Check the properties on the file - make sure it isn't set as read only
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 and .PST problem
I actually ran scanpst on it and nothing
James - try doing a little bit of research on this:
Take a look at the group meetings on other user's calendars. I'm guessing that
meeting organized by UserA, will still show up as owned by UserA.
Second, try an experiment - update one of those meetings originally set up by UserA
from
Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange
domains
Hey Darc,
Can you see/select the test2kdomain from the usrmgr on the 5th server?
- Original Message -
From: Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:38 PM
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
I've got
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
I've got an odd situation with an Exchange 5.5 server (Win2K, but in an NT4
domain) not seeing all of the trusted domains. I've
on the server and in the WINS database?
Can you browse from that machine?
- Original Message -
From: Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
That was my thought - my
ummm. . . of course I couldn't see test2kdomain in usrmgr. It's a trusted domain,
not trusting.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
Ah - good
You have to have user access to the mailbox. What works best is the Exchange service
account.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: EXMERGE ERROR
Ie Exchange admin privs,
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
Yes, on both the server and the WINS database.
And yes, I can browse all domains from
don't get it.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and trusted domains
Did that, too. No static entries.
This is really odd. You can assign access to *any
I've got an odd situation with an Exchange 5.5 server (Win2K, but in an NT4 domain)
not seeing all of the trusted domains. I've checked the FAQ, the archives, and the
Microsoft KB.
Here's the situation:
Exchange 5.5 organization in TestNTDomain with three sites/five servers (one or two
No - not admin. For your first clue, from the Exchange admin menu select
Tools/Options. Click on the Permissions tab. Turn on Display rights for roles on
Permissions Page.
Now - go back to one of those mailboxes and look at the rights that go with Admin.
The do not include any ability to
?
Only give rights from the mailbox via Exchange Administrator?
I'll change that setting to user right away.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox permission problems
Hi-tech: buy a product like Quest MessageStats or NetIQ AppAnalyzer
Low-tech method 1: subscribe all of your DL's to a Public Folder and monitor that
Low-tech method 2: contact the owners of all DL's and ask them if the list is still
needed
-Original Message-
From: Huntington, Debra
not ( at this
point ) worried about the granularity. I'll use the admin tool. Thanks
Darcy.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox permission problems
You can give rights from the client
Are you looking for real-time monitoring or monitoring over time for stats?
Quest's Spotlight tools are good for quickly checking the queues, and the general
health of servers.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:56 PM
supported for several more years
I thought support for Exchange 5.5 ends this year.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Question
OK, we're actually in
?scid=fh;en-us;LifeSrvr
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
supported for several more years
I thought support for Exchange 5.5 ends this year.
Darcy
Wow - one I hadn't seen before. Thanks, William!
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 12:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Twas the night before Christmas
Twas the night before Christmas, and all 'cross the WAN
We had a virtual loop happen here from an OOF. Somebody went on vacation and set up
OOF, then added an extra rule to auto-reply to all messages [1]. We have an app that
uses a mailbox to send out daily updates, and has a rule on the mailbox to fire off a
new message in response to anything
Every copy of a PF is considered a replica, including the original one. The limits
should apply to all of them.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Understanding Public Folder Limits;
: Understanding Public Folder Limits; Exch2000
Aha. And if messages are still there after the age limit for replicas has passed --
what should I check?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange
, such as last Friday, the message is
delivered *only* to users on the same server as Bridget and the IC mailbox.
As above, no NDR's were ever returned. Only the message tracking log shows the
failures.
Ideas???
Darcy Adams
Sr. Exchange Administrator
Getty Images
601 N. 34th Street
Seattle, WA
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Non-delivery puzzle
Environment: Exchange 5.5, sp4 with hotfixes.
NT4 domain, some boxes NT4, some W2K
Single organization, multiple sites, multiple
It's not a big deal - if you are comfortable with telephony systems as well as with
Exchange connectors. Setting up and the systems correctly is the trick, but shouldn't
be too difficult. If you've set them up correctly, administration is quite simple.
If it's worthwhile will vary depending
Except for a rather annoying and stubborn stain.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
Plus I'm told you can throw a
To answer your last question: Move all of your POP users to the same server. To pick
up their mail, they have to point to the server their mailbox is hosted on.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:32 AM
To:
;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items
folder. No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he
implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore
In Outlook2000 the reply to field defaults to the primary mailbox. You can set that
to whatever you want on an individual message basis.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:timault;westat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A
Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder. No need
for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed Crowley Never Restore
Method?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 5:30 PM
Trend 3.52 in AVAPI mode with pattern 382 and I am yet to see it
successfully clean the virus. Are there any specific settings I should set
in Scanmail?
