IL PROTECTED]
Office: (602) 631-7486
Fax: (602) 294-7486
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
----
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon
Sometimes those with a little experience are not so tolerant of those with less.
Newbie pointers to the archives and knowledge base tend to come with a lot of colorful
hazing. The odd thing is that those that have been hazed and complained mightily
about it, frequently appear a year or two lat
In other words, it is a DNS issue.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Help
try the ip #.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be
On the original question, can a voice message (or any audio message attachment for
that matter) be "played" through an OWA interface?
The answer is both yes and no.
Obviously, there are two pieces to this: the OWA side and the client side. On the OWA
side, the audio part has to be fed to the c
David's data is good, but perhaps the explanation of "why" included in the tech data
is wanting.
Is it "caused" by a client error induced by a portable device? Perhaps if it was a
one-off situation, the probability of that would be high, and it may be the case in
your situation. However, in t
I got several nice replies to this, and would just like to thank you all.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Thin Clients
I'm curious to find out about large organizations that either are already o
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Did it have any security?
And everyone says Microsoft has too many holes
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EM
I'm curious to find out about large organizations that either are already or are
thinking seriously about switching a significant portion of their PC base to thin
clients )probably Citrix based).
If you done this, how is it going? What are your top five recommendations? What are
the top five
Most perceived problems have simple solutions. One of the bad things about a forum
with this many participants, is that the frequency that we see complex or unusual
problems is sufficiently high that it tends to make us go looking for complexities a
little too quickly at times.
So, are there a
Obviously. If the bits can be read from the disk where the in-box is and
displayed, but any Assembly Language programming definition, they have been
copied. If you can read, then you have copied by definition.
If something can be displayed, it can be captured.
What is striking though, is how ma
Microsoft has too many holes
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
Me too. It was an amazing tool. I did a lot of programming in both
Smartware and Smartware
II (or was that Smartware plus a
bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing
macros work. Loved it for that.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 1
This will not help you with your SEC problem. It's just a musing and is
merely to suggest that no audit technique is fool proof. I think that any
system that you can design, a clever person can get around.
Let me suggest a scenario from back in the days when I was working on virus
delivery techn
The purpose of an MX record is for an SMTP relay host to be able to resolve
a specific name. OWA is not an SMTP service. Rather, it is a web pump. It
dynamically generates a web page view of the specified content of your
server's stores. The protocol that is used to hit the OWA server is
someth
I don't remember the limits, but there are finite amounts for the total
number of rules and the space that they can consume. Also, you may want to
take at look at the relative advantages and disadvantages of disabling
Outlook rules in favor of Exchange rules.
-Original Message-
From: MS
Sit down with your business manager and figure out exactly how to charge the
appropriate budget for the cost of the moderator. Then write a nice polite
note that explains the charge back process to your customers making the
request and wait. Odds are the request will go away.
-Original Messa
Each had its own purpose, time and place. Most people that I know, use them
all. It is common for Exchange Server users with the heavy Outlook client
to set their default to RTF and use the others on an as needed basis.
You do understand that under the hood, this is a silly question. Body part
logy seems to be an instinctive
trait in humans yet.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "How do I explain NDRs" Question
I did a delete of the thread and then thought that perh
I did a delete of the thread and then thought that perhaps the data should
be expanded.
But, note that the comments including Daniel's were right on.
Explaining how mail delivery works to non-experts is not easy. It involves
explaining address resolution both within NT domains and in the DNS wo
would update the LegacyExchangeDN if mailbox is moved from one Admin
Group to another.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy confusion
It is probably not the intended design
It is probably not the intended design. Rather, it is probably a bit of
deferred work that has been assigned a fairly low priority.
There are a lot of ugly compromises in any complex product.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03,
If you use a FAX ISP, then all you need is to be connected to the net.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Faxing via Exchange
I was curious as to how hard it is to set up Exchan
There are several concepts that intersect this question: simple negligence,
gross negligence, ownership and the precedence by which various legal
concepts get applied.
In short, it depends on what is being disclaimed, to whom, why, and what
sort of recourse is claimed. Their value will vary great
hange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question
In Ex5.5, DL's DO have SMTP addys.
-Original Message-----
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL Question
Perhaps this is a more interesting question th
Perhaps this is a more interesting question than implied.
There are two or maybe three (or maybe four) possibilities depending on
where the DL is located, how many servers are involved and how many
instances of single instance storage are involved.
If it is a client DL, then I think that the "poo
rld numbers. Are there better tools to
get a handle on the store?
Jim Liddil
> -Original Message-
> From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Size of mailbox
>
>
> Keep in mind
As you can see, like most technologies, PDA's are surrounded by lots of
opinions. Often people like what they have used, even if it is only one
type and have no real basis for a comparison (i.e. valid opinion).
Ok, the ugly truth: None of the systems out there are very good yet.
You've heard the
Keep in mind that there is no such thing as a mailbox. So, in a very real
sense, it consumes little if any space. Ok, what is it.
The store or more accurately the two stores are two large combined storage
environments. One is used to manage inherently private stuff (mailboxes)
and the other is
As you can tell from the flavor of the other responses, clearly you have a
credentials mismatch situation. That is, the security context that the
users have prior to launching Outlook does not match the security context
assigned to their inbox. There are lots of ways to generate this condition,
I would never argue with Chris. He knows more about how Exchange works than
I have forgotten, and I have forgotten a lot, so much so that not much is
left. ;-)
But, my question about laptops was to make sure that the dumb easy and most
probable explanation (in my experience) was not being overlo
Or Exchange Rules.
-Original Message-
From: Johnny [mailto:john.mcgivern@;baldhead.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: forwarding and copying messages in exchange 2000
Hi everyone,
I can't seem to find a spot in exchange 2000 were I can have
difference
between a trust and domain membership, or being in a forest.
"Maybe" was the right answer.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Domain Trusts and Exchange Accounts
Maybe.
-O
Maybe.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:erik@;epicentric.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Domain Trusts and Exchange Accounts
Hi,
If you have two domains and they fully trust each other can an NT account in
domain a be mapped
I'll bet he is using a laptop.
Now what made him say that?
> -Original Message-
> From: Friese, Casey [mailto:cfriese@;penncolor.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:45 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 in an native win2k network. I h
Obviously.
There is an underlying analytical issue that is more interesting. I think
it may help in diagnosing future "questions" assuming of course a basic
familiarity with the FAQs and documentation.
We often forget that everything in computing is 1s and 0s. All else is an
abstraction of that
James Watt and others gave as one of their reasons for not having to take
care of the environment as the looming end of the world, second coming,
rapture, etc. etc. Maybe . . .
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek@;cigital.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:43 PM
To: Ex
Amazing Ed. You write a political bomb and it gets posted. I write a slam
of legal retention requirements and policies and Swynk bounces it as
objectionable content.
This list does some amazingly funny things at times.
Had any consulting jobs on the continent lately? ;-)
-Original Message
So Roger, does this mean that you are getting ready for the sobering
messages?
First, let me say that I am not privy to any advanced product planning in
what I am about to say, and am only speculating. I fully expect to see a
pure hardware version of an entry level Exchange Server within ten year
, 2002 9:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
Hmm. . .so, then what are the implications of the new Tablet PC's? All
those meeting notes in electronic form - another gold mine for the lawyers.
Darcy
-Original Message-----
From
>From my perspective, such legal requirements are short sighted. We have
them in scattered places today, and it is usually a mistake.
Occasionally some good comes out of archiving such stuff, but it has to be
ok to use e-mail as an informal ad hoc communications tool. Setting it up
as a permanen
Tongue out of cheek - this is a product design problem of course.
Give me one good reason for Exchange being in the storage or data management
business. How it ought to work in a world with Active Directories and
Distributed File System overlays to NTFS is that a mailbox should be a
pointer to us
I am reminded of the old phrase that was so "lovingly" attributed to AT&T
back in the 60's: "We're the phone company, we don't care, we don't have
to."
Perhaps one in the business of providing a service and wanting to be
continuously improving the quality of that service with an aim toward
keepin
Hi Greg. This reminds me of the days when Ed C. called you Deckler the
heckler. How have you been?
I thought that nobody was going to pick-up the bait that I threw out there.
I thought it was sort of like throwing a copy of the beatitudes or some
Gandhi quotes into a debate about what to do abou
IM is vile and inhuman technology, especially in the hands of carriers and
others with capitalist motives; but it can also move us back toward 19th
century attitudes about employee-management relations. We should launch a
campaign to stamp it out.
I just thought I'd throw that out there.
-Or
You like to pay more for it?
The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)?
You don't want to deal with reply traffic?
Your link to your ISP is via a 300 baud acoustic modem?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA@;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:08 PM
To:
Dear Jeff,
To get any value out of this list, you have to assume that massive deletes
without reads is the norm.
Use a rule to move everything coming in from the list to a single folder.
Sort that folder by subject.
Don't even try to interact with a thread without using a tripane
viewer/reader.
F
I only know one thing that will induce a synch error at will. There are
probably others. I'll share my recipe and maybe that will help.
Recipe for indcing synch errors:
1. Set mailbox size limit low.
2. Have users fill mailboxes, including some meeting requests.
3. Have users attempt to pro
Near term - offer as many options as you can (OWA, broadband, (not Citrix
for remoting Outlook, but perhaps offered it for other reasons). Make sure
that the users understand their options and that you are working on offering
better technologies as they are available.