Thanks in advance.
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: 11 November 2002 14:48
-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sent Item
Ed - I'm surprised at you. The item went through the Deleted Items folder.
No need for dumpsteralwayson. The question is: did he implement the Ed
www.friend-greeting.net
www.friend-cards.net
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I
You need to point it to something that has a directory on it. In AD/E2K, the
directory is on the GC's.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
A *GC*? I
uses for
lookups.. if it is using MAPI, then it ought to be redirected for its
lookups, if it's using LDAP then it ought to point to a GC... I think.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange
Only if you have deleted items retention turned on that the server hosting that user's
mailbox.
Or contact the person he sent the email to.
Or, restore.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Exchange
Have you set up Deleted Items retention on the server? Or, to reiterate what Chris
said: if you've followed the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method, you're okay.
If you have not - you're pretty much stuck. If you've got good backups, you can do a
restore to another server, play back the logs, and
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Suppressing the envelope
Thanks folks - my error for not specifying
That's been my experience. I've had several situations where I was changing DL
memberships via import, and the best option has always been to use overwrite if I
had to remove members.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Friday,
I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and
network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team
sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops.
HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN
-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up
Maybe they didnt notice the little envelope icon in the system tray...
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent
Hmm. . .so, then what are the implications of the new Tablet PC's? All those meeting
notes in electronic form - another gold mine for the lawyers.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange
the envelope icon that shows up in
the task bar when new mail comes in?
Many thanks!
Darcy Adams
Sr. Exchange Administrator
Getty Images
601 N. 34th Street
Seattle, WA 98103
Tel 206-925-6617
Cell 206-255-0169
http://www.gettyimages.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED
So - how much mailbox size do you give your users? And do you give them the
opportunity to burn their PST's to CD just in case?
Finally - who are you to judge what's important and what isn't? Do you do their jobs,
as well as your own.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
So - not only do you tell them no PST backups, you lie to them about where PST's can
be saved.
Nice customer service standards you have there.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:01 AM
To: Exchange
Subject: RE: Suppressing the envelope
Sure, Darcy. I am on 2002 but I believe it is the same in 2000.
Tools/Options/E-Mail Options/Advanced E-Mail Option. Un-tick the Show
envelope in System tray.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent
likely have
to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo
is costing their company business.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams
Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Still 3rd party
I'd think twice about that one - if you have a multi-site organization, any directory
replication connectors that depend on those X400 connectors will have to be either
pointed to another connector in the same site, or deleted before you can delete the
connector.
And, if you delete the dirrep
I think you're SOL on this one. I've never found a way to keep the calendar on the
server yet use a .pst file for the primary delivery point. Although I'd certainly be
interested in hearing otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCready;DPLINC.com]
Sent:
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments/Personal Folders
Yep. Its one or the other.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com
, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCready;DPLINC.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Appointments/Personal Folders
But, if someone request a meeting, wouldn't that also forward to the PST?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams
have to join you in phoning stupid admins to tell them
why RBL $foo is costing their company business.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent
OL11 will work against Exchange 5.5, E2K, and Titanium. You just won't get all the
features unless you run it against Titanium.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Are you giving a local host or an external host name as your send from?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:EdE;stainsafe.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
Hello group.
I am using
from:
Rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No denial message.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
Are you giving a local host
even have to put in the domain and I still get 250 OK. I
can put in helo test.com and get 250 OK.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector
-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
Are you giving a local host or an external host name as your send from?
-Original Message-
From: Ed
Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Internet Mail Connector and Relaying
This is my telnet session
Helo stainsafe.com
Mail from:
Rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No denial message.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:37
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
My guess is that you just had a bad day (or week) with them. Besides
being quite responsive
Did you check their rights on the OWA server? Remember, in 5.5 users need log on
locally rights to the OWA server.
-Original Message-
From: Robinson, Scott [mailto:robinss;sunbeam.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange5.5
Yes.
. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I'm surprised - I've never had
??? That's backwards from anything I've heard. Everything I've seen says Forest
Prep, Domain Prep, *then* ADC. Not disagreeing with what you've seen, but wondering
about the inconsistency.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, October
Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Joining Site
??? That's backwards from anything I've heard. Everything
I've seen says Forest Prep, Domain Prep, *then* ADC. Not
disagreeing
And you care about this because As long as the question is on-topic for the
lists, I see no issue. If he wants to go through the pain of monitoring all of them,
so be it.
Pick which list you're going to provide an answer on and ignore the rest.
-Original Message-
From: David N.
to join you in
phoning stupid
admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23
Have you tried starting with the knowledge base?
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:JMorgan;SCSDB.k12.sc.us]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Rules not running correctly
I have recently moved all my Exchange Environment to a new
This just means that your server was unable to deliver to those addresses within the
time-out period for some reason. So, what's your question?
-Original Message-
From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:bmalekzada;aoptix.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 8:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
in that previous
statement
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Sorry - no. You threw the first stone when you called Chris names
I've seen this happen in the following situation:
Users had large messages, or lots of messages with attachments
AV running on the Exchange server (Trend Scanmail 3.5 in the case I've seen)
Move users to new server - synching would fail because the AV check of the large
messages would cause
Did he by any chance remove the others users from the to and/or cc lists before he
sent it?
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar events
I have a user who is
Yep. Actually, three times. They were giving away X-box games. Since I don't have
an X-box, I took one game and traded the other two for the conference shirt.
Yeah, yeah, I know. . . I traded two $50 games for a $30 shirt. I've still got one
game that I'm willing to sell if anybody wants
Subject: RE: We have a winner!
Ahyou should have e-bay'ed the games
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: We have a winner!
Yep
Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the current stance on
that is that they're thinking about possibly including RBL support in a future
release.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin;natco-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night
and the current stance on that is that they're
admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their
company business.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday
night and the
current
Before you posted this question, did you explore the Knowledge Base? You'll find the
answer there.
Probably in Q324340
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Keith Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing a site
To clarify: Are the Inboxes gone?
Or are the contents of the Inboxes gone?
If the latter, I would suspect that the users moved or deleted the mail. Check to see
if they have accessed their mailbox via a POP client, or if they have set up their
Outlook profile to direct all new mail to a
Well, I don't know - but it won't hurt anything to set it to 0 months. As Jim pointed
out, it won't wipe out any of his calendar information. You can then see for yourself
and answer the question.
You know - run a test and see what happens.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: WAISEL,
Pfooey! I have several stores that are well over 50gb each. No problems with cycling
the store, rebooting the boxes, performing backups (and restores) etc. . .
You just have to know WTF you're doing.
Hey - didn't you once claim to be an expert in Exchange 5.5?
Darcy
-Original
Um, what?? Excuse me - no. You can change the domain membership of an Exchange 5.5
server without doing any harm to your users. Just be sure that the domain you move
your Exchange servers to trusts the domain your users are in.
Check it out - field-tested, proven method:
Have you tried entering {fax number}@netmoves.com in the fax number field?
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fax
Hi,
I have noticed that if I have a contact which has its
That's not funny, Ed!
Yes - Hotmail is unusually slow today. I'm getting Server is busy errors when I try
to log on to my hotmail account. No big deal.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange
Just a wild guess: are all of your servers at the same SP level?
-Original Message-
From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Intrasite Replication Issue?
Scenario:
NT 4.0 SP6a SRP
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I don't remember the exact errors, but the behavior you're describing sounds a lot
like what I got when I did some test upgrades from Exchange 5.5 sp3 to sp4. At one
point the bridgehead servers were at sp4, but not the other servers in the sites.
So, a question for you: are all of the serves
NetIQ has a product that will monitor Public Folder usage. AppAnalyzer.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Organizing Public Folders
Kelley, Jason said :
We are planning to
I'll be there. Yeah!!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC
OK, the time draws near.
Who is going?
Martin Blackstone
Director, Information Technologies
Superior Access
When you say that you can see the members but others can't, do you mean that you can
see the members via the Exchange Admin, but can't using Outlook? If that's the case,
check to see if the member mailboxes are hidden from the directory.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave
, an
exchange administrator).
When I am logged in as joe-normal user, the membership is not displayed in
Outlook...
dave
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Distribution list membership NOT being
The archives. This has been discussed repeatedly by the group.
-Original Message-
From: Bob P. Antonietti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Please tell me where to go
Hello.
Could someone please tell me where I could
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