Ok, long term. There needs t
I think those graphics would look like an ASCII representation of a binary
file.
Some days CJ's "graphic beard monogram" is more apropos than others.
CJ, since you're so good at this stuff, you should teach some classes on
technology and history someplace. I'm sure the kids would become heroe
A null "from" field is compliant with the RFC's for a number of good
reasons. Also, I don't think you would want to pound on your (or anybody
else's) DNS servers to do something not related to packet delivery.
Besides, it wouldn't buy you much. Just because you have a positive DNS
resolution, it
I think you have some lawyers that are not quite up to snuff on this topic.
You could do their homework for them, but of course that would be practicing
law.
You should have a policy. They should be highly motivated to have you
delete any and all old digital data (especially mail) that you can,
Well, since there is no such thing as an 'inbox' except as a view of a bunch
of items sharing a particular attribute in a big data base (i.e. the store),
one of two conditions or some combination of them must exist:
1. The would be viewer does not have the required matching attribute to
access t
Are you sure that you want to do this? As with any tool that is automagic,
it can be used maliciously. Consider to what other ends it might be put.
In effect, you would be converting every person with access to that folder
with censorship powers.
A bigger problem might be that you would get exa
Did you run the obvious other set of tests? Try sending from PMDF to those
other mail systems as well. If you cough up the same errors, then . . .
-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subj
A HUGE block of training - in a hurry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange HELL
I was recently given the responsibility for an Exchange 2000 Server.
This server has lots
I didn't see you get any replies. Let me add a couple things, but I can't
claim to have THE answer.
First, I suspect that your address resolution description is not quite
right. Client user interface do frequently display extraneous characters as
though the MTA was trying to parse them in error
Public folders, like shared file, should be organized in accordance with
your enterprise's master information management schema.
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Organizing Public
Hmm . . .
I think that several issues that should be thought of distinctly and
separate, have been muddled together here.
We have
- mail box size limits
- storage management
- .PST usage
- .OST usage
- budget and PHB management
- Data and information
Well if you get stranded for four years like Tom Hanks' character in
castaway, then native mode will be hard to avoid.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5
he
Lotus/cc:Mail relationship are appearing in the IBM/Lotus relationship.
Russ
Russell W. Chung
800.419.8726
+1/818.957.4925
fax: +1/818.951.5761
http://www.ameagle.com
"Dupler, Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NT/2000 and with the release R6 Domino, the word is, will tightly integrate
AD and provide administrators a single spot to create users both for the
Network and Notes.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 5:13 PM
To: Exchange
Some typo corrections - sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Comment on Notes and Exchange
I agree with much of what has been posted, especially about the cost of
switching, Notes not being horrid
I agree with much of what has been posted, especially about the cost of
switching, Notes not being horrid, and Exchange being more about . . . well
that's where I started to disagree, since the phrase that was used was
"e-mail system."
So I thought I would throw in some basics that are very old,
>From the 80,000' level, Exchange's various 'servers' are parts of the core
product that can be installed all on a single machine, but which are
typically broken out and run on machines dedicated to specific tasks
(mailbox, bridgeheads, various connectors, OWA, public folders and so on).
Separati
Seemingly an incredibly mundane thread that probably would have drawn some
flames in earlier times. [My hasn't this list gotten civil lately.]
Isn't it odd that just as we are getting pretty far along with the
elimination of WINS, that we are also well along in beginning to recognize
that we nee
Ed's discussion in the FAQ is excellent. I would add one item to the two
"goods."
If you are providing Exchange Server services to non-employees, they may be
receiving some mail which is not the property of the enterprise. This could
also be true for employees, but you need to clarify exactly w
It was almost certainly something very simple. Look at the time stamp. By
any chance was their mail server off-line for a few minutes for an end of
the day service activity?
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:13 PM
To: E
So that can't happen of course. But maybe . . .
If somehow the replies were being managed in an out of date version of the
store (running with the PST idea).
Is rule moving the calendar replies to a PST folder, and then the responses
being worked later, when off-line? That could create the pos
Credentials belong to someone, but that does not mean that the owner was the
user. Sloppy password protection can create an opportunity for someone else
to masquerade as you, which is especially useful for nefarious activities.
Reading someone else's mail is definitely nefarious - right up there
Or gee, Schedule +. or Word, or Excel, or Access, or . . .
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Automatic Email Software
Ahhh, Outlook maybe?
Geoff
-Original Messa
AD was originally designed (if you can call it that) to be pretty well
abstracted. The notion of a user ID was replaced by creating an attribute
to all fields that said whether or not it could authenticate. Two fields
have that attribute set to true. One is the UPN and the other is the down
lev
In-line typo corrections. Other than that, this is just a repeat, primarily
for the sake of having a clean copy in the archives.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging & Collaboration II
This is
If you are not to sensitive about the format, it may be easier to do it in
two parts. I'm sure you have an SMTP mailer daemon available, if not
laying around, certainly IBM can get you one. Send first to a mailbox on a
good messaging system that has a rules engine. Then auto forward to a fax
a
This is Data Dump #2 in response to Leonard's question about UM and
Collaboration.
Subtitle: What is Exchange?
When Exchange 4.0 (Touchdown) was under development in building 16 (roughly
1993-1996 but it goes back to 1990 if you count the preliminary work that
was done on the MTA in project "Sp
It is on the distribution media of earlier versions of the server. The one
that was included in Win95 and NT 4 Pro does not work with the server.
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: "Exch
Not to mention that it is a basic violation of the first class mail
paradigm, and thus while it is a useful tool in some situations, it is not
acceptable as a part of the core MTA/Message Store service.
Perhaps at some point it would be a good idea to review the first class mail
paradigm and the
kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Do you
ot;this is not an unsolicited e-mail".
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:0
Gary, you have developed a sense of humor.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A mistake was made...
If mailbox deletion fails, try FDISK on the server, see if that helps.
-Or
)? No. You are. All technology
expands and reaches critical mass based on demand. Ask anyone who lost
money in the .COM bust. At the end of the day, sales drive everything.
3. How is it happening (solutions)? One desktop or mobile user at a time.
More later.
-Original Message-
From:
A mailbox is not a container, but rather a view of a subset of the objects
within a container having some common attribute (i.e. belong to a specific
mailbox). Deleting a mailbox is NOT the same thing as deleting a container
and its contents. Deleting a mailbox merely deletes a view and nulls ou
uot; - William Lefkovics
> > > > > > > www.airborne.net
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Original Message
Sounds like a DNS or DDNS error. Can't happen with DHCP, so . . .
maybe the static address is associated with something else?
maybe the name you like is misspelled?
else
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:42 PM
His minionness would appreciate that.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley
*sigh*
I do miss CJ... I'll go punish myself now...
New Features: Convert your limb
I'm not sure that it will drive the message, since it is coming out of the
server's store automatically, but it may be wise to make sure that to OST is
not synched to a previously excessive size.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29,
.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tools
They could go 162-0 and they'll still fall in 4 to the Yanks.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Extended Exchange
Declares: "TGIF" in
Nippon poetics
-Original Message-
From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
1 - Waht does Haiku mean?
2 - I'm not understanding half of what yo
If you mean the Chevy, try the message boards at www.camaroz28.com
If you mean the Datsun/Nissan, try the classifieds at www.240z.org/
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Z
To lighte
As I understand it, tools do exist to work with Jet family databases outside
of the context of the products in which they are embedded. This approach is
not recommended, and for that reason, those tools are reserved for use by
the developers. So, you need to at the very least interact with the
E
onday, April 22, 2002 1:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Because of the fact that this is now running rampant through my exchange
site. It appears an outside site has been sending this crap all day.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why are you convinced that something is wrong?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Okay, guys I need some help here, an e-mail was just forward to me from one
of my H
I suppose that it isn't real in the Platonic sense wherein all things are
but representations of an unseen ideal rather like shadows on the wall, but
Lori a mere shadow? Clearly Erik needs a trip to the "Ask the Experts"
booth at the next MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:
> in any name as long as you have permission to send as that person.
>
> Steve Evans
> Computing Services
> SDSU Foundation
> 619 594-0653
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:04 PM
> To: E
Did I get this right?
- You are an Exchange administrator.
- You want to send an e-mail message from your PC.
- You want to be logged in as you.
- You want to be in your personal copy of Outlook.
- You want the header of the message, when it is received, to indicate that
the sender was someone el
Convert to a 1985 version of cc:Mail running on Netware 2.0a.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server
Hello Everyone,
Our clients send lo
Baptism by fire, the usual experience.
Mike, next time instead of describing the problem vaguely, and then
proposing the solution that you intend to use and only asking questions
about how to implement that solution, be more direct.
First, describe the exact failure and include the exact text of
If you have a problem, it will be with the ownership of defined objects.
For example, two fax servers will both want to define how to handle a
freeform address that looks like a phone number. I can't think of any
specific conflicts that have to exist by definition in two UM systems, but
they are
The lies we told about how secure it was . . .
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: hops?
Reminds me of what I used to say about MSMail: "What's amazing is not how
well the bear
Yeah, but it gets very grey when the application is leveraging QoS or is an
LDAP query about the last MAC address where a specific user was running an
authenticated session (DEN/CIM capability).
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2
The ones I get start "I wish your membership was on hold . . ."
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Your membership on exchange has been put on hold
Anybody else getting th
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
